Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Next Ff Leader

Options
  • 10-02-2020 6:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭


    Surely Martin can no longer remain as leader of FF.........completely rejected at the polls on Saturday.
    Who’s inline to takeover?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    He'll hang on with fingernails and teeth for another day. Doesn't want to be the only FF leader in history never to be Taoiseach.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,663 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    FF TDs calling for a parliamentary party on Thursday. Lots of anger towards Michael Martin at the amount of seats lost, they are suffering a terrible election with a lot of candidates lost because they were transfer toxic


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,143 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Absolute madness leaving him contest an election, he represents everything of the old guard that the electorate don't like. This god given right that FF should be in power.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    FF need to take a hard look at themselves and not just their Leader. There is a serious lack of talent in the party, just take a look at their front bench and ask yourself, how many of them if you were to pick a government would be given ministries? Another problem they have is their performance in the last government as part of confidence and supply, they let FG get away with so much and they way that is perceived by the public is that they were in government with FG and supported FG.

    They will need to sort themselves out very quickly as I reckon their will be an election in the summer.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,942 ✭✭✭topper75


    Floppybits wrote: »
    FF need to take a hard look at themselves and not just their Leader. There is a serious lack of talent in the party, just take a look at their front bench and ask yourself, how many of them if you were to pick a government would be given ministries? Another problem they have is their performance in the last government as part of confidence and supply, they let FG get away with so much and they way that is perceived by the public is that they were in government with FG and supported FG.

    They will need to sort themselves out very quickly as I reckon their will be an election in the summer.

    Yeah the plug should have been pulled with the hospital cost nonsense. They were all hiding behind the Brexit thing.

    Fair charge but on the FF front bench talent accusation.
    But it gets worse - look at SF :eek: Blatant lack of talent didn't stop a tidal wave of first pref.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,055 ✭✭✭JohnnyFlash


    FF have a real crisis on their hands. They were always a catch-all party of populism. That era is over. SF have moved into the left wing position and it will be piss easy for FG in opposition to move back to their traditional centre right position where most of their core want them to be anyway. What’s FF’s angle?

    Tough times for the soldiers of destiny in the long term.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,731 ✭✭✭jam_mac_jam


    They are looking very old and tired these days. I don't think he's going for a while though


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    topper75 wrote: »
    Yeah the plug should have been pulled with the hospital cost nonsense. They were all hiding behind the Brexit thing.

    Fair charge but on the FF front bench talent accusation.
    But it gets worse - look at SF :eek: Blatant lack of talent didn't stop a tidal wave of first pref.

    Yep but if you look at both front benches you have to admit SF were the better performers than FF in the previous Dail and even during the run up to the election.

    Now that could be down to FF being in confidence and supply agreement but you didn't see the FF Finance spokesperson attacking FG or vested interests like the insurance scandals like we did SF. Who is the spokesperson for housing in FF? they haven't been out like SF spokesperson. Sure people didn't even know that Sean Haughey was spokesperson for Foreign affairs and Trade, did he even speak at all in the last 4 or so years, who were the others spokespeople?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Floppybits


    They are looking very old and tired these days. I don't think he's going for a while though

    I thought the same for FG as well. They seemed to have run out of energy and ideas despite what they were saying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,591 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    There is no party cohesion at all. In our electorate area a long standing FF candidate was asking for a No1 for himself and then advising to vote outside the party just to thwart one of his fellow FF candidates.

    SF gave them a hard lesson on party brand and pushing transfers in the right direction.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,988 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    FF have a real crisis on their hands. They were always a catch-all party of populism. That era is over. SF have moved into the left wing position and it will be piss easy for FG in opposition to move back to their traditional centre right position where most of their core want them to be anyway. What’s FF’s angle?

    Tough times for the soldiers of destiny in the long term.

    good points - I was hoping for a FF canvasser to show up so I could ask them what the party actually stands for. In the past they were the default party of government; if you wanted a political career you joined FF.

    That's not enough anymore and they have no identity beyond "those guys my parents voted for".


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    Not buying this tidal wave of support for SF............they were just in the right place at the right time.
    The tv debates blew it for FF .......simply showed them to be a party stuck in the past.


  • Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Floppybits wrote: »
    Yep but if you look at both front benches you have to admit SF were the better performers than FF in the previous Dail and even during the run up to the election.

    Now that could be down to FF being in confidence and supply agreement but you didn't see the FF Finance spokesperson attacking FG or vested interests like the insurance scandals like we did SF. Who is the spokesperson for housing in FF? they haven't been out like SF spokesperson. Sure people didn't even know that Sean Haughey was spokesperson for Foreign affairs and Trade, did he even speak at all in the last 4 or so years, who were the others spokespeople?

    To be honest, I see Eoin O'Broin who has ideas, albeit some are far-fetched and unachievable, but there is an intellect there. Louise O'Reilly is very good too, an ex-union official, and well-respected for her work there. Beyond that, Pearse struggles with understanding the numbers, and the rest aren't really up to much. David "up the ra" Cullinane as a Minister? Mary-Lou makes for a great out-front leader, but the debates showed she doesn't do detail very well. Dessie Ellis, Aengus O'Snodaigh, enough said.

    Still, you are right, it does compare favourably with Fianna Fail.

    Fine Gael had some weak ones, how did Mary Mitchell O'Connor ever get a job, but probably have the strongest line-up of the main parties.


  • Registered Users Posts: 37 dwmcdos


    _Brian wrote: »
    There is no party cohesion at all. In our electorate area a long standing FF candidate was asking for a No1 for himself and then advising to vote outside the party just to thwart one of his fellow FF candidates.

    SF gave them a hard lesson on party brand and pushing transfers in the right direction.

    It was noticeable across all constituencies that they weren't transferring particularly well to their running mates, bit of a civil war brewing?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,574 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Basic equation is this: FF are (just about) the largest party ⇒ They will be leading the next government (assuming one is formed and there isn't another GE right away ⇒ Micheal Martin will be taoiseach ⇒ He stays on as FF leader as least as long as that government lasts


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,988 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    Basic equation is this: FF are (just about) the largest party ⇒ They will be leading the next government (assuming one is formed and there isn't another GE right away ⇒ Micheal Martin will be taoiseach ⇒ He stays on as FF leader as least as long as that government lasts

    which would guarantee they'd go into the next election with MM as leader; there are probably many in FF who wouldn't be keen on that idea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,178 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    Lisa Chambers will be the next leader.


  • Registered Users Posts: 341 ✭✭john9876


    Pherekydes wrote: »
    Lisa Chambers will be the next leader.

    Can she be leader if not a TD?

    Surely there's a Haughey or a Cowen who can carry on the great traditions of FF?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,143 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Basic equation is this: FF are (just about) the largest party ⇒ They will be leading the next government (assuming one is formed and there isn't another GE right away ⇒ Micheal Martin will be taoiseach ⇒ He stays on as FF leader as least as long as that government lasts

    They did abysmal and especially bad in Dublin constituencies. His leadership is in severe doubt. They are meeting tomorrow aren't they?


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,178 ✭✭✭✭Pherekydes


    john9876 wrote: »
    Can she be leader if not a TD?

    Surely there's a Haughey or a Cowen who can carry on the great traditions of FF?

    Well, taking Loafing Oaf's equation above and carrying on: Mícheál is an Taoiseach until the next election, gets dumped after a mauling and a newly reelected, photogenic TD is selected as leader for a new generation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 341 ✭✭john9876


    Odds from PP

    Next Fianna Fail Leader

    Dara Calleary
    5/2
    Jim O'Callaghan
    5/2
    Michael McGrath
    4/1
    Thomas Byrne
    6/1
    Niall Collins
    7/1
    Paul McAuliffe
    12/1
    Darragh O'Brien
    16/1
    Barry Cowen
    18/1
    Robert Troy
    25/1
    John McGuinness
    25/1
    Jack Chambers
    33/1
    James Browne
    33/1
    Anne Rabbitte
    33/1
    Seán Ó Fearghail
    50/1
    Mary Butler
    50/1
    Eamon O'Cuiv
    66/1
    Stephen Donnelly
    66/1
    Willie O'Dea
    150 / 1


  • Registered Users Posts: 341 ✭✭john9876


    Just for comparison, the next Fine Gael leader seems a more straightforward affair

