Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

COVID-19: Vaccine/antidote and testing procedures Megathread [Mod Warning - Post #1]

1180181183185186195

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭Henryq.


    hmmm wrote: »
    The EU have pre-purchased several vaccines. If there is a glut (and hopefully there will be), the EU will donate the remaining vaccines to poorer countries. The EU have also assisted with scaling up production to ensure that cheaper vaccines like Oxford are made in large quantities.

    Thankfully we are part of the EU as it has allowed us to be part of large deals which would have been hard to negotiate as a small country.

    The end of Covid will only happen when the entire world is vaccinated - it's in our national interest to help the rest of the world, aside entirely from a moral obligation. As long as the poorer countries still have it circulating there is a chance of a mutation which bypasses our current vaccines or a chance that it will be reintroduced as immunity has waned.

    My understanding is that the risk of mutation will always be there

    I'm not sure about vaccination in that scenario or how it works


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭CIARAN_BOYLE


    Henryq. wrote: »
    My understanding is that the risk of mutation will always be there

    I'm not sure about vaccination in that scenario or how it works

    If its circulating the risk of mutation remains.

    If it's not circulating the risk of mutation will be next to nothing as it will be dead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭Henryq.


    If its circulating the risk of mutation remains.

    If it's not circulating the risk of mutation will be next to nothing as it will be dead.

    Are you talking about zero-covid?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Henryq. wrote: »
    My understanding is that the risk of mutation will always be there

    I'm not sure about vaccination in that scenario or how it works

    The more cases there are, the more opportunity for mutation. The more people that are vaccinated the fewer cases.

    It is actually in our interest for the vaccine to be rolled out in as many countries as possible after the vulnerable have been done. If we are all vaccinated but a mutation in the infection path emerges in Moldova for example and rapidly spreads, we are back to square one.

    Whereas if there is vaccine rollout in parallel in multiple countries, case levels will rapidly fall in all countries significantly reducing the opportunity for mutation, and also increasing the chance of detection of an emerging mutation as fewer countries will be in crisis mode


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭Henryq.


    The more cases there are, the more opportunity for mutation. The more people that are vaccinated the fewer cases.

    It is actually in our interest for the vaccine to be rolled out in as many countries as possible after the vulnerable have been done. If we are all vaccinated but a mutation in the infection path emerges in Moldova for example and rapidly spreads, we are back to square one.

    Whereas if there is vaccine rollout in parallel in multiple countries, case levels will rapidly fall in all countries significantly reducing the opportunity for mutation, and also increasing the chance of detection of an emerging mutation as fewer countries will be in crisis mode

    That is one of the mistakes we made here

    Too much focus on crude lockdowns and we are back to square one in the event of another pandemic

    Other countries like Korea and Japan are better placed with advanced test and trace systems in place


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,014 ✭✭✭✭titan18


    The more cases there are, the more opportunity for mutation. The more people that are vaccinated the fewer cases.

    It is actually in our interest for the vaccine to be rolled out in as many countries as possible after the vulnerable have been done. If we are all vaccinated but a mutation in the infection path emerges in Moldova for example and rapidly spreads, we are back to square one.

    Whereas if there is vaccine rollout in parallel in multiple countries, case levels will rapidly fall in all countries significantly reducing the opportunity for mutation, and also increasing the chance of detection of an emerging mutation as fewer countries will be in crisis mode

    Is that not the same case here though? Like if we only vaccinate the vulnerable here, it can still get a mutation in the non vulnerable here as the spread isn't exactly going to change drastically there just less serious, so why should we vaccinate the vulnerable in Moldova first then. Morally, I understand, economically I don't see why if we're still in restrictions and paying to vaccinate others.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,764 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    https://twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338480072483868673

    This is a bit bleak to be honest. I'm in my mid-twenties and franky cannot see myself nor my social group continuing to severely restrict our lives beyond another couple of months


  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 51,688 Mod ✭✭✭✭Stheno


    AdamD wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338480072483868673

    This is a bit bleak to be honest. I'm in my mid-twenties and franky cannot see myself nor my social group continuing to severely restrict our lives beyond another couple of months

