Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Could Sinn Fein actually run a country ?

Options
  • 04-02-2020 7:34am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭


    We have a party here that's core voter is lower income. With that the policies are driven I.e. the richer middle class will pay for everything and the taxes will continue to tumble in. Let's look at northern Ireland 21 years under their control. Last year the UK gave 10 billion in prop up money. That's 10 billion for 1.5million people approx, every year the British public pay for Northern Ireland. Could Sinn fein actually manage a much larger country with a different majority tax payer ? While we all have a choice on who we vote for it's a case of careful what you want , there are no free lunches


«13456747

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 23,764 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Cant be worse than FG tbf.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    We have a party here that's core voter is lower income. With that the policies are driven I.e. the richer middle class will pay for everything and the taxes will continue to tumble in. Let's look at northern Ireland 21 years under their control. Last year the UK gave 10 billion in prop up money. That's 10 billion for 1.5million people approx, every year the British public pay for Northern Ireland. Could Sinn fein actually manage a much larger country with a different majority tax payer ? While we all have a choice on who we vote for it's a case of careful what you want , there are no free lunches


    Their core vote now extends to university educated young people that cant access affordable housing. FG have gifted them an entirely new voter base. Eoin O'Broin's housing policy actually isn't all that bad when you dig into it. It's not a free-house for all the chizzlers setup - it's more or less the Vienna housing model tweaked to an Irish context. How that's worse than Eoghan Murphy's 'the morket will sort it out, yaw' policy, I'm not sure.

    As to whether they can run a country, well, FG and FF's governance has been various shades of sh*t, so let's find out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    . Let's look at northern Ireland 21 years under their control. Last year the UK gave 10 billion in prop up money. That's 10 billion for 1.5million people approx, every year the British public pay for Northern Ireland.

    The North clearly isn't under their control. The budget is set by Westminster so that's where the power lies. Stormont is a glorified county council.

    Power sharing and Londons indifference to it means the radical economic reform the North needs will never happen.

    That Westminster keeps throwing bad money after good to prop up a failed statelet is an entirely separate issue. And you're right it is something British people should be angry about.
    I'd be the first to hammer SF for a lot of things but I fail to see how that's their fault.

    As for the the title of the thread. Ya, sure why not. The fact FF are one of/the biggest party in the country again after leading the country to the point where we were days from there being no money in ATMS and nothing to pay public servant wages, I fail to see why anyone would be afraid of Sinn Fein having a crack at it.
    Only for "something, something, IRA" logic that's been spoon fed to them by Denis O'Brien and politicians.


  • Moderators, Home & Garden Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 12,594 Mod ✭✭✭✭2011


    They don’t understand economics. Any time Mary is questioned on the affordability of SF proposals she fails to answer it sufficiently. I would love to get a state pension at 65 but the money simply isn’t there. I agree with her proposal to increase vacant property tax and I like their approach to the insurance crises. I also understand people’s frustration at the current housing / rent situation but SF would run the country into the ground.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,504 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Cant be worse than FG tbf.

    Okay I'll go for the pantomime answer .. oh yes they could ...

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Eggs For Dinner


    State cars to be replaced by JCBs


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Cant be worse than FG tbf.

    Yeah. They could.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    2011 wrote: »
    They don’t understand economics. Any time Mary is questioned on the affordability of SF proposals she fails to answer it sufficiently. I would love to get a state pension at 65 but the money simply isn’t there. I agree with her proposal to increase vacant property tax and I like their approach to the insurance crises. I also understand people’s frustration at the current housing / rent situation but SF would run the country into the ground.


    There's scant evidence that FF or FG are much better.


    Think of it this way, we're reporting 6% GDP growth or thereabouts, and FG keeping on pointing at it. Why would a younger person or someone on lower wages give a hoot about that when their prospects of home ownership gets more distant and their quality of life dis-improves? In all honesty, why would they give a sh*t? You can't bank it, you can't apply for a mortgage with it and you can't pay your rent with it. Headline GDP growth doesn't butter parsnips for most people.