    Next Permanent Leader of Fine Gael after Leo Varadkar

    Simon Coveney
    2/5
    Paschal Donohoe
    15/2
    Helen McEntee
    10/1
    Josepha Madigan
    14/1
    Simon Harris
    20/1
    Heather Humphreys
    25/1
    Eoghan Murphy
    25/1
    Paul Kehoe
    33/1
    Charles Flanagan
    33/1
    Richard Bruton
    33/1
    Seán Kyne
    33/1
    Martin Heydon
    40/1
    Joe McHugh
    40/1
    Michael Ring
    66/1
    Michael Creed
    66/1
    Colm Brophy
    100/1


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,574 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    john9876 wrote: »
    Odds from PP

    Next Fianna Fail Leader

    Dara Calleary
    5/2
    Jim O'Callaghan
    5/2
    Michael McGrath
    4/1
    Thomas Byrne
    6/1
    Niall Collins
    7/1
    Paul McAuliffe
    12/1
    Darragh O'Brien
    16/1
    Barry Cowen
    18/1
    Robert Troy
    25/1
    John McGuinness
    25/1
    Jack Chambers
    33/1
    James Browne
    33/1
    Anne Rabbitte
    33/1
    Seán Ó Fearghail
    50/1
    Mary Butler
    50/1
    Eamon O'Cuiv
    66/1
    Stephen Donnelly
    66/1
    Willie O'Dea
    150 / 1

    O'Callaghan has boosted his stature hugely through his strong stand against coalition with SF in recent days, when the likes of Calleary and O'Dea were hemming and hawing in the face of Martin's apparent wobble. He remains AFAIK the only senior FF figure to categorically say he would not serve in government with SF.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,858 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    O'Callaghan has boosted his stature hugely through his strong stand against coalition with SF in recent days, when the likes of Calleary and O'Dea were hemming and hawing in the face of Martin's apparent wobble. He remains AFAIK the only senior FF figure to categorically say he would not serve in government with SF.

    Martin’s apparent wobble was a last desperate attempt to save his political career..


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,398 ✭✭✭Morgans


    What I was wanting Mary Wilson to ask O'Callaghan was "what do you say to FF supporters who voted for you in the hopes for your manifesto to be implemented?" Having got the largest amount of seats in the country, you are saying you do not want to be in government. If you are so abhorred by SF in government why arent you as the leading party in the country negotiating to prevent it from happening. Will FF with O'Callaghan as leader ever sit in government?

    I understand the horse trading and the calculation that SF will have to come to FF in the coming weeks. Its no problem sending out mixed messages at this stage.


  • Registered Users Posts: 16,574 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Morgans wrote: »
    What I was wanting Mary Wilson to ask O'Callaghan was "what do you say to FF supporters who voted for you in the hopes for your manifesto to be implemented?" Having got the largest amount of seats in the country, you are saying you do not want to be in government. If you are so abhorred by SF in government why arent you as the leading party in the country negotiating to prevent it from happening. Will FF with O'Callaghan as leader ever sit in government?

    They are currently "giving SF the time and space" to put together a broad left government. O'Callaghan has not said he opposes a deal with FG.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,591 ✭✭✭✭_Brian


    dwmcdos wrote: »
    It was noticeable across all constituencies that they weren't transferring particularly well to their running mates, bit of a civil war brewing?

    I don’t know who the party whip is but they failed in their job to force people into line. Imagine if a SF candidate was going about trying to thwart another SF candidate, they would have ventilation in their knees very quickly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,950 ✭✭✭ChikiChiki


    rob316 wrote: »
    Absolute madness leaving him contest an election, he represents everything of the old guard that the electorate don't like. This god given right that FF should be in power.

    Fully agree. But a lot in the upper echelons of the party do not see them as having done any wrong. Completely detached.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,398 ✭✭✭Morgans


    They are currently "giving SF the time and space" to put together a broad left government. O'Callaghan has not said he opposes a deal with FG.

    FG, Coveney, has said that they oppose a confidence and Supply arrangement. Everyone knows what FF are doing. Its remarkable how easy a ride they are getting for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 14,339 ✭✭✭✭jimmycrackcorm


    Morgans wrote: »
    FG, Coveney, has said that they oppose a confidence and Supply arrangement. Everyone knows what FF are doing. Its remarkable how easy a ride they are getting for it.

    I think even if we end up with another election, which would suit SF as they would gain seats, it would be FF that would lose out more than FG.

    So it suits FG to block C&S. Particularly when FF are strenuously saying that no one wants another election.


Advertisement