Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The Curious Case of Violet-Anne Wynne

Options
1…5859616364…99

Comments

  • Options
    #1802
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    limnam wrote: »
    Hopefully not down to the house not been up to standard.

    Hope the kids were not affected in any way.

    We all make mistakes

    Some cause young women to die of cervical cancer.

    Or stop kids getting chemo

    Some fall behind on their rent.

    I know who I'd rather give a chance to

    And 8k back to the state is a great start


    What a load of rubbish


    You cant give back what wasn't yours in the first place......so you need to update that part as well


  • Options
    #1803
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Not much good to the charity whose generosity was abused in such a shameful way.

    Imagine staying for six years and bringing children into an unstable house?

    The rest of your post is rubbish.

    Probably better than bringing them up in the street

    It's not like FG were providing huge amounts of options...


  • Options
    #1804
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    What a load of rubbish


    You cant give back what wasn't yours in the first place......so you need to update that part as well

    What's not hers?


  • Options
    #1805
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Not much good to the charity whose generosity was abused in such a shameful way.


    FG then pulled the plug on them.

    During a housing crisis.

    Go team.


  • Options
    #1806
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    FG then pulled the plug on them.

    During a housing crisis.

    Go team.

    Because the people they were set up to support thanked them by not paying the paltry sum requested.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1807
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    limnam wrote: »
    FG then pulled the plug on them.

    During a housing crisis.

    Go team.


    :P


    Always FG fault, not the people not paying the charity>?


  • Options
    #1808
    Annasopra
    Registered Users Posts: 41,072 ✭✭✭✭Annasopra


    limnam wrote: »
    Lets hope so

    The 8k euro back to the state is great to see

    Not many TD's with that moral fiber. Could do with more of them :)

    Moral Fibre? You're having a laugh

    It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things.

    Terry Pratchet



  • Options
    #1809
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    All I know is she made a deceleration to give to the state 8k euro as a TD she's entitled to.

    At a time when other TD's are looking for WFH policies to get more money from the state

    Great to see/hear from any TD/Party.

    Spin it anyway you want. That's what she did

    On today’s news it said that NO TD had asked for more for working from home. That was a SF fantasy.


  • Options
    #1810
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Deleted User wrote: »
    On today’s news it said that NO TD had asked for more for working from home. That was a SF fantasy.


    Oh that was debunked pages ago.....


    Anyone with any bit of sense would see straight throught that BS.....do expect to have it fired out on every political thread for the next 3 -4 years by some political supporters


  • Options
    #1811
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Deleted User wrote: »
    On today’s news it said that NO TD had asked for more for working from home. That was a SF fantasy.

    There is an awful lot of Sinn Fein fantasy out there.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1812
    For Forks Sake
    Registered Users Posts: 11,596 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Oh that was debunked pages ago.....


    Anyone with any bit of sense would see straight throught that BS.....do expect to have it fired out on every political thread for the next 3 -4 years by some political supporters

    Debunked by the houses of the Oireachtas officially, that story was a fabrication.

    EVyV_SiXgAAktoq?format=jpg&name=900x900


  • Options
    #1813
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    Debunked by the houses of the Oireachtas officially, that story was a fabrication.

    EVyV_SiXgAAktoq?format=jpg&name=900x900

    It was picked up and spread on Twitter by the usual gang of Shinnerbots on there. Objective was achieved, the spreading of fake news to denigrate other parties and politicians. It is a Johnson/Trump tactic that Sinn Fein have adopted to great effect.


  • Options
    #1814
    Edgware
    Registered Users Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    For Forks Sake wrote: »
    Debunked by the houses of the Oireachtas officially, that story was a fabrication.

    EVyV_SiXgAAktoq?format=jpg&name=900x900

    S.F. response

    " Dinny's boys would say that wouldn't they"


  • Options
    #1815
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    I will wait for the withdrawel from limnam who spent days firing it out to every single post


  • Options
    #1816
    Rodney Bathgate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    I will wait for the withdrawel from limnam who spent days firing it out to every single post

    That isn’t how the internet works...


  • Options
    #1817
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Rodney Bathgate wrote: »
    That isn’t how the internet works...


    Some internet forums do, boards unfortunealty is not one of them!!! :p


  • Options
    #1818
    Zulu
    Registered Users Posts: 10,965 ✭✭✭✭Zulu


    Meanwhile another days ticks past where the despicable Ms Wynne refuses to return that which she stole from a charity.
    Good job SF, lead by example. :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #1819
    Shefwedfan
    Closed Accounts Posts: 18,958 ✭✭✭✭Shefwedfan


    Zulu wrote: »
    Meanwhile another days ticks past where the despicable Ms Wynne refuses to return that which she stole from a charity.
    Good job SF, lead by example. :rolleyes:


    Strangely quiet around here today :p:p


  • Options
    #1820
    BnB
    Registered Users Posts: 1,085 ✭✭✭BnB


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The only thing we know for certain is that she didn't pay her debts and let a charity go out of business.
    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    Plus by not paying made sure other people stayed on the street

    100%. It is important that the facts don't get lost in the reams of scutter posted here to try and hide them.


  • Options
    #1821
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Because the people they were set up to support thanked them by not paying the paltry sum requested.


    So you have this great plan.


    If 1 person in this great plan falls behind, the over all plan will fail.


    Knowing that 61% of council dwellings are in arrears.


    You go ahead with said plan.


    Moronic is being nice.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1822
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Shefwedfan wrote: »
    :P


    Always FG fault, not the people not paying the charity>?


    As mentioned if 61% of council dwellings are in arrears you can not build a plan that requires 100% compliance.


    It's ludicrous.


    So either it was doomed to failure from the off. Or the funding been pulled killed it.


  • Options
    #1823
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    On today’s news it said that NO TD had asked for more for working from home. That was a SF fantasy.


    Don't know why people are calling it SF fantasy


    There was no quotes from SF saying that someone did.


    A number of TDs have raised the question of new allowances to allow them to purchase office equipment while they work from home during the Covid-19 outbreak.


    there was no mention of who the sources where


    so if the paper go and ask SF a question and they answer the question. It's hardly SF fantasy.


    Who was the papers source?


  • Options
    #1824
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    BnB wrote: »
    100%. It is important that the facts don't get lost in the reams of scutter posted here to try and hide them.


    Facts like due to FG's lack of governance on housing people are on the streets?


    Keep it front and center my good man.


  • Options
    #1825
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    limnam wrote: »
    Don't know why people are calling it SF fantasy


    There was no quotes from SF saying that someone did.


    A number of TDs have raised the question of new allowances to allow them to purchase office equipment while they work from home during the Covid-19 outbreak.


    there was no mention of who the sources where


    so if the paper go and ask SF a question and they answer the question. It's hardly SF fantasy.


    Who was the papers source?

    Welcome back. Missed you yesterday.

    Now, take some time to do a bit of research. NO TD was named because NO TD asked for extra allowances. Keep an eye on the original source for a retraction.


  • Options
    #1826
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    Deleted User wrote: »
    Welcome back. Missed you yesterday.

    Now, take some time to do a bit of research. NO TD was named because NO TD asked for extra allowances. Keep an eye on the original source for a retraction.


    Correct.


    The paper said


    "A number of TDs have raised the question of new allowances to allow them to purchase office equipment while they work from home during the Covid-19 outbreak."


    SF did not say......


    As I said if the paper asks a question they'll get an answer.


    Where does it say SF was the source ?


  • Options
    #1827
    Rodney Bathgate
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,445 ✭✭✭Rodney Bathgate


    Back with a bang.


  • Options
    #1828
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    limnam wrote: »
    Correct.


    The paper said


    "A number of TDs have raised the question of new allowances to allow them to purchase office equipment while they work from home during the Covid-19 outbreak."


    SF did not say......


    As I said if the paper asks a question they'll get an answer.


    Where does it say SF was the source ?

    The whole thing started with Shinnerbots on Twitter, picked up by a media source, and SF TDs falling over themselves to be quoted on it.

    Well played by Sinn Fein to find a gullible journalist. It doesn’t even matter that it has been debunked, enough of the SF support will have believed it. An excellent lesson to other parties in how to shore up party support through the use of fake news. Very Boris and Trump-like.


  • Options
    #1829
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    blanch152 wrote: »
    The whole thing started with Shinnerbots on Twitter, picked up by a media source, and SF TDs falling over themselves to be quoted on it.

    Well played by Sinn Fein to find a gullible journalist. It doesn’t even matter that it has been debunked, enough of the SF support will have believed it. An excellent lesson to other parties in how to shore up party support through the use of fake news. Very Boris and Trump-like.


    What was debunked?


    News paper in shoddy research shocker?


    Get out of it.


    SF accused no one of anything in the piece


    The paper had a "source" which it failed to reveal and then blame SF because the reporter asked them questions on it ?


  • Options
    #1830
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    limnam wrote: »
    What was debunked?


    News paper in shoddy research shocker?


    Get out of it.


    SF accused no one of anything in the piece


    The paper had a "source" which it failed to reveal and then blame SF because the reporter asked them questions on it ?

    your repeated vague and un sourced allegation , that is what debunked , quite easily in fact ,

    besides this thread is about an act of selfish theft from a charity by you (violet )


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #1831
    limnam
    Registered Users Posts: 9,171 ✭✭✭limnam


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    your repeated vague and un sourced allegation , that is what debunked , quite easily in fact ,

    besides this thread is about an act of selfish theft from a charity by you (violet )


    Don't see how it takes a way from the amazing work by Violet.


    Giving back 8k a year back to the state.



    Moral fiber.


    What have you got?


Advertisement