The Witcher Werewolf - GAMETHREAD

Nigel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

I don't really know how I could milk credit, there are two bad teams here Nigel. Gabs being bad doesn't mean I'm good. I could be a teammate throwing Gabriel under the bus, someone on the other evil team or a goodie.

Also, why would I want distance if Gabriel is good?

because leading a lynch mob that ends up getting a villager lynched isn't a good place to be? You realise we're talking in the context of your posts could be seen to gently push gabs as a baddie and put him up for lynch?

Jake WW

Including 6 in the first FFA creates a lot of fluff for those looking for good reasons for all 6 could you narrow it down now to 3 or put them in two groups a sides and b sides? So we can debate them

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

because leading a lynch mob that ends up getting a villager lynched isn't a good place to be? You realise we're talking in the context of your posts could be seen to gently push gabs as a baddie and put him up for lynch?

Oh I saw what you meant after I posted that, as per the following post. I read it as distancing myself from Gabriel which I thought was odd.

Surely any vote where a villager is lynched isn't a good place to be. Me leading a lynch mob again Gabriel say is still only worth 1 vote. Everyone else has to make their own mind up. I've said a number of times he's top of my list, I don't think anyone else has yet suspected Gabriel so I think we're far away from a mob forming. You and Conor have both ignored the post that raised my suspicions, but have focused on me instead. Do you find anything suspicious in Gabriel's post?

Conor WW

That’s not my FFA Jake. My FFA will be three from those six

Conor WW

Angus is too quiet for my liking. One post yesterday re timing of nilfs and monsters kills.

One post today just after munch regarding nilfs and monsters again.

Too quiet Angus, why didn’t you take time today at munch when many were around to strike up a convo?

Jake WW

Ah ok Conor

Phil WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

no he never responded.

yo phil, what up?

Instead of being part of a gang-handed attack on me, if you read the thread you would see that I apologised already for that mistake. I mixed you up with someone else.

Vernon WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Hi everybody, checking in. Going to read what's been happening so far, will post what I think then

let us know how you get on gerty

Vernon WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Instead of being part of a gang-handed attack on me, if you read the thread you would see that I apologised already for that mistake. I mixed you up with someone else.

i miss stuff, apologies

Gabriel WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Instead of being part of a gang-handed attack on me, if you read the thread you would see that I apologised already for that mistake. I mixed you up with someone else.

A what? :eek:

Vernon WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Did Phil ever get back to this? I can't see it. It seems an odd mistake to make and then make no reference to it when called out on it.

Vernon WW wrote: »

no he never responded.

yo phil, what up?

Phil WW wrote: »

Instead of being part of a gang-handed attack on me, if you read the thread you would see that I apologised already for that mistake. I mixed you up with someone else.

which begs the questions, was barbara **** stirring?

having said that, i cannot find your clarification

Phil WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

which begs the questions, was barbara **** stirring?

I don't like to speak on behalf of other people so I'll let Barbara answer that.

Angus WW

@Conor - what about my two posts so far has me on your longlist of FFA candidates?

Angus WW

Conor WW wrote: »

Angus is too quiet for my liking. One post yesterday re timing of nilfs and monsters kills.

One post today just after munch regarding nilfs and monsters again.

Too quiet Angus, why didn’t you take time today at munch when many were around to strike up a convo?

Because I'm working, I'm on my lunch now so I'm here, I'll be back this evening.

I asked a question yesterday about the munches cause it wasn't in the OP

Vernon WW

Angus WW wrote: »

@Conor - what about my two posts so far has me on your longlist of FFA candidates?

i think he is picking low posters

Orla WW

Conor WW wrote: »

It’s not that confusing, Juicy Lucy.

I have taken 6 players and will base an FFA of 3 from said players. I highly doubt all 6 are good and I’m hoping half are bad and I select correctly.

The hashtag thing is for those of us who, near lynch time, have said “when I die and return NRV don’t forget blah blah blah”. Those posts are always forgotten.

Your really plating a numbers game there, hoping for three bad out of a random 6 isn't exactly a scientific way to prove someone is a wolf. I get you need to start somewhere but a random 6 is a rough start point. That being said, I've no better ideas right now

Orla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

no he never responded.

yo phil, what up?

Did Phil ever answer? Been on plenty and something potentially easy to clarify

Vernon WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Did Phil ever answer? Been on plenty and something potentially easy to clarify

few posts above

Phil WW

Orla WW wrote: »

Did Phil ever answer? Been on plenty and something potentially easy to clarify

Is anyone reading this thread?

Orla WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

few posts above

Thanks

Jake WW

Just a tally of all posts so far, good to have lots of info

Conor WW 32
Barbara WW 19
Liam WW 15
Jake WW 15
Phil WW 13
Derry WW 13
Frank WW 13
Nigel WW 11
Gabriel WW 10
Orla WW 9
Patrick WW 9
Vernon WW 9
Lucy WW 8
Eva WW 7
Stu Redman 6
Angus WW 4
Emily WW 2
Gertrude WW 1
Holly WW 1
Abigail WW 1
Show Thread & Close Window

Conor WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Because I'm working, I'm on my lunch now so I'm here, I'll be back this evening.

I asked a question yesterday about the munches cause it wasn't in the OP

I wonder if you would have replied so promptly if I had posted about you at 11:45am or 2:45pm. Now we’ll never know.

Abigail WW

Derry I have no reads yet. Not much to go on really. Give me a chance!

Late to the party today because of a Guinea pig related emergency. (That's got to be a new excuse ) Have a few things to sort for the parents and then I'll be back. Just popped on to catch up before I fall too far behind.

Emily WW

Vernon WW wrote: »

no he never responded.

yo phil, what up?

Seems very suspicious from Phil alright ðŸ˜

Gabriel WW

Jasus Conor you're chatty aren't ya!

Vernon WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Jasus Conor you're chatty aren't ya!

chatting is good.

Phil WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Seems very suspicious from Phil alright ðŸ˜

Even more suspicious from you to go out of your way to not read ten posts previous.

Phil WW

Orla and Emily straight onto my FFA. No way two people could be so oblivious to a couple of posts around them.

Emily WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Even more suspicious from you to go out of your way to not read ten posts previous.

My smiley face didn't come out, I was just on the wind

Derry WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Instead of being part of a gang-handed attack on me, if you read the thread you would see that I apologised already for that mistake. I mixed you up with someone else.

And the Abigail mistake? :rolleyes: