Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Travellers Naas and Curragh

  • 26-04-2020 9:12pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭


    Next time you think of voting Sinn Fein or PBP, it is their amendment to Covid-19 legislation that is preventing Travellers from being removed off the Curragh or their new locations around the Naas bypass.


    From dail records

    Solidarity-People Before Profit want a line included "for the avoidance of any doubt" that all Travellers who are currently resident in any location should not be evicted during the crisis. Exceptions to this would be "where movement is required to ameliorate hardship and provide protection" but it would be "subject to consultation with the Travellers involved".This amendment is supported by Sinn Fein.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,048 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Darc19 wrote: »
    Next time you think of voting Sinn Fein or PBP, it is their amendment to Covid-19 legislation that is preventing Travellers from being removed off the Curragh or their new locations around the Naas bypass.


    From dail records

    Solidarity-People Before Profit want a line included "for the avoidance of any doubt" that all Travellers who are currently resident in any location should not be evicted during the crisis. Exceptions to this would be "where movement is required to ameliorate hardship and provide protection" but it would be "subject to consultation with the Travellers involved".This amendment is supported by Sinn Fein.

    What are you on about they've already been removed in Naas.

    https://twitter.com/NaasBall/status/1254439882610675713?s=19

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,817 ✭✭✭Darc19


    What are you on about they've already been removed in Naas.

    https://twitter.com/NaasBall/status/1254439882610675713?s=19

    Still littering three locations on the Curragh and they very much made it clear that they cannot be moved.

    Even that effer from pavee point is requesting that a water supply be provided.

    You couldn't make it up.

    Remember it was a SF / PBP amendment that has given this scourge these "rights"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,999 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    What are you on about they've already been removed in Naas.

    https://twitter.com/NaasBall/status/1254439882610675713?s=19

    The reply to that tweet says they have moved 200 metres up the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,468 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Unless they’re going back on the ferry they came in on, it’s not exactly a win.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    They were moved on in nass as they gained illegal entry.
    Curragh is fair game for them under the legislation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭Rosahane


    i wonder if they have car insurance, motor tax and appropriate driving licences for towing caravans?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere


    I would still like someone to explain to me just how - LEGALLY - they got to the Curragh in the first place? After all, taccroding to reports they arrived over Easter Weekend, the LD was already active then.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,512 ✭✭✭Wheety


    Darc19 wrote: »
    Next time you think of voting Sinn Fein or PBP, it is their amendment to Covid-19 legislation that is preventing Travellers from being removed off the Curragh or their new locations around the Naas bypass.


    From dail records

    Solidarity-People Before Profit want a line included "for the avoidance of any doubt" that all Travellers who are currently resident in any location should not be evicted during the crisis. Exceptions to this would be "where movement is required to ameliorate hardship and provide protection" but it would be "subject to consultation with the Travellers involved".This amendment is supported by Sinn Fein.

    This is the appropiate word. They are not protected if they arrived after the lockdown.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 965 ✭✭✭shaveAbullock


    I would still like someone to explain to me just how - LEGALLY - they got to the Curragh in the first place? After all, taccroding to reports they arrived over Easter Weekend, the LD was already active then.

    Don't people from outside of Ireland have the right to move freely under current leglislation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,048 ✭✭✭✭Mantis Toboggan


    Don't people from outside of Ireland have the right to move freely under current leglislation?

    Yeah looks to be a loophole in the current legislation.

    Regardless, rules don't seem to apply to travellers and they're free to do what they like it seems.

    Free Palestine 🇵🇸



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,875 ✭✭✭matchthis


    Anyone with half a brain cell wouldn't go travelling during current circumstances


  • Hosted Moderators Posts: 23,117 ✭✭✭✭beertons


    matchthis wrote: »
    Anyone with half a brain cell wouldn't go travelling during current circumstances

    That swiftly excuses them so.


  • Posts: 7,499 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Rosahane wrote: »
    i wonder if they have car insurance, motor tax and appropriate driving licences for towing caravans?

    No need to wonder,no is the answer.


Advertisement