Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

new coronavirus outbreak China, Korea, USA - mod warnings in OP (updated 24/02/20)

Options
1319320322324325332

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 22,477 ✭✭✭✭Knex*


    fritzelly wrote: »
    So this is convenient, cannot declare a pandemic if you have no criteria to declare one

    https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1231919662167941123

    highresrollsafe.jpg


  • Posts: 8,647 [Deleted User]


    givyjoe wrote: »
    No it doesn't, it assumes a 2% death rate on 1000000 infections (20k), which won't be the case if we don't have enough respirators etc for critical patients. 20% of cases being critical means 200k will have been in critical condition, that's an enormous number. Hopefully that worst case scenario doesn't happen, but if does we have to hope those numbers are spread over as long a time period as possible. Thats why it's so important to do as much as we possibly can to slow down the spread.

    Just posting this as you are lying again. As it says nowhere in the article you linked that 20% of people would need critical care. Why do some posters feel the need to lie?


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,530 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    BanditLuke wrote: »

    Mother nature fights back.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,167 ✭✭✭Fr_Dougal


    fritzelly wrote: »
    So this is convenient, cannot declare a pandemic if you have no criteria to declare one

    https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1231919662167941123

    This is Waterford Whispers type stuff.

    Next we’ll have the death toll drop because the WHO want to redefine what ‘death’ is.

    We’ve already seen it a few times with ‘infected cases’.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    We can asses mortality rate based on a sample of 27K people who have had an outcome
    That sample is contained inside an 80K sample of people who will eventually have an outcome, so we can also observe how such mortality rate will evolve
    Form a statistical stand point this is good data

    Sure, you can assess how the 80k are getting on; you can’t extrapolate further than that 80k and into the general population (with any degree of accuracy).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    Bahrain Covid19 case is school bus driver

    https://www.gulf-insider.com/bahrain-coronavirus-patient-identified-as-school-bus-driver/

    Hopefully as it looks this doesn't infect kids that badly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,476 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Another death in Italy - cancer sufferer again - total 6 now


  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭ThePopehimself


    DrumSteve wrote: »
    So 3 people?

    I wonder how many people that Taxi man will pick up or the nurse will see in the ward.
    ...and how many more Taxi's are driving around having had similar passengers today...

    The 13:22 Milan to Dublin EI433 just landed at Terminal 2 Dublin Airport
    And the 15:40 Dublin to Milan EI 436 is due to depart this afternoon bang on schedule…
    There are people travelling back and forth to South Korea from Dublin and Shannon...and so it goes.

    Our stable doors have been left wide open.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    Mother nature fights back.

    You know what it wouldn't surprise me.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭Minime2.5


    Mother nature fights back.

    Against the disease that is the human race


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    givyjoe wrote: »
    A number of posters have literally just dismissed the stats we have of confirmed cases.. are you picking and choosing which posts you read in full?

    Are you on a piss take? You literally calculated infection rates based upon the total population of China, compared to current infection rates and don't see why that's being dismissed? The virus has only been around for 2.5/3 months, half of which the breakout zones have been under quarantine.

    Also, I didn't estimate the 1 million infected in Ireland. You might want to take a that up with the professor in Beaumont.

    You should really provide that list of what end-points the data is sufficient to draw conclusions on, and what it’s not sufficient for. I’ll get you started based on your previous views; please amend as appropriate:

    Good for:
    No of deaths in Ireland
    No of ICU beds needed

    Not good for:
    No of cases in Ireland

    What mcconkey said was that IF 1m people got infected in Ireland, the following might happen; how do you think that supports anything you have to say?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    Europe is currently having worst day on the markets since 2016.
    About $400 billion worth of stock has been crumpled up, and lobbed into the waste paper bin this morning.
    Ah well.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,600 ✭✭✭BanditLuke


    ...and how many more Taxi's are driving around having had similar passengers today...

    The 13:22 Milan to Dublin EI433 just landed at Terminal 2 Dublin Airport
    And the 15:40 Dublin to Milan EI 436 is due to depart this afternoon bang on schedule…
    There are people travelling back and forth to South Korea from Dublin and Shannon...and so it goes.

    Our stable doors have been left wide open.

    It's actually farcial now. The government has sent out HSE talking heads all morning to tell people stop being silly everything is okay yet they still up until 1pm had zero checks within the airport for incoming passangers never mind cancelling flights. If it wasn't so serious you'd laugh.


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,476 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Coronavirus on Liveline - you know this is bad now


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    Just posting this as you are lying again. As it says nowhere in the article you linked that 20% of people would need critical care. Why do some posters feel the need to lie?

    Right, I've had enough of this crap. Go back and check my post and re read it, then you can come back to apologise. The article states that 5% of cases of FLU cases were critical (in feb 2019), which is exactly what I stated. The 20% of critical cases comes from the actual stats of current critical cases of covid19, which is... ~20%. Id suggest you read things twice before falsely accusing people of lying. It's absolutely pathetic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    drkpower wrote: »
    Sure, you can assess how the 80k are getting on; you can’t extrapolate further than that 80k and into the general population (with any degree of accuracy).


    80K is decently sized sample


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,486 ✭✭✭touts


    There is a lad on Lifeline who thinks he has Coronavirus because someone who worked in the college he visited last week in South Korea now has it.

    First reaction is phone Joe!

    Edit: it turns out he phoned the HSE this morning and they said he had nothing to worry about so now he is onto Joe because the HSE didn't quarantine him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,510 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    touts wrote: »
    There is a lad on Lifeline who thinks he has Coronavirus because someone who worked in the college he visited last week in South Korea now has it. First reaction is phone Joe!

    What did Joe say? Go on.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 10,799 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    3 cases in the philippines? you think that is enough data to run stats?
    you need to look at large samples, that's how you look at data
    3 confirmed cases
    It’s enough if it suits his argument

    Lads, did you read my full post.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    I'm expecting a visitor from Rome on Wednesday, she'll stay for 1 month LOL!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,475 ✭✭✭drkpower


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    80K is decently sized sample

    But you don’t know much or anything about how representative that 80k is if the total of people who get covid.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,586 ✭✭✭4068ac1elhodqr


    fritzelly wrote: »
    Coronavirus on Liveline - you know this is bad now
    The chap said he tried to call the HSE on Sunday for advice, but the line was closed.

    When did get through for advice today, it was 'ah sure, look it...'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    Fr_Dougal wrote: »
    This is Waterford Whispers type stuff.

    Next we’ll have the death toll drop because the WHO want to redefine what ‘death’ is.

    We’ve already seen it a few times with ‘infected cases’.

    Ha, was only chatting to a friend this morning about this, explained the WHO were taking the advice of Stats/infectious disease experts, and we were waiting to see the result of that today.
    But I said, 'i guess they are figuring out how to say 'pandemic' without actually saying it.'

    Not fit for purpose, that organisation. They are there to protect PEOPLE not economies..


  • Posts: 8,647 [Deleted User]


    Mic 1972 wrote: »
    80K is decently sized sample

    Cmere. I thought you were a business analyst. Surely, you realise that the fact fact over 90% of cases are in the Hubei province would skew any data???


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,269 ✭✭✭Runaways


    This guy on the radio sounds like he’s waffling


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,268 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Interesting to see how much the Dow Jones drops today.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,047 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    How did the virus enter Italy? And how many on the airplane that brought in the carrier caught the virus too. Airplane air conditioning is a petri dish for such airborne viruses.

    Airplane Air is HEPA filtered:
    Every winter, legions of healthy travelers board airplanes wondering if they’ll still be well when they walk off, after spending hours packed shoulder to shoulder with dozens—or even hundreds—of other passengers, some of whom are likely to be suffering from a cold or the flu. This year, the prospect of contracting swine flu has of course heightened the anxiety. But there’s good reason to take heart (and take to the skies): Several scientific studies show that, in terms of the spread of contagious bugs, airplanes are healthier environments than is commonly believed.

    While it’s true that the germs which cause colds and flu can be passed from person to person through coughs and sneezes, research indicates that you need to be sitting very close to a sick passenger—usually within two rows—and for longer than eight hours to significantly increase your chances of contracting an illness. “There is a heightened risk of infection when you enter a confined space such as an aircraft or subway, but a plane is a much safer place because of the ventilation system,” says Dr. Mark Gendreau, an emergency and aviation medicine expert at the Lahey Clinic in Burlington, Massachusetts.

    On average, cabin air is completely refreshed 20 times per hour, compared with just 12 times per hour in an office building. On most aircraft, air is also circulated through hospital-grade HEPA filters, which remove 99.97 percent of bacteria, as well as the airborne particles that viruses use for transport (many regional jets lack these filters). Additionally, cabins are divided into separate ventilation sections about every seven rows of seats, which means that you share air only with those in your immediate environment and not with the guy who’s coughing up a lung ten rows back. When the plane is on the ground, however, air circulation in the cabin can be greatly reduced.

    The most common way to pick up a bug when flying, experts say, is from a contaminated surface—tray tables, lavatory doors, and latches on overhead bins are loaded with viruses and bacteria. “When I travel, I become very compulsive and even wipe the tray table with an alcohol-based hand sanitizer,” says Dr. Gendreau.
    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/34708785/ns/travel-travel_tips/t/airplane-air-not-bad-you-think/


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,287 ✭✭✭givyjoe


    whiskeyman wrote: »
    I just saw a clip of him on the RTE 9 news.
    He said if you have symptoms, to call 999 or your GP!!!

    WTF??
    Seems ok to me. What do you think they should do?

    givyjoe wrote: »
    Call Joe Duffy

    The chap said he tried to call the HSE on Sunday for advice, but the line was closed.

    When did get through for advice today, it was 'ah sure, look it...'.

    This wasnt a joke!


  • Registered Users Posts: 550 ✭✭✭elbyrneo


    My Mam is travelling to Spain on Thursday, she would be prone to picking up infections. To put her mind a little at ease for the airplane/airport want to get her a mask, the n95 respirator type ones, not the surgical ones that dont do much.

    Sold out everywhere I can see. Any suggestions at short notice?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,886 ✭✭✭dominatinMC


    elbyrneo wrote: »
    My Mam is travelling to Spain on Thursday, she would be prone to picking up infections. To put her mind a little at ease for the airplane/airport want to get her a mask, the n95 respirator type ones, not the surgical ones that dont do much.

    Sold out everywhere I can see. Any suggestions at short notice?
    Is the trip urgent/critical? If not, then why bother


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement