Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Curious Case of Violet-Anne Wynne

Options
1…3435373940…99

Comments

  • Options
    #1082
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    Don't worry Febuary.

    Won't be long till your March.

    You are a smart buck limnam. Still don’t understand why someone who claims not to support or vote for SF has posted easily a hundred posts defending this scrounger. Any thoughts on that?


  • Options
    #1083
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    id say you missed something , ask boggles , he know who the chap is

    so not a TD no?

    Didn't run in the election?

    Carry on....


  • Options
    #1084
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Boggles wrote: »
    .

    so you don't know the difference between cannabis herb and cannabis oil then ?

    or was he extracting the oil from the herb do you think ?


  • Options
    #1085
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »
    You are a smart buck limnam. Still don’t understand why someone who claims not to support or vote for SF has posted easily a hundred posts defending this scrounger. Any thoughts on that?

    Oh, I'm just a big softy really.

    Seeing a poor woman down on her luck with 5 kids and a sick partner.

    I just want to hear more. That fair enough Febuary ?


  • Options
    #1086
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    limnam wrote: »
    so not a TD no?

    Didn't run in the election?

    Carry on....

    but you know who he is right ? in the context of this thread like ?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1087
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    Wouldn’t be surprised to hear that the husband (or one of the kids) has been highly active in this thread. Might explain a few anomalies and some of the wilder claims about mysterious ‘circumstances’ to excuse the 4 years of rent arrears.


  • Options
    #1088
    Zulu
    Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    limnam wrote: »
    Nah. Have a crack of your wan with her 5 kids and sick partner.
    You mean the morally corrupt thief who stole from a homeless charity now elected as a public representative? You mean her? That we shouldn't hold our public representatives to account?

    Make up your mind limnam - either we hold our representatives to account or we don't.

    I'm clear that they should be held to account - regardless of party, gender, or amount of children. Weirdly you only seem to want to hold other parties to account, and are happy to give a free pass to charity thief.


  • Options
    #1089
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    but you know who he is right ? in the context of this thread like ?

    Well I'm just trying to get clarification here.

    If he's not a TD didn't run etc. Why we're concerned ?


  • Options
    #1090
    Donald Trump
    Registered Users Posts: 19,846 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Boggles wrote: »
    Again, I am not defending anyone.

    You brought Maria into and for some hilarious reason stating that she was a proven liar but you wanted her to admit it or something.

    :D

    Lol. Trying to deflect. I was clear in stating that she was guilty. I also stated that she never admitted to it. Which is a fact.

    It is Limnam's stated position that Ms. Violet would have to explicitly admit to something for him to condemn her for it. I wanted to see how he'd react if the same "logic" was applied to Ms. Bailey. As expected, he, and yourself, lost your collective shits

    Boggles wrote: »
    I said the lady needs to explain herself, which hopefully she does, hopefully she also gives the 12K to a deserving charity.

    You apparently need her to explicitly admit to it too????

    A High Court case finding isn't enough? And as for the 12k, how about a refund of the legal fees as well while she's at it?


  • Options
    #1091
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Donald Trump wrote: »
    And as for the 12k, how about a refund of the legal fees as well while she's at it?

    You should write her a letter...


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1092
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    Zulu wrote: »
    You mean the morally corrupt thief who stole from a homeless charity now elected as a public representative? You mean her? That we shouldn't hold our public representatives to account?

    Make up your mind limnam - either we hold our representatives to account or we don't.

    I'm clear that they should be held to account - regardless of party, gender, or amount of children. Weirdly you only seem to want to hold other parties to account, and are happy to give a free pass to charity thief.

    Limnam is not a SF supporter or SF voter. It is just co-incidence that the lady he is defending is an elected TD for that party. However he is not actually defending her. Despite a hundred posts in this thread filled with whataboutery and play acting.


  • Options
    #1093
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Zulu wrote: »
    You mean the morally corrupt thief who stole from a homeless charity now elected as a public representative? You mean her? That we shouldn't hold our public representatives to account?

    Make up your mind limnam - either we hold our representatives to account or we don't.

    I'm clear that they should be held to account - regardless of party, gender, or amount of children. Weirdly you only seem to want to hold other parties to account, and are happy to give a free pass to charity thief.

    Should she fck up as a TD. In any capacity.

    I'll create the thread for you.


  • Options
    #1094
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    limnam wrote: »
    Well I'm just trying to get clarification here.

    If he's not a TD didn't run etc. Why we're concerned ?

    clarification is good ,

    I was clarifying a comment that you liked made by boggles in which the stated something that was not true

    I don't bring him up but if you want you can go back to page one of the thread and check who did

    deflect away


  • Options
    #1095
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »
    Limnam is not a SF supporter or SF voter. It is just co-incidence that the lady he is defending is an elected TD for that party. However he is not actually defending her. Despite a hundred posts in this thread filled with whataboutery and play acting.

    Big fan of Eoin O'Brion though.

    Brightest TD in the country.

    If he was in my constituency. He'd have my 1-whatever.


  • Options
    #1096
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    Should she fck up as a TD. In any capacity.

    I'll create the thread for you.

    This thread will be here, waiting for you.


  • Options
    #1097
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    clarification is good ,

    I was clarifying a comment that you liked made by boggles in which the stated something that was not true

    I don't bring him up but if you want you can go back to page one of the thread and check who did

    deflect away

    i believe people had brought her partner into long before boggles.

    Why I don't know. That's why I was wondering as you were quick to point out what his court case was for.

    Why do we care?


  • Options
    #1098
    Zulu
    Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    limnam wrote: »
    Should she fck up as a TD. In any capacity.

    I'll create the thread for you.
    So an omertà for the time prior to office, is it?


  • Options
    #1099
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »
    This thread will be here, waiting for you.

    We could run a book on what month you'll be then Febuary.


  • Options
    #1100
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Zulu wrote: »
    So an omertà for the time prior to office, is it?

    No. should something further come to light on this one also happy to have a crack off her.

    But sicne she's came out and offered the refund etc. We've no further insight.

    The point is really to show you I'm not "defending" her and I'll be the first here to have a lash off her if she fcks up as a TD


  • Options
    #1101
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    We could run a book on what month you'll be then Febuary.

    No idea what you are on about, but the same could be said for 95% of you posts.

    Are you prepared to admit to being the husband yet?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1102
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »

    Are you prepared to admit to being the husband yet?

    Hehe.

    I'm not clever enough for that February.


  • Options
    #1103
    Zulu
    Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    limnam wrote: »
    The point is really to show you I'm not "defending" her ...
    Wow, thats got to be the worst made point on the internet.

    You deserve some sort or award or recognition!


  • Options
    #1104
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    Hehe.

    I'm not clever enough for that February.

    You are probably right, but then again i haven’t seen anything to suggest he is any way clever.

    I’d be ashamed to admit being related to this scrounger so your secret is safe with us.


  • Options
    #1105
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    limnam wrote: »
    It seems like 80% of people who voted had an issue with FG. Bizzare.


    I see thread is still going so I will just reply to this bit


    FG had 25.5% of the vote in 2016 which went down to 22.2%


    So they lost 2.1% of the vote. Not 80%......do you think 100% of the country voted for FG last time



    Even the 80% was wrong as they got 22% so you should have said 77.8%


    The rest of the post wasjust rubbish, I found this bit entertaining:p:p:p

    I dont even like FG, I think Leo turned into a huge disappointment but even I would stick up for them against SF


  • Options
    #1106
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »
    You are probably right, but then again i haven’t seen anything to suggest he is any way clever.

    I’d be ashamed to admit being related to this scrounger so your secret is safe with us.

    He got hold of a highly educated trinity student. Must have something about him :)


  • Options
    #1107
    Boggles
    Registered Users Posts: 40,231 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    so you don't know the difference between cannabis herb and cannabis oil then ?

    or was he extracting the oil from the herb do you think ?

    It's not my opinion. :confused:

    Again here is the quote.
    Judge Patrick Durcan, at Kilrush District Court, said he had "great sympathy" for John Montaine, from Kilrush, Co Clare, who has been seizure-free since using THC oil, extracted from cannabis, before going to bed each night
    mynamejeff wrote: »
    made by boggles in which the stated something that was not true

    What did I state that was not true?


  • Options
    #1108
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    I see thread is still going so I will just reply to this bit


    FG had 25.5% of the vote in 2016 which went down to 22.2%


    So they lost 2.1% of the vote. Not 80%......do you think 100% of the country voted for FG last time



    Even the 80% was wrong as they got 22% so you should have said 77.8%


    The rest of the post wasjust rubbish, I found this bit entertaining:p:p:p

    Oh my bad. Let me openly admit here how wrong I was on this point.

    77.8% not 80% of people who voted had an issue with FG.

    You said the majority of people have no issue with FG.

    77.8% of voters don't want them in government.

    Are we ok on this now yeah?


  • Options
    #1109
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    He got hold of a highly educated trinity student. Must have something about him :)

    Highly educated? I heard she spent a week studying the book of Kells.


  • Options
    #1110
    Martin Lanigan
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 231 ✭✭Martin Lanigan


    limnam wrote: »
    Oh my bad. Let me openly admit here how wrong I was on this point.

    77.8% not 80% of people who voted had an issue with FG.

    You said the majority of people have no issue with FG.

    77.8% of voters don't want them in government.

    Are we ok on this now yeah?

    And let’s not forget that more than 75% of people who voted don’t want SF in government.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1111
    Boggles
    Registered Users Posts: 40,231 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Martin Lanigan wrote: »
    Highly educated? I heard she spent a week studying the book of Kells.

    Tell that other voice in your head they are talking nonsense. :)


Advertisement