Is it just me or have SF vanished?

Shefwedfan

all about the mane wrote: »

Show us the production data....

I’m sure there employer would only be delighted with sharing such sensitive information on an internet discussion board.

As if the poster would have one idea what to do with the production data.....

tikkahunter

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Fair enough...but do you have any data on this?

The reason I ask is that a couple of days ago I raised the issue of testing difficulties and various people lost their marbles about scaremongering, lies...the people 'didn't exist', they were 'idiots' and yet today, Leo and the HSE both apologised over those issues which will contib=nue for at least another week.

So forgive if I doubt you and ask for data to back up what you said.

That information is highly confidential

all about the mane

tikkahunter wrote: »

That information is highly confidential

Nah, you need to share it with francie. Otherwise you are lying...

FrancieBrady

tikkahunter wrote: »

That information is highly confidential

So you are saying they cannot 'step up' production?

aido79

tikkahunter wrote: »

That information is highly confidential

How did Louise get access to it?

tikkahunter

aido79 wrote: »

How did Louise get access to it?

She didn’t, she doesn’t have a ****ing clue what she is talking about . In a lot of cases companies would have to contract out the work to smaller companies to up batches.

tikkahunter

FrancieBrady wrote: »

So you are saying they cannot 'step up' production?

In a lot of cases they would have to contract out the work to smaller pharmaceutical companies to carry out the batches . It’s complicated

Shefwedfan

tikkahunter wrote: »

She didn’t, she doesn’t have a ****ing clue what she is talking about . In a lot of cases companies would have to contract out the work to smaller companies to up batches.

It’s fairly common

SF statement, SF talking poo

blanch152

all about the mane wrote: »

What does she mean by stepping up to the plate?

From what I have been told on here, stepping up to the plate means nothing, after all when it is said that FG stepped up to the plate, it is dismissed as nothing.

blanch152

FrancieBrady wrote: »

So you are saying they cannot 'step up' production?

Are you saying they can? What evidence do you have?

Aren’t they innocent until proven guilty like Gerry Adams?

all about the mane

And do all these plants and workers just stop making the drugs they are currently making. What about those patients? Also, does she realise how bespoke these facilities are? The regulatory requirements required to start production, the equipment, training etc. She hasn’t a feckin clue. Is she seriously meant to be SF’s spokesperson on health??

aido79

tikkahunter wrote: »

She didn’t, she doesn’t have a ****ing clue what she is talking about . In a lot of cases companies would have to contract out the work to smaller companies to up batches.

She needs to be pulled up on this. Why is she allowed to go on camera and come out with nonsense without fact checking it first or even doing the slightest bit of research? Next she'll be expecting them to come up with a vaccine.

blanch152

all about the mane wrote: »

And do all these plants and workers just stop making the drugs they are currently making. What about those patients? Also, does she realise how bespoke these facilities are? She hasn’t a feckin clue. Is she seriously meant to be SF’s spokesperson on health??

Louise was a career trade unionist, a rabble rouser for SIPTU in the health sector, part of a failed attempt by SF to take over the union.

all about the mane

blanch152 wrote: »

Louise was a career trade unionist, a rabble rouser for SIPTU in the health sector, part of a failed attempt by SF to take over the union.

The unions are the main reason the health sector is in the state it’s in. Great choice SF!

tikkahunter

all about the mane wrote: »

And do all these plants and workers just stop making the drugs they are currently making. What about those patients? Also, does she realise how bespoke these facilities are? The regulatory requirements required to start production, the equipment, training etc. She hasn’t a feckin clue. Is she seriously meant to be SF’s spokesperson on health??

One of our drugs took about 2 years just to validate it in the plant , from passing clinical trails to getting to the patient can take 4 years . She is a clown.

FrancieBrady

tikkahunter wrote: »

In a lot of cases they would have to contract out the work to smaller pharmaceutical companies to carry out the batches . It’s complicated

I think you are spoofing tbh.

The HSE and NHS are in negotiations with a phama company Randox who say that they have 'stepped up' their production because of the Covid-19 virus.

Randox has stepped up its manufacturing operation in Co Antrim to escalate production of its Covid-19 test kits because it anticipates that governments will come under pressure, particularly in Europe, to test increasing numbers of people.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/hse-and-nhs-officials-in-talks-with-randox-about-using-its-rapid-covid-19-test-1.4202579

According to google there are approx 180 other pharma plants in Ireland.

tikkahunter

aido79 wrote: »

She needs to be pulled up on this. Why is she allowed to go on camera and come out with nonsense without fact checking it first or even doing the slightest bit of research? Next she'll be expecting them to come up with a vaccine.

It’s spouting populist ****e , telling the masses what they want to hear instead of just the truth and facts . It’s a worldwide pandemic and pharmaceuticals are really struggling. Like they need people to run the plants and they can get the virus as well . Sure I’m out now in isolation until my test results come back .

all about the mane

tikkahunter wrote: »

One of our drugs took about 2 years just to validate it in the plant , from passing clinical trails to getting to the patient can take 4 years . She is a clown.

