Ming the Trouserless.

sabat

Kilboor wrote: »

Saying he was hacked is pathetic in my opinion. Does anyone actually believe him

This is the crux of the matter. Remember-Nixon had no knowledge or involvement in the Watergate break-in; it was the lying and scheming afterwards that forced him to resign. I fully expect Ming to be departing Brussels in a helicopter by the end of the week-his position is now untenable.

Truthvader

sabat wrote: »

This is the crux of the matter. Remember-Nixon had no knowledge or involvement in the Watergate break-in; it was the lying and scheming afterwards that forced him to resign. I fully expect Ming to be departing Brussels in a helicopter by the end of the week-his position is now untenable.

Look someone else has even referenced Watergate already

Yurt2

Jinglejangle69 wrote: »

What do you expect, you're making it too easy.

Put your hand out.....


Laughed at, seriously.

Crap edit jingle. And still doesn't even make sense after it.

IAMAMORON

Truthvader wrote: »

Yeah but can we still call it "arsegate"? Go on please?

I would go for "Mchugearsegate" but that is not fair on poor Spairse, she doesn't deserve this publicity either, despite her beautiful arse.

This is not about her arse.

JohnnyFlash

IAMAMORON wrote: »

I would go for "Mchugearsegate" but that is not fair on poor Spairse, she doesn't deserve this publicity either, despite her beautiful arse.

This is not about her arse.

It’s more about the arse of Ming’s 10 skinner joint.

Pintman Paddy Losty

Few paranoid delusional types posting in here about a coordinated FG conspiracy. Too much wacky baccy obviously.

As blanch said, the last episode where someone banged that drum, they ended up having virtual pie all over their face. Fell for my ruse hook, line and sinker. Fun times.

Anyway, as Johnny said, I don't think anyone is claiming it's the crime of the century. It's his silly and ridiculous excuse that he was hacked that is the worst part.

I wonder is Ming over in Belgium at the moment? Probably text the wife saying he was off to bed, then went off and bought an eight of Moroccon hash from an Arab. Went back to his (taxpayer funded) flat and proceeded to get baked out of his mind.

Probably slugging on a few bottles of that strong Belgian beer as well. It's powerful stuff. Did me for, more than once.

Still though. Never did I get so blotto that I posted on social media thinking it was a search box.

I'd say he'll be in the dog house when he gets back to Roscommon.

Everlong1

Asus X540L wrote: »

Same goes for Bono, he turns up at extremely formal meetings about third world debt in leather trousers and wrap-around shades, while everyone else there is wearing a 3 piece.
Absolute knob.

Not a valid comparison. Bono is not an elected politician. He attends those meetings as a campaigner. And as far as real world economics and realistic solutions to problems are concerned, he's a lot more clued in than Ming, Wallace, Boy Barrett and the other token gesture megaphone mob. Which is why he has been quite successful in his campaigning and has achieved real results.

Everlong1

Yurt! wrote: »

Tis a curious successful man who carries on like you do.

You seem utterly serene, at peace with yourself and the world *snigger*

Johnny's success is due to his healthy diet which enables him to exercise a Zen like mastery of his bowels. Have you not read his legendary thread on the subject? If we only had 20 more men like him Ireland could conquer the world. He makes Denis O'Brien look like a shoeshine boy.

Yurt!

Yurt! wrote: »

It's both. And many other factors external to the control of any government.

But, positing leprechaun economic stats (and there are countries ranking below us where the average quality of life as well as income is blatantly superior to Ireland's) as evidence of FG not being f*ckups on many fronts deserves mockery.

Some of the posters here would have you believe FG split the atom and sent men to the moon. They're class-A bullsh*tters and when you put an obvious FG screw up under their nose they'd blame the weatherman for it before broaching any criticism. Jokers to a man.

If it's both, why did you say "the credit for Ireland's development goes to the people"?

The unpleasant reality is FF taosigh like Lemass and Haughey played huge roles in Irish economic success, as much as de Valera impeded it. Government policies matter.

FF, when they were left wing, built huge numbers of social housing and made free secondary education accessible to all. Ahern bringing them economically to the right was a disaster for Ireland.

Your original post was simplistic nonsense.

