Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Walking Dead 2: Game Thread

1…1819212324…88

Comments

  • #602
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    It could of been scavangers from tonight?!

    Just feels now that walkers have a bigger pool of people to hide in. But hey rick , heavy lies the thrown, I’m glad it’s not me making those calls.

    Throne not thrown.... That misspell really annoys me....


  • #603
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Above link, that you thanked , was me confirming my vote for Emily. I thought you thanked it because you got that.



    So you voted for me because I wouldn’t tell you flat out who I was voting for? So why did you wait until a few mins before the lynch to bring it up?

    Because I was in work and busy. I didnt finish till 9 so I just posted whenever I got the chance


  • #604
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    It could of been scavangers from tonight?!

    Just feels now that walkers have a bigger pool of people to hide in. But hey rick , heavy lies the thrown, I’m glad it’s not me making those calls.

    Nope, couldnt be the scavengers.


  • #605
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    CFDs are only really CFDs when the votes are known. With secret voting, a CFD doesnt exist. It's just votes falling where they fall through natural progression

    I thought a CFD was a last minute jump on one target. Somebody says something close to lynch and people panic and jump on a target before anybody knows what happened?

    I don’t believe my name was mentioned as a target until about 15 mins to end of lynch so I see that as a potential CFD casualty.

    Maybe somebody will correct me on that and I’ve not been understanding CFDs all this time?

    Time for snuggles......


  • #606
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    Nope, couldnt be the scavengers.

    Can scavengers not be security the next day and vice versa? I thought you couldn’t be the same thing in consecutive days but that you could In theory be rotated between the two so you might be a scavenger or Security person every day?


  • Advertisement
  • #607
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Throne not thrown.... That misspell really annoys me....

    Crown
    , It's spelled Crown.


  • #608
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Can scavengers not be security the next day and vice versa? I thought you couldn’t be the same thing in consecutive days but that you could In theory be rotated between the two so you might be a scavenger or Security person every day?

    Now it’s time for snuggles ....


  • #609
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Would the wolves work with us ? We can't even ask one to talk to us cos they will just get flipped.

    They'll have to, the have two opportunities to get that walker before theres another walker to worry about. They are also more than likely going to munch in that group or they are confirming theres a wolf in it also. So they have to help us with their munch tomorrow and its in their interest to munch out of that group the following day

    In fact that will always be the case, in every group of six on the nite of a conversion we'll know for a fact that theres a walker in that group


  • #610
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    I thought a CFD was a last minute jump on one target. Somebody says something close to lynch and people panic and jump on a target before anybody knows what happened?

    I don’t believe my name was mentioned as a target until about 15 mins to end of lynch so I see that as a potential CFD casualty.

    Maybe somebody will correct me on that and I’ve not been understanding CFDs all this time?

    Time for snuggles......

    But Derry you do realise that Oisin had already voted for you and only made that known after I said I was voting for you. It could have been a CFD if other people jumped on it in those last two minutes after it was made known myself and Oisin were on you but it wasn't. Even if it was then that would have put a huge target on everyone who voted for you.

    You're making a very big deal out of what if, if you ask me :confused:


  • #611
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Crown
    , It's spelled Crown.

    It is and all. Maybe it’s not time for snuggles with the kids, it’s time for bed for me. Can’t spell or even get the phrase right !!!:(


  • Advertisement
  • #612
    Phil WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭Phil WW


    https://youtu.be/E0njVhzJSRQ


  • #613
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    I thought a CFD was a last minute jump on one target. Somebody says something close to lynch and people panic and jump on a target before anybody knows what happened?

    I don’t believe my name was mentioned as a target until about 15 mins to end of lynch so I see that as a potential CFD casualty.

    Maybe somebody will correct me on that and I’ve not been understanding CFDs all this time?

    Time for snuggles......

    You're 90% right
    The caveat is that it's people switching to another target when there is already a clear runaway wagon.

