Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

MCU Werewolf MAIN GAME THREAD

Options
1293032343547

Comments

  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    Is there a players list anywhere?

    Previous page. mac posted it


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,202 ✭✭✭Jake WW


    MacDanger wrote: »
    No comp today by the looks of it, usually announced by now looking back on previous days

    Be a shame, enjoyed the comps


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    I tend to look to previous games and we generally have 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 and there are about 20 people left so more than likely 3 no more than 4 left.

    There was 24 to start, and what, another 24 later?

    Where are you getting 20 for your 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 calc?

    so 1 in 4 for 24 would be 6 and one in 4 for 48 would be 12.
    1 in 5 for 24 would be 4 and 1 in 5 for 48 would be 9.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    MacDanger wrote: »
    Fairly wolfy looking there Lucy

    Yeah I'm just going to have to live with it mac, seems people don't like my questions so Ill just keep asking them

    Anyone have thoughts on the thoughts on the question?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    There was 24 to start, and what, another 24 later?

    Where are you getting 20 for your 1 in 4 or 1 in 5 calc?

    so 1 in 4 for 24 would be 6 and one in 4 for 48 would be 12.
    1 in 5 for 24 would be 4 and 1 in 5 for 48 would be 9.

    I hadnt looked at numbers left, guessed at 20, and was basing scale on previous games re 1 in 3 or 1 in 4.


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    I never mentioned 1 in 5


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    I was also taking into account the dead wolves so reckoning no more than 3 or 4 left.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    I tend to look to previous games and we generally have 1 in 3 or 1 in 4 and there are about 20 people left so more than likely 3 no more than 4 left.

    Now I see you are getting 20 from 20 alive players.
    Do you think that the mods add and subtract wolves depending on how many wolves vs villagers are killed during the game?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    I was also taking into account the dead wolves so reckoning no more than 3 or 4 left.

    whoops, my mistake, lets adjust....

    so, 1 in 3 for 24 would be 8 and one in 3 for 48 would be 16.
    1 in 4 for 24 would be 6 and one in 4 for 48 would be 12.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    Now I see you are getting 20 from 20 alive players.
    Do you think that the mods add and subtract wolves depending on how many wolves vs villagers are killed during the game?

    Ewan I am only going by games i have previously played. Yesterday they basically restarted the game with 20+ players, we have had 3 wolves deaths so I was surmising that there are another 3 or 4 left based on the numbers. No, I dont think they add/subtract or throw them in for laughs as game goes along as it is too well planned previously, mind you that would be funny,


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    How many wolves flipped?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    What does flipped mean?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    What does flipped mean?

    How many reveal notices revealed a wolf?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭Conor WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    How many wolves flipped?

    9 total

    3 Cosmic
    3 Earth
    3 anon


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Katie WW


    Okay so what I could find was actually this. I had though I'd seen Ecto and JGF say they were happy to be peeked but I can't find it so must be wrong there.

    Molly in the cosmic thread

    "Nah I'm happy enough to be peeked. Just feel like this is coming out of nowhere over nothing. Ah well."


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    How many wolves flipped?

    since we moved here
    3 from the earth game
    3 from the rest


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    whoops, my mistake, lets adjust....

    so, 1 in 3 for 24 would be 8 and one in 3 for 48 would be 16.
    1 in 4 for 24 would be 6 and one in 4 for 48 would be 12.
    Conor WW wrote: »
    9 total

    3 Cosmic
    3 Earth
    3 anon

    Okay,
    so if its one in 3 there is 5 wolves left, and if its one in 4 there is 3 wolves left.


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    I wasnt counting Cosmic or Earth because they were pre merged thread.

    Thanks for explaining flipped, i had this mad thought for a sec (similar to what happens in movies) where I thought they turn states evidence and started helping villagers and was thinking wtf I havent seen that in a game before, lol.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Just going through numbers and I want someone to confirm this by counting them
    Baggly wrote: »
    u8IrQc5.jpg

    24 original players, 25? in the image

    My counting or Baggly game concept?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Everytime I count it I get a different fuppin number!


  • Advertisement
  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,047 ✭✭✭Steve WW


    i count 24 characters and the skeletal thing in background so 25


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,409 ✭✭✭Ewan WW


    Steve WW wrote: »
    i count 24 characters and the skeletal thing in background so 25

    I get the same, but don't see the point being made.


