Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public service pay cut?

Options
14950525455126

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 24,202 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I think we can move on from that comment.

    For countless years, it has suited successive governments to deal with public service pay on a system of analogous grades. Its more efficient for scaling, pensions, seniority etc

    A Garda Sergeant with 20 years service is the same as a Staff Nurse with 20 years, is the same as a civil service Exec Officer, an Army Lieutenant etc. (thats an example, i dont know if those are an exact analogy)

    It suits the Unions to deal with things that way too, for many reasons. So, you won't see, say, nurses and paramedics pay protected while all other analogous grades take a hit, it would cause far too much strife.

    And its also too simplistic to say just medics and Guards worked harder in this thing. Tons of staff in social protection, HSE, HSA, local Councils, the defence forces and civil defence, the enterprise agencies, the state labs, the agri bodies etc, worked weeks worth of unpaid hours to reshape long established systems to cope.

    My guess is there won't be a pay hit, especially if H2 2020 shows a significant rebound, more likely a selective moratorium on recruitment to cut costs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Ridiculous comment.

    No more ridiculous than someone who uses a criminal act to justify a public servant's salary.


  • Registered Users Posts: 52,014 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    salonfire wrote: »
    No more ridiculous than someone who uses a criminal act to justify a public servant's salary.

    Totally appropriate when the criminal act was aimed at him and his family because of the work he does. Your comment was stupid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Having 'Pubic Pay Cuts' in the title of this thread is disingenuous imho, as none have occurred for close to a ~ decade now!?

    Perhaps it should be titled, something more like:

    ' What Has to Happen to Prevent Senseless Public Pay Rises?'

    E.g. Ireland is going into a massive recession, with 25% unemployment, but the public sector are still giving themselves a further 2% pay rise on already hugely over the top & totally out of line salaries & pensions. Jesus wept!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭ParkRunner


    daithi7 wrote: »
    Having 'Pubic Pay Cuts' in the title of this thread is disingenuous imho, as none have occurred for close to a ~ decade now!?

    Perhaps it should be titled, something more like:

    ' What Has to Happen to Prevent Senseless Public Pay Rises?'

    E.g. Ireland is going into a massive recession, with 25% unemployment, but the public sector are still giving themselves a further 2% pay rise on already hugely over the top & totally out of line salaries & pensions. Jesus wept!!

    I think the logic is you don’t cut yourself out of a recession as it just prolongs it. It depends on the wider state of the economy really and how long any recession might last. Needs a bit more analysis than knee jerk reactions as once a pay cut is signaled that’s a whole lot of money that’s going to immediately be banked rather than spent in anticipation


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    ParkRunner wrote: »
    I think the logic is you don’t cut yourself out of a recession as it just prolongs it. It depends on the wider state of the economy really and how long any recession might last. Needs a bit more analysis than knee jerk reactions as once a pay cut is signaled that’s a whole lot of money that’s going to immediately be banked rather than spent in anticipation

    So we shouldn't cut during downtowns and we certainly couldn't cut or rein in spending during the boom times.

    When do we control our debt and spending?


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,611 ✭✭✭Treppen


    salonfire wrote: »
    So we shouldn't cut during downtowns and we certainly couldn't cut or rein in spending during the boom times.

    When do we control our debt and spending?

    How did the last cuts in the public sector in 2010 work out for you?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Treppen wrote: »
    How did the last cuts in the public sector in 2010 work out for you?

    Is that an answer to my question?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭JJJackal


    ParkRunner wrote: »
    I think the logic is you don’t cut yourself out of a recession as it just prolongs it. It depends on the wider state of the economy really and how long any recession might last. Needs a bit more analysis than knee jerk reactions as once a pay cut is signaled that’s a whole lot of money that’s going to immediately be banked rather than spent in anticipation

    You certainly dont give yourself a 2% payrise (a rise that will have eventually have to be taken back you would think??)


  • Registered Users Posts: 487 ✭✭Jim Root


    JJJackal wrote: »
    You certainly dont give yourself a 2% payrise (a rise that will have eventually have to be taken back you would think??)

    Bingo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 18,602 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The reality of the 2% is:
    1. It's part of a legally agreed roadmap of pay and conditions restoration.
    2. The net cost to the state is not 2%
    3. It is very likely that shortly after far more than 2% will be shorn off public sector wages using the various channels of negotion available.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,480 ✭✭✭Blondini


    daithi7 wrote: »
    Having 'Pubic Pay Cuts' in the title of this thread is disingenuous imho, as none have occurred for close to a ~ decade now!?

    Perhaps it should be titled, something more like:

    ' What Has to Happen to Prevent Senseless Public Pay Rises?'