JohnnyFlash

Everlong1 wrote: »

Johnny's success is due to his healthy diet which enables him to exercise a Zen like mastery of his bowels. Have you not read his legendary thread on the subject? If we only had 20 more men like him Ireland could conquer the world. He makes Denis O'Brien look like a shoeshine boy.

Thanks for the compliments, dude, but you go too far. I do believe that a lot of the irritation and anger you see on this site is down to the posters being extremely ‘bound up’. I’d suggest they get more fresh fruit and vegetables into their diet.

BattleCorp

I wonder is Ming in the doghouse with Mrs. Judith Flanagan.

Nexytus

Funny, you can have a subtle dig at blanchardstown just by simply naming the place.

Sorolla

Yurt! wrote: »

Kind of like how you drone on about SF incessantly in threads about Fine Gael? Sauce for the goose is apparently not sauce for the gander in blanchland.

The simple and godfearing people of the west of Ireland who like to eat their dinner in the middle of the day and enjoy warming their arses up agin a roaring turf fire have great respect for this MEP - he has more credibility in the tip of his thumb than most other elected representatives have in their whole bodies.

His Twitter was compromised and some gob****e sent out a strange message - so fekkin what ??

He will always get my vote and all the simple folk like myself have great time for him

ChikiChiki

There are 3 posters on this thread that are clearly the same person.

blanch152

Yurt! wrote: »

Kind of like how you drone on about SF incessantly in threads about Fine Gael? Sauce for the goose is apparently not sauce for the gander in blanchland.

An admission of sorts.

keano_afc

Meh, Ming is on the right side of the political fence here so very little will be made of this.

Can imagine the same reaction if it had been Mattie McGrath or Ronan Mullen, obviously.

Trouser Snake

keano_afc wrote: »

Can imagine the same reaction if it had been Mattie McGrath or Ronan Mullen, obviously.

Can't imagine them being any good for a quarter ounce either.

JohnnyFlash

ChikiChiki wrote: »

There are 3 posters on this thread that are clearly the same person.

You’ve made that accusation before about me and Emmet, dude. It’s wrong, but you can continue to make it. It’s heartwarming you spend so much time thinking about me.

suicide_circus

keano_afc wrote: »

Meh, Ming is on the right side of the political fence here so very little will be made of this.

Can imagine the same reaction if it had been Mattie McGrath or Ronan Mullen, obviously.

Oh can you imagine the wailing and gnashing of teeth about #metoo, toxic masculinity, the male gaze, the patriarchy and other assorted buzz words that would come out if this was anyone but a confirmed lefty. Saoirse would have gone for the jugular, i have no doubt.

Yurt2

blanch152 wrote: »

An admission of sorts.

You get wrecked on those threads either way. I'm not trying to dictate what people say on any thread, have at it.


Fine Gael B.O.Ts on boards are sad acts. Oh look, I did it again.

Yurt2

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You’ve made that accusation before about me and Emmet, dude. It’s wrong, but you can continue to make it. It’s heartwarming you spend so much time thinking about me.

Lots of posters have leveled the accusation of you running multis, not just ChikiChiki, mostly because it's true.

JohnnyFlash

Yurt! wrote: »

Lots of posters have leveled the accusation of you running multis, because it's true.

It isn’t, dude. It’s something that you’ve let fester and develop in your head, and now you absolutely believe it to be true despite a load of Tom, Dick, and Harry’s making the same accusation years before you. The mods and admins have repeatedly checked this out. Sorry to disappoint you, dude.

You’re gonna have to look for another smoking gun .

Yurt2

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

It isn’t, dude. It’s something that you’ve let fester and develop in your head, and now you absolutely believe it to be true despite a load of Tom, Dick, and Harry’s making the same accusation years before you. The mods and admins have repeatedly checked this out. Sorry to disappoint you, dude.

You’re gonna have to look for another smoking gun .

Isn't it awful altogether that so many people have have independently come to that conclusion about you? How on earth does that happen?


Oh look, Emmett and PaddyLosty liked your post. How odd. And you're all online around the same time.

EmmetSpiceland

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

It isn’t, dude. It’s something that you’ve let fester and develop in your head, and now you absolutely believe it to be true despite a load of Tom, Dick, and Harry’s making the same accusation years before you. The mods and admins have repeatedly checked this out. Sorry to disappoint you, dude.

You’re gonna have to look for another smoking gun .

Long overdue that it became something the mods look at and “action”.

It’s “old hat” at this stage and tantamount to abuse. I won’t comment my own “feelings” on the matter as the last time I was “carded” myself for expressing my displeasure at being link, or compared, to a certain other user.

Although, of course, the initial “accusers” went unpunished. Again.

JohnnyFlash

Yurt! wrote: »

Isn't it awful altogether that so many people have have independently come to that conclusion about you? How on earth does that happen?


Oh look, Emmett and PaddyLosty liked your post. How odd. And you're all online around the same time.

You join a long list of pilgrims who are wrong. No shame in that, dude. It’s ok to be wrong. Even happens to me occasionally. Very occasionally in fairness.

I think the readers of this thread would prefer we discuss the Ming saga instead of wildly inaccurate accusations being fired around, so I suggest we all maybe move back on topic? Hmmmm?

blanch152

Yurt! wrote: »

Isn't it awful altogether that so many people have have independently come to that conclusion about you? How on earth does that happen?


Oh look, Emmett and PaddyLosty liked your post. How odd. And you're all online around the same time.

Not that unusual that so many people independently come to the same conclusion about a poster. But let's leave it at that.

EmmetSpiceland

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You join a long list of pilgrims who are wrong. No shame in that, dude. It’s ok to be wrong. Even happens to me occasionally. Very occasionally in fairness.

I think the readers of this thread would prefer we discuss the Ming saga instead of wildly inaccurate accusations being fired around, so I suggest we all maybe move back on topic? Hmmmm?

You could also suggest that certain users take a “leaf” out of Ming’s book and “chill out” with a weed spliff.

Yurt2

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

You join a long list of pilgrims who are wrong. No shame in that, dude. It’s ok to be wrong. Even happens to me occasionally. Very occasionally in fairness.

I think the readers of this thread would prefer we discuss the Ming saga instead of wildly inaccurate accusations being fired around, so I suggest we all maybe move back on topic? Hmmmm?

Nah, lets talk about how sh*t this iteration of FG are and Michael D'Arcy's spot of bother. I think people reading this find that much more interesting.


I suppose the latest instruction is that IAIM aren't a lobby group right?

Nexytus

Why don't the three of you post at the exact same time in three different threads in different forums. At short notice so you haven't time to set the posts ready to post from three different devices.

suicide_circus

"Dude"

Pintman Paddy Losty

Yurt! wrote: »

Nah, lets talk about how sh*t this iteration of FG are and Michael D'Arcy's spot of bother. I think people reading this find that much more interesting.


I suppose the latest instruction is that IAIM aren't a lobby group right?

Eh, I'm sure there are threads to talk about those things in?


If you've no interest in discussing Ming the trouserless creep, then I suggest you buzz off. Not posting a load of unrelated stuff in here. It makes you look unhinged.

blanch152

Nexytus wrote: »

Why don't the three of you post at the exact same time in three different threads in different forums. At short notice so you haven't time to set the posts ready to post from three different devices.

They could only co-ordinate that if they were the same person. Kind of defeats your test.

Yurt2

Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »

Eh, I'm sure there are threads to talk about those things in?


If you've no interest in discussing Ming the trouserless creep, then I suggest you buzz off. Not posting a load of unrelated stuff in here. It makes you look unhinged.

Oh Pintman you sweet summer child, if only you could see what we see when we read your posts.

Try shutting down another poster, you're onto a losing game here.

Michael D'Arcy, where will this latest FG rollercoaster take us?

Pintman Paddy Losty

Nexytus wrote: »

Why don't the three of you post at the exact same time in three different threads in different forums. At short notice so you haven't time to set the posts ready to post from three different devices.

Because that could easily be achieved through the magic of having a couple of tabs open.


The admins have investigated this. Thorough job they did. Myself and Johnny have met each other once, but we're not the same person.


Emmet certainly ain't me. To be honest I'm very much not a fan of his, at all.

JohnnyFlash

blanch152 wrote: »

They could only co-ordinate that if they were the same person. Kind of defeats your test.

