Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

The UK response to Covid-19 [MOD WARNING 1ST POST]

Options
1325326328330331

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    I must have missed it and only seen the Cummings said he wanted Herd Immunity story which he denies.

    Oh yeah he denies that alright and wouldn't be surprised if there's a line in one of his tortuous blog posts outlining how he was apparently against herd immunity all along!


  • Registered Users Posts: 23 ThatsNotMyCat


    Irish living in UK... would also agree you should do your course and just take the same precautions you would take at home. Especially given it will help you with job prospects etc. Obviously the virus is more prevalent here but if you socially distance and take the right precautions I really think you would be extremely unlucky to catch it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,669 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    On a slightly different note:

    Inside Westminster’s coronavirus blame game

    Interestingly it says Cummings was the man to give everyone a good kick up the arse when nobody wanted to consider the lockdown.


    Still took them a week to lockdown before Cummings seemed to have seen the light. That week, as one of the advisers said, cost about 20 000 lives. They were all messing about and believing in their own exceptionalism before they woke up.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    ... And Cummings then seemingly forgot all about the whole lockdown thing, traipsing across London between infected workplace and infected home, then drove the length of the country with an infected family ... Well we know the rest.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,094 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Have they released todays figures yet?

    They have been hovering around low numbers on some days for the last week, including I think zero hospital deaths yesterday. Think they could try to announce a zero deaths day tomorrow as an additional dead cat in addition to todays dead cat of Shamima Begum. Really hope the Russia Report tomorrow has something good in it to have made it worth delaying for so long.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    robinph wrote: »
    Have they released todays figures yet?

    They have been hovering around low numbers on some days for the last week, including I think zero hospital deaths yesterday. Think they could try to announce a zero deaths day tomorrow as an additional dead cat in addition to todays dead cat of Shamima Begum. Really hope the Russia Report tomorrow has something good in it to have made it worth delaying for so long.

    642 cases, 66 deaths. KCL have updated the daily count to 2,103. It's not a good picture in terms of new cases. The R is pretty certainly above 1.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23 ThatsNotMyCat


    Where do you find the KCL data?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Where do you find the KCL data?

    I keep rabbiting on about it because it is pretty good. Their link is here.

    Data on the R rate in different regions is available when you contribute on the app. I'd recommend anyone in the UK to do so.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    642 cases, 66 deaths. KCL have updated the daily count to 2,103. It's not a good picture in terms of new cases. The R is pretty certainly above 1.

    The thing is that the cases have been at that level or higher for weeks, and hospital admissions have continued to decline. Surely we are now past the lag which would see the cases translate into hospital admission, if not yet deaths. I don’t know what the explanation is other than there has been more testing of younger lightly symptomatic or asymptomatic people


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    The thing is that the cases have been at that level or higher for weeks, and hospital admissions have continued to decline. Surely we are now past the lag which would see the cases translate into hospital admission, if not yet deaths. I don’t know what the explanation is other than there has been more testing of younger lightly symptomatic or asymptomatic people

    Numbers of deaths are definitely going to continue coming down, but deaths are really a picture of a number of weeks ago, as are hospital admissions.

    Cases are at the start of the funnel. The number of active cases of the virus at any one time will also give a picture as to what admissions and deaths may look like later on.

    If we continue with 10 people infecting 12 more that means that things could pick up again if it isn't controlled carefully. Hopefully the localised measures will work because we don't want to start the autumn and winter with much more cases again.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,494 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    Patrick Vallance being questioned by the science & technology committee today.

    He appears to be answering fairly honestly so far on lockdown and care home measures.

    https://twitter.com/tnewtondunn/status/1283769617001979905


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Numbers of deaths are definitely going to continue coming down, but deaths are really a picture of a number of weeks ago, as are hospital admissions.

    Cases are at the start of the funnel. The number of active cases of the virus at any one time will also give a picture as to what admissions and deaths may look like later on.

    If we continue with 10 people infecting 12 more that means that things could pick up again if it isn't controlled carefully. Hopefully the localised measures will work because we don't want to start the autumn and winter with much more cases again.

    I understand how it works re infections to hospital to deaths. But it has been a number of weeks with infections at this level or higher and admissions are still declining. I would have thought that that would be enough time to see the infections feed through to hospital admissions. The lag is not an indefinite time period


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    I keep rabbiting on about it because it is pretty good. Their link is here.

    Data on the R rate in different regions is available when you contribute on the app. I'd recommend anyone in the UK to do so.
    I'm struggling to find the information you say this website/app provides after investigating further.

    Where exactly can you get the different region information when you contribute?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    S.M.B. wrote: »
    I'm struggling to find the information you say this website/app provides after investigating further.

