Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The UK response to Covid-19 [MOD WARNING 1ST POST]

1193194195196198

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,717 ✭✭✭maebee


    England's top medic Professor Chris Whitty is at odds with Boris:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8534763/Social-distancing-needed-long-time-Chris-Whitty-says.html

    Shades of Trump and Dr. Fauci.

    Trump and Johnson are taking advice from their scientists LOL


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    maebee wrote: »
    England's top medic Professor Chris Whitty is at odds with Boris:

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8534763/Social-distancing-needed-long-time-Chris-Whitty-says.html

    Shades of Trump and Dr. Fauci.

    Trump and Johnson are taking advice from their scientists LOL

    The situation in the US is totally different. The US is on a steep upward trajectory in respect to the virus.

    The way I interpret yesterday is as follows. Johnson is being ridiculously idealistic with his idea that we're going to be back to normal before Christmas. I don't believe this. I'm not sure he does either, considering the emphasis on his plans being conditional.

    Chris Whitty is probably more on the money in that we're going to be asked to distance into the long term. I think most people are willing to do this provided that it keeps them safe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,294 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Do as I say, not as I do...

    UK transport secretary becomes first senior politician to book foreign holiday
    Grant Shapps previously warned that those booking a holiday in August would be taking a chance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Do as I say, not as I do...

    UK transport secretary becomes first senior politician to book foreign holiday
    Grant Shapps previously warned that those booking a holiday in August would be taking a chance.


    Where's the contradiction?

    He said that those booking a holiday in August would be taking a chance. He is taking a chance. Now, what did he mean by chance. Chance that one would catch the virus, a chance that the holiday would have to be cancelled at short notice, a chance that one would lose money?

    The advice from the Foreign Office has been changed in the meanwhile as the article also states.

    He wasn't saying that people shouldn't as an absolute law. He was informing the public that it was a risk.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Yeah, that's just looking for any reason to have a pop at those in charge.

    I went to the pub yesterday, and IKEA today. Both experiences went as well as could be expected.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So whilst the UK government are encouraging staycations, it's ok for ministers to head abroad?
    It's hypocrisy at its finest!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    Yeah, it is OK for anyone to head abroad. Not sure whether I 100% agree with the current travel guidelines but that's irrelevant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    So whilst the UK government are encouraging staycations, it's ok for ministers to head abroad?
    It's hypocrisy at its finest!

    I agree,we normally visit Ireland two or three times a year but apart from visiting wife`s sick aunty in February(before all this kicked off) we have`nt or would`nt attempt going over-despite stena line constantly sending tempting deals!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    So whilst the UK government are encouraging staycations, it's ok for ministers to head abroad?
    It's hypocrisy at its finest!


    You do know that the travel policy changed in England right?

    I think it is too liberal and perhaps people should stay in the UK, but we can no longer say that the government are prohibiting non-essential travel when they aren't.

    Encouraging staycations is probably more to stimulate the domestic economy. I'd actually quite like to go somewhere in the UK depending on how the situation with the virus pans out informed by the prevalence map from KCL.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,351 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Do you not agree that it is hypocritical for the UK government to want people to holiday at home and boost the economy whilst ministers holiday abroad?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    I agree,we normally visit Ireland two or three times a year but apart from visiting wife`s sick aunty in February(before all this kicked off) we have`nt or would`nt attempt going over-despite stena line constantly sending tempting deals!

    Please don't. You've much reading to do for your next trip.

    ---

    Just had a call with a friend who's living in London and was very abrupt about how much I want him to come home, but I don't want him near this place til England sorts its shít out. So stuck in East London he will stay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    Do you not agree that it is hypocritical for the UK government to want people to holiday at home and boost the economy whilst ministers holiday abroad?

    Well, no he doesn't. He just outlined that above.

    This government can do no wrong for Theo.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    You'd swear we're riddled with the virus here in London. If I was on the phone to a friend and they made it clear that they thought I should stay in London I'd be pretty annoyed tbh.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    You'd swear we're riddled with the virus here in London. If I was on the phone to a friend and they made it clear that they thought I should stay in London I'd be pretty annoyed tbh.