‘Here, Paddy, I’m dropping you a PM so we can all post at the same time to prove we aren’t the same person’.

‘Not sure anyone cares much about that, Flashy’.

‘Ya, I know’.

Pintman Paddy Losty

Yurt! wrote: »

Oh Pintman you sweet summer child, if only you could see what we see when we read your posts.

Try shutting down another poster, you're onto a losing game here.

Michael D'Arcy, where will this latest FG rollercoaster take us?

Not sure dude. Set up a thread there and see where it goes?

JohnnyFlash

Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »

Not sure dude. Set up a thread there and see where it goes?

Careful, dude. Yurt might report us to the Standards in Public Office office.

EmmetSpiceland

Yurt! wrote: »

Nah, lets talk about how sh*t this iteration of FG are and Michael D'Arcy's spot of bother. I think people reading this find that much more interesting.


I suppose the latest instruction is that IAIM aren't a lobby group right?

I’m sure there’s other threads more “suited” for that sort of thing. Why would you want to bring it up in here?

You’ve been getting progressively more “deranged” as the day has gone on. Have you taken any breaks at all? Can’t be good for the mind to be so angry online all day.

Nexytus wrote: »

Why don't the three of you post at the exact same time in three different threads in different forums. At short notice so you haven't time to set the posts ready to post from three different devices.

I’m sure the mods, or admins, have ways of “checking” these things.

While I wouldn’t consent to jumping through nonsense “hoops” I would certainly welcome any mod/admin examination. Although, I’m sure they are more than “satisfied” with things.

Would be nice if they publicly confirmed everything was above “board” and asked users to refrain from these tired “accusations”.

Yurt2

Pintman Paddy Losty wrote: »

Not sure dude. Set up a thread there and see where it goes?

Nah we'll do it here if it's all the same to you.


I can imagine Fine Gael having tough tête-à-têtes with Brian Hayes of the BPFI when looking out for the public interest. Real bruising encounters I'm sure.

suicide_circus

Well "done" dudes, yiz "have" ruined "the" thread.

s1ippy

You could post on three different devices

suicide_circus

s1ippy wrote: »

You could post on three different devices

With 3 different VPNs

blanch152

suicide_circus wrote: »

Well "done" dudes, yiz "have" ruined "the" thread.

Oh I "think" it was a "single", maybe even singular poster who was responsible for ruining the thread, and not one of the Three Amigos.

Nexytus

I meant in response to a queue from someone here and have 30 seconds to do it.

Could be done with helpers but you couldn't post on three devices simultaneously at short notice.

suicide_circus

blanch152 wrote: »

Oh I "think" it was a "single", maybe even singular poster who was responsible for ruining the thread, and not one of the Three Amigos.

I "think" they "prefer" the term "dude" rather "than" Amigo

JohnnyFlash

Nexytus wrote: »

I meant in response to a queue from someone here and have 30 seconds to do it.

Could be done with helpers but you couldn't post on three devices simultaneously at short notice.

Occam’s razor. Like it is with Ming getting as high as a kite and having an old late night perv instead of it being the work of shady hackers out to get him.

The simplest explanation is nearly always the truth.

ToddDameron

It's not unlike the Flutt and Fulton tag team from a few years back.

Tacitus Kilgore

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Occam’s razor. Like it is with Ming getting as high as a kite and having an old late night perv instead of it being the work of shady hackers out to get him.

The simplest explanation is nearly always the truth.

TBH Occam's razor points more to booze for this, you wouldn't know, of course, with the devils lettuce not being a tipple of yours - that's not really a stoned type of mistake - but definitely a drunk one, very definitely a drunk one.

Tacitus Kilgore

And yeah, it's obvious that one or more of the thunderdome stalwarts are still here, there may be multi's involved but unless they're seriously unhinged to a deranged level - Spicey is not one of them.

Nexytus

JohnnyFlash wrote: »

Occam’s razor. Like it is with Ming getting as high as a kite and having an old late night perv instead of it being the work of shady hackers out to get him.

The simplest explanation is nearly always the truth.

I don't support the contention on multiaccounting.
Just found it interesting musing on ways to test such a thing in the age of vpns.
Be more interesting to get back to Ming's lack of self control and night time antics.