Ahmaud Arbery

Gatling

Donald Trump wrote: »

I'm not wasting any more time on this.


Gatling has said the same as I did. That your man was running away and that he also ran towards the man

I said he was being chased and they tried to stop him ,
I don't think that how you put it .

But it's on you to defend your claims

Guy:Incognito

Donald Trump wrote: »

I'm not wasting any more time on this.


Gatling has said the same as I did. That your man was running away and that he also ran towards the man with the gun. Yourself and ShatterAlan can take it up with him/her.

Well Gatling thanked my post laying out the steps above. So lets take it from there and assume we're all on the same page. What part do you dispute.

Post 652 to avoid any "accidental" confusion.

mynamejeff

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

I can't wait to hear their reasoning for making someone run from them in their 2 pickup's for 4 minutes.

Idiots couldn't be arsed to break a sweat in their "neighbourly good deed".

that's what trials are for , to uncover and expose facts rather than just rushing to outrage

not like its the first time that has happened in America in circumstances like this

mynamejeff

Gatling wrote: »

They were late for the klan meeting hence the rush

did you check that post yet ?

mynamejeff

Gatling wrote: »

He was running away and they tried to stop him .



It's really that simple unless you're a Raving Racist trying force a fake agenda to solely blame the blackman

so now im a racist ? that's not very clever gatling

yet your the one bringing up race would it have a difference if every one involved was black or every one was white ?

MeMen2_MoRi_

mynamejeff wrote: »

that's what trials are for , to uncover and expose facts rather than just rushing to outrage

not like its the first time that has happened in America in circumstances like this

No outrage from me, I'm saying it as I see it and read it. Can't say the same for yourself.

The big "telling" indicators for me are, the length of time the police sat on this case, how quickly the GBI (sp) moved when the video surfaced, the added evidence from the "witness" William Bryan who will now also stand trial.

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

did you check that post yet ?

Did you have a read over mine above and point out where you disagree?

Also , the one where you say he attacked and punched 2 men, one of which never got out of the back of the truck.

mynamejeff

is there footage of what happened before the video ?

I didn't see one


or is it racist to ask to see all the evidence ?

mynamejeff

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Did you have a read over mine above and point out where you disagree?

Also , the one where you say he attacked and punched 2 men, one of which never got out of the back of the truck.

ok I ll amend it to say one armed man , is that ok ?

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

is there footage of what happened before the video ?

I didn't see one


or is it racist to ask to see all the evidence ?

Not thats been released, but theres a reconstruction video posted numerous times, each time one of you claim to not know one of the key parts of what happened.

mynamejeff

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

One more time

The camera car is also chasing him. So he has a car behind and a car in front.

Whent the video starts hes going down the road in the direction of the car,, as the other car is behind him.

Travis McMichael is out of the car on the drivers side.

Arbery then changes direction to go around the passenger side to avoid McMichaels.

McMichaels then goes from the side of the car to the front to head him off. This is where they meet and the struggle starts

Which part of that is wrong?

Which part of him changing direction to go to the opposite side of the car indicates that he wanted to attack them?

Why did McMichaels leave where he was and go to where Arbery was going? If hed stayed hwere he was, Arbery goes off downt the road.

is there evidence that the guy shooting the video is chasing him ? or did that happen before the footage ive seen

Gatling

mynamejeff wrote: »

so now im a racist ? that's not very clever gatling

Can only comment on what I see and read.

ShatterAlan

Donald Trump wrote: »

Jesus. Afraid to give a straight answer.





So you are not against it. Grand.





BTW, 42% of people on death row are black. So good luck with reconciling that with your other virtue signalling.

Despite committing the exact same crime as 10 times the white criminal.


Do you want to continue making a clown out of yourself?

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

is there evidence that the guy shooting the video is chasing him ? or did that happen before the footage ive seen

any evidence he isnt?

The fact hes also been charged with the murder would lead any reasonable person to the conclusion that he was involved.

MeMen2_MoRi_

mynamejeff wrote: »

is there footage of what happened before the video ?

I didn't see one


or is it racist to ask to see all the evidence ?

It will come out in trial, the cops found more video belonging to William Bryan (camera guy in the second pick up chasing Ahmaud) that made it known to the police that he was more then just a "witness" that day.

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

ok I ll amend it to say one armed man , is that ok ?

You probably should .We wouldnt want any made up rubbish in the narrative , would we?

JP Liz V1

Was the victim armed with a gun or knife?

Gatling

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

You probably should .We wouldnt want any made up rubbish in the narrative , would we?

Imagine that.


Oh wait too late

mynamejeff

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

any evidence he isnt?

The fact hes also been charged with the murder would lead any reasonable person to the conclusion that he was involved.[/QUOTE


that isn't really the way evidence works but I suspect (or at least hope ) you already know that

Guy:Incognito

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Was the victim armed with a gun or knife?

A tank by tomorrow.


Unless youre not joking. No he wasnt armed with anything.

MeMen2_MoRi_

mynamejeff wrote: »

is there evidence that the guy shooting the video is chasing him ? or did that happen before the footage ive seen

https://youtu.be/JQyssmg9Veo

Knock yourself out with listening to what the cops investigating this re saying.

mynamejeff

MeMen2_MoRi_ wrote: »

It will come out in trial, the cops found more video belonging to William Bryan (camera guy in the second pick up chasing Ahmaud) that made it known to the police that he was more then just a "witness" that day.

well then that will be great for the trial , shame no one here as seen it and knows for sure

Gatling

JP Liz V1 wrote: »

Was the victim armed with a gun or knife?

No he was completely unarmed .

Despite this several posters claim he had a hammer

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

any evidence he isnt?

The fact hes also been charged with the murder would lead any reasonable person to the conclusion that he was involved.[/QUOTE


that isn't really the way evidence works but I suspect (or at least hope ) you already know that

Is there any evidence the father was involved so?

Instead of trying stupid ways out, how about the parts you disagree with? You managed a few posts of distraction so let get back to it.

mynamejeff

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

You probably should .We wouldnt want any made up rubbish in the narrative , would we?

well some posters have already been at that ,

accusing people of saying things that they haven't and then refusing to acknowledge it

MeMen2_MoRi_

mynamejeff wrote: »

well then that will be great for the trial , shame no one here as seen it and knows for sure

Hahaha, you think if there was evidence to support your view of these three idiots that they'd be arresting the 3rd guy on felony murder and false imprisonment

Donald Trump

ShatterAlan wrote: »

Despite committing the exact same crime as 10 times the white criminal.


Do you want to continue making a clown out of yourself?

You should just keep yourself busy with your gedanken experiments about clubbing people to death with your hurely

Guy:Incognito

mynamejeff wrote: »

well some posters have already been at that ,

accusing people of saying things that they haven't and then refusing to acknowledge it

Yeah , yeah, youre the real victim in all this, spare us. Any chance of leaving the last page of distraction where it is and going through that bullet point account again? Or do you want to argue about who was involved some more to try bury the whole thing?

mynamejeff

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

mynamejeff wrote: »

Is there any evidence the father was involved so?

Instead of trying stupid ways out, how about the parts you disagree with? You managed a few posts of distraction so let get back to it.

so I asked you if there was any evidence of something and there isn't simple

did you watch the link memen2 posted ? its vague in the extreme and rightfully so as its going to used in a murder trial , no one apart from the police investigating it know whats on the videos

Gatling

Guy:Incognito wrote: »

Yeah , yeah, youre the real victim in all this,

But it's all the Blackman's fault for making him post