    Why does this matter?


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    Just going through numbers and I want someone to confirm this by counting them
    Baggly wrote: »
    u8IrQc5.jpg

    24 original players, 25? in the image

    My counting or Baggly game concept?

    Yep I get 25 too


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭Katie WW


    So Isla first said that it would be a waste of a peek because they felt it would be more beneficial to find a wolf.
    duffman13 wrote: »
    I think both remaining earthers will be taken out and then we can reassess that theory

    At the moment Isla would be my favourite for a peek of the anons so far
    Isla WW wrote: »
    it would be a waste in that you wont get a wolf, but a cleared villager is decent as well

    Three hours later the idea is put forward again.
    duffman13 wrote: »
    I've a list of anons above I think should be peeked into. My suggestion would be Isla but I'm happy with everyone else to chime in
    Isla WW wrote: »
    bad idea. when i come back good i get munched

    Wendy and Abigail then chime in as if this is the first reaction of isla to the idea of being peeked. It is not.
    Wendy WW wrote: »
    What..................
    Abigail WW wrote: »
    Why you over other confirmed?
    Isla WW wrote: »
    not automatically. but the wolves will take out a known villager
    duffman13 wrote: »
    Me and MacDanger are ahead of you there rather than a peek from Steve who is an unknown! Strange
    duffman13 wrote: »
    My vote will be on Isla after that reply
    duffman13 wrote: »
    No issue with you being an unknown. Was more concerned with Isla not wanting to be peeked because she'll be munched. In a game where there is no real power villager it stinks badly

    Barbara then comes in saying Isla is terrified of being peeked, when it is not true. Her first post says that we'd be better off peeking elsewhere to find a wolf. When the idea is brought up again she says it's another bad idea because she'll be munched (which eventually she probably would be).
    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Peek Isla

    Most suspect for me and looks terrified at the thought of being peeked
    Isla WW wrote: »
    not terrified. peek away if you must


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Steve WW wrote: »
    i count 24 characters and the skeletal thing in background so 25

    Yeah odd that seeing as Baggly was so careful about the stones in the 2 worlds


    OYPiBz0.jpg

    12 players/12 characters

    BbQWXFC.jpg

    12 Players/13 characters

    Might be nothing might be something


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    And if anybody wants to count this lot and try to correlate them, feel free

    [IMG][/img]mcu-phase-2.png


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    Yeah odd that seeing as Baggly was so careful about the stones in the 2 worlds


    OYPiBz0.jpg

    12 players/12 characters

    BbQWXFC.jpg

    12 Players/13 characters

    Might be nothing might be something

    It crossed my mind that if there was a 4th wolf in one of the islands, would it make more sense that it was in the one with Thanos. Although I don’t see how having an extra character (and not player) would fit that theory.

    Think we could go round and round debating the amount of wolves left but what we know for a fact is that there were at least 6 wolves in two islands and it’s reasonable to assume there is a similar amount right now. So that leaves 3 I think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,896 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    Ewan WW wrote: »
    I get the same, but don't see the point being made.


    Why does this matter?

    I just like to think Baggly and try to get ahead of his game plan and such a glaring error isn't Baggly at all


  • Forum Games Player Posts: 3,927 ✭✭✭Orla WW


    Spook_ie wrote: »
    And if anybody wants to count this lot and try to correlate them, feel free

    [IMG][/img]mcu-phase-2.png

    I counted 24 + the face hiding in the background

    giphy.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,951 ✭✭✭duffman13


    Katie WW wrote: »
    So Isla first said that it would be a waste of a peek because they felt it would be more beneficial to find a wolf.





    Three hours later the idea is put forward again.





    Wendy and Abigail then chime in as if this is the first reaction of isla to the idea of being peeked. It is not.













    Barbara then comes in saying Isla is terrified of being peeked, when it is not true. Her first post says that we'd be better off peeking elsewhere to find a wolf. When the idea is brought up again she says it's another bad idea because she'll be munched (which eventually she probably would be).

    I'm actually reading over that interaction myself, one or two seemed to jump on board relatively quickly but not really go at it either.

    Its hard to really judge as Islas own response warranted being jumped on to an extent


Advertisement