2020 US Presidential Election (aka: The Trump Coronation)

Professor Moriarty

one world order wrote: »

He could improve a lot but as imperfect as he is, he is on the right side and trying his best. We all fall below the standard and it’s a ongoing battle against the temptations of this world. At the core he has policies I agree with.

What core policies do you agree with?

Overheal

statesaver wrote: »

When is the first debate ?

Not until the fall. The RNC isn’t even until late August which is when Trump is actually coronated as the GOP nominee.

extra gravy

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

You clearly are.
You shouldn't be mocking someone's religious beliefs

Why not? I respect his right to believe what he wants but that doesn't mean I have to respect those beliefs.

smartz

one world order wrote: »

To be honest I would rather put my trust in Jesus Christ than be deceived by the evil that control this world.

Out of curiosity, what branch of christianity do you belong to? And is the '8000 people control the world' a common belief in your community?

Muahahaha

duploelabs wrote: »

Reading that makes me feel like I've just huffed glue.

So I've asked you this before, what media do you read and trust?

Id be interested in knowing this too. Like if oneworldorder is claiming that the mainstream media are all fake news then what sites does he get his truthful news from? Maybe he will provide us with a few links of news media he considers to be good sources and that way we can all go and educate ourselves and finally be free from the clutches and the lies of the mainstream media.

So help us out here oneworldorder, throw up a few links of where you believe we should get our news from given you say the mainstream media is all fake. Where will we find the real truth?

Overheal

These Supercuts are great

https://twitter.com/projectlincoln/status/1276514449084604422?s=21

SHOVELLER

one world order wrote: »

He is a strong leader, built a great economy before they unleashed the virus, shows up the fake mainstream media and he will continue to put America first. Law abiding citizens that respect their country will come out again and re-elect him for another 4 years.

What is the colour of the sky in your world?

If you seriously believe that fictional nonsense I have an iceberg for sale.

PropJoe10

statesaver wrote: »

When is the first debate ?

Is Trump obliged to do debates? I'm not 100% clear on that. I'm not sure if debating this time is a good idea, considering his lack of achievement in pretty much every area. There's only so far that "Biden is senile" can take him, seeing as he's not the brightest or most coherent spark himself.

osarusan

PropJoe10 wrote: »

Is Trump obliged to do debates? I'm not 100% clear on that. I'm not sure if debating this time is a good idea, considering his lack of achievement in pretty much every area. There's only so far that "Biden is senile" can take him, seeing as he's not the brightest or most coherent spark himself.

The whole 'Biden is senile' thing makes avoiding debates difficult as Trump should be chomping at the bit to expose his senility.


Not debating would lose him even more of the floating voters that are already moving away from him.

ohnonotgmail

back to something substantive. Trump has known since march that the Russians have been paying a bounty for killing american troops in afghanistan. not only has trump done nothing about it he wanted russia readmitted to the G8 after he was told. the man is a traitor.

PropJoe10

osarusan wrote: »

The whole 'Biden is senile' thing makes avoiding debates difficult as Trump should be chomping at the bit to expose his senility.


Not debating would lose him even more of the floating voters that are already moving away from him.

You're right, but the obvious fact is that Trump is even less coherent than Biden is (I am not a fan of Biden, personally). Trump is barely able to form a sentence at this stage, as shown on Hannity the other night when Hannity had to step in when he asked Trump what his aims for his next 4 years were and Trump babbled like a confused child.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he refused to debate Biden and just focused on his rallies.

Brian?

one world order wrote: »

I have seen enough. There is enough evidence on YouTube if your willing to find out. I am not linking stuff here.

Tell me what to search for so.

Brian?

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

You clearly are.
You shouldn't be mocking someone's religious beliefs

Why? Does that cover every religion ever conceived?

duploelabs

PropJoe10 wrote: »

You're right, but the obvious fact is that Trump is even less coherent than Biden is (I am not a fan of Biden, personally). Trump is barely able to form a sentence at this stage, as shown on Hannity the other night when Hannity had to step in when he asked Trump what his aims for his next 4 years were and Trump babbled like a confused child.

I wouldn't be surprised at all if he refused to debate Biden and just focused on his rallies.

I would say he'll come up with some excuse, as if he did debate, it would show up his 'Biden is in mental decline' as false. At least he can control the narrative from his pulpit

ohnonotgmail

duploelabs wrote: »

I would say he'll come up with some excuse, as if he did debate, it would show up his 'Biden is in mental decline' as false. At least he can control the narrative from his pulpit

i think he will place some completely unreasonable conditions on the debates and then blame biden when he wont agree to them.

Brian?

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i think he will place some completely unreasonable conditions on the debates and then blame biden when he wont agree to them.

Trump's only chance to turn it around is to make Biden senile. He has to debate him.

amdublin

Overheal wrote: »

Not until the fall. The RNC isn’t even until late August which is when Trump is actually coronated as the GOP nominee.

Is there any chance that the Republicans would nominate someone else?

Has that ever happened that someone instead of the sitting president was nominated?

ExMachina1000

Brian? wrote: »

Why? Does that cover every religion ever conceived?

Just the ones around today is fine thanks

Brian?

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Just the ones around today is fine thanks

Even the snake handlers and the Presbyterians?

Brian?

amdublin wrote: »

Is there any chance that the Republicans would nominate someone else?

Has that ever happened that someone instead of the sitting president was nominated?

Nope. Not going to happen

jamule

can any of the trump bum boys translate this into something coherent, maybe its just me but it is the greatitest orator of our time
but its a bit much for my uneductated mind


'Hannity: 'What are your goals for your second term.'

Trump: 'Well, one of the things that will be really great, you know the word experience is still good. I always say talent is more important than experience. I’ve always said that. But the word experience is a very important word. It’s an — a very important meaning.

I never did this before. I never slept over in Washington. I was in Washington, I think, 17 times. All of a sudden, I’m president of the United States. You know the story. I’m riding down Pennsylvania Avenue with our First Lady and I say, ‘This is great. But I didn’t know very many people in Washington. It wasn’t my thing. I was from Manhattan, from New York. Now I know everybody, and I have great people in the administration.”

You make some mistakes. Like, you know, an idiot like Bolton. All he wanted to do was drop bombs on everybody. You don’t have to drop bombs on everybody. You don’t have to kill people.'

Timberrrrrrrr

ExMachina1000 wrote: »

Just the ones around today is fine thanks

We should take Scientology seriously?

ohnonotgmail

amdublin wrote: »

Is there any chance that the Republicans would nominate someone else?

Has that ever happened that someone instead of the sitting president was nominated?

Not since Andrew Johnson who was long considered the worst president in history. The key word being "was"

extra gravy

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

We should take Scientology seriously?

And Pastafarianism...:pac:

ohnonotgmail

extra gravy wrote: »

And Pastafarianism...:pac:

*dons collander* excuse me?

extra gravy

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

*dons collander* excuse me?

Apologies, I know you guys have been straining for recognition for a while!

I'll get my coat...

duploelabs

extra gravy wrote: »

And Pastafarianism...:pac:

Easter bunny and tooth fairy?

TheRepentent

extra gravy wrote: »

And Pastafarianism...:pac:

Tahe your malformed noodles and F**k off:pac:

smartz

amdublin wrote: »

Is there any chance that the Republicans would nominate someone else?

Has that ever happened that someone instead of the sitting president was nominated?

I believe Gerald Ford came very close to losing it in 76, and he actually had a slightly higher approval rate than Trump at the time (about 45%). However, he was up against a very well defined primary opponent in Ronald Reagan, and there doesn't seem to be anybody in that role currently in the G.O.P.

I think one of the real questions is at what point do other (running) Republican candidates start to publicly question the president, to try and save their own back. Doubtless there is a number, I'm guessing it's somewhere in the 30 % bracket.

mcmoustache

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

LMAO

This shìte should be confined to the CT threads.

It's gone mainstream. Trump himself has appeared on infowars and retweeted Q-Anon nonsense. Then again, he does depend on his base being gullible so the CT types are perfect for it.