    Whats the alternative?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,004 ✭✭✭Hmmzis


    Looks like the final readout for the Russian Sputnik V vaccine has been done (78 cases):

    https://sputnikvaccine.com/newsroom/pressreleases/the-sputnik-v-vaccine-s-efficacy-is-confirmed-at-91-4-based-on-data-analysis-of-the-final-control-po/

    Still at 91.4% efficacy and no severe cases in the vaccine group (20 in the placebo). It's mentioned they'll publish their data in an international journal (The Lancet most likely).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,764 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    Stheno wrote: »
    Whats the alternative?

    I don't see how we can't be open sooner if the vaccine rollout is done properly.

    And the personal alternative? I'll start socialising more. The likelihood of this disease being an issue for me is incredibly low, my current behavior is to stop this spreading to others. On a long enough timeline I will not continue to do so.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    Whereas if there is vaccine rollout in parallel in multiple countries, case levels will rapidly fall in all countries significantly reducing the opportunity for mutation, and also increasing the chance of detection of an emerging mutation as fewer countries will be in crisis mode
    West Africa has done brilliantly to control Ebola with relatively small numbers of vaccine doses. The most recent outbreak spread over a large area, and it required only 40,000 to be vaccinated before the outbreak was extinguished. And that vaccine has been successfully kept at -80C in countries which often lack much basic infrastructure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,493 ✭✭✭VG31


    AdamD wrote: »
    I don't see how we can't be open sooner if the vaccine rollout is done properly.

    And the personal alternative? I'll start socialising more. The likelihood of this disease being an issue for me is incredibly low, my current behavior is to stop this spreading to others. On a long enough timeline I will not continue to do so.
    I couldn't agree more.

    The (correct) narrative throughout this pandemic has been while most people will not be affected badly by the virus, you could pass it on to someone who may be.

    I've followed the guidelines as much as I can; primarily so I don't spread it to elderly or vulnerable family members, not beacuse I am afraid of the virus myself (not that I want to get it, but I don't go around in fear either). If it gets to the stage where everyone I know who is elderly/vulnerable is vaccinated, I really can't see myself continuing to social distance etc.

    There does seem to be a moving of the goalposts recently from protecting the elderly and vulnerable to stopping covid cases. If the hospitals are empty cases shouldn't matter. If you're not vulnerable in any way but really don't want to risk getting covid them of course you can still wear a mask or isolate yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Henryq. wrote: »
    My understanding is that the risk of mutation will always be there


    RTE news app headline is reporting a new strain in the UK:

    In a statement, Mr Hancock said: "Over the last few days, thanks to our world-class genomic capability in the UK, we have identified a new variant of coronavirus which may be associated with the faster spread in the South of England." 

    Matt Hancock said the numbers of the new variant of coronavirus "are increasing rapidly".

    He told the Commons: "Initial analysis suggests that this variant is growing faster than the existing variants.

    Now the important bit :

    Mr Hancock added: "I must stress at this point that there is currently nothing to suggest that this variant is more likely to cause serious disease and the latest clinical advice is that it's highly unlikely that this mutation would fail to respond to a vaccine, but it shows we've got to be vigilant and follow the rules and everyone needs to take personal responsibility not to spread this virus.“


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,922 ✭✭✭Deeper Blue


    I predict that this new strain will be like the mink thing i.e. a complete non story for RTE to fawn over for a week which will be completely forgotten in a month's time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    I find these trucks full of vaccines and pictures of healthcare staff lining up to get them so fantastic. A great achievement for humanity.

    https://twitter.com/MaxFilby/status/1338511135557955587


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭jackofalltrades


    VG31 wrote: »
    I couldn't agree more.

    The (correct) narrative throughout this pandemic has been while most people will not be affected badly by the virus, you could pass it on to someone who may be.

    I've followed the guidelines as much as I can; primarily so I don't spread it to elderly or vulnerable family members, not beacuse I am afraid of the virus myself (not that I want to get it, but I don't go around in fear either). If it gets to the stage where everyone I know who is elderly/vulnerable is vaccinated, I really can't see myself continuing to social distance etc.

    There does seem to be a moving of the goalposts recently from protecting the elderly and vulnerable to stopping covid cases. If the hospitals are empty cases shouldn't matter. If you're not vulnerable in any way but really don't want to risk getting covid them of course you can still wear a mask or isolate yourself.
    Everyone's vulnerable, just to differing degrees.
    I have a neighbour in his 40s, who caught COVID back in March and is still struggling to walk around his house. He had no underlying issues.
    Someone else I know got it and still hasn't got their sense of smell or taste back.
    I know others who got it and were fine.

    It would be madness to stop socially distancing or wearing masks in public until everyone's had a chance to be vaccinated.
    It would be giving up with the finish line in sight, when you could just wait a few months more and ensure everyone is protected.
    We don't hit herd immunity until we get 60-70% vaccinated, based on estimates.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    This is funny. "Do we have to sign for it?" "You betcha"

    https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1338512887845969920


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,483 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Very informative table from yesterday’s Sunday Business Post. Didn’t see it posted already

    https://twitter.com/rachellavin/status/1338484785367408640


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Stheno wrote: »
    Whats the alternative?

    Well the UK reckon that measures will be done away with there by the spring so maybe its time Glynn and co. pulled the finger out and hold up their end of the bargain.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,431 ✭✭✭Sky King


    "Vaccines will not bring an end to the pandemic" according to an RTE broadcast this evening.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338546966125547527

    Here was me thinking that having the vast majority of the population immune to covid would end the pandemic. Ffs.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Sky King wrote: »
    "Vaccines will not bring an end to the pandemic" according to an RTE broadcast this evening.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338546966125547527

    Here was me thinking that having the vast majority of the population immune to covid would end the pandemic. Ffs.

    There preparing us for another 6 months of excuses, finger pointing and arse covering while the HSE put on a modern day three stooges routine with rolling out the vaccine. Someone suggested early, very correctly that there should be press conferences dedicated to the vaccine rollout. That ain't happening because they'd expose how hopeless they truly are.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,641 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Sky King wrote: »
    "Vaccines will not bring an end to the pandemic" according to an RTE broadcast this evening.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338546966125547527

    Here was me thinking that having the vast majority of the population immune to covid would end the pandemic. Ffs.

    In fairness that's not Rte's fault, they are reporting what was said. She clearly says that the vaccine will not end social distancing, madness... I don't know if its covid institutionalisation in the public service here or I've gotten everything about this vaccine wrong


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,913 ✭✭✭JacksonHeightsOwn


    Sky King wrote: »
    "Vaccines will not bring an end to the pandemic" according to an RTE broadcast this evening.

    https://mobile.twitter.com/rtenews/status/1338546966125547527

    Here was me thinking that having the vast majority of the population immune to covid would end the pandemic. Ffs.

    If a vaccine doesn't bring an end to this, then quite frankly, wtf will then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    snotboogie wrote: »
    In fairness that's not Rte's fault, they are reporting what was said. She clearly says that the vaccine will not end social distancing, madness... I don't know if its covid institutionalisation in the public service here or I've gotten everything about this vaccine wrong
    It sounds more like another let's not drop our guard speech. They will not keep people on board if a good portion of the populace have taken new vaccines and are still expected to do what we've been doing. There's unlikely to be much more than 6 months compliance with these guidelines and we continue to be subjected to Levels of living with the virus.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Well the UK reckon that measures will be done away with there by the spring so maybe its time Glynn and co. pulled the finger out and hold up their end of the bargain.

    You do realise it's not their fault ( if any exists) that the vaccine is not approved yet ?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    There preparing us for another 6 months of excuses, finger pointing and arse covering while the HSE put on a modern day three stooges routine with rolling out the vaccine. Someone suggested early, very correctly that there should be press conferences dedicated to the vaccine rollout. That ain't happening because they'd expose how hopeless they truly are.

    How about waiting to see if that happens before you start giving out ?

    Why would wasting time at dedicated press conferences improve the rollout of the vaccine , Ffs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Well the UK reckon that measures will be done away with there by the spring so maybe its time Glynn and co. pulled the finger out and hold up their end of the bargain.
    I'd be wary of the UK thoughts on any of this as they've been wrong so many times this year!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    You do realise it's not their fault ( if any exists) that the vaccine is not approved yet ?

    I do realize that thanks. What i mean is them dragging out the distribution of a vaccine when the time comes. Japan plan on vaccinating everyone by the summer and the UK are ending restrictions by spring. Here, Martin is already giving us the 'we hope to...' routine. It's not good enough.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    is_that_so wrote: »
    I'd be wary of the UK thoughts on any of this as they've been wrong so many times this year!

    What about Japan? It can't be a case of everyone else getting it wrong and ireland being right.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    How about waiting to see if that happens before you start giving out ?

    Why would wasting time at dedicated press conferences improve the rollout of the vaccine , Ffs?

    It would provide the public with a tangible timeline and a framework for how it's going to work. How is that a waste of time? Ffs


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    How about waiting to see if that happens before you start giving out ?

    Why would wasting time at dedicated press conferences improve the rollout of the vaccine , Ffs?
    It's just a commentary on what was said and it was pretty underwhelming stuff. They will lose a lot of people if that is the continued message through 2021, never mind the aim of the vaccine strategy in the first place. As has been hinted by the Government good communication is vital in this next phase. On that basis they are off to a bad start.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    is_that_so wrote: »
    It's just a commentary on what was said and it was pretty underwhelming stuff. They will lose a lot of people if that is the continued message through 2021, never mind the aim of the vaccine strategy in the first place. As has been hinted by the Government good communication is vital in this next phase. On that basis they are off to a bad start.

    That's exactly my point. The tone regarding the vaccine compared to other countries is dreadful. They seem almost afraid to acknowledge it's existence. But I guess some people feel we should just choke down any crap the government and HSE dish up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    What about Japan? It can't be a case of everyone else getting it wrong and ireland being right.
    Eh, how did Japan get into this? The UK have got strategies wrong, failed miserably on contact tracing and I've lost track of how many "game changers" they've had. In short they've spoofed a lot and Spring really means early Autumn!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,312 ✭✭✭Azatadine


    That's exactly my point. The tone regarding the vaccine compared to other countries is dreadful. They seem almost afraid to acknowledge it's existence. But I guess some people feel we should just choke down any crap the government and HSE dish up.

    There is a bit of that (not wanting to acknowledge it exists) for some reason alright


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    is_that_so wrote: »
    Eh, how did Japan get into this? The UK have got strategies wrong, failed miserably on contact tracing and I've lost track of how many "game changers" they've had. In short they've spoofed a lot and Spring really means early Autumn!

    Japan have said they plan on vaccinating everyone by the summer. A country of 120 million people. Fair enough the uk have had their mishaps and disasters but so have we and at least the government there are making amends with the vaccine rollout.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    That's exactly my point. The tone regarding the vaccine compared to other countries is dreadful. They seem almost afraid to acknowledge it's existence. But I guess some people feel we should just choke down any crap the government and HSE dish up.

    Absolutely not, but the continued bashing is getting just a bit tiresome.
    From tomorrow we will all know what , where AND when, and ranting about public health and how terrible the HSE surely can wait until there actually is something to give out about .

    Edit . I note that the UK covid management gets given the benefit of the doubt by you, despite the fact that they have been one of the worst countries through this, but always with the bashing of the Irish response .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Japan have said they plan on vaccinating everyone by the summer. A country of 120 million people. Fair enough the uk have had their mishaps and disasters but so have we and at least the government there are making amends with the vaccine rollout.
    I'd believe Japan but not the UK until they actually do it! Bear in mind only one vaccine is in play and they desperately need the Oxford one, to get anywhere near their planned numbers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    Absolutely not, but the continued bashing is getting just a bit tiresome.
    From tomorrow we will all know what , where AND when, and ranting about public health and how terrible the HSE surely can wait until there actually is something to give out about .

    It's not ranting or bashing it's valid criticism of an important issue. If you cant see why it's important that we roll out a vaccine as quickly as possible for economic, health and social reasons then I give up


  • Administrators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 78,295 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Beasty


    Threads merged


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    It's not ranting or bashing it's valid criticism of an important issue. If you cant see why it's important that we roll out a vaccine as quickly as possible for economic, health and social reasons then I give up

    I never said any of that .
    Of course you would twist and deflect.
    You just continue ranting ....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    Why do people think the HSE will mess up the roll out of the vaccine?

    It’s not as if we are rolling out 100,000s of vaccine doses each year and have been doing it for decades.


    What I’ve learned during this pandemic is that there are a large portion of thick people in this country.

    It will be this huge group of people who have difficulty following the most basic simplest instructions around their first and second appointments.

    The amount of doses that will be wasted due to incompetence within the public will be amazing


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    I never said any of that .
    Of course you would twist and deflect.
    You just continue ranting ....

    Point out where I'm ranting please? Everything I have said I've backed up. Is it a matter of you simply throwing a fit because you don't like what's being said?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Why do people think the HSE will mess up the roll out of the vaccine?

    It’s not as if we are rolling out 100,000s of vaccine doses each year and have been doing it for decades.


    What I’ve learned during this pandemic is that there are a large portion of thick people in this country.

    It will be this huge group of people who have difficulty following the most basic simplest instructions around their first and second appointments.

    What worries me is the particular storage methods for the moderna vaccine. The low temperatures just leave it open for error.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 134 ✭✭Henryq.


    There preparing us for another 6 months of excuses, finger pointing and arse covering while the HSE put on a modern day three stooges routine with rolling out the vaccine. Someone suggested early, very correctly that there should be press conferences dedicated to the vaccine rollout. That ain't happening because they'd expose how hopeless they truly are.

    That was me

    We should be talking vaccine rollout now

    At the moment the government are throwing out soundbytes about the vaccine


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Why do people think the HSE will mess up the roll out of the vaccine?

    It’s not as if we are rolling out 100,000s of vaccine doses each year and have been doing it for decades.


    What I’ve learned during this pandemic is that there are a large portion of thick people in this country.

    It will be this huge group of people who have difficulty following the most basic simplest instructions around their first and second appointments.
    Indeed they took care of over 1m flu' shots this year. It's all the other issues that exist in the HSE that are conflated for this. We will see tomorrow or the next day anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Henryq. wrote: »
    That was me

    We should be talking vaccine rollout now

    At the moment the government are throwing out soundbytes about the vaccine

    It’s a bit worrying alright.

    However, look at Germany. They had a detailed plan in place to start rolling out the vaccine this week. Now no vaccine ready and their Covid management strategy has failed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,136 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Henryq. wrote: »
    That was me

    We should be talking vaccine rollout now

    At the moment the government are throwing out soundbytes about the vaccine
    We can't roll out what is not approved. The plan will be published tomorrow or the next day.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    What worries me is the particular storage methods for the moderna vaccine. The low temperatures just leave it open for error.

    Yes. The thick sh1ts not turning up for appointment because they are delayed in the hairdressers or “forget”

    That’s what will mess up the lifespan of doses.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 547 ✭✭✭BeefeaterHat


    Henryq. wrote: »
    That was me

    We should be talking vaccine rollout now

    At the moment the government are throwing out soundbytes about the vaccine

    Exactly it's pure fluff. If I answered questions the way Micheal Martin does at work I'd be kicked out the door


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,371 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Point out where I'm ranting please? Everything I have said I've backed up. Is it a matter of you simply throwing a fit because you don't like what's being said?

    I have already pointed out / quoted three of your posts that are just bashing for the sake of it . Where are they backed up ?
    There is no data until we know what the vaccine task force have recommended ,so I merely suggest you wait for that before you give out about it . And that you cut the Irish response the same slack you so generously cut the truly awful UK government.
    No fit just responding to some very unbalanced comments .


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement