General Election TV debates

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

What???

I know. Shocking isn’t it!

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

I know. Shocking isn’t it!

I say Michael lacks the intelligence to see he is restricting his chances and you pivot to some irrelevant working class/private school Mary Lou something or other theorising?

WTF?

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I say Michael lacks the intelligence to see he is restricting his chances and you pivot to some irrelevant working class/private school Mary Lou something or other theorising?

WTF?

You see Michael Martin’s refusal to enter coalition with Sinn Fein as a sign of lack of intelligence because you say he is unbelievably power hungry so he is stupid to forego the chance of power if it means SF as a partner.

You accuse someone else of lacking in intelligence when you can’t see the stupidity of your own argument.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

You see Michael Martin’s refusal to enter coalition with Sinn Fein as a sign of lack of intelligence because you say he is unbelievably power hungry so he is stupid to forego the chance of power if it means SF as a partner.

You accuse someone else of lacking in intelligence when you can’t see the stupidity of your own argument.

Many many power hungry people lack the intelligence to see obstacles they put in their own way and have a habit of digging holes.

That's why I made the point that when faced with the consequences he will swallow his words and 'find a way'. The exact same way he found a way to go in to a confidence and supply arrangement.
You can see the 'form of words' he found to justify that if you replay the debate.

Try reading what is being said?

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Many many power hungry people lack the intelligence to see obstacles they put in their own way and have a habit of digging holes.

That's why I made the point that when faced with the consequences he will swallow his words and 'find a way'. The exact same way he found a way to go in to a confidence and supply arrangement.
You can see the 'form of words' he found to justify that if you replay the debate.

Try reading what is being said?

You are contradicting yourself.

You are labelling MM as power hungry and then when this was contradicted as unintelligent.

As usual you are twisting yourself in knots to defend a point which is clearly untrue.

Show me the quote where MM ruled out confidence and supply.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

You are contradicting yourself.

You are labelling MM as power hungry and then when this was contradicted as unintelligent.

As usual you are twisting yourself in knots to defend a point which is clearly untrue.

What twisting?
The two aren't mutually exclusive, in fact they go and in hand normally IMO.

Show me the quote where MM ruled out confidence and supply.

I didn't say he did.
I said 'he found a way to go' into one after I can't remember exactly how long they circled each other.

James Brown

Phoebas wrote: »

Peadar Toibin has thrown a big spanner in the SF works on who controls Sinn Fein.

Sinn Féin TDs have 'zero' influence and policies are handed down, says Tóibín

We used to get a lot of this from FF & FG but now it's coming from the horse's mouth.

https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/election-2020/sinn-fein-tds-have-zero-influence-and-policies-are-handed-down-says-toibin-38901964.html

TBF the public might not know that that's common place. I know personally Labour do it and I know on two issues FG did it.
No lone candidate makes policy and will even flip flop if HQ says so.
People join the party they feel in sync with and follow the lead from HQ.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

What twisting?
The two aren't mutually exclusive, in fact they go and in hand normally IMO.



I didn't say he did.
I said 'he found a way to go' into one after I can't remember exactly how long they circled each other.

Martin outlined his position and kept his word after the election in 2016. There is no reason to believe he won’t keep his word about not entering coalition with SF after this election.

On the other hand Sinn Fein have abandoned more principles, broken more promises and crossed more red lines than probably any party in the history of the state.

Most recently the commitment to the Irish Language Bill. From a precondition of ending the three year hiatus from Stormont to abandoned when it was politically expedient.

James Brown

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Yawn.

Tell us more about the troubles :rolleyes:

SafeSurfer

Matt Barrett wrote: »

Tell us more about the troubles :rolleyes:

Why don’t you ask your comrade who doesn’t think it was a power struggle. How’s that Irish Language Act coming along Matt.

rob316

Can't people build a bridge and get over SF part in the troubles? MM and LV are looking over their shoulders and doing everything they can to keep them away from power. You can be sure FG/FF will have no problem carrying on this supply and confidence agreement again the other way around if it comes to pass.

SafeSurfer

rob316 wrote: »

Can't people build a bridge and get over SF part in the troubles? MM and LV are looking over their shoulders and doing everything they can to keep them away from power. You can be sure FG/FF will have no problem carrying on this supply and confidence agreement again the other way around if it comes to pass.

That’s the mantra of the New National Socialist party in Germany too. It’s unfair to constantly bring up the past. Especially those pesky Jews, gypsies etc.

Godwin Alert!

maccored

SafeSurfer wrote: »

That’s the mantra of the New National Socialist party in Germany too. It’s unfair to constantly bring up the past. Especially those pesky Jews, gypsies etc.

Godwin Alert!

just going to say - someone would come along and godwin themselves

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Martin outlined his position and kept his word after the election in 2016. There is no reason to believe he won’t keep his word about not entering coalition with SF after this election.

And he portrayed it as 'woe is me, I did it for the country' etc etc etc last night on the debate.
My view of him, is that he is a leader looking for a spine.
He is a master of this kind of rhetoric and he will do it again if it comes to a situation that it's a coalition with SF or nothing.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

And he portrayed it as 'woe is me, I did it for the country' etc etc etc last night on the debate.
My view of him, is that he is a leader looking for a spine.
He is a master of this kind of rhetoric and he will do it again if it comes to a situation that it's a coalition with SF or nothing.

So just to be clear. You are criticising Michael Martin because you think he may break a promise in the future, not going into coalition with SF, but remain completely silent on Mary Lou’s already broken promise not to re enter Stormont with an Irish Language Act.

Who should we believe?

Someone who may break a commitment in the future or someone who broke a commitment to her supporters last week?

James Brown

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Why don’t you ask your comrade who doesn’t think it was a power struggle. How’s that Irish Language Act coming along Matt.

It's compulsory in schools chief. Where are you typing from? Are you alluding to the north were SF stepped up to get things running again? Not so long ago they were getting the business for being petty and stubborn. FYI I think they were wrong to concede.
I place SF over and above FF/FG, but I vote on policy not team.

James Brown

SafeSurfer wrote: »

That’s the mantra of the New National Socialist party in Germany too. It’s unfair to constantly bring up the past. Especially those pesky Jews, gypsies etc.

Godwin Alert!

Hey FG don't do that no more, they don't even speak it, not since Charlie tan-again's father. Move on comrade.

You lads need rehearse better. SF are all for immigrants, open doors and that right?

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

So just to be clear. You are criticising Michael Martin because you think he may break a promise in the future, not going into coalition with SF, but remain completely silent on Mary Lou’s already broken promise not to re enter Stormont with an Irish Language Act.

Who should we believe?

Someone who may break a commitment in the future or someone who broke a commitment to her supporters last week?

Go to the relevant thread and in a discussion with blanch (I think) I said I thought SF would be wrong to go back with out a stand alone act and that I was bitterly disappointed that they did.

Sorry you have to eat your words here.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Go to the relevant thread and in a discussion with blanch (I think) I said I thought SF would be wrong to go back with out a stand alone act and that I was bitterly disappointed that they did.

Sorry you have to eat your words here.

Hilarious Frankie. It’s time you took a break and had a biscuit. You obviously have food on the mind, from labelling people who aren’t “power hungry” and asking those who speak the truth to eat their words.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Hilarious Frankie. It’s time you took a break and had a biscuit. You obviously have food on the mind, from labelling people who aren’t “power hungry” and asking those who speak the truth to eat their words.

What's hilarious is that you made an accusation and the facts don't back you up.

And not man/woman enough to withdraw it.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

What's hilarious is that you made an accusation and the facts don't back you up.

And not man/woman enough to withdraw it.

What accusation is that?

You accused MM of being power hungry despite his making attaining power more difficult by rejecting SF. If he was as power hungry as you describe “the most odious power hungry sleeved politician to emerge in this country in the last 20 years”. He would have courted alliance with SF to secure his place as Taoiseach. He didn’t. He rejected them and you are hurt by that.

Speaking of odious, power hungry politicians, Gerry Adams clamoured over the corpses of even close friends in the pursuit of power and reigned with an iron fist over Sinn Fein for a Mugabe like term of nearly 30 years!

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

What accusation is that?

You accused MM of being power hungry despite his making attaining power more difficult by rejecting SF. If he was as power hungry as you describe “the most odious power hungry sleeved politician to emerge in this country in the last 20 years”. He would have courted alliance with SF to secure his place as Taoiseach. He didn’t. He rejected them and you are hurt by that.

Speaking of odious, power hungry politicians, Gerry Adams clamoured over the corpses of even close friends in the pursuit of power and reigned with an iron fist over Sinn Fein for a Mugabe like term of nearly 30 years!

You don't even realise when you make false accusations.

but remain completely silent on Mary Lou’s already broken promise not to re enter Stormont with an Irish Language Act.

I wasn't silent on it. On the relevant thread I said I thought they should stay out until the got a standalone act and that i was bitterly disappointed they din't get it.

Will you withdraw the accusation?


And we get it. You don't think he is power hungry. That, as they say, is just your opinion, as mine is just mine.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

You don't even realise when you make false accusations.



I wasn't silent on it. On the relevant thread I said I thought they should stay out until the got a standalone act and that i was bitterly disappointed they din't get it.

Will you withdraw the accusation?


And we get it. You don't think he is power hungry. That, as they say, is just your opinion, as mine is just mine.

Get real Frankie. You want me to trawl through every thread before commenting on the discussion we are currently having to see if you have expressed an opinion?

In this thread you remained silent about Mary Lou breaking a commitment a week ago while criticising Michael Martin because you think he will break a commitment in the future. Get over yourself and stop being so precious.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Get real Frankie. You want me to trawl through every thread before commenting on the discussion we are currently having to see if you have expressed an opinion?

In this thread you remained silent about Mary Lou breaking a commitment a week ago while criticising Michael Martin because you think he will break a commitment in the future. Get over yourself and stop being so precious.

I have to criticise other leaders now when I criticise Michael?

Jaysus, this gets stranger and stranger.

You don't agree he is power hungry. Grand. That your opinion.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I have to criticise other leaders now when I criticise Michael?

Jaysus, this gets stranger and stranger.

You don't agree he is power hungry. Grand. That your opinion.

We differ in opinion. My opinion is supported by the facts. Your opinion is based on your personal prejudice. I mean criticising someone for something they may do in the future, come on.
And by the way your use of the royal we, is telling.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

We differ in opinion. My opinion is supported by the facts. Your opinion is based on your personal prejudice. I mean criticising someone for something they may do in the future, come on.
And by the way your use of the royal we, is telling.

My opinion is based on my experience of Martin, a sleeveen who can use his finely honed rhetoric to weasel out of any commitment or act he may have carried out. He walked into several haymakers last night trying to do that, from Varadkar and M.L.M etc.

He will do the same re: SF coalition, if it is the only option IN MY OPINION.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

My opinion is based on my experience of Martin, a sleeveen who can use his finely honed rhetoric to weasel out of any commitment or act he may have carried out. He walked into several haymakers last night trying to do that, from Varadkar and M.L.M etc.

He will do the same re: SF coalition, if it is the only option IN MY OPINION.

Did he break any commitment he made since becoming Fianna Fáil leader? In your opinion.

FrancieBrady

SafeSurfer wrote: »

Did he break any commitment he made since becoming Fianna Fáil leader? In your opinion.

Quick look at his 2016 manifesto.

Commitments to

protecting and strengthening vital public services.

Secure home ownership and tackle homelessness

Tackle crime and develop community services

All broken. He stood by while these got worse. The audience agreed last night when he walked into the haymakers on them too.

An Ciarraioch

Pro-life FF members might feel abandoned in relation to abortion, similarly the decision to contest elections in NI was quietly dropped.

SafeSurfer

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Quick look at his 2016 manifesto.

Commitments to

protecting and strengthening vital public services.

Secure home ownership and tackle homelessness

Tackle crime and develop community services

All broken. He stood by while these got worse. The audience agreed last night when he walked into the haymakers on them too.

Is that the sound of straws being clutched.