Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid-19; Impact on the aviation industry

Options
1111112114116117143

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Caquas wrote: »
    I thought the mandatory Passenger Locator Forms were supposed to make international travel safe.

    Apparently we have collected a half million of these PLFs but they have been no use to our contact tracers who have only looked a five of these forms - yes, fingers of one hand!

    Why is this story not getting attention while we destroy Christmas for those in Britain who wanted to spend the holidays with their family and friends in Ireland?

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40192038.html

    That is pretty shocking.
    However I would argue that Christmas has been ruined by the UK Govt not us. As this uncontrolled increase and higher restrictions are effects of the UK policy.

    NOT visiting family and friends in Ireland us the responsible thing to do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,472 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    GT89 wrote: »
    Hows the ferries being limited to cargo going to be enforced what's to stop a truck driver taking a passenger for a fee

    The driver is normally booked on to the ferry by his/her company with all their details name truck reg etc, So at check in at the terminal alarms would go off with an extra pax.
    Also the majority of companies do not permit pax to travel in their trucks unless they are staff.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,895 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    The poor airlines were probably thinking “at least at Christmas we’ll have a few busy days, lower frequencies but we’ll get some cash in”. Me with all these cancellations they’ll have to refund a lot - what a brutal impact the pandemic has caused the industry.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Tenger wrote: »
    That is pretty shocking.
    However I would argue that Christmas has been ruined by the UK Govt not us. As this uncontrolled increase and higher restrictions are effects of the UK policy.

    NOT visiting family and friends in Ireland us the responsible thing to do.

    You're right but throngs of Irish are making the trip on crowded planes, so who cares about Passenger Locator Forms?

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/travel-ban-passengers-come-to-ireland-on-multiple-flights-today-1.4443048

    Icing on the cake - the Irish government is organising two flights for people stranded in Britain.
    Those who do travel from Britain must self-isolate for 14 days, it added. They will also have to fill out a passenger locator form.
    Ahhh.....nah.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/two-flights-to-bring-stranded-irish-residents-home-from-uk-1.4442836


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,826 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Its for Irish residents stuck over there due to being their for work when the doors clanged shut; not people on their holiers. There won't be any way back provided basically.

    Anyone in Britain who intended to spend Christmas with their family here should have been here for over a week already


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    L1011 wrote: »
    Its for Irish residents stuck over there due to being their for work when the doors clanged shut; not people on their holiers. There won't be any way back provided basically.

    Anyone in Britain who intended to spend Christmas with their family here should have been here for over a week already

    In theory yes, but thats not how its been working in reality, at all. The quarantine on arrival in Ireland is entirely self-enforced/'optional'. I know personally plenty of people who've flown in from the US or UK and been out socializing a day later this month - and almost everyone has similar stories.

    Even with this ban on flights from London to Dublin the flights are still flying direct to Belfast from London, 90 minutes up the road from Dublin, with no border or controls in-between there and the rest of the country. Anyone who was planning on coming home, whos been put off by the Dublin flights being cancelled, will just do that.

    Having a completely open border with NI (and theres no alternative - either logistically, or politically) just makes any flight bans completely ineffective for Ireland.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    bk wrote: »
    Seems that the French have thought of that and as a result they are banning all attended cargo to the UK.

    That means no trucks on ferries with drivers. Bulk and unattended cargo still possible, but this will cause mayhem for the UK as so much of it is usually attended.

    As an aside I don’t think many drivers would risk what you suggest above given recent events with people smuggling.

    An another loophole could be to go and rent a van and say you are doing bringing goods back from the UK or vice versa.


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,735 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    GT89 wrote: »
    An another loophole could be to go and rent a van and say you are doing bringing goods back from the UK or vice versa.

    Errr... you could jump in the Irish Sea too and start swimming!

    I don’t think people will be doing either of those.


  • Registered Users Posts: 68,826 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    GT89 wrote: »
    An another loophole could be to go and rent a van and say you are doing bringing goods back from the UK or vice versa.

    "What goods? "Errrrmmm..."

    Remember you'll have to lie to people who have a right to check what's in your (empty) van.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    If people put as much effort into following the public health guidelines as they do in trying to identify and exploit loopholes in them we wouldn't be in this current mess...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,922 ✭✭✭Storm 10


    If people put as much effort into following the public health guidelines as they do in trying to identify and exploit loopholes in them we wouldn't be in this current mess...

    Very true in one of the County lockdowns a few months ago that included Kildare where you were banned from leaving the County, I met a group of lads from Kildare who made there way to Galway for the weekend and were all having a great laugh about how they made it to Galway by driving all the side roads to exit the County, wonder how many they infected before going back.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Blut2 wrote: »
    In theory yes, but thats not how its been working in reality, at all. The quarantine on arrival in Ireland is entirely self-enforced/'optional'. I know personally plenty of people who've flown in from the US or UK and been out socializing a day later this month - and almost everyone has similar stories.

    Even with this ban on flights from London to Dublin the flights are still flying direct to Belfast from London, 90 minutes up the road from Dublin, with no border or controls in-between there and the rest of the country. Anyone who was planning on coming home, whos been put off by the Dublin flights being cancelled, will just do that.

    Having a completely open border with NI (and theres no alternative - either logistically, or politically) just makes any flight bans completely ineffective for Ireland.

    Just because something isn't perfect doesn't mean that it isn't effective. What percentage of people who had flights booked from the UK to Dublin or Cork are now going to rebook, fly to Belfast and then drive down? Some will do it but it will hugely decrease the numbers arriving from the UK. Therefor it is effective but not perfect.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    snotboogie wrote: »
    Just because something isn't perfect doesn't mean that it isn't effective. What percentage of people who had flights booked from the UK to Dublin or Cork are now going to rebook, fly to Belfast and then drive down? Some will do it but it will hugely decrease the numbers arriving from the UK. Therefor it is effective but not perfect.

    The World Health Organization, who probably have a rather better idea about this sort of thing than either of us, disagree entirely with you:

    WHO continues to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks.

    In general, evidence shows that restricting the movement of people and goods during public health emergencies is ineffective in most situations and may divert resources from other interventions. Furthermore, restrictions may interrupt needed aid and technical support, may disrupt businesses, and may have negative social and economic effects on the affected countries.

    https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak


  • Registered Users Posts: 130 ✭✭mikel97


    snotboogie wrote: »
    Just because something isn't perfect doesn't mean that it isn't effective. What percentage of people who had flights booked from the UK to Dublin or Cork are now going to rebook, fly to Belfast and then drive down? Some will do it but it will hugely decrease the numbers arriving from the UK. Therefor it is effective but not perfect.


    Complete waist of time and any effort. INeffective. No infection rate change probably increase if anything by restricting travel. All in the WHO guidance document on travel. Now Im off to catch a flight to Germany


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,601 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Blut2 wrote: »
    The World Health Organization, who probably have a rather better idea about this sort of thing than either of us, disagree entirely with you:



    https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak

    Thats a completely different point, you were arguing it is ineffective because of the option to fly to Belfast. Interestingly, nearly every government in the OECD has imposed travel bans on the UK, so there are clearly health experts at the highest level who disagree with the WHO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,920 ✭✭✭billy few mates


    mikel97 wrote: »
    Complete waist of time and any effort. INeffective. No infection rate change probably increase if anything by restricting travel. All in the WHO guidance document on travel. Now Im off to catch a flight to Germany

    lol.... :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    snotboogie wrote: »
    Thats a completely different point, you were arguing it is ineffective because of the option to fly to Belfast. Interestingly, nearly every government in the OECD has imposed travel bans on the UK, so there are clearly health experts at the highest level who disagree with the WHO.

    Its the same point. Travel bans are proven to be ineffective, because unless they're complete (ie Australia/NZ) then people will just utilize loopholes to travel around them - and then enter a country completely untracked. An effective track and trace system for all arrivals has been proven to be much, much more effective at limiting travel related covid cases than partial travel bans.

