Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Flightradar24 (and other trackers) Thread Part IV

Options
12223252728118

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭dashoonage


    https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=405d0f

    another one going round at shannon, runway closed?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,980 ✭✭✭Growler!!!


    dashoonage wrote: »
    https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=405d0f

    another one going round at shannon, runway closed?

    Looks like a training flight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    Couple of flights doing circuits in Shannon this morning, the easyjet and luftwaffe were 2 of them


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This aircraft is taking a strange route, left Shannon flew out over the Atlantic before making a u-turn and heading back over the country and turning back again towards Shannon.

    Edit: upon searching for the registration it's some type of test flight.

    https://m.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-737-800-vp-cmu-amck-aviation/eg9j0d

    VPCMU from Shannon https://fr24.com/VPCMU/267fd22a


  • Registered Users Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Salmon Leap


    NordWind Airlines 777 en route to Dublin ex-Nanjing


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 119 ✭✭No Bills


    Delta Air Lines #DL161 out of Amsterdam has an issue and has turned around. Just landed at Dublin.
    https://twitter.com/NikPhillips666/status/1347201672263720961


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,162 ✭✭✭10-10-20


    By the look of his track, they were initially aligning to land in Shannon and then picked Dublin. Was that correct and would it be to do with facilities and availability of company resources in Dublin, or was it due to the nature of the fault?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,187 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Don't forget hotels and alternative travel options


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    10-10-20 wrote: »
    By the look of his track, they were initially aligning to land in Shannon and then picked Dublin. Was that correct and would it be to do with facilities and availability of company resources in Dublin, or was it due to the nature of the fault?

    Absolutely no staff available on the ground in Shannon would have been the issue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,131 ✭✭✭dashoonage




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭A320


    10-10-20 wrote: »
    By the look of his track, they were initially aligning to land in Shannon and then picked Dublin. Was that correct and would it be to do with facilities and availability of company resources in Dublin, or was it due to the nature of the fault?

    correct but it was a sick pax,if they landed in Shannon the onwards flight would probably of been cancelled.they have coverage in Dublin to help with that


  • Registered Users Posts: 705 ✭✭✭BZ


    Absolutely no staff available on the ground in Shannon would have been the issue.

    Incorrect. Considering there was ground handlers on the ground at that time that could have easily handled the aircraft.

    Connectivity however if required would be a different story.


  • Registered Users Posts: 708 ✭✭✭A320


    BZ wrote: »
    Incorrect. Considering there was ground handlers on the ground at that time that could have easily handled the aircraft.

    Connectivity however if required would be a different story.

    He's correct really,Was there an engineer qualified to inspect the overweight aircraft? There was in Dublin along with company staff so hence why it diverted there


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,454 ✭✭✭RocketRaccoon


    BZ wrote: »
    Incorrect. Considering there was ground handlers on the ground at that time that could have easily handled the aircraft.

    Connectivity however if required would be a different story.

    I doubt there was enough to handle a Delta flight, they usually demand double the amount of other airlines.
    Coupled with the fact there probably wasn't anyone to run their system for pax in the airport.

    There was no security staff in the airport to secure the aircraft door, rear door and ramp area.

    Then take into consideration there would have been no direct Delta employees anywhere near the airport too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 705 ✭✭✭BZ


    A320 wrote: »
    He's correct really,Was there an engineer qualified to inspect the overweight aircraft? There was in Dublin along with company staff so hence why it diverted there

    Lufthansa / Shannon Aerospace have two hangars full of engineers at the moment and they look after Delta when scheduled into Shannon.

    I do understand why they diverted to DUB as Connectivity wise if the aircraft went tech its a lot easier to get people. Also fire cover wise SNN currently CAT7 and a 767-300 requires CAT8 so DUB was the only choice on this front.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    Also fire cover wise SNN currently CAT7 and a 767-300 requires CAT8 so DUB was the only choice on this front.
    Can’t this be dropped by 1? So normally requiring CAT8 can be dropped to CAT7.