Exactly. As a spokesperson for health you would think she would have some clue as to how things work. Scary to think she would get anywhere near the brief.

Shefwedfan

tikkahunter wrote: »

One of our drugs took about 2 years just to validate it in the plant , from passing clinical trails to getting to the patient can take 4 years . She is a clown.

SF are clowns, she won’t have talked without been given the go ahead by the rest of the gobs**ts

Let them talk, at this stage if another election comes around they will be back to the usual jobless free loaders supporters

all about the mane

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I think you are spoofing tbh.

The HSE and NHS are in negotiations with a phama company Randox who say that they have 'stepped up' their production because of the Covid-19 virus.






https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/hse-and-nhs-officials-in-talks-with-randox-about-using-its-rapid-covid-19-test-1.4202579

According to google there are approx 180 other pharma plants in Ireland.

Do you think those plants might be producing something else? They can just stop what they are doing and short the market for those patients. Great idea.

tikkahunter

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I think you are spoofing tbh.

The HSE and NHS are in negotiations with a phama company Randox who say that they have 'stepped up' their production because of the Covid-19 virus.






https://www.irishtimes.com/business/health-pharma/hse-and-nhs-officials-in-talks-with-randox-about-using-its-rapid-covid-19-test-1.4202579

According to google there are approx 180 other pharma plants in Ireland.

180 and and what do they make , listen you don’t have a clue what you are talking about . You can’t just start making kits because you are a pharma plant .You have to have the machines then validate them . The NHS and Uk government wouldn’t lie would they .

FrancieBrady

all about the mane wrote: »

Do you think those plants might be producing something else? They can just stop what they are doing and short the market for those patients. Great idea.

In a crisis, anything is possible and everything should be on the table. And any politician is going to put possible solutions on the table and is not going to worry about upsetting a few easily annoyed.

Many many people and businesses have moved heaven and earth, why would the pharma industry not be asked to do the same?

Oh I fecking forgot...they might move if we upset them. :rolleyes:

FrancieBrady

tikkahunter wrote: »

180 and and what do they make , listen you don’t have a clue what you are talking about . You can’t just start making kits because you are a pharma plant .You have to have the machines then validate them . The NHS and Uk government wouldn’t lie would they .

Apparently, neither do you have a clue...as you immediately claimed a company couldn't step up to the plate and she was 'mouthing off'. As the IT article shows a fairly major one is waiting to do just that if they negotiate a deal with the HSE and NHS.

Now if you can show any back up at all that ALL other pharma plants can not do similar that would back up your position.

tikkahunter

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Apparently, neither do you have a clue...as you immediately claimed a company couldn't step up to the plate and she was 'mouthing off'. As the IT article shows a fairly major one is waiting to do just that if they negotiate a deal with the HSE and NHS.

Now if you can show any back up at all that ALL other pharma plants can not do similar that would back up your position.

I am working in pharma for 22 years, I have more of a clue than you what goes on and how difficult it is to produce product on a daily basis .

all about the mane

FrancieBrady wrote: »

In a crisis, anything is possible and everything should be on the table. And any politician is going to put possible solutions on the table and is not going to worry about upsetting a few easily annoyed.

Many many people and businesses have moved heaven and earth, why would the pharma industry not be asked to do the same?

Oh I fecking forgot...they might move if we upset them. :rolleyes:

It’s nothing to do with upsetting them. The pharma plants that are still in production are only still producing because they are making critical drugs. Drugs that patients are depending on. Do you just expect them to stop producing those medicines?

Shefwedfan

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Apparently, neither do you have a clue...as you immediately claimed a company couldn't step up to the plate and she was 'mouthing off'. As the IT article shows a fairly major one is waiting to do just that if they negotiate a deal with the HSE and NHS.

Now if you can show any back up at all that ALL other pharma plants can not do similar that would back up your position.

According to your mate earlier nobody is required to back up data with links, it’s in the charter

Hence why your knocking around so long :-)

Shefwedfan

all about the mane wrote: »

It’s nothing to do with upsetting them. The pharma plants that are still in production are only still producing because they are making critical drugs. Drugs that patients are depending on. Do you just expect them to stop producing those medicines?

Nah we don’t need those cancer drugs or any of the rest of those medicines, SF told us to ramp up :-)

tikkahunter

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Nah we don’t need those cancer drugs or any of the rest of those medicines, SF told us to ramp up :-)

Let them all eat cake

all about the mane

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Nah we don’t need those cancer drugs or any of the rest of those medicines, SF told us to ramp up :-)

Yeah, let’s just drop all those patients that won’t survive without them. Louise wants action! Jesus wept

tikkahunter

tikkahunter wrote: »

See Louise OReilly mouthing off on the news about Pharma plants having to step up to the plate .She is a lousy piece of ****e , the majority of pharma plants are already 24/7 365 and are struggling to keep up with batches . Not a word about the employees that have to go in and work in the plants risking bringing the virus home to their family if they become infected at work . Not all of us can stay at home and get paid for it .

Saw that and yes, she really is the lowest of the low.