Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

General British politics discussion thread

1275276278280281508

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,606 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    John Grace, guardian had a great line on UK voter fraud

    'There are more Tory MPs facing allegations of sexual misconduct than there have been prosecutions for voter fraud.'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,573 ✭✭✭political analyst


    There doesn't seem to have been any further development on the debating of the Troubles legacy Bill in the House of Lords in the past few weeks. When is it intended that the Bill will be passed? If Labour wins the next election, is it a given that Starmer would have the Bill repealed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,606 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Oakessh1tt reveals all Matt Hancock's emails a Health minister. The notes he gave her access to as she was writing his biography. They really deserve each other.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,066 ✭✭✭amacca



    One political journalist said: “The man needs his head testing to have gone near Oakeshott with a flaming trebuchet, let alone a bargepole.”


    I had a good laugh at that line...I read it in a plummy stephen fry accent



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,155 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Almost sounds like he was honey-potted! He does seem an extremely insecure man.

    Pity that the Telegraph has it given it is both loyal to Boris nad extremely anti -covid lockdown so wonder who they will protect and make to look bad.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Mail had details of a YouGov poll taken across Europe which showed that British respondents believed people from ethnic minorities and LGBT were hugely overrepresented on television and in adverts. But in every other country, these groups were regarded as under represented. They really are going down a racist / far right rabbit hole with the Tories and the tabloids.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,718 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Or it could be that TV in other countries has different levels of representation.

    The whole thing is stupid though. An advert that has a wide mix of minorities and orientations might seem like unrealistically too much for someone in Torquay but too little for someone in London. If someone is getting triggered by ads they should go have a deep think about their life.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭✭retalivity


    Westminister is full of idiots where it is genuinely bewildering how they have got so far in life, however Hancock seems like a level above. Thick as two short planks, almost Truss-like levels of nothingness between the ears and continues failing upwards. This must be the 4th or 5th scandal he;s been part of so far?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,718 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Matt Hancock:

    The King's School, Chester.

    Exeter College, Oxford.

    Christ' College, Cambridge.

    All you need on the C.V. to reach the top of the Tory party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I would imagine that plenty of European countries have black, Muslim and LGBT people on TV and in adverts. It's just that there is a relentless far right / racist agenda being pushed by the English tabloids and making their readers believe that such groups are over-represented. All part of their horrible 'culture wars'.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Yes, the British tabloids are abhorrent and have a history of being implicitly and explicitly racist.

    Yes, the far-right will push anything at all to further their odious aims.

    I can't speak to Britain or any other country but I have noticed, however, that there is a thing in Irish adverts where there appears to be a disproportionate number of black or mixed black/white people (in comparison to their share of the population (1.38%)). At the same time I can't recall seeing any east Asian or southern Asian people in Irish adverts (They make up 2.1% of the population). Don't think I've seen any travelers either although they only make up 0.7%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The thing about diversity in adverts is that many companies are going down this route in response to demand from viewers and readers. It's not because they are all "leftie, pinko liberals" but because they know it's a changing world and brands that show awareness of things like diversity & inclusion and climate change can gain many new customers. If people of Asian origin are seriously under-represented in Irish adverts, that is something they will have to look hard at.

    The English media unfortunately though are knee deep in their culture wars and playing to the racist gallery and view even concepts like "diversity" as an affront to their traditional British values (interesting though that it's the UK brands that are pushing things like diversity and climate change awareness, as their customers are probably much younger than anyone reading the Mail or the Sun or watching GB News). These culture wars are as much about age as anything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,539 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The fact is, if you think about it, you should expect minority groups to be over-represented in advertising.

    Business want to sell their product to as many people as possible, so they want figures in their advertising that everyone can identify with - men, women, gay, straight, black, white, etc. They don't care about the relative sizes of these groups; why would they? Having e.g. a black person in an ad as well as a white person is only a barrier to selling to white people if the white people are vicious racists, which most people in the UK are not.

    So you should expect the people who populate ads, and are shown consuming the products/services and enjoying them, to be a happy, diverse bunch that exemplifies all the different groups in society (so they ads can appeal to them all) but that does not attempt to represent the relative sizes of those groups (because that is irrelevant to the advertisers' purpose).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Also, there is some pressure from consumers for them to be more diverse in their advertising and marketing. Companies that stick to the old fashioned ways can look out of touch and as if they are not moving with the times.

    As I said further up, I think much of this culture war stuff is age related. Readers of the right wing tabloids and watchers of GB News etc are likely to be much older - but that demographic is one that many companies and brands are not going to be even that interested in. Hence you get all the Brexity / Tory voting OAPs complaining about there being too many black people in TV adverts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,539 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Back in the day, some products or services weren't advertised by showing People Like You, but rather People That You Trust. So ads for banking products, for example, featured people who looked like bankers; ads for pharmaceuticals, toothpaste, etc, featured people in white coats, and so on. (This is still true to some extent, but it used to be much more true.) In the UK context, this translated into a lot of authority figures who, given UK socioeconomic tropes, were male and white and had the right accent.

    I suspect what people who are uncomfortable about greater diversity in advertising are actually lamenting is the passing of a social order in which people were assume to defer to a socially exclusive establishment. Seeing lots of women, gays, people of colour etc in advertisements underlines for them the passing of a social order in which they felt comfortable. The don't actually dislike gays, women, etc; they just don't trust them in the way that they trust an old Etonian.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,800 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think Johnson has put paid to trust in old Etonians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes to all of the above and one other factor is that concepts like diversity and inclusion will be seen as "woke" and "left wing" by the usual suspects. In other words, they will spin the inclusion of black people and gays and other minorities in adverts and TV dramas as something almost quite sinister and an "agenda" being pursued (when those responsible for the depictions will rightly point out that such minorities were often absent from the TV screens for many decades).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    That makes a good deal of sense. It still doesn't explain why there aren't any/many Asian people in Irish ads though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,478 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Bump from last December.

    I suggested that Sir Graham Brady (Altrincham) might be under threat in the next GE. He has announced today that he won't stand again.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,399 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Would a certain amount of it come down to focus groups and how they inform marketing policy?

    Could it be that there's a better response to black people than to other ethnic minorities because of the many more black role models in sport and entertainment?

    I honestly don't know how any of this works but it's just what occurred to me reading your post.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,247 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    Out of curiosity, will he still be able to lead the 1922 committee if he's no longer an MP?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,800 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,718 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Will there be anyone left for a 1922 committee 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,041 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Gary Lineker has done fantastic work exposing the toxic links between the Tory Brexit government, the right wing press and the BBC.

    It's not so much that the BBC is right wing and Brexit supporting, but they are clearly terrified of their Tory masters and have been jumping through hoops trying not to offend them or upset them.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Looks like the upcoming Online Safety Bill might result in WhatsApp being removed from the UK market: certainly the head of the service doesn't seem inclined to change the code for the sake of one market.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,199 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    British exceptionalism rears its ugly head again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,718 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    They can all go on Telegram or Truth or any of the other dodgy platforms the loopers and dictators seem to love.

    Also HS2 put back 2 years and a number of road projects cancelled because of high cost.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,199 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    I thought HS2s funding had already been siloed off?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,718 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,080 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Delaying the project for 2 years due to soaring inflation is not going to do anything to actually cut the costs of it?



Advertisement