    E.g. Ireland is going into a massive recession, with 25% unemployment, but the public sector are still giving themselves a further 2% pay rise on already hugely over the top & totally out of line salaries & pensions. Jesus wept!!

    Whatcha waiting for then!

    Publicjobs.ie


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,078 ✭✭✭salonfire


    Blondini wrote: »
    Whatcha waiting for then!

    Publicjobs.ie

    That reins in spending and spiralling debt ... how exactly?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 92 ✭✭ShedTower


    Jesus people are barmy when it comes to public sector pay. The 2% was a part of a 3 year public service pay stability agreement in 2017. Nobody cared that the private sector was receiving far higher pay increases since then. The public sector was falling way behind on wages, certainly in admin areas.

    If things start picking up again in 2021 the private sector will get the increases (and lets face it a lot of them won't even lose the increases of the last few years). As this goes on the public sector will eventually get a 3 or 4 year pay agreement with pittance here and pittance there. Most of it kicked down the road, just as this 2% was in 2017. With a promise not to ask for anything else for years just to get it.


    Newbies are pulling €390 a week. What's the Covid payment, €350? €390 for a full week of work, after competing against hundreds or thousands to get it. And a pretty poor pension to be honest, one that's miles different to preexisting schemes.


    The public sector will suffer in 2021 and 2022, despite how the private sector bounces back. They'll suffer with the next pay agreement too.


    The public service was a good place to be back in the day, no doubt. But anyone who joined it in the last few years must absolutely be baffled by it all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 671 ✭✭✭addaword


    ShedTower wrote: »

    The public sector will suffer in 2021 and 2022,

    Not as much as those on an average of 15,000 or whatever less a year, most of whom have no pension, security etc How many will lose their jobs? Now that is suffering.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 92 ✭✭ShedTower


    addaword wrote: »
    Not as much as those on an average of 15,000 or whatever less a year, most of whom have no pension, security etc How many will lose their jobs? Now that is suffering.

    15k or less a year? You're talking about a select group of bigwigs at the top who have been in for decades. I'm talking about the thousands of ordinary public servants.

    And how many of those you mentioned wouldn't have even considered the public service due to the low wages? And won't either when things pick back up.


    As I said the public service is very different to what it was and it has been for anyone in since 2013. You can't just keep making it worse.


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,602 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    addaword wrote: »
    Not as much as those on an average of 15,000 or whatever less a year, most of whom have no pension, security etc How many will lose their jobs? Now that is suffering.

    There's obviously various levels and degrees of suffering. Ultimately everyone will get some state support to get through it. Its a great little country we live in and it may provide those that were in lower wages an opportunity to retrain and get into a better paying and more secure career


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭daithi7


    ParkRunner wrote: »
    I think the logic is you don’t cut yourself out of a recession as it just prolongs it. It depends on the wider state of the economy really and how long any recession might last. Needs a bit more analysis than knee jerk reactions as once a pay cut is signaled that’s a whole lot of money that’s going to immediately be banked rather than spent in anticipation


    I think even someone like you knows the only ' logic' is to quietly pile on even more pay rises for the public sector (who of course politicians own pay is linked to ~ funny dat hey!? ). This must all be pulled off before the mother of all recessions is reflected fully in the national finances in the autumn & next year.

    Once the horror of our financial reality is fully apparent, & it will be, this latest pay rise is going to be seen to be the absolute abomination that it is.

    As another poster succinctly put it, since the last financial crash there has been a ~ restoration of public pay to Celtic Tiger levels ( which were never sustainable anyway) but there has been no corresponding restoration to 2007 Tax Levels. I.e. USC rates & other 'emergency & one off taxes are all still in place. Why?! To pay outsized pubic pay & pensions off course!!

    That's just plain wrong imho, and this public pay rise, now when we've 25% unemployment, is a total disgrace


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,602 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    daithi7 wrote: »
    I think even someone like you know' the logic' is to quietly pile on even more pay rises for the public sector (who of course politicians own pay is linked to ~ funny dat hey!? ) before the mother of all recessions is reflected fully in the national finances in the autumn & next year.

    Once the horror of our financial reality is fully apparent, this latest pay rise is going to be seen to be the absolute abomination that it is.

    As another poster succinctly put it, since the last financial crash there has been a restoration of public pay to Celtic Tiger levels ( which were never sustainable) but there has been no restoration to 2007 Tax Levels. (I.e. USC, rates, other 'emergency & one off taxes all stillin place ).

    That's just plain wrong imho, and this public pay rise now, is a disgrace

    Your lack of appreciation for facts is telling.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,387 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    daithi7 wrote: »

    As another poster succinctly put it, since the last financial crash there has been a restoration of public pay to Celtic Tiger levels..

