The Curious Case of Violet-Anne Wynne

Martin Lanigan

Why would any party continue to fund a scheme where the participants decide to stop paying their rent for 4 years?

limnam

Martin Lanigan wrote: »

Why would any party continue to fund a scheme where the participants decide to stop paying their rent for 4 years?

Was there others?

martingriff

limnam wrote: »

Should be.

but if that's the case. What's running the country is an illegal drug user who's drug habit funded criminal gangs.

Right man at the top? or is there another way to do this ?

So we are allowed to look at a person back history and question it then grand so

limnam

martingriff wrote: »

So we are allowed to look at a person back history and question it then grand so

Sure, no issues there.

What are we going to do with Leo? his drug habit fueling criminal gangs.

Blood on his hands. (another one)

Or do we think it might get a bit silly ?

Millionaire only not

limnam wrote: »

The one they spent 90k on which resulted in Leo embarrassingly having to pull vidoes from?

Money well spent.

Post a story on a good job by a TD from another party and I'll come in and clap along with you.

Maybe this, oh wait

No beds for 2,655 people in Irish hospitals this week.

470 people are waiting for beds this morning, with the highest trolley figures in:

UH #Limerick: 54 people
UH #Galway: 46 people
#Cork UH: 42 people

*clap clap*

Important issues.

I wonder why ! Anything to do with letting the non work classes breed to there hearts content at public expense !

While the fools struggle to pay there taxes and bills in the hope they may have a child or 2 before there biological clock runs out !

U would have to wonder at times who has the intelligence at the end of the day ! Is it them or us

Zulu

limnam wrote: »

Oh,

Yes, sure absolutely I could. As I said.

You say you can....

If this was her plan from the start I'd be more than happy to condemn her.

But as she's a mother with 5 kids and a sick husband etc I'd like to understand more about what happened. Why did the payments go sporadic. What happened in the fall out.

...yet you don't.

Why won't you condemn the actions of a person who steals from a homeless charity?

Speaks volumes.

<que wheeling, and spinning, and dodging, but no condemnation>

martingriff

limnam wrote: »

Sure, no issues there.

What are we going to do with Leo? his drug habit fueling criminal gangs.

Blood on his hands. (another one)

Or do we think it might get a bit silly ?

I think you should be able to ask get answers and not be shouted down with but but the other sides. Now how far you go with it I agree can get silly. I mean if it was 1 joint and realised it was wrong then so be it would be my answer

limnam

Zulu wrote: »

Why won't you condemn the actions of a person who steals from a homeless charity?

As I said. Happy to. If I knew more.

But I think the fact she's offered to pay back the 12k says a lot

We need more TD's who if/when they're not found to do the right thing. To do the right thing. I'd love to see all the falsely claimed expenses back

Maybe then we wouldn't need to take 20m from the disabled.

But yeah mother of 5 sick husband etc. get her!

limnam

martingriff wrote: »

I think you should be able to ask get answers and not be shouted down with but but the other sides. Now how far you go with it I agree can get silly. I mean if it was 1 joint and realised it was wrong then so be it would be my answer

We can't get the answer as Leo believes in keeping illegal activities in the past private

Millionaire only not

Another point on violet Anne as already has been said ! She never entendres to pay ! They said her record was appalling from the start
If she couldn’t afford 60 why not 30 ? 20 even ! Surely she had money at some stage of the 4 years in and out from maternity wards !
But she made a decision not to have birth control even though it’s free to her with a medical card , conceive children at nearly 1 a year and yet live rent free !
But the social welfare department choose to fund her at the cost of our health care and education of tax paying people !
And someone voted for this bum , dress it up or down as already has been said but these are the facts ! Sinn Fein put her on the ballot paper there responsible !

Zulu

limnam wrote: »

As I said. Happy to. If I knew more.

...so you are not happy to.

Stop speaking out of the side of your mouth.

But I think the fact she's offered to pay back the 12k says a lot

She said she'd pay rent. She didn't. So, yeah, it says a lot alright.

But yeah mother of 5 sick husband etc. get her!

a thief who robbed from a homeless charity, you mean.

limnam

That's why I'd like to hear what the fall out was.

Looks like there was payments, then sporadic payments. Would seem odd to do this if the plan was to never pay.

Then there was the fall out and then no further payment.

I'd just like to understand that before lashing into a woman with 5 kids and a sick partner.

limnam

Zulu wrote: »

...so you are not happy to.

Am happy to. With more information.

Millionaire only not

limnam wrote: »

As I said. Happy to. If I knew more.

But I think the fact she's offered to pay back the 12k says a lot

We need more TD's who if/when they're not found to do the right thing. To do the right thing. I'd love to see all the falsely claimed expenses back

Maybe then we wouldn't need to take 20m from the disabled.

But yeah mother of 5 sick husband etc. get her!

He wasn’t that sick your contradicting yourself !
Maybe the 5 of them are not the one father! Was she just a sperm bank !

Martin Lanigan

limnam wrote: »

Was there others?

I’m sure there was when they saw Violet-Anne get away with living rent free for 4 years.

limnam

Millionaire only not wrote: »

He wasn’t that sick your contradicting yourself !
Maybe the 5 of them are not the one father! Was she just a sperm bank !

huh

Are you a doctor ? Did you treat him?

martingriff

limnam wrote: »

We can't get the answer as Leo believes in keeping illegal activities in the past private

Well he answered he did which was more one did. I don't think he was a hardcore and I say if he did more then a few as a lot did in there younger years I be surprised. That been said hope he does not get in to power again or if he does MArtin sticks him in health

limnam

Martin Lanigan wrote: »

I’m sure there was when they saw Violet-Anne get away with living rent free for 4 years.

Your sure?

proof?

Or you're making silly assumptions again.

limnam

martingriff wrote: »

Well he answered he did which was more one did. I don't think he was a hardcore and I say if he did more then a few as a lot did in there younger years I be surprised. That been said hope he does not get in to power again or if he does MArtin sticks him in health

Right so now we know he did. So he's funded criminal gangs. Our leader.

Fit to be a public representative ? To be the leader of a country?

Kids looking up to him to etc ?

Standards only seem to be asked of the few.

Martin Lanigan

Millionaire only not wrote: »

He wasn’t that sick your contradicting yourself !
Maybe the 5 of them are not the one father! Was she just a sperm bank !

She had at least 2 of the kids while he was allegedly sick. Common sense (and fiscal responsibility) would have meant putting expanding the brood on hold for the rest of us, but when the state funds all aspects of your life then you don’t really need to worry about that. Better to add more kids and stop paying rent than meeting your financial responsibilities if you can get away with it.

Millionaire only not

limnam wrote: »

huh

Are you a doctor ? Did you treat him?

Oh doctor I’m sick I can’t work !
But I can get it up and the wife can’t take any birth control .
The doctor probably prescribed viagra for the poor crater break the boredom of watching sky all day ! In my rent free house with all my benefits!

Donald Trump

Boggles wrote: »

If 12k in arrears sunk the charity, I doubt it was viable.

It's likely that if they were letting her get away with it, there were others too. She was a well-educated individual (on paper) with access to opportunities. Now if she could walk all over them, imagine them trying to get money out of other, more "hardened", chancers?

They also brought her to the High Court, no? That wouldn't be cheap either. You could say that that would have been a waste but they also couldn't be seen as unwilling to take any action so I presume that they did so in desperation.

Donald Trump

limnam wrote: »

That's why I'd like to hear what the fall out was.

Looks like there was payments, then sporadic payments. Would seem odd to do this if the plan was to never pay.

Then there was the fall out and then no further payment.

I'd just like to understand that before lashing into a woman with 5 kids and a sick partner.

It's mad that there was a fall out. Was this between her and the charity? I wonder what on earth could possibly have lead to a deteriorating relationship between them......... :rolleyes:

limnam

Martin Lanigan wrote: »

but when the state funds all aspects of your life then you don’t really need to worry about that. Better to add more kids and stop paying rent than meeting your financial responsibilities if you can get away with it.

Sure that's all down to non SF policies

limnam

Millionaire only not wrote: »

Oh doctor I’m sick I can’t work !
But I can get it up and the wife can’t take any birth control .
The doctor probably prescribed viagra for the poor crater break the boredom of watching sky all day ! In my rent free house with all my benefits!

So now their doctor was incompetent too.

Hehehe.

Come of it.

Donald Trump

limnam wrote: »

Sure that's all down to non SF policies

Hey limnam. a little off topic, but is your avatar of a fella wearing a balaclava?




Perhaps he's even singing "oh ah, up the Ra" too?

limnam

Donald Trump wrote: »

Hey limnam. a little off topic, but is your avatar of a fella wearing a balaclava?




Perhaps he's even singing "oh ah, up the Ra" too?

I can't see it, but I think it's penfold from Danger mouse

Martin Lanigan

limnam wrote: »

Your sure?

proof?

Or you're making silly assumptions again.

Just like you with your mysterious circumstances

riddles

Dublin City council was paid 78m€ in 2018 in rent.
Average rent was 252€ per month.

THE LEVEL OF rent arrears amount tenants of council housing in Dublin city has risen by over €4m to almost €33m during 2019 with 25 households now owing the local authority at least €27,000 each.

The latest figures show around 60% of tenants are in arrears with over 5% of tenants owing at least €7,000.

Surely a logically step is ensure rent is deducted automatically from either earned income or social welfare.
There must be another huge pot of money spent on collections from across all departments.

There is also the destruction of property that goes on in council houses again all paid for.

Every single person has a form of income either earned or from social welfare - all outstanding monies should be deducted centrally or charged against future liabilities like earned income, job seekers, pension etc.

Nothing should be totally free such as travel, doctors, prescriptions.

As we have seen in the election the everything should be free brigade is on the cusp of taking over.

Martin Lanigan

limnam wrote: »

Sure that's all down to non SF policies

And your favourite scrounger Violet-Anne took full advantage. And then some, to the time of 12k rent arrears, from a charity. Lowest of the low stealing from a charity.