    A decreasing amount of people feel the benefit of that 6% growth, FG & FF can't square that circle.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,800 ✭✭✭Fann Linn


    After FG/FF.
    Yep.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭rn


    They can indeed run a country... They should get a crack at health and housing. We'd learn a lot from seeing them in power. They would then be faced with trying to introduce all the radical solutions into systems that resist change.

    On health, it's a basket case of vested interests with consultants holding the most power. SF are the complete opposite demographic to hospital consultants.

    In housing, the building industry is pretty much at capacity, with economy at full employment. Will SF bring in the huge amount of cheap, foreign labour needed to do this huge public housing scheme they want to do.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,352 ✭✭✭topmanamillion


    2011 wrote: »
    They don’t understand economics. Any time Mary is questioned on the affordability of SF proposals she fails to answer it sufficiently. I would love to get a state pension at 65 but the money simply isn’t there. I agree with her proposal to increase vacant property tax and I like their approach to the insurance crises. I also understand people’s frustration at the current housing / rent situation but SF would run the country into the ground.

    The money isn't there?
    Pull the other one. The moneys there to turn down €12 billion from Apple. Along with tolerating the wastage in the top heavy managerial haven of a so called health service we have.

    Ayone with 45 odd years of a working life has contributed enough in tax and pension contributions to be entitled to their pension.
    Take it out of some where else. Plenty of other places but that's not as easy as pressing plus on a computer and upping the pension age.


  • Registered Users Posts: 916 ✭✭✭Iscreamkone


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Cant be worse than FG tbf.

    The economy is booming.
    That will not happen under SF
    Then where will they get the money to give their supporters

    In fact there’s not enough money available now to pay for their leftie schemes


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    The economy is booming.


    If the economy booming sorted all ills then FG wouldn't be in trouble. A minority of people are feeling the benefit, how are you going to make the rest give a sh*t if the economy is booming?


    Bill Clinton once famously quipped 'It's the economy stupid.' It's increasingly clear that's complete bunk, when quality of life declines and life fundamentals like securing somewhere to live, saving for a pension, raising a child etc become more difficult in a red-hot economy, something's wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    FG/FF are the parties who have rewarded the dead beats amlnd lay abouts. They are the parties who have made the middle income subsidise these wasters and also bail out the banks. FF/FG have made it profitable not to work. FF destroyed our economy.

    So to hell with them.

    Time for change


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Cant be worse than FG tbf.

    Oh it could.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Yurt! wrote: »
    If the economy booming sorted all ills then FG wouldn't be in trouble. A minority of people are feeling the benefit, how are you going to make the rest give a sh*t if the economy is booming?


    Bill Clinton once famously quipped 'It's the economy stupid.' It's increasingly clear that's complete bunk, when quality of life declines and life fundamentals like securing somewhere to live, saving for a pension, raising a child etc become more difficult in a red-hot economy, something's wrong.

    And the ironic thing is that its the spongers from social economic deprived areas who will votes in SF. FF/FG are much more friendly to this crowd. They are doing really well in the current system. Biting the hand that feeds them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,657 ✭✭✭Day Lewin


    Give the man the Slean.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    Oh it could.

    Not for the working man.


  • Registered Users Posts: 24,401 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    2011 wrote: »
    They don’t understand economics. Any time Mary is questioned on the affordability of SF proposals she fails to answer it sufficiently. I would love to get a state pension at 65 but the money simply isn’t there. I agree with her proposal to increase vacant property tax and I like their approach to the insurance crises. I also understand people’s frustration at the current housing / rent situation but SF would run the country into the ground.

    Well FF have done that how many times now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 945 ✭✭✭Colonel Claptrap


    State cars to be replaced by JCBs

    And blacked out vans.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 506 ✭✭✭Maewyn Succat


    The money isn't there?
    Pull the other one. The moneys there to turn down €12 billion from Apple. Along with tolerating the wastage in the top heavy managerial haven of a so called health service we have.