  • Registered Users Posts: 705 ✭✭✭BZ


    smurfjed wrote: »
    Can’t this be dropped by 1? So normally requiring CAT8 can be dropped to CAT7.

    I'm not a 100 percent sure on that. It may be possible if operator is accepting of it?


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unusual aircraft for such a short route, unless it turned back from its original destination?

    Qatar Airways 787

    QR8865 from London to Dublin https://fr24.com/QTR8865/26844bb4


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 6,522 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Steve


    FR24 History is showing it as a regular scheduled operation, comes to Dublin from London, then goes out to Doha, probably not enough demand from either location at the moment to justify direct flights. Might even be cargo, as there was nothing showing on the Dublin Airport site

    Shore, if it was easy, everybody would be doin it.😁



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,550 ✭✭✭john boye


    FR24 History is showing it as a regular scheduled operation, comes to Dublin from London, then goes out to Doha, probably not enough demand from either location at the moment to justify direct flights. Might even be cargo, as there was nothing showing on the Dublin Airport site

    I assumed it was cargo as the regular Doha-Dublin route is still operating, albeit on a reduced timetable.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 982 ✭✭✭Stephen Strange


    Unusual aircraft for such a short route, unless it turned back from its original destination?

    Qatar Airways 787

    QR8865 from London to Dublin https://fr24.com/QTR8865/26844bb4

    Operates cargo LHR-DUB-DOH regularly at the moment


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,191 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    BZ wrote: »
    I'm not a 100 percent sure on that. It may be possible if operator is accepting of it?

    Actually as this was an ETOPS flight and EINN was most likely a nominated alternate, this would apply.

    121.106

    ETOPS Alternate Airport: Rescue and fire fighting service.

    (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the following rescue and fire fighting service (RFFS) must be available at each airport listed as an ETOPS Alternate Airport in a dispatch or flight release.

    (1) For ETOPS up to 180 minutes, each designated ETOPS Alternate Airport must have RFFS equivalent to that specified by ICAO as Category 4, or higher.


    For non-ETOPS, if the airport has less than 5 daily flights requiring CAT8 (or any CAT), the category can be dropped by 1. So if Shannon primarily has B737 operations, a B767 operator would be allowed drop his required Fire Category by 1. as per FAR139.


  • Registered Users Posts: 921 ✭✭✭Bussywussy


    BZ wrote: »
    Lufthansa / Shannon Aerospace have two hangars full of engineers at the moment and they look after Delta when scheduled into Shannon.

    I do understand why they diverted to DUB as Connectivity wise if the aircraft went tech its a lot easier to get people. Also fire cover wise SNN currently CAT7 and a 767-300 requires CAT8 so DUB was the only choice on this front.

    That contract was terminated a while back


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,793 ✭✭✭Comhrá


    TsnBfe7l.png


  • Registered Users Posts: 208 ✭✭damo80


    Comhra wrote: »
    TsnBfe7l.png

    Haven't seen so many planes fly over the house than I have last 2 days. majority are France to US. 1 Every few mins sometimes 3-4 at a time. Like a mad rush to get to the states!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,254 ✭✭✭Oops!


    Same here, the clear blue sky helps too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 876 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    I doubt there was enough to handle a Delta flight, they usually demand double the amount of other airlines.
    Coupled with the fact there probably wasn't anyone to run their system for pax in the airport.

    There was no security staff in the airport to secure the aircraft door, rear door and ramp area.

    Then take into consideration there would have been no direct Delta employees anywhere near the airport too.

    Medlink will have had an input too. Depending on the nature of the medical emergency, flights often change their diversion from Shannon to Dublin based on Medlink.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Another 787 at Dublin, I'm presuming it's another cargo flight as this airframe according to the listed history usually flies medium and long-haul routes from Heathrow.

    https://www.flightradar24.com/VIR521/268b1517


  • Registered Users Posts: 353 ✭✭masit


    Some noise out of this yoke, 2500ft, just above the fog here. With the fog,not been able to see, felt like it was just above us.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 163 ✭✭colbarr


    HM Coastguard living life on the edge!


Advertisement