2020 US Presidential Election (aka: The Trump Coronation)

Brian?

da_miser wrote: »

Its elderly abuse, Joe should be at home watching TV and looking at photos of his grand children, Trump will eat him alive in the debates, that is if the Dems dont worm their way out of them, i doubt we will be lucky enough to see any debates this election, Joe is clearly getting worse each time he is allowed out by his handlers, a vote for Joe is really a vote to make his VP the president, so who will he choose? My money is on Michell Obama.
For your amusement/dismay, turn up the sound.
https://imgur.com/a/elgXKwM

A 3 second video of a man thinking. That's a real smoking gun. It's over for Biden

ancapailldorcha

notobtuse wrote: »

It appears democrats and the Left have gone from Orange Man Bad to White Man Bad. Are they purposely trying to throw this election? Forget Trump's obnoxious behavior, the Left are turning the election and the discussion into one of unparalleled hate and disgust. I used to think democrats and the Left had good hearts, were passionate, but just misguided. Now I'm not so sure. We are in for a terrible five months ahead of us. And if Trump wins I'm afraid the Left will tear this country apart. We may be witnessing the beginning of a second Civil War. Can one have a war (which usually demands a winner and loser) without bloodshed?

There's an actual fascist in the Oval Office and you're presumably moaning about some protestors.

As Brian? says, the Democrats have plenty of big money backers. Someone on the American right who's content with Trump's divisive politics voicing concerns about the left starting a civil war are just completely hollow IMO.

frag420

eagle eye wrote: »

You are attacking the poster and you've no basis for your comment either.
Joe Biden said he met Deng Xiaoping in Paris, the man died 20+ years ago, he called Corey Booker the President.
I could go on and on with examples but I'd like to hear you explain away those two as nothing.

Can you explain these away...all from 2019, more from 2018/17 too if you care to look...if trump had brains made from wool there still wouldn't be enough to make a tampon for a budgie!

eagle eye

da_miser wrote:

My money is on Michell Obama. For your amusement/dismay, turn up the sound.

Unfortunately Michelle Obama has said many times she doesn't want a position like that. It'd be great if she changed her mind.

da_miser

ancapailldorcha wrote: »

There's an actual fascist in the Oval Office and you're presumably moaning about some protestors.

.

You must live a very sheltered life , woke to the max, Get out and see the world, read a few books, then look back at your Ridiculous statement that a fascist is n the white house.
God help you when you actually meet a nasty person in the real world, you'll piss yourself with fear

da_miser

eagle eye wrote: »

Unfortunately Michelle Obama has said many times she doesn't want a position like that. It'd be great if she changed her mind.

Why would it be great?
Shes is a black woman, is that all that is required?

Read it and weep, here is your hero in all her glory.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2008/05/is-michelle-obama-responsible-for-the-jeremiah-wright-fiasco.html

eagle eye

da_miser wrote:

Why would it be great? Shes is a black woman, is that all that is required?

Read it and weep, here is your hero in all her glory.

I read that crap. It's biased, you can even feel the hate between the words when it's not clearly evident on the page.
If you are reading and believing agenda driven haters like that then there's no hope for you.

Professor Moriarty

da_miser wrote: »

You must live a very sheltered life , woke to the max, Get out and see the world, read a few books, then look back at your Ridiculous statement that a fascist is n the white house.
God help you when you actually meet a nasty person in the real world, you'll piss yourself with fear

So Trump is a nasty person? Agreed.

da_miser

Trumps next election video.
The Dems want to disband the police, Vote Biden and this is what you will get.
https://imgur.com/KZ15LMc

Huuuge win for Trump in November, i can see no other outcome.

MadYaker

da_miser wrote: »

Why would it be great?
Shes is a black woman, is that all that is required?

Read it and weep, here is your hero in all her glory.

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2008/05/is-michelle-obama-responsible-for-the-jeremiah-wright-fiasco.html

She seems like a decent person and can speak in full sentences so it’d be an improvement on trump at least.

Cody montana

da_miser wrote: »

Trumps next election video.
The Dems want to disband the police, Vote Biden and this is what you will get.
https://imgur.com/KZ15LMc

Huuuge win for Trump in November, i can see no other outcome.

Even though Biden has said the exact opposite.
He promised to give 300 million to the police.
Also the looting happened under trumps watch.

What to you think of trump gassing peacefully protesters?

da_miser

MadYaker wrote: »

She seems like a decent person and can speak in full sentences so it’d be an improvement on trump at least.

The cope is growing around boards among the orange man bad posters, the melt downs when he wins reelection will be unprecedented.
Now riddle me this, will you accept you are wrong about Trump when he wins bigly in November, will you accept that the media is pushing propaganda and no matter what Trump does , the media will not be happy.

Professor Moriarty

da_miser wrote: »

The cope is growing around boards among the orange man bad posters, the melt downs when he wins reelection will be unprecedented.
Now riddle me this, will you accept you are wrong about Trump when he wins bigly in November, will you accept that the media is pushing propaganda and no matter what Trump does , the media will not be happy.

That's a lie. The NYT has been profitable during that time.

da_miser

As far as im concerned the left has lost the plot, especially in the states, no matter what Trump does the media goes mad, for years the media have been clamouring for a end to the Afgan war, them when Trump says he is going to end it and bring the troops home, media does a 180 turn and wants to stay there.
One of the best examples of the Orange man bad rhetoric followed with out question by the left is maternity leave, the media campaigns for it and as soon as Trump agrees the media does a 180, what type of mental illness is this, the public can see this madness and will vote Bigly for Trump in November.

Professor Moriarty

da_miser wrote: »

As far as im concerned the left has lost the plot, especially in the states, no matter what Trump does the media goes mad, for years the media have been clamouring for a end to the Afgan war, them when Trump says he is going to end it and bring the troops home, media does a 180 turn and wants to stay there.
One of the best examples of the Orange man bad rhetoric followed with out question by the left is maternity leave, the media campaigns for it and as soon as Trump agrees the media does a 180, what type of mental illness is this, the public can see this madness and will vote Bigly for Trump in November.

Kinda boring now.

Cody montana

da_miser wrote: »

As far as im concerned the left has lost the plot, especially in the states, no matter what Trump does the media goes mad, for years the media have been clamouring for a end to the Afgan war, them when Trump says he is going to end it and bring the troops home, media does a 180 turn and wants to stay there.
One of the best examples of the Orange man bad rhetoric followed with out question by the left is maternity leave, the media campaigns for it and as soon as Trump agrees the media does a 180, what type of mental illness is this, the public can see this madness and will vote Bigly for Trump in November.

What to you think of trump gassing peacefully protesters?
Why can’t you answer?

da_miser

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Kinda boring now.

Lalalalalalalal stick my fingers in my ears , i cant hear you.
Pathetic , you have just proven the anti Trump left propaganda is nonsense, you have been show clear evidence of the madness that has infected the left and you dont want to know about it.
Orange man bad is not a valid position to take by anyone with a bit of sense.

Bold Abdu

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

That's a lie. The NYT has been profitable during that time.

It may or may not be a lie, but you've misunderstood.

Professor Moriarty

Bold Abdu wrote: »

It may or may not be a lie, but you've misunderstood.

Maybe? Happy to be corrected.

Bold Abdu

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Maybe? Happy to be corrected.

It's not the tax forum but anyway...


If the NYT made an $80m loss in 2009 and a profit in every year thereafter, it would have claimed the $80 loss against the profits in those years.



You stand corrected!

Professor Moriarty

Bold Abdu wrote: »

It's not the tax forum but anyway...


If the NYT made an $80m loss in 2009 and a profit in every year thereafter, it would have claimed the $80 loss against the profits in those years.



You stand corrected!

Ah! I understand the concept of writing off losses. It's just that there is no evidence of the NYT making such losses. None that I can find anyway.

Professor Moriarty

da_miser wrote: »

Lalalalalalalal stick my fingers in my ears , i cant hear you.
Pathetic , you have just proven the anti Trump left propaganda is nonsense, you have been show clear evidence of the madness that has infected the left and you dont want to know about it.
Orange man bad is not a valid position to take by anyone with a bit of sense.

Why do you call him Orange Man? Kind of insulting isn't it?

Bold Abdu

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Ah! I understand the concept of writing off losses. It's just that there is no evidence of the NYT making such losses. None that I can find anyway.

The general point stands. Just because you can't find it doesn't mean it didn't happen.



A quick google search finds an article from Techcrunch (from 6 Feb 2019). First paragraph -



Today’s news that The (failing?) New York Times reported net income of $55.2 million, after losses a year earlier — and that its digital business raked in $709 million — is just one indicator that some of the nation’s oldest media properties are finally crossing the bridge into the 21st century.


You don't have to apologise to the guy you called a liar!

Professor Moriarty

Bold Abdu wrote: »

The general point stands. Just because you can't find it doesn't mean it didn't happen.



A quick google search finds an article from Techcrunch. First paragraph -



Today’s news that The (failing?) New York Times reported net income of $55.2 million, after losses a year earlier — and that its digital business raked in $709 million — is just one indicator that some of the nation’s oldest media properties are finally crossing the bridge into the 21st century.


You don't have to apologise to the guy you called a liar!

Yes, but how much losses? Where is the proof that the NYT has lost 80 billion and written it off over the past 8 years? I certainly can't find any.

eagle eye

Love da_miser's post showing CNN for the agenda driven shysters they are.

ExMachina1000

eagle eye wrote: »

Love da_miser's post showing CNN for the agenda driven shysters they are.

Divisive grifters is the correct term

da_miser

Cody montana wrote: »

What to you think of trump gassing peacefully protesters?
Why can’t you answer?

Give examples of this, i have show two examples of the left BS and still we have not got a response as to why the left 180 is acceptable

extra gravy

Bold Abdu wrote: »

The general point stands. Just because you can't find it doesn't mean it didn't happen.



A quick google search finds an article from Techcrunch (from 6 Feb 2019). First paragraph -

Today’s news that The (failing?) New York Times reported net income of $55.2 million, after losses a year earlier — and that its digital business raked in $709 million — is just one indicator that some of the nation’s oldest media properties are finally crossing the bridge into the 21st century.

You don't have to apologise to the guy you called a liar!

The original image stated 80m in losses SINCE 2012. Nowhere in your post have you shown the evidence of this.

Bold Abdu

Professor Moriarty wrote: »

Yes, but how much losses? Where is the proof that the NYT has lost 80 billion and written it off over the past 8 years? I certainly can't find any.

You couldn't find any losses earlier but were happy to call someone a liar. It took me 20 seconds to find some losses from 2018.


I haven't looked, but I'm sure the NYT is a massive group company. Companies within the group may have made $80m losses that were utilised.



Before calling someone a liar, racist, fascist etc. people should have some information. Not just throw the terms around. That's all I'm saying.

eagle eye

da_miser wrote:

Give examples of this, i have show two examples of the left BS and still we have not got a response as to why the left 180 is acceptable

Who are you calling the left?