    Where exactly can you get the different region information when you contribute?

    After you contribute on the app, it brings you to a page with a link:

    "New: for app users only. Location of positive test results reported over last 2 weeks".

    Then on this page it has charts with the latest results and charts. On each chart you can see the R number.

    On the bottom of this page you can see "View full report sent to the government" also.

    Edit: Scratch that, the link is generally available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,373 ✭✭✭S.M.B.


    I didn't spot it as its under a cta labeled Cases in my area?

    So that page was publicly available, just not explicitly linked to via their site. :|


  • Registered Users Posts: 971 ✭✭✭bob mcbob


    Another day, another dodgy contract allocated to one of the Brexit boys goes tits up. This ones not important, just covid tests at a cost of £133M.

    Randox employs the Conservative politician Owen Paterson as a £100,000-a-year consultant. The former cabinet minister and leading Brexit supporter has been a consultant since 2015.

    Previously Randox has not responded to questions about whether Paterson was involved in securing the contract. The Guardian did not receive a response when it asked Paterson for a response.


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/16/uk-government-orders-halt-randox-covid-19-tests-over-safety-issues


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 40,061 ✭✭✭✭Harry Palmr


    They seem to be making hard work of the local lockdown in Leicester. Using a bureaucratic/administrative
    approach to it rather than looking where the hot spots are and isolating those areas.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    bob mcbob wrote: »
    Another day, another dodgy contract allocated to one of the Brexit boys goes tits up. This ones not important, just covid tests at a cost of £133M.

    Randox employs the Conservative politician Owen Paterson as a £100,000-a-year consultant. The former cabinet minister and leading Brexit supporter has been a consultant since 2015.

    Previously Randox has not responded to questions about whether Paterson was involved in securing the contract. The Guardian did not receive a response when it asked Paterson for a response.


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jul/16/uk-government-orders-halt-randox-covid-19-tests-over-safety-issues

    Not forgetting the 67,000 randox sourced tests which had to be shipped to the States, of which almost half were subsequently binned. Or the fact that Paterson's wife is on the board of Aintree racecourse, home of the Grand National sponsored by none other than....Randox Ltd. A grim catalogue of mind boggling incompetence and small minded cronyism with lives of vulnerable people at stake.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    According to this Canadian link Russia is doing its utmost to snoop on the nations leading the charge for a vaccine.
    http://globalnews.ca/news/7183585/russian-hackers-target-canada-u-s-and-u-k-covid-19-vaccine-research-intelligence-agency-says/


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,188 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    https://twitter.com/BBCDouglasF/status/1283751998270115840

    The Scottish Governments Kate Forbes called this correctly last week and was derided, dismissed and summarily ignored just because she is a young member of the Scottish Government. A lot of egg on those unionist faces now but they will not care, they got their 'headline' last week


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 19,042 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    I keep rabbiting on about it because it is pretty good. Their link is here.

    Data on the R rate in different regions is available when you contribute on the app. I'd recommend anyone in the UK to do so.

    Speaking of apps. I know we had our run ins about it when the UKGov were acting the maggot with their "world leading spyware" they were launching originally.

    I have been using the HSE app and find it great, simple and encourages engagement everyday. The Readme(s) got a thorough going over from this end before I downloaded it and encouraged others to do the same.

    I was wondering if you've had a look or compared it etc given your obvious interest (and Irishness).

    And if so, how does it compare with what Britain have now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,042 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    https://twitter.com/BBCDouglasF/status/1283751998270115840

    The Scottish Governments Kate Forbes called this correctly last week and was derided, dismissed and summarily ignored just because she is a young member of the Scottish Government. A lot of egg on those unionist faces now but they will not care, they got their 'headline' last week

    That's always the way with unionist attitudes to Scotland and indeed Ireland.

    It's always about the "headline today". The news is moving so fast that any correction or retraction won't matter in the end. It's infuriating but that's the world under the thumb of England.

    Quite simply, appearing to doing something is more important to the Tories at ALL times. Whether it works or not or is even in the end more detrimental, it doesn't matter.

    Did we ever get a handle on those deliveries from Turkey?


    Exactly.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Speaking of apps. I know we had our run ins about it when the UKGov were acting the maggot with their "world leading spyware" they were launching originally.

    I have been using the HSE app and find it great, simple and encourages engagement everyday. The Readme(s) got a thorough going over from this end before I downloaded it and encouraged others to do the same.

    I was wondering if you've had a look or compared it etc given your obvious interest (and Irishness).

    And if so, how does it compare with what Britain have now?