    Ayone with 45 odd years of a working life has contributed enough in tax and pension contributions to be entitled to their pension.
    Take it out of some where else. Plenty of other places but that's not as easy as pressing plus on a computer and upping the pension age.

    How much of that €12 billion would Ireland actually get to keep do you think? Feel free to do a Sinn Fein and dodge the question if you don't want to answer..


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    And the ironic thing is that its the spongers from social economic deprived areas who will votes in SF. FF/FG are much more friendly to this crowd. They are doing really well in the current system. Biting the hand that feeds them.


    What percentage of people in Ireland are spongers? We have close to full employment, and there is natural churn included in the unemployment figures - i.e. people that are moving from one job to another and spend a month or two on the scratch.

    The long term unemployed are not the problem with how the country are governed. I don't like that there are long-term unemployed, it's not desireable but you're overstating how many there are.

    If your life isn't optimal, it's not because of Dessie and Charlene down in the flats.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,740 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Yurt! wrote: »
    Their core vote now extends to university educated young people that cant access affordable housing. FG have gifted them an entirely new voter base. Eoin O'Broin's housing policy actually isn't all that bad when you dig into it. It's not a free-house for all the chizzlers setup - it's more or less the Vienna housing model tweaked to an Irish context. How that's worse than Eoghan Murphy's 'the morket will sort it out, yaw' policy, I'm not sure.

    As to whether they can run a country, well, FG and FF's governance has been various shades of sh*t, so let's find out.

    That's a terrible indictment of our education system.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    Not for the working man.

    You live in a country that is 3rd in the UN Human Development Index, not Somalia. The ‘working man’ in Ireland has it better than about 7.3 billion people on the planet. Context, dude.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    The money isn't there?
    No.

    Sinn Féin are talking about spending increases of €4.4bn per year over the next five years.

    And proposing tax increases of €3.8bn per year.

    Where's the other €600m going to come from?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    2011 wrote: »
    They don’t understand economics. Any time Mary is questioned on the affordability of SF proposals she fails to answer it sufficiently. I would love to get a state pension at 65 but the money simply isn’t there. I agree with her proposal to increase vacant property tax and I like their approach to the insurance crises. I also understand people’s frustration at the current housing / rent situation but SF would run the country into the ground.

    FF ran the country off a cliff face. FG have continued to screw the ordinary working man and woman while propping up banks, investments funds etc.

    Rents sky high
    No chance of buying a house
    At least 10000 homeless
    Childcare through the roof
    Hospital waiting times through the roof
    Black and tan celebrations

    Enough is enough.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Allinall wrote: »
    That's a terrible indictment of our education system.


    Yes, its the university system's fault that housing is unaffordable. Gold star.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,245 ✭✭✭Gretas Gonna Get Ya!


    They've been sitting there on the sidelines, getting a great lesson in how NOT to run a country... They seem hungry and motivated to make changes. I like some of their policies - not all of them mind you.

    I can't stomach voting the other shower back in. It's basically a vote for ineptitude and wastefulness... how can you reward that?

    I'm prepared to give SF a chance, and see what they can do. And screw all the snobs in this country, that look down their nose at them! (nice added bonus :P)


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,673 ✭✭✭Feisar


    To quote that great SF/IRA recruiter, Margaret Thatcher — 'The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.'

    First they came for the socialists...



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,820 ✭✭✭smelly sock


    You live in a country that is 3rd in the UN Human Development Index, not Somalia. The ‘working man’ in Ireland has it better than about 7.3 billion people on the planet. Context, dude.

    Stats just dont paint a picture dude.

    You are denying the housing crisis?

    The healthcare crisis?

    The mortgage arrears crisis?

    Homeless at at least 10000.

    Insurance costs are mental.

    Mortgage interest rates sky high.


Advertisement