    If we knew there were 10 votes on patrick with 15 minutes to go and then someone says ::
    " I dont like patrick anymore, let's vote brendan " and a sea of votes appeared on brendan in minutes. That would be a CFD.

    But all that requires that there is knowledge of where the votes are going. If theres no knowledge, theres no Chinese


  • #614
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    It could of been scavangers from tonight?!

    Just feels now that walkers have a bigger pool of people to hide in. But hey rick , heavy lies the thrown, I’m glad it’s not me making those calls.

    I'm open to correction but I don't think it does. In any group of 6 on the night of a conversion we know for a fact that there is at least one walker


  • #615
    Desmond WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,625 ✭✭✭Desmond WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Can scavengers not be security the next day and vice versa? I thought you couldn’t be the same thing in consecutive days but that you could In theory be rotated between the two so you might be a scavenger or Security person every day?

    But its still the same day. Security cannot be the same 3 scavengers picked immediately prior. However, I think the scavengers tomorrow can be the 3 security from tonight assuming they are still alive.


  • #616
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Phil WW wrote: »
    Crown
    , It's spelled Crown.



  • #617
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    But Derry you do realise that Oisin had already voted for you and only made that known after I said I was voting for you. It could have been a CFD if other people jumped on it in those last two minutes after it was made known myself and Oisin were on you but it wasn't. Even if it was then that would have put a huge target on everyone who voted for you.

    You're making a very big deal out of what if, if you ask me :confused:

    Emily ? Are you conor ?
    Conor WW wrote: »
    Hey guys, just home now lynch link not working. Waiting to hear back from the mods but am going to stick a vote on Derry.

    Going off gut feel mostly, he’s stood out the most to me but I can’t pinpoint off the top of my head why so will go back over his posts tonight and see what my gut is telling me and report back.

    Have a cleared evening now too so want to have a proper look back over the days events which will help me get a better understanding of what’s what for tomorrow

    Oisin WW wrote: »
    I agree with your vote target

    I've been pretty busy today but I didnt like his vote theory earlier on. I haven't had much to go on but that's where it is.

    Brendan not a terribe place either on what I've seen
    WerewolfGM wrote: »
    Lynch Day 1


    Votes Lynchee No. Of Votes
    Mary WW, Angus WW, Clodagh WW, Barbara WW Patrick WW 4
    Gertrude WW, Winifred WW, Doris WW, Phil WW Brendan WW 4
    Oisin WW, Desmond WW, Conor WW Derry WW 3
    Patrick WW, Brendan WW Angus WW 2
    Wendy WW, Liam WW Clodagh WW 2
    Ewan WW Emily WW 1
    Nigel WW Gertrude WW 1
    Emily WW Mary WW 1
    Derry WW Oisin WW 1

    Patrick WW was lynched on the basis of LAST VOTE CAST

    Conor voting Derry. Not emily.


  • #618
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    But its still the same day. Security cannot be the same 3 scavengers picked immediately prior. However, I think the scavengers tomorrow can be the 3 security from tonight assuming they are still alive.


    Dessie is right, well spotted

    From the OP

    Each night he will have to choose three players to send out into the wilderness the next day to scavenge for supplies.

    At the lynch he will also select three players for security duty – who cannot be the same players as above.


  • #619
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    But Derry you do realise that Oisin had already voted for you and only made that known after I said I was voting for you. It could have been a CFD if other people jumped on it in those last two minutes after it was made known myself and Oisin were on you but it wasn't. Even if it was then that would have put a huge target on everyone who voted for you.

    You're making a very big deal out of what if, if you ask me :confused:

    Guys I done a boo boo, I signed into my laptop and posted without thinking and when reading back realised it said Emily posted my post and I looked an I was signed in as Emily from the last WW game

    giphy.gif


  • #620
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Looked over Riona's posts, nothing of note in them, this is the closest thing just cause she's talking about RVs when she was one.
    Like I said nothing to see here



    Riona WW wrote: »
    How many wolves are there and what kind of powers they have

    When do the walkers strike? It seems to indicate in the the op those outside the walls may also face danger

    How many walkers are there!

    The bit about Rick, is he all powerful or are there other traditional power roles aswell?

    Just general early confusion


  • #621
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,147 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    Emily ? Are you conor ?
    .

    Turns out yes they are!


  • Advertisement
  • #622
    WerewolfGM
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭WerewolfGM


    Emily WW wrote: »
    But Derry you do realise that Oisin had already voted for you and only made that known after I said I was voting for you. It could have been a CFD if other people jumped on it in those last two minutes after it was made known myself and Oisin were on you but it wasn't. Even if it was then that would have put a huge target on everyone who voted for you.

    You're making a very big deal out of what if, if you ask me :confused:

    Mod Note:

    The above post should be attributed to Conor WW - a mistake was made and a mispost occurred.

    Mods want to clarify there are NO DUAL ACCOUNT roles in this game and this was simply an error.

    Thank you for your time.


  • #623
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    here i was watching a different debate, then see a lovely post by me! was i highjacked? :pac:


  • #624
    Conor WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Emily WW wrote: »
    here i was watching a different debate, then see a lovely post by me! was i highjacked? :pac:

    Ahhh sorry Emily, I died when I read back and saw your name, sweat was pumping out of me :o


  • #625
    Oisin WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,133 ✭✭✭Oisin WW


    I was going to end the two of you lol


  • #626
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Oisin WW wrote: »
    Emily ? Are you conor ?








    Conor voting Derry. Not emily.
    Derry WW wrote: »
    Ah to be fair, that was a fairly flimsy call.

    Listen my own choice tonight was based on post count so I can’t really throw too many stones but I thought Patrick was not a fair target as he was active at least and there would of been time to see how his game progressed . It was originally on Emily until she started to post within a few mins of me voting (and most her posts are from 6 onwards tonight). I then voted for Oisin who equally had little to show.

    So Liam/Angus and Ewan, why did Rick choose these? Any chance be thought one might be a walker ?

    tumblr_mn4vdvulmz1qdlh1io1_250.gif


  • #627
    Emily WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭Emily WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Ahhh sorry Emily, I died when I read back and saw your name, sweat was pumping out of me :o

    no worries, it happens. i think.


  • #628
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I'm open to correction but I don't think it does. In any group of 6 on the night of a conversion we know for a fact that there is at least one walker

    So it’s only the 6 chosen on the day of the conversion, not the potential 12 in between conversions? Is this proven or just a theory?


  • #629
    Clodagh WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,893 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Desmond WW wrote: »
    But its still the same day. Security cannot be the same 3 scavengers picked immediately prior. However, I think the scavengers tomorrow can be the 3 security from tonight assuming they are still alive.

    Assuming there’s a conversion in the morning we know there’ll be a walker in there. That said with conversions on a two day basis maybe something can be done to manage the pools but I’m too tired tonight to try to work the situation out


  • #630
    Clodagh WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,893 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Conor WW wrote: »
    Guys I done a boo boo, I signed into my laptop and posted without thinking and when reading back realised it said Emily posted my post and I looked an I was signed in as Emily from the last WW game

    giphy.gif


    Awkward


    Good thing Oisin was so alert, remarkable


  • Advertisement
  • #631
    Clodagh WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,893 ✭✭✭Clodagh WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    So it’s only the 6 chosen on the day of the conversion, not the potential 12 in between conversions? Is this proven or just a theory?

    Mod seemed to confirm here
    WerewolfGM wrote: »
    Mod Announcement:

    Since the question has been asked, all six chosen are eligible for kills OR conversions, as per the OP.



    On another note is isoing peoples posts buggy for others using the mobile site? Quite a few times now it can’t find any posts for some players when I look for them


Advertisement