    I'm a complete technophobe so out of my depth but i do know they are being helped out on their app by the Germans and there is a version of the Germany corona warn app available for download across the uk. As to how effective it is in a uk context, i cant say. Not seen much advertising for it or people talking about downloading it so seems rather doubtful to say the least.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭theological


    Speaking of apps. I know we had our run ins about it when the UKGov were acting the maggot with their "world leading spyware" they were launching originally.

    I have been using the HSE app and find it great, simple and encourages engagement everyday. The Readme(s) got a thorough going over from this end before I downloaded it and encouraged others to do the same.

    I was wondering if you've had a look or compared it etc given your obvious interest (and Irishness).

    And if so, how does it compare with what Britain have now?

    I've not got a lot to add on this. It's disappointing that the UK doesn't have a contact tracing app. I've been pretty clear that that is disappointing. The primary reason it is disappointing is that a manual track and trace service is only so effective. It requires people to have a good mental memory of who they were in contact with. A digital source of truth in combination with mental memory would be much more effective.

    The KCL app isn't a contact tracing app. It is an app where people can contribute towards building a model to estimate the number of live cases of coronavirus in the community. It's pretty helpful.

    So the KCL app can't be compared with a contact tracing app because they don't do the same thing.

    I haven't used the Irish app because I'm not likely to be in Ireland for the rest of this calendar year at least I suspect. If I was in Ireland I would definitely use it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    An interesting article in the independent suggesting that herd immunity may actually work for the UK in a second wave.
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-herd-immunity-second-wave-oxford-study-boris-johnson-a9623791.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,188 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    RobMc59 wrote: »
    An interesting article in the independent suggesting that herd immunity may actually work for the UK in a second wave.
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-herd-immunity-second-wave-oxford-study-boris-johnson-a9623791.html

    Stopped reading when the article stated 'in a paper yet to be peer-reviewed'


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    In relation to the app, they went from it being absolutely integral to the battle against the virus to being not much of a big deal when it was clear they'd botched it, a mere "cherry on Dido's cake".

    So which is it? More likely the former, if research conducted on the Isle of Wight trials is any guide:

    "The analysis shows that the app reached a far higher number of potential cases and contacts than manual contact tracing. Between the 6 May and 26 May, 160 cases on the Isle of Wight were reported to manual contact tracing, resulting in 163 individuals receiving a notification and request to self-isolate. During the same period 1,524 people reported symptoms to the app resulting in 1,188 receiving an exposure notification.

    “You can see straight away that you have the potential for a digital platform to work much faster and at scale,” said Kendall. “What you’d like to know is how many actually developed symptoms or were infections that were taken out of the epidemic.”


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,494 ✭✭✭Dave0301


    I see Hancock has ordered an urgent review into how PHE have been recording deaths, and that people that tested for Covid-19 but died later of natural causes had it recorded as a cause of death.

    It is unlikely to impact on the figures much for the April/May but may explain why deaths have not come down as quickly as other countries in the last few weeks. I view anything they do with such cynicism these days though that I can't help but think it is another deflection from them. Also, give the excess deaths for countries all over the world, it gives a much better view of the impact of the virus.

    W2nnWN6


  • Registered Users Posts: 971 ✭✭✭bob mcbob


    After you contribute on the app, it brings you to a page with a link:

    "New: for app users only. Location of positive test results reported over last 2 weeks".

    Then on this page it has charts with the latest results and charts. On each chart you can see the R number.

    On the bottom of this page you can see "View full report sent to the government" also.

    Edit: Scratch that, the link is generally available.

    Sorry this must be wrong - in this all regions except the Midlands are reporting the R rate at 1 or above. But in Boris's press conference, he has just stated -

    Johnson says the R rate is between 0.7 and 0.9.

    I’m pleased to report that we’ve continued to make steady progress in our collective effort to beat the coronavirus. For three weeks now the number of new cases identified through testing, each day has been below 1,000.


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2020/jul/17/uk-coronavirus-live-boris-johnson-3bn-plan-nhs-battle-ready-for-winter-second-wave

    As always he is always guided by the science.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Dave0301 wrote: »
    I see Hancock has ordered an urgent review into how PHE have been recording deaths, and that people that tested for Covid-19 but died later of natural causes had it recorded as a cause of death.

    It is unlikely to impact on the figures much for the April/May but may explain why deaths have not come down as quickly as other countries in the last few weeks. I view anything they do with such cynicism these days though that I can't help but think it is another deflection from them. Also, give the excess deaths for countries all over the world, it gives a much better view of the impact of the virus.

    W2nnWN6

    While he's at it perhaps Matt could have a stab at estimating how many thousand care home deaths due to corona went unreported because they weren't being tested.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement