Why does RTE have such a pro-SF bias?

Shefwedfan

Chiparus wrote: »

Did he get a free house in 2010?

Who cares?

If he did fair play to him

I am wondering what this has to do with RTÉ bias for SF????

Shefwedfan

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Who cares?

If he did fair play to him

If a quarter of what is in that/alluded to in village article is true.....its in jail he should be

Easy to see why simon coveney wants nothing to do with him too,man is a toxic throwback to the corruption of the 80s and 90s

Rodney Bathgate

I listen to Radio Nova. Most of their ‘news’ broadcasts have some leftist footage, usually SF, but occasionally ABC/PBP/Solidarity or whatever they call themselves. They will quote or paraphrase the person in question then play the recording repeating the same thing, which is usually nonsense. I’ve started turning the news off to avoid it.

Shefwedfan

[Deleted User] wrote: »

If a quarter of what is in that/alluded to in village article is true.....its in jail he should be

Easy to see why simon coveney wants nothing to do with him too,man is a toxic throwback to the corruption of the 80s and 90s

I can post an article from the beano on politics? Has better credentials to that website posted :-)

US2

When you see people on the left and the right calling rte bias then you know they are actually impartial. People just cannot stand news they dont agree with. Idiots.

Shefwedfan

[Deleted User] wrote: »

If a quarter of what is in that/alluded to in village article is true.....its in jail he should be

Easy to see why simon coveney wants nothing to do with him too,man is a toxic throwback to the corruption of the 80s and 90s

Do you think Gerry Adams should be in jail for protecting a paedophile for years?

McMurphy

Shefwedfan wrote: »

I can post an article from the beano on politics? Has better credentials to that website posted :-)

That's fairly condescending considering you thought It was a shinner conspiracy that everyone except you knew that any sitting Ceann Comhairle had a guaranteed seat after their tenure.

Shefwedfan

McMurphy wrote: »

That's fairly condescending considering you thought It was a shinner conspiracy that everyone except you knew that any sitting Ceann Comhairle had a guaranteed seat after their tenure.

Will leave you to it lads, keep up the good work

McMurphy

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Will leave you to it lads, keep up the good work

Ah don't be like that shef,. This is supposedly the light hearted current affairs forum. It's ok to have a bit of craic.

maccored

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Do you think Gerry Adams should be in jail for protecting a paedophile for years?

throw in a bit of whataboutery while yer at it, eh!

Chiparus

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Who cares?

If he did fair play to him

I am wondering what this has to do with RTÉ bias for SF????

You think it is OK that politicains can be bought?

Shefwedfan

Chiparus wrote: »

You think it is OK that politicains can be bought?

You think it’s ok for politician to hide child abusers? I think that topic would be of more concern wouldn’t you?

In regards to the article you posted from
“Village”, I already said I’m sure I can find a copy of the beano which has more political clout and at least a good read

What’s next? Sending a link to a Gemma article on 5g and telling us it was MM ? :-)

Shefwedfan

maccored wrote: »

throw in a bit of whataboutery while yer at it, eh!

So child abusing is whatsboutery now? Strange position to take. The rest of the Civilised world think it’s abhorrent.

People who protect child abuser are as bad as the abuser. Do you not think?

Shefwedfan

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Do you think Gerry Adams should be in jail for protecting a paedophile for years?

He's done alot worse,but he is retired and not running for taoiseach

I must look more into this thing about micheal martin corruption allegation and be better informed upon it

Shefwedfan

Shefwedfan wrote: »

So child abusing is whatsboutery now? Strange position to take. The rest of the Civilised world think it’s abhorrent.

People who protect child abuser are as bad as the abuser. Do you not think?

Indeed most people,would also find those who use victims of child abuse to further political points as bad as the abuser too


Which is why thankfuly,mary butler and FF supporters insulting and hurling abuse at survivors of bill kennelly during last election rarely gets mentions ....because it is a pure scummy thing to do

NIMAN

This thread just proves that people will see what they want to see.

Many SF supporters have been slagging off rte for years saying it is in the pocket of FG or FF.

Many threads on here say it is the government's own propaganda machine.

Yet the op thinks it's biased towards SF!!

Shefwedfan

Deleted User wrote: »

He's done alot worse,but he is retired and not running for taoiseach

I must look more into this thing about micheal martin corruption allegation and be better informed upon it

Give you a tip....don't use the "Village" as a reliable media source

Hairy Japanese BASTARDS!

RTÉ are pro-SF? :pac:

LOL, they're anything but.

Shefwedfan

Hairy Japanese BASTARDS! wrote: »

RTÉ are pro-SF? :pac:

LOL, they're anything but.

Watch the news.....every story they roll out the standard SF "politician" to tell us all how it was done wrong :P:P

Shefwedfan

Deleted User wrote: »

Indeed most people,would also find those who use victims of child abuse to further