    That other poster would be incorrect.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,016 ✭✭✭JJJackal


    kippy wrote: »
    The reality of the 2% is:
    1. It's part of a legally agreed roadmap of pay and conditions restoration.
    2. The net cost to the state is not 2%
    3. It is very likely that shortly after far more than 2% will be shorn off public sector wages using the various channels of negotion available.

    1. You negotiate with the unions to defer - everyone knows we dont have the money now.
    2. Net gain of future cuts to state - a 5% cut is really only a 1% gain because state wont get PAYE, PRSI etc etc and people wont spend in shop so no VAT and then other people wont have jobs cause the public sector arent buying in shops ets
    3. It makes sense to delay the 2% for now - you dont miss what you never had. Giving it now and shearing off 4% next year to make up for it is far worse than delaying it imo.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,256 ✭✭✭combat14


    the green tax everything and anything that stirs party are in government now.. it will be pay rises that are needed not cuts to afford all the new "green" taxes that are being brought in


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,450 ✭✭✭fliball123


    combat14 wrote: »
    the green tax everything and anything that stirs party are in government now.. it will be pay rises that are needed not cuts to afford all the new "green" taxes that are being brought in

    How do you reckon that so we all have to pay more taxes for their payrises. emmm thanks but no thanks.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,502 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    Pascal Donohoe gives a statement on plans around public sector pay

    Minister for Finance confirms the September pay increase will go ahead as scheduled and a new pay agreement will be negotiated later in the year. There will be no public sector pay cuts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    ShedTower wrote: »
    Jesus people are barmy when it comes to public sector pay. The 2% was a part of a 3 year public service pay stability agreement in 2017. Nobody cared that the private sector was receiving far higher pay increases since then. The public sector was falling way behind on wages, certainly in admin areas.

    If things start picking up again in 2021 the private sector will get the increases (and lets face it a lot of them won't even lose the increases of the last few years). As this goes on the public sector will eventually get a 3 or 4 year pay agreement with pittance here and pittance there. Most of it kicked down the road, just as this 2% was in 2017. With a promise not to ask for anything else for years just to get it.


    Newbies are pulling €390 a week. What's the Covid payment, €350? €390 for a full week of work, after competing against hundreds or thousands to get it. And a pretty poor pension to be honest, one that's miles different to preexisting schemes.


    The public sector will suffer in 2021 and 2022, despite how the private sector bounces back. They'll suffer with the next pay agreement too.


    The public service was a good place to be back in the day, no doubt. But anyone who joined it in the last few years must absolutely be baffled by it all.

    Don't try and educate the Indo reading Newstalk listening morons with facts and figures you'll give yourself a hernia dealing with them.

    There is a weird subset in Irish society who go pink in the face at the thought of Public servants receiving decent pay and who believe that cutting their pay is the solution to all economic problems I find these are the same people who want public services supplied to them before they request them.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,108 ✭✭✭TheSheriff


    Pascal Donohoe gives a statement on plans around public sector pay

    Minister for Finance confirms the September pay increase will go ahead as scheduled and a new pay agreement will be negotiated later in the year. There will be no public sector pay cuts.

    Glad to hear this.

    I interface with alot of public servants in my role; they are some of the hardest working people I know. Well deserved and delighted the government haven't backtracked.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Scoundrel wrote: »
    Don't try and educate the Indo reading Newstalk listening morons with facts and figures you'll give yourself a hernia dealing with them.

    No cuts would be severe enough to satisfy them. No point justifying PS pay to these haters. As we can see anyway the decision makers like Pascal appreciate the work the PS do.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    No cuts would be severe enough to satisfy them. No point justifying PS pay to these haters. As we can see anyway the decision makers like Pascal appreciate the work the PS do.

    Indeed and any sensible person knows that cuts of some form are coming i.e recruitment/promotion moratorium pay freeze etc but imagine the government asking unions for concessions in next pay deal having refused to honour the previous one they'd be laughed out of it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,301 ✭✭✭daithi7


    Scoundrel wrote: »
    Don't try and educate the Indo reading Newstalk listening morons with facts and figures you'll give yourself a hernia dealing with them.

    Blah, de blah, bs, blah, bs...
    .

    In Ireland public sector pay is 30% greater than the private sector (not including the gold plated,
    index linked pensions)

    In the UK the differential is just 1%.

    Fact is , Ireland pays its public sector far too much and the rest of the workforce and society as a whole must pay for this excess.

    Is a travesty, that feeds into things like the cost of Healthcare, policing, etc, etc, etc . That's what bothers neutrals tbh.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,516 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    combat14 wrote: »
    the green tax everything and anything that stirs party are in government now.. it will be pay rises that are needed not cuts to afford all the new "green" taxes that are being brought in


    I wonder can you list the names of these "new green taxes"?

    I haven't heard of any.


Advertisement