    Governments imposing travel bans on the UK doesn't provide evidence of health experts disagreeing with the WHO in any shape or form. It provides evidence of politicians pursuing the easiest, best looking, kneejerk option for 'optics'.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    It's worth noting that the current WHO advice is generalised, however they have concluded "only extensive travel restrictions – i.e. over 90% – had any meaningful effect on reducing the magnitude of epidemics" in their actual research.

    https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/92/12/14-135590/en/

    So the actual conclusions from the WHO is yes travel bans can help, it just depends on the extent of the ban.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭GT89


    L1011 wrote: »
    "What goods? "Errrrmmm..."

    Remember you'll have to lie to people who have a right to check what's in your (empty) van.

    Will that actually be enforced though?


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,218 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Blut2 wrote: »
    The World Health Organization, who probably have a rather better idea about this sort of thing than either of us, disagree entirely with you:



    https://www.who.int/news-room/articles-detail/updated-who-recommendations-for-international-traffic-in-relation-to-covid-19-outbreak

    It's not a one rule fits all type situation. Ireland is in an odd position here because we have a land border with another country that we can't close or really place any sort of checks on.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭trellheim


    Inbounds this week expected to self-isolate for 14 days (source RTE 9pm news).


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,184 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    First repatriation flight is 25 minutes out

    EI4179 LHR to DUB, Aer Lingus 4 digit flight numbers beginning with 4 are charters so this is real deal


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    Surprised they didn't send a A330 over.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,922 ✭✭✭GM228


    First repatriation flight is 25 minutes out

    EI4179 LHR to DUB, Aer Lingus 4 digit flight numbers beginning with 4 are charters so this is real deal

    Is that not the second one, the first operated earlier by Ryanair?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,500 ✭✭✭Jack1985


    Surprised they didn't send a A330 over.

    DFA just advised FR/EI of required numbers, for example FR had 80 odd pax on the first repatriation flight, that operated from STN. Flat fee I believe was €95 a head.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Blut2


    MadYaker wrote: »
    It's not a one rule fits all type situation. Ireland is in an odd position here because we have a land border with another country that we can't close or really place any sort of checks on.

    But thats the whole problem. The government of NI will never under any circumstances agree to closing its borders to the rest of the UK (as seen by yesterday's vote in Stormont on this exact issue that confirmed just that) thanks to having the DUP in power. Their entire raison d'être is maintaining any and all links to the UK, at any cost.

    Its why any talk of closing Ireland's borders this year has been absolute nonsense - it would never do any good, with Belfast open to the world and no controls/checks between it and the rest of Ireland.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,086 ✭✭✭Nijmegen


    Interesting article - really feels like we’re back in March, except with slightly better contact tracing.

    https://twitter.com/irishexaminer/status/1341481162842271750?s=21


  • Registered Users Posts: 572 ✭✭✭AnRothar


    And out of curiosity how many flights was there from the UK to Ireland during the relevant period?


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    AnRothar wrote: »
    And out of curiosity how many flights was there from the UK to Ireland during the relevant period?
    Probably about 15-20 a day.
    Multiple daily flights from LHR, LGW and STN. Then at least 1 a day from smaller airports.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 17,720 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Tenger wrote: »
    Probably about 15-20 a day.
    Multiple daily flights from LHR, LGW and STN. Then at least 1 a day from smaller airports.

    That really depended on the day of the week.

    Most days weren’t even close to that Tenger.

    On Wed 9th December for example there were 4 flights.

    2 LHR, 1 STN and 1 MAN.

    On Fri 11 December there were 15 flights.

    4 LHR, 1 LGW, 2 MAN, 2 BHX, 2 EDI, 2 STN, 1 GLA, 1 BRS

    What’s particularly noticeable is the lack of Aer Lingus Regional flights out of Dublin compared with Belfast City where they are much more frequent.


Advertisement