    Totally agree. Part of the reason I don't want to go to Ireland this summer is because of the quarantine period, but I'd say most of the reason I don't want to go is because you'd be dealing with people like BonnieSituation or some of the people on the other thread.

    Can you fill us in a bit about your experience at the pub? What kind of measures did they have to keep people safe?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,383 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    The plan was to avoid pubs until we had a clearer picture of who was doing a good job and who wasn't, but my Wife, 5 month old baby and I walked past one of the small pubs off the High Street here that has a beer garden out the back and seating at the front on Monday and staff were explaining to a punter what the process was. It all sounded pretty thorough to us so we decided we'd drop by on Friday at around 4.30 to see if it would be quiet.

    Gave my details at the front door, my wife and baby didn't even walk inside, I went through a well marked one way system to order at the bar but there was barely more than one person inside at any time. Had two pints out the front, place got a bit busier and the phone was consistently ringing asking for tables to be reserved which they don't do.

    I was very pleased with the experience and thought the risk of catching something there was incredibly low. Will go again next week and try a few very similar places nearby for comparison.

    I wouldn't be organising any big all day social event at a pub any time soon but sitting outside having a fresh draft pint was lovely and a very different situation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Seems like testing and tracing isn't going well, or at least as well as people hoped it would.

    https://twitter.com/ShaunLintern/status/1284594091171483652?s=20

    So only about 50% of close contacts being contacted. It would have been nice to have a app to help with all of this, but then more time was wasted as the UK wanted to go a different route than everyone else, again, and we are where we are I suppose.

    Another U-turn from Matt Hancock here as well,

    https://twitter.com/AndyBurnhamGM/status/1284600757023580162?s=20

    Matt Hancock in new U-turn on coronavirus testing data
    The health secretary, Matt Hancock, has bowed to pressure from councils, which demanded full access to the names and data of people in their areas who tested positive for Covid-19, and those with whom they have been in contact, in another major government U-turn.

    Local authorities and public health officials have been complaining for weeks that they are being hampered in efforts to combat and prevent local outbreaks by lack of access to “named patient data” which would allow them to get straight to the sources of local outbreaks.

    Now the Observer has been told that Hancock, who has insisted repeatedly that local authorities have all the information they need from the track and trace system, is set to give way and allow access to the named data as well other information already provided, such as postcodes, so long as strict data protection rules and conditions are followed.

    The arrogance of those in charge, trying to tell people that they have the information to make it work and they would send someone to teach them to use what they have. Now they will provide the information that has been requested, because I guess they have seen for themselves that the data being provided isn't adequate after all.

    But stay at home and holiday in the UK to help the local hotels. It is your duty to do this as we are all suffering and the local tourism sector could use some of the money you would have used to travel to Europe this summer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    It's utterly mind boggling what has gone on there. The figures for contact tracing have got worse every week since the start. Over five months into the crisis and only now are local authorities beginning to get access to the fuller data they need, that is actually a national scandal or should be. Even up to this week, councils were employing people just to ring around care homes daily to find news of positive tests - that is sheer bonkers. The sidelining of public health teams is the single biggest issue of this government performance, while incompetent private investors have creamed off millions.

    https://twitter.com/Lisa_McNally1/status/1283489569640513536?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Update on those pesky Russians trying to steal our vaccine story.

    https://twitter.com/wie_lei/status/1284816611204096000?s=20


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Totally agree. Part of the reason I don't want to go to Ireland this summer is because of the quarantine period, but I'd say most of the reason I don't want to go is because you'd be dealing with people like BonnieSituation or some of the people on the other thread.

    Can you fill us in a bit about your experience at the pub? What kind of measures did they have to keep people safe?

    All pubs I've seen around Liverpool and here in Birkenhead appear well organised and social distancing is being observed.A family member has a pub in Nuneaton which isn't far from Leicester.He's said they have a system of booking tables which is working well,again, social distancing is being observed.
    I mention this as both areas are under the spotlight.
    Perhaps anecdotal but I know three people who have definitely had the virus, two of them were unaware they had it.I know many people who suspect they may have had it but put it down to 'being under the weather',which is scary.
    It's interesting to note suggestions that the UK may be getting to herd immunity seem to be gathering impetus in the media despite a number of posters trying to shut that suggestion down.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,066 ✭✭✭Christy42


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    All pubs I've seen around Liverpool and here in Birkenhead appear well organised and social distancing is being observed.A family member has a pub in Nuneaton which isn't far from Leicester.He's said they have a system of booking tables which is working well,again, social distancing is being observed.
    I mention this as both areas are under the spotlight.
    Perhaps anecdotal but I know three people who have definitely had the virus, two of them were unaware they had it.I know many people who suspect they may have had it but put it down to 'being under the weather',which is scary.
    It's interesting to note suggestions that the UK may be getting to herd immunity seem to be gathering impetus in the media despite a number of posters trying to shut that suggestion down.

    Where is that suggestion getting to in the scientific community?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,385 ✭✭✭lainey_d_123


    The situation in the US is totally different. The US is on a steep upward trajectory in respect to the virus.

    The way I interpret yesterday is as follows. Johnson is being ridiculously idealistic with his idea that we're going to be back to normal before Christmas. I don't believe this. I'm not sure he does either, considering the emphasis on his plans being conditional.

    Chris Whitty is probably more on the money in that we're going to be asked to distance into the long term. I think most people are willing to do this provided that it keeps them safe.

    What does 'normal' even mean though? Surely it's a pretty meaningless word now. If it means 'go back to how it was this time last year' then no, we won't get there for a very long time and possibly never.

    If it means being able to travel while taking all the current precautions with a relatively low risk of getting sick or catching the virus, being able to go out to shops and restaurants while still taking precautions, is that unrealistic?

    Friend of a friend here in London is a scientist with very specialist knowledge of infectious diseases and he's confident he'll be able to go to New York for Christmas and do all the stuff you'd normally do there as a tourist.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Christy42 wrote: »
    Where is that suggestion getting to in the scientific community?

    I doubt very far. These reports are based largely around the same group of oxford scientists who were claiming back in march that half the uk population had already being infected. That claim was patently ridiculous so let's see how this latest one pans out.

    https://www.ft.com/content/5ff6469a-6dd8-11ea-89df-41bea055720b


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    Spent the weekend in Northern Ireland... I don't think I am a worrier or a doom and gloom "look at those people" type.... But, they are certainly not taking the issue as seriously up there. Cafes, pubs and restaurants were jammed... Avoided them as a result.

    The 1m social distance markers on the ground feel very close to people, almost zero mask wearing by workers in cafes and pubs etc..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,535 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    Cases seem to have stopped trending downwards a little bit and holding steady. Some days the last week or so have been higher than previous days in the proceeding weeks.

    Could well just be a case of more testing finding more cases, but difficult to know when they don't say how many people have been tested.

    I wonder is there a figure that the UK Govt are happy to accept as a 7 day average and then just get on with things.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    mloc123 wrote: »
    Spent the weekend in Northern Ireland... I don't think I am a worrier or a doom and gloom "look at those people" type.... But, they are certainly not taking the issue as seriously up there. Cafes, pubs and restaurants were jammed... Avoided them as a result.

    The 1m social distance markers on the ground feel very close to people, almost zero mask wearing by workers in cafes and pubs etc..


    The advice isn't simply 1 metre. It is 1 metre with mitigations, like wearing a face mask or being outdoors. 2 metres isn't a standard, countries differ on this. Most of continental Europe is 1.5m without mitigations. France and Denmark at at 1m without other mitigations. The UK distancing is actually conservative in comparison with many.

    I wouldn't generalise the entire population based on anecdotes. Across the UK we've seen most people be pretty compliant with the measures. There are always exceptions where people go too far anywhere.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,118 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Over the last couple of weeks have somehow ended up going to some coffee shops, restaurants and shopping malls. It has been exceedingly variable as to how well people seem to be following the advice/regulations in different places.

    In one town walking along a windy seafront and some old dear will give you a dirty look for being 5m away and then mutter something under their breath about social distancing as they go past as if we were too close (whilst the 5 year old was walking along the wall so not like we could move further over). Then another place and 90% of people are wearing masks and following the arrows around the store, but another one an nobody does.

    Have had a 50% hit rate so far on being asked for contact details when eating inside somewhere, although wouldn't be too hard to trace people through their bank cards if really needed I guess.

    Don't take what you see happening in one place as indicative of the whole country. How people are behaving in one shop along my local high street is totally different to what they do in another shop 50m away. Can't figure out why it is, but totally different behaviour from the same population just because of a different logo over the door to the shop.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,385 ✭✭✭lainey_d_123


    robinph wrote: »
    Over the last couple of weeks have somehow ended up going to some coffee shops, restaurants and shopping malls. It has been exceedingly variable as to how well people seem to be following the advice/regulations in different places.

    In one town walking along a windy seafront and some old dear will give you a dirty look for being 5m away and then mutter something under their breath about social distancing as they go past as if we were too close (whilst the 5 year old was walking along the wall so not like we could move further over). Then another place and 90% of people are wearing masks and following the arrows around the store, but another one an nobody does.

    Have had a 50% hit rate so far on being asked for contact details when eating inside somewhere, although wouldn't be too hard to trace people through their bank cards if really needed I guess.

    Don't take what you see happening in one place as indicative of the whole country. How people are behaving in one shop along my local high street is totally different to what they do in another shop 50m away. Can't figure out why it is, but totally different behaviour from the same population just because of a different logo over the door to the shop.

    This sums up the entire problem in this country - the lack of consistency. It's draining just never knowing what to expect. I might go into a shop and see all the staff in masks/PPE and customers respecting social distancing, and feel reassured it's safe, then go back the next week and it's mayhem. I get on one bus and everyone is in masks and then another one where everyone has them pulled down or not wearing them at all. How can people be confident about making plans (and hence restarting the economy) when there's so much confusion about what to do and rules/laws are not being enforced?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,865 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    UK investigating Covid-19 outbreak at a test & trace centre. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-cluster-outbreak-lanarkshire-test-trace-nhs-scotland-a9627366.html

    Seems like Covid's breaking out in a number of places in the UK, and that 'test and trace' is only reaching about 1/2 of contacts in the places mentioned.

    Frankly, I'm not sure i'd trust data from HMG, with the media reporting outbreaks and the 'test and trace' system not fit for purpose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,535 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    Igotadose wrote: »
    UK investigating Covid-19 outbreak at a test & trace centre. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-cluster-outbreak-lanarkshire-test-trace-nhs-scotland-a9627366.html

    Seems like Covid's breaking out in a number of places in the UK, and that 'test and trace' is only reaching about 1/2 of contacts in the places mentioned.

    Frankly, I'm not sure i'd trust data from HMG, with the media reporting outbreaks and the 'test and trace' system not fit for purpose.

    Nonsense. Balderdash...we'll be fine by Christmas.

    :pac:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Igotadose wrote: »
    UK investigating Covid-19 outbreak at a test & trace centre. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/coronavirus-cluster-outbreak-lanarkshire-test-trace-nhs-scotland-a9627366.html

    Seems like Covid's breaking out in a number of places in the UK, and that 'test and trace' is only reaching about 1/2 of contacts in the places mentioned.

    Frankly, I'm not sure i'd trust data from HMG, with the media reporting outbreaks and the 'test and trace' system not fit for purpose.

    Where are you getting 1/2? The latest statistics that are recorded suggested that nearly 80% are being contacted.

    Edit: It seems that you mean that only 50% in Blackburn and Darwen are being contacted. If so that's definitely something that needs to be addressed at a local level also.
    Dave0301 wrote: »
    Cases seem to have stopped trending downwards a little bit and holding steady. Some days the last week or so have been higher than previous days in the proceeding weeks.

    Could well just be a case of more testing finding more cases, but difficult to know when they don't say how many people have been tested.

    I wonder is there a figure that the UK Govt are happy to accept as a 7 day average and then just get on with things.

    The problem is that despite the SAGE figures for the R, the UK R is not being held at below 1. KCL reckon it is 1.1 across the UK at the moment. No region is below 1. If the R was held below 1 we would be still seeing a slow decline before the autumn.

    You're right much more needs to be done at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Where are you getting 1/2? The latest statistics that are recorded suggested that nearly 80% are being contacted.

    Edit: It seems that you mean that only 50% in Blackburn and Darwen are being contacted. If so that's definitely something that needs to be addressed at a local level also.



    The problem is that despite the SAGE figures for the R, the UK R is not being held at below 1. KCL reckon it is 1.1 across the UK at the moment. No region is below 1. If the R was held below 1 we would be still seeing a slow decline before the autumn.

    You're right much more needs to be done at this stage.


    I don't know how seriously to take you giving us a link to a UK Government numbers site to prove how well it is going. The UK Government cannot be trusted in the way they use statistics and the NSO called them out on it.

    https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1285106458078715904?s=20


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,454 ✭✭✭mloc123


    The advice isn't simply 1 metre. It is 1 metre with mitigations, like wearing a face mask or being outdoors. 2 metres isn't a standard, countries differ on this. Most of continental Europe is 1.5m without mitigations. France and Denmark at at 1m without other mitigations. The UK distancing is actually conservative in comparison with many.

    I wouldn't generalise the entire population based on anecdotes. Across the UK we've seen most people be pretty compliant with the measures. There are always exceptions where people go too far anywhere.

    I can only talk about what I saw in Newcastle (Co. Down) and that was 1m distancing, inside without masks. Standing on the 1m marks in a queue, I don't think in normal times I would stand closer to a stranger... So it is basically business as usual.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,535 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    Enzokk wrote: »
    I don't know how seriously to take you giving us a link to a UK Government numbers site to prove how well it is going. The UK Government cannot be trusted in the way they use statistics and the NSO called them out on it.

    https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1285106458078715904?s=20

    Gavin Williamson this morning saying
    “The information that they give is treated with the absolute highest security”

    But don't mind the fact that personal details have already been shared on social media.

    From The Times
    Details of Covid-19 patients are being shared on Facebook and WhatsApp in breach of data protection laws as staff turn to colleagues for help to do their jobs.

    Screenshots have contained the names, NHS numbers, contact details and case IDs of people who have tested positive for the virus.

    They were posted in unregulated social media groups.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Latest track and trace figures (week ending 8 July) - 2,815 people reached to provide contact details.

    Latest ONS estimates (week ending July 12) - 11,900 new cases that week.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Latest track and trace figures (week ending 8 July) - 2,815 people reached to provide contact details.

    Latest ONS estimates (week ending July 12) - 11,900 new cases that week.

    Obviously you can only track and trace people who have come forward for tests. If people aren't getting the tests, then obviously they won't enter the system for tracing.

    Logical answer: People should be encouraged to come forward for tests.
    Enzokk wrote: »
    I don't know how seriously to take you giving us a link to a UK Government numbers site to prove how well it is going. The UK Government cannot be trusted in the way they use statistics and the NSO called them out on it.

    https://twitter.com/afneil/status/1285106458078715904?s=20

    I don't know how seriously to take someone who is unwilling to use the only figures we actually have.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Obviously you can only track and trace people who have come forward for tests. If people aren't getting the tests, then obviously they won't enter the system for tracing.

    Logical answer: People should be encouraged to come forward for tests.

    And if they still dont, is it enough then just to shrug and say, well we tried our best anyway? Forget where but there was an interview with a german doctor a couple of weeks ago who talked about how they were trying to track down asymptomatic cases and contact trace them. "The virus doesnt come to you, you have to go and find it," or along those lines. I've no clear idea what kind of targeted testing they're conducting but it doesnt look nearly enough or efficient. Of course, big issue remains virus was never sufficiently contained initially so, unlike other places, fresh outbreaks are less likely to be limited to small areas and much harder to trace, as was case in Leicester.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    And if they still dont, is it enough then just to shrug and say, well we tried our best anyway? Forget where but there was an interview with a german doctor a couple of weeks ago who talked about how they were trying to track down asymptomatic cases and contact trace them. "The virus doesnt come to you, you have to go and find it," or along those lines. I've no clear idea what kind of targeted testing they're conducting but it doesnt look nearly enough or efficient. Of course, big issue remains virus was never sufficiently contained initially so, unlike other places, fresh outbreaks are less likely to be limited to small areas and much harder to trace, as was case in Leicester.

    There are just over 28,000 cases of symptomatic COVID in the UK.

    It should be possible to contain spread locally at this stage. I've not seen any good reason to explain why this wouldn't be possible. The data is now there on a local level. It is up to the authorities and public health officials to use it on a local level.

    Leicester is the only case where they have had to lockdown an entire city so far. All the rest of the actions (over 100 of them) have been done on a more granular level. This would cause me to question your last sentence.

    If there is a re-imposition of a national lockdown I think everyone would accept that that would be a massive failure at this stage.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,066 ✭✭✭Christy42


    Obviously you can only track and trace people who have come forward for tests. If people aren't getting the tests, then obviously they won't enter the system for tracing.

    Logical answer: People should be encouraged to come forward for tests.



    I don't know how seriously to take someone who is unwilling to use the only figures we actually have.

    No data is the same as inaccurate data. If all you have is untrustworthy data that is a sign you need to try and get better data, not that you should use the untrustworthy data.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    There are just over 28,000 cases of symptomatic COVID in the UK.

    It should be possible to contain spread locally at this stage. I've not seen any good reason to explain why this wouldn't be possible. The data is now there on a local level. It is up to the authorities and public health officials to use it on a local level.

    Leicester is the only case where they have had to lockdown an entire city so far. All the rest of the actions (over 100 of them) have been done on a more granular level. This would cause me to question your last sentence.

    If there is a re-imposition of a national lockdown I think everyone would accept that that would be a massive failure at this stage.

    I didnt say anything was certain, just that it was less likely. Going by your beloved kcl tracker, the outlook would appear to be concerning, dark red warning splotches all over the place, over 2k new cases daily. And great that local authorities are getting the data they have been crying out to get hold of for months. If only etc etc


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I wouldn't implicitly trust any data that comes directly from DHSC and, by implication, phe and, unfortunately, nhs. A couple of weeks back Hancock was crowing about stats showing a near perfect record in turning test results around within 24 hours. Given the chronic problems you read about with their testing centres, I've no problem disbelieving him. And wasnt Sunak savaged by the IFS last week for massaging his finance package figures? Just not credible, any of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Speaking of track and trace and more awarding of government contracts. Big consulting firm McKinseys being brought in to report on governance issues within NHS Test and Trace. Dido Harding, head of TAT, is an ex McKinseys employee.

    You couldn't make it up, except you can.

    https://twitter.com/Cedders68/status/1285139402382094336?s=20


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Christy42 wrote: »
    No data is the same as inaccurate data. If all you have is untrustworthy data that is a sign you need to try and get better data, not that you should use the untrustworthy data.

    I think if people are going to claim that the data is false, it should be up to them firstly to explain why, and secondly to provide a better dataset which explains this. Otherwise it is just an empty claim.
    I didnt say anything was certain, just that it was less likely. Going by your beloved kcl tracker, the outlook would appear to be concerning, dark red warning splotches all over the place, over 2k new cases daily. And great that local authorities are getting the data they have been crying out to get hold of for months. If only etc etc

    Let's take the most extreme example in Blackburn with Darwen, which I don't dispute may well go into local lockdown because the prevalence is greater than Leicester when it went into lockdown.

    There are 3152 cases per million versus 360 per million in Chelmsford.

    Blackburn with Darwen's population is 148,942 which means that there are 469 cases of coronavirus there which means that 0.3% of the population are symptomatic with coronavirus. That prevalence is still relatively low, although it needs to be controlled so it doesn't kick off again.

    So, if I am walking down the street in Blackburn what is the probability that I'm going to bump into someone with symptomatic coronavirus presuming that none of these people are isolating?

    It's a 1 in 472 person chance presuming none of this number is isolating, and I suspect the vast majority will be. Or a 0.2% chance in a scenario where all with symptomatic coronavirus are walking around.

    Of course that is much greater than Chelmsford with 60 symptomatic cases of coronavirus. Comparatively there you've got a 1 in 4675 person chance of meeting someone with symptomatic coronavirus presuming they were all on the street. In percentage terms 0.02%.

    Nationally it is 1 in 2390 or a 0.04% percentage chance presuming that all of the symptomatic cases are on the street.

    It is worth having perspective. The UK is not virus ridden as you seem to be suggesting. The reason the colours were changed on KCL is because the map was becoming less meaningful after pretty much all of the country had less than 1% population having symptomatic coronavirus.
    Speaking of track and trace and more awarding of government contracts. Big consulting firm McKinseys being brought in to report on governance issues within NHS Test and Trace. Dido Harding, head of TAT, is an ex McKinseys employee.

    You couldn't make it up, except you can.

    https://twitter.com/Cedders68/status/1285139402382094336?s=20

    Damned if you do and damned if you don't. If the government didn't get this going you'd be saying they didn't get it going, when they do get it going you criticise that they used a particular consultancy firm in the process. That doesn't make much sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Let's take the most extreme example in Blackburn with Darwen, which I don't dispute may well go into local lockdown because the prevalence is greater than Leicester when it went into lockdown.

    There are 3152 cases per million versus 360 per million in Chelmsford.

    Blackburn with Darwen's population is 148,942 which means that there are 469 cases of coronavirus there which means that 0.3% of the population are symptomatic with coronavirus. That prevalence is still relatively low, although it needs to be controlled so it doesn't kick off again.

    So, if I am walking down the street in Blackburn what is the probability that I'm going to bump into someone with symptomatic coronavirus presuming that none of these people are isolating?

    It's a 1 in 472 person chance presuming none of this number is isolating, and I suspect the vast majority will be. Or a 0.2% chance in a scenario where all with symptomatic coronavirus are walking around.

    Of course that is much greater than Chelmsford with 60 symptomatic cases of coronavirus. Comparatively there you've got a 1 in 4675 person chance of meeting someone with symptomatic coronavirus presuming they were all on the street. In percentage terms 0.02%.

    Nationally it is 1 in 2390 or a 0.04% percentage chance presuming that all of the symptomatic cases are on the street.

    It is worth having perspective. The UK is not virus ridden as you seem to be suggesting. The reason the colours were changed on KCL is because the map was becoming less meaningful after pretty much all of the country had less than 1% population having symptomatic coronavirus.

    You're doing it again. Inventing a claim i never made and arguing away against the straw man to your hearts content. Never suggested or even seemed to suggest the uk was "virus ridden". Where did you get that?

    What i said was no different to anything Patrick Vallance told the select committee last week. There are little warning signs there and we shouldn't ignore them simply because Boris Johnson thinks we should be more "upbeat and confident" and that it will be all over by xmas. A few months back he told us it would all be done and dusted in 12 weeks. The point is, not that things are getting critical again, but that if they did, are the systems - test and trace etc - in place to ensure they can be dealt with quickly and efficiently? Lot of the evidence still suggests not.

    And why, if the situation is worse in Blackburn than it was in Leicester, are they not locking down? Less than half being contact traced? What are they waiting for?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Damned if you do and damned if you don't. If the government didn't get this going you'd be saying they didn't get it going, when they do get it going you criticise that they used a particular consultancy firm in the process. That doesn't make much sense.

    A particular consultancy firm?! All the 10s or 100s of firms they could have used and they opt for the one and used to employ the head of the body they will be investigating. That's just more low level cronyism from a government that practices it like a daily ritual. Not surprised you'd seek to defend it, though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    You're doing it again. Inventing a claim i never made and arguing away against the straw man to your hearts content. Never suggested or even seemed to suggest the uk was "virus ridden". Where did you get that?

    What i said was no different to anything Patrick Vallance told the select committee last week. There are little warning signs there and we shouldn't ignore them simply because Boris Johnson thinks we should be more "upbeat and confident" and that it will be all over by xmas. A few months back he told us it would all be done and dusted in 12 weeks. The point is, not that things are getting critical again, but that if they did, are the systems - test and trace etc - in place to ensure they can be dealt with quickly and efficiently? Lot of the evidence still suggests not.

    And why, if the situation is worse in Blackburn than it was in Leicester, are they not locking down? Less than half being contact traced? What are they waiting for?

    It was an explanation to point out that the red dots perhaps aren't as alarming as what you think. Also, the explanation isn't just for you, it is for others who may be reading.

    There are already increased measures in Blackburn. The director of public health for Blackburn with Darwen is leading the response. If it continues they will have to have the same approach as in Leicester.

    As for the rest, it isn't relevant to the point we're discussing but I think the UK did "turn the tide on coronavirus" in 12 weeks. The virus is no longer climbing, people are getting back to some form of normality and it is now able to be monitored and managed locally rather than nationally.

