Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Coronavirus

Options
17475767779

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 17,974 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    enno99 wrote: »
    Calling bullssh!t here
    so you watched it until he said he was going to explain what he was highlighting and stopped

    He was already manipulating the figures, giving "his take" on them.
    hes a loon

    He thinks the Las Vegas mass shooting was "an inside job", he has an entire batshiat insane video channel dedicated to it. You are getting information on Youtube about Coronavirus from a guy like that, who also makes countless videos trying to link Corona to influenza

    On a conspiracy theory forum..

    And you are calling other posters hilarious?

    Okay, lol

    What other videos have you posted, on yeah that banned mental one from the Infowars reporter who has just been arrested ..

    Almost as if there's a pattern to this..

    I have a 5 hour moon landing hoax video you might be extremely impressed with, and hey remember, if you don't watch the whole thing, you can't say it isn't true :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Whatever I only pointed out your silly statement and where you made stuff up
    Your opions arent relevant
    What did I make up?

    You're misrepresenting things yet again I think.

    And you're dodging points.

    This random guy on youtube has no between qualification to comment on the CDC data than you or I.

    You haven't done anything to verify what he says is true, you just accepted his word unquestioningly.

    He believes is something very ridiculous that indicates that he's either very dishonest, or very stupid. Thus, there's every reason that he's being very stupid or very dishonest about this topic too.

    What I am not clear on is whether or not you just agree with his claims about fake shootings, or if you didn't realise he claimed that stuff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    What did I make up?

    You're misrepresenting things yet again I think.

    And you're dodging points.

    This random guy on youtube has no between qualification to comment on the CDC data than you or I.

    You haven't done anything to verify what he says is true, you just accepted his word unquestioningly.

    He believes is something very ridiculous that indicates that he's either very dishonest, or very stupid. Thus, there's every reason that he's being very stupid or very dishonest about this topic too.

    What I am not clear on is whether or not you just agree with his claims about fake shootings, or if you didn't realise he claimed that stuff.

    see making stuff up did he claim nobody was shot ?

    Is there a course you need to take before you can comment on data


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    see making stuff up did he claim nobody was shot ?
    Ok. He believes that there was more than one shooter in Las Vegas as part of a government conspiracy.
    That's just as ridiculous as claiming it's faked. There's no real reason to distinguish them.
    enno99 wrote: »
    Is there a course you need to take before you can comment on data
    No. But to have those comments be accurate and carry some weight, yes you do.
    Statistics would be a good start.


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,783 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    Welfare check on isle 1!



  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »


    No. But to have those comments be accurate and carry some weight, yes you do.
    Statistics would be a good start.

    He recognised the software running behind this map as something he and others developed
    how did he put it like you baby or first car
    so I guess he understands data

    https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html

    Also interesting is the link to bloomberg

    https://www.jhsph.edu/

    Michael Bloomberg’s Secret Plans to Take Down Trump
    Whether or not he runs for president, the former New York City mayor is building the most powerful political organization in America.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/bloomberg-building-data-organization-crush-trump/581710/


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    He recognised the software running behind this map as something he and others developed
    how did he put it like you baby or first car
    so I guess he understands data
    Lol Convincing.

    If he's so smart and reliable though, why does he believe stupid stuff like the idea that there were multiple shooters in the Las Vegas shootings?

    Surely if he was so smart and reliable, he'd understand why that was stupid.

    And yet...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    Lol Convincing.

    If he's so smart and reliable though, why does he believe stupid stuff like the idea that there were multiple shooters in the Las Vegas shootings?

    Surely if he was so smart and reliable, he'd understand why that was stupid.

    And yet...

    LOL

    No corruption in Vegas right
    No corrupt FBI right


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,974 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    enno99 wrote: »
    LOL

    No corruption in Vegas right
    No corrupt FBI right

    Would you like to make a thread on the Las Vegas shooting "false flag"? I'd like to hear more about this theory.


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    LOL

    No corruption in Vegas right
    No corrupt FBI right
    Ah my mistake.

    I assumed you understood these fake shooters/ multiple shooter theories were silly.

    I see I was wrong and you share that belief.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    Ah my mistake.

    I assumed you understood these fake shooters/ multiple shooter theories were silly.

    I see I was wrong and you share that belief.

    Well silly is believing the offical story unquestioningly.
    you level that accusation at me and others here all the time
    Yet you dont question the official story

    Rampant corruption with Police /FBI/ Casinos with a profit motive to cover up stuff


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    Would you like to make a thread on the Las Vegas shooting "false flag"? I'd like to hear more about this theory.

    knock yourself out anyone here can start a thread :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    Dohnjoe wrote: »
    He was already manipulating the figures, giving "his take" on them.

    Care to explain what he did ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Well silly is believing the offical story unquestioningly.
    you level that accusation at me and others here all the time
    Yet you dont question the official story

    Rampant corruption with Police /FBI/ Casinos with a profit motive to cover up stuff
    Lol you aren't making a good case for yourself there.

    The notion that shootings like Las Vegas have multiple shooters that are covered up, or that they are faked is silly, childish nonsense.
    Anyone who believes such a thing is either lacking in critical thinking skills or they are being deceptive.
    In both cases their expertise, real or imagined, is questionable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    The notion that shootings like Las Vegas have multiple shooters that are covered up, or that they are faked is silly, childish nonsense.

    According to who ?

    You ? thats not that convincing
    Corrupt FBI
    Corrupt MSM
    Corrupt Vegas Police
    Corrupt Casinos looking out for their profit margin

    1-5 which is the most credible

    I mean by your standard if they were corrupt or lied before its reasonable to think they did here also


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    According to who ?

    You ? thats not that convincing
    According to rational people with critical thinking skills.
    enno99 wrote: »
    Corrupt FBI
    Corrupt MSM
    Corrupt Vegas Police
    Corrupt Casinos looking out for their profit margin

    1-5 which is the most credible

    I mean by your standard if they were corrupt or lied before its reasonable to think they did here also
    lol.
    Misrepresention again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Covid conspiracists are going nuts over this.

    They claim they found evidence is was a planned event.

    Look at the date and Covid-19 references.
    https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215?fbclid=IwAR3w_mtzzNWBksYV2DIZ5aORPclmUZ-hwzumQvWlP0zir8s9F3kq5HEnFQg


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,545 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Covid conspiracists are going nuts over this.

    They claim they found evidence is was a planned event.

    Look at the date and Covid-19 references.
    https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215?fbclid=IwAR3w_mtzzNWBksYV2DIZ5aORPclmUZ-hwzumQvWlP0zir8s9F3kq5HEnFQg

    Or someone typed in the wrong date.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Or someone typed in the wrong date.

    Another one here its 2018. Odd thats all i say. There maybe an explantation here wait and see.
    https://wits.worldbank.org/tariff/trains/en/country/CAN/partner/ALL/nomen/h5/product/902780


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    According to rational people with critical thinking skills.

    Or people that let MSM do their thinking for them


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Or people that let MSM do their thinking for them
    Lol ok.

    So if you don't believe that the Las Vegas shootings were fake, it's because your blindly following the mainstream media.

    Gotcha.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    Lol ok.

    So if you don't believe that the Las Vegas shootings were fake it's because your blindly following the mainstream media.

    Gotcha.

    Fake. making things up again LOL


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Fake. making things up again LOL
    Which part?
    Saying the shooting is fake and saying the shooting was actually done by a second shooter/had multiple shoots isn't much of a distinction for the vast majority of people.

    You can't whinge all you like about being lumped in with people who believe in crisis actors etc, but it seems your belief isn't far off.

    So if you boy actually was promoting the idea that the Las Vegas shooting was fake, would that make a difference for you? Would that make you agree that he's not worth taking seriously?


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    King Mob wrote:
    So if you don't believe that the Las Vegas shootings were fake, it's because your blindly following the mainstream media.


    I follow the msm as I'm lucky to have vision


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    King Mob wrote: »
    Which part?
    Saying the shooting is fake and saying the shooting was actually done by a second shooter/had multiple shoots isn't much of a distinction for the vast majority of people.

    You can't whinge all you like about being lumped in with people who believe in crisis actors etc, but it seems your belief isn't far off.

    So if you boy actually was promoting the idea that the Las Vegas shooting was fake, would that make a difference for you? Would that make you agree that he's not worth taking seriously?

    Did you make that up also :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    Wanderer78 wrote: »
    I follow the msm as I'm lucky to have vision

    Blind leading the blind :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 29,384 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    enno99 wrote: »
    Blind leading the blind :)

    sorry i fell over there, stupid eyes


  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    Did you make that up also :D
    What did I make up?
    You just keep deflecting and aren't actually addressing anything.
    It's making you look very childish.

    The point remains that this video make believes something very stupid, ie, that there's a conspiracy around a mass shooting.
    if he believes something like that, it shows that he either doesn't have good critical thinking skills or he is being dishonest and has no problem promoting a stupid and wrong theory to gain attention.
    There are no other reasons for why he would support such a ridiculous notion.

    Thus we can assume that he's doing the same about corona virus.

    You've not provided any good reason to think that's not the case. And you've shown that you didn't think too hard about what he's claimed.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,988 ✭✭✭enno99


    You like to assume lots of things

    Did he say they were fake or crisis actors
    You like to add this so you can rant
    Why are you making stuff up
    To think critically, you need to be able to put aside any assumptions or judgments and merely analyze the information you receive. You need to be objective, evaluating ideas without bias.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 25,236 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    enno99 wrote: »
    You like to assume lots of things

    Did he say they were fake or crisis actors
    You like to add this so you can rant
    Why are you making stuff up
    But claiming that there was a second shooter for some reason isn't better or more rational than claiming there was crisis actors.
    It's the same kind of stupid and delusional.
    There isn't much reason to distinguish between the two versions of the same silly theory.
    You're just whinging about this hair splitting because you're desperate to avoid points you're incapable for addressing and you are upset that you've expressed a belief in a very silly theory.

    You can keep avoiding the points if you like, but it doesn't make them go away. It just makes it clear you can't address them.

    Your guy believes in a very silly, very stupid theory.
    Therefore he is either stupid or dishonest.
    Therefore he is also most likely being stupid and dishonest about his claims about a topic he has no expertise or qualification in.

    I don't understand why you can't grasp this.
    Most rational people do.


Advertisement