Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Werewolf: SAW - Gamethread

Options
1…4748505253…92

Comments

  • Options
    #1472
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Interesting day to catch up on, so Frankie is an SK, good news! Steve trying to shoot Conor was interesting, is there still more sk kills left today? Only one death I can see


  • Options
    #1473
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    The only proper thing to do is to lynch OUTSIDE the claims. So lynch somebody else. Which I would be for

    Eh no, that's bizarre, lynching outside doesn't find a liar, lynching inside does and therefore an Sk


  • Options
    #1474
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    wow what a unique idea, and certainly know bias involved.

    Exactly. We lynch someone who might actually be evil and it hopefully takes a kill off the table


  • Options
    #1475
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    For me I'd have Emily, Holly or Orla do the next game

    I'm happy to do it if it's at 12. If it's more like 12:15 then I won't be around for all of it but happy for you guys to guess for me anyway


  • Options
    #1476
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    20 people beaker doesnt like

    and the worst playlist in history









    in the real world, very big differences in "wrongdoings" between the characters as well - but the Saw movies were similar, at least that's my recollection of the first one anyway.

    I was in Latvia last year and did an escape room based on saw actually. It was class - no traps though.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1477
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Eh no, that's bizarre, lynching outside doesn't find a liar, lynching inside does and therefore an Sk

    No guarantee of that.

    I'm good
    Conor might still be good. His peek might not be true and then you have two good people die for no reason.

    I'm far more inclined to believe that people pushing the line :: one of conor or me have to be an SK are evil and lining up two potential mislynches for themselves


  • Options
    #1478
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    So who would you vote for?, you do still have a vote.

    I'm thinking abigail right now. I had them pegged for evil yesterday and that post made just now still makes me think it.


  • Options
    #1479
    Doris WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,158 ✭✭✭Doris WW


    Vote gone in for Frank as I don’t see any other way to resolve this than to see wether or not Conor is telling the truth.


  • Options
    #1480
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    I'm toing and froing on Orla at the moment.

    On one hand her tone reads pure and seems to have good intentions

    But she did make a number of what could potentially be perspective slips when responding to Steve earlier.

    Frank mentioned it earlier and I meant to come back to it.

    Frank might be bad, but he's also hunting other baddies so I wouldn't just discount all of his points.

    I think Doris is a bit more suss than Orla. As far as I can see she's had 40 posts (nice middle of the road stuff) but hasn't accused anyone or given any reads or questioned anyone. Everything is just agreeing with other people or asking questions. It's the definition of safe play.

    I'll post an ISO in a few


  • Options
    #1481
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    No guarantee of that.

    I'm good
    Conor might still be good. His peek might not be true and then you have two good people die for no reason.

    I'm far more inclined to believe that people pushing the line :: one of conor or me have to be an SK are evil and lining up two potential mislynches for themselves




    No people are pushing the line based on the evidence presented, we have someone who claims to have peeked you bad, we have an adversarial challenge that the peek is flawed, seeing as we don't have any dueling pistols to resolve the winner we need to do it by logic, which is lynch you to see how you flop and then take it from there.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1482
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Nice try at deflection there, can we go unanimous and string him now?

    No deflection. I'm still trying to find evil. Everyone else looking in the wrong place


  • Options
    #1483
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    No people are pushing the line based on the evidence presented, we have someone who claims to have peeked you bad, we have an adversarial challenge that the peek is flawed, seeing as we don't have any dueling pistols to resolve the winner we need to do it by logic, which is lynch you to see how you flop and then take it from there.

    Methinks the gentleman doth protest too much


  • Options
    #1484
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    If the peek was a real peek, derry would have been a good option


  • Options
    #1485
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    No deflection. I'm still trying to find evil. Everyone else looking in the wrong place




    As an SK you would be trying to find evil anyway, so you could honestly say that. Doesn't detract from Conor saying he peeked you evil.


  • Options
    #1486
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    Vote gone in for Frank as I don’t see any other way to resolve this than to see wether or not Conor is telling the truth.

    Conor might think hes telling the truth.


  • Options
    #1487
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    If the peek was a real peek, derry would have been a good option




    If the peek isn't a real peek then Conor is the option to just lynch after you


  • Options
    #1488
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    As an SK you would be trying to find evil anyway, so you could honestly say that. Doesn't detract from Conor saying he peeked you evil.

    If I have to go, I have to go. I just dont want to see the village going down the line of

    " well frank is revealed good, that means conor must be evil "

    That might not be the case and from my perspective it looks like abigail pushed that


  • Options
    #1489
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    You're wriggling like a baited hook there Frank

    giphy.gif


  • Options
    #1490
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    Conor might think hes telling the truth.

    Conor will follow what the peek told him. Sorry Frank :cool:


  • Options
    #1491
    Wendy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,104 ✭✭✭Wendy WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    If I have to go, I have to go. I just dont want to see the village going down the line of

    " well frank is revealed good, that means conor must be evil "

    That might not be the case and from my perspective it looks like abigail pushed that

    giphy.gif

    can i change my vote? voted derry at about 9am this morning. what a tense day. vernon (i think) freaking about the combinations was fun


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1492
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    If the peek isn't a real peek then Conor is the option to just lynch after you

    That's bad/lazy villaging at best and just plain wolfy at worst.

    If he has lied about having a peek, it's a terrible play as a sk because he knows his shelf life is short.

    If the peek is a tailored peek or reverse peek though, like he wouldn't know that.

    To just say. Well if you're good, we'll kill conor next. That doesn't fit and is a wolfy way of looking at things imo


  • Options
    #1493
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    If the peek isn't a real peek then Conor is the option to just lynch after you

    That's bad/lazy villaging at best and just plain wolfy at worst.

    If he has lied about having a peek, it's a terrible play as a sk because he knows his shelf life is short.

    If the peek is a tailored peek or reverse peek though, like he wouldn't know that.

    To just say. Well if you're good, we'll kill conor next. That doesn't fit and is a wolfy way of looking at things imo


  • Options
    #1494
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Sorry for double post, got a 404 error and didnt think it went through


  • Options
    #1495
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Wendy WW wrote: »
    giphy.gif

    can i change my vote? voted derry at about 9am this morning. what a tense day. vernon (i think) freaking about the combinations was fun




    Biatch, go to the vote thread and vote who you think


  • Options
    #1496
    Wendy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,104 ✭✭✭Wendy WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Biatch, go to the vote thread and vote who you think

    you


  • Options
    #1497
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    That's bad/lazy villaging at best and just plain wolfy at worst.

    If he has lied about having a peek, it's a terrible play as a sk because he knows his shelf life is short.

    If the peek is a tailored peek or reverse peek though, like he wouldn't know that.

    To just say. Well if you're good, we'll kill conor next. That doesn't fit and is a wolfy way of looking at things imo


    No wolves in this game just wriggly SKs


  • Options
    #1498
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Conor will follow what the peek told him. Sorry Frank :cool:

    I'm not saying you should change Conor. I'm saying that when I flip good, that people shouldn't automatically lynch you :)


  • Options
    #1499
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Wendy WW wrote: »
    you
    You wanna vote me go ahead and do so


  • Options
    #1500
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    No wolves in this game just wriggly SKs

    Semantics, nice


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1501
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Doris WW wrote: »
    Doris checking in. I see we have a few interesting characters here, should be a good game
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Hi all just caught up. First day back in work so a bit mental.

    I see nothing has happened since door 2 was selected so we can probably rule out that as the cause of Vernon's situation. Could be linked to the voting as suggested but I wouldn't rule out that is could also be a power in play.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    It's too early to know how he got linked so we should be open to all possibilities.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    So no role reveal on death
    beakerjoe wrote: »
    ISLA WAS ...............Bobby Brown

    bobby-brown.jpg

    Bobby Brown was Good
    Doris WW wrote: »
    In some games people's roles are given out when they die like above, that is called auto-priest.

    In other games one player has the role of the priest and learns the information on a player death, it is up to them when to tell the rest of the players. There is a chance they could die before telling anyone
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Lol she had 7 posts! Doesn't take long
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Seriously what are you doing!!
    Doris WW wrote: »
    The numbers look right, we just need to get the right order
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Could be another theory - he could be linked to you. Thinks you are a wolf and are worth dying for so trying to get himself lynched?
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Would be suss if they didn't share their prizes since we all know they won some.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Can you use it on yourself if it looks like the person you are tied to is gonna die?
    Conor WW wrote: »
    I want to flip that question to the village though.

    Why were people rushing to save Derry? They put themselves forward, let them sort it out.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Pretty sure there was also someone else involved in Isla's death too
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Wonder could the doors be that the poster who posts after the door is opened is killed? Also interesting that Isla was mentioned in the kill post - who did we say we think opened the door that killed Isla?

    That's three goodies gone today!
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Nice way to boot your post count there Derry
    Doris WW wrote: »
    So if the three kills have been the SKs that means that nothing has happened with the opening of the doors?

    Also puts us in a good position for parity are realistically we only need one village to be left standing
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Morning all, hopefully today is a better day for us and we don't lose as many villagers. Be great is the SK's start taking each other out. Feels weird not waiting on a 10am munch post.

    I wonder if there is a game today (apart from the big one tonight!) and if so is it still at 12. Are we going to go in village consensus on who should play the game as if it is like yesterday the person playing could be killed.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    It’s just who I am and how I always play
    Doris WW wrote: »
    You don't have to be posting to be online



    Convenient you now have a power when you start to come under suspicion.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    She also hasn't reached the posting requirements so could end up as a mod kill.

    Emily also didn't meet the requirements as she currently only has 8 posts.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I've voted Emily, we see what happens
    Doris WW wrote: »
    So myself and Wendy both voted and nothing happened so wonder what Beaker has in store for us today.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Yes I'm willing to chance it
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Wonder will we get a countdown timer like yesterday to let us know what time to be here
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Happy to go with Nigel
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Ok so 12.15. Who is playing? Happy to go if Nigel doesn't want to.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Pretty sure it's 12.15
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I don't get the hysteria either, it's not as if she will really be hurt
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Probably should have let someone else do that as you were involved in the game yesterday
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I wonder can he post while knocked out? And how do we release him if we want to.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Wonder what this because of Babs
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Probably looking to cause chaos at lynch
    Doris WW wrote: »
    So if the below is right we are 1 v 1 v 1 v 11

    Alive:

    Steve
    Jake
    Lucy
    Conor
    Abigail
    Holly
    Wendy
    Derry
    Vernon
    Orla
    Barbara
    Emily
    Frank
    Doris

    Dead:
    Phil
    Nigel
    Senan
    Angus
    Patrick
    Isla
    Katie
    Doris WW wrote: »
    No I reckon he means they couldn't PM Beaker to put the kill order in
    Doris WW wrote: »
    But then again would kill orders not be done through the BR's?
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Interesting read back.

    So if Steve was punished for being selfish, I wonder will Conor be rewarded for being selfless?
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Well that answers my query
    Doris WW wrote: »
    I would go with your gut feel on the peek as we don't have much else to go on.
    Doris WW wrote: »
    Vote gone in for Frank as I don’t see any other way to resolve this than to see wether or not Conor is telling the truth.

    Doris' ISO
    Not a single read not a single accusation in the entire game. Stated her votes that's it. Her Vote on Frank is obvious.

    This is seriously suss play in my opinion.
    Doris, anything you want to say?


Advertisement