    If you're interpreting that as coronavirus will be gone in 12 weeks that is a matter of your interpretation rather than what was actually said.
    A particular consultancy firm?! All the 10s or 100s of firms they could have used and they opt for the one and used to employ the head of the body they will be investigating. That's just more low level cronyism from a government that practices it like a daily ritual. Not surprised you'd seek to defend it, though.

    I'd rather that the measures were in place quickly to deal with the virus rather than going through a long tender process when things are needed quickly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,066 ✭✭✭Christy42


    I think if people are going to claim that the data is false, it should be up to them firstly to explain why, and secondly to provide a better dataset which explains this.

    This is complete and utter bull. It is up to those gathering the data to show why their data should be trusted. Simply because I don't have the answers does not mean that they can simply insert whatever fairytale they want to in the middle. That is the exact opposite of how science works.

    If you do an experiment it I up to you to say you hav efollowed proper procedures when collecting the data and just because no one else has done the experiment doesn't mean you can insert any old data. That is a ridiculous requirement.

    The UK government have done nothing to earn respect or trust. They need to show why they should be trusted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Christy42 wrote: »
    This is complete and utter bull. It is up to those gathering the data to show why their data should be trusted. Simply because I don't have the answers does not mean that they can simply insert whatever fairytale they want to in the middle. That is the exact opposite of how science works.

    If you do an experiment it I up to you to say you hav efollowed proper procedures when collecting the data and just because no one else has done the experiment doesn't mean you can insert any old data. That is a ridiculous requirement.

    The UK government have done nothing to earn respect or trust. They need to show why they should be trusted.

    I think you'd still need to highlight the flaws in the data to demonstrate why it shouldn't be trusted. If you're not willing to provide reasons for this and instead insist on repeating the same claim there's not much you can add to the discussion other than you trust nobody for no reason.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    It was an explanation to point out that the red dots perhaps aren't as alarming as what you think. Also, the explanation isn't just for you, it is for others who may be reading.

    There are already increased measures in Blackburn. The director of public health for Blackburn with Darwen is leading the response. If it continues they will have to have the same approach as in Leicester.

    As for the rest, it isn't relevant to the point we're discussing but I think the UK did "turn the tide on coronavirus" in 12 weeks. The virus is no longer climbing, people are getting back to some form of normality and it is now able to be monitored and managed locally rather than nationally.

    If you're interpreting that as coronavirus will be gone in 12 weeks that is a matter of your interpretation rather than what was actually said.



    I'd rather that the measures were in place quickly to deal with the virus rather than going through a long tender process when things are needed quickly.

    "We will turn the tide within 12 weeks," says prime minister Boris Johnson. "We can send coronavirus packing."

    Truth be told, I'm not all that interested in kcl tracker, it's really just that you go on about it incessantly here. And now that it is showing increased levels of infections, quite significantly in a few locations, you still find ways of downplaying it, sure they're merely adjusting their colour fonts as a routine exercise!

    On tenders, i think there's more than a smidgin of an argument in favour of taking time to getting good efficient systems in place rather than rushing out to pour huge sums of money into private operators, including chums of senior government figures in many cases, and seeing correspondingly huge levels of cronyism and incompetence as a result.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    "We will turn the tide within 12 weeks," says prime minister Boris Johnson. "We can send coronavirus packing."

    Truth be told, I'm not all that interested in kcl tracker, it's really just that you go on about it incessantly here. And now that it is showing increased levels of infections, quite significantly in a few locations, you still find ways of downplaying it, sure they're merely adjusting their colour fonts as a routine exercise!

    On tenders, i think there's more than a smidgin of an argument in favour of taking time to getting good efficient systems in place rather than rushing out to pour huge sums of money into private operators, including chums of senior government figures in many cases, and seeing correspondingly huge levels of cronyism and incompetence as a result.

    I think the red dots aren't insignificant, but they are not what you seem to be claiming they are. By pointing out what is factual about Blackburn for example, I'm not "downplaying" anything. I'm putting the data into perspective and explaining why it isn't as alarming as you are suggesting.

    I've also explained why their colour scheme for the overlay on the map changed a few weeks ago. You can choose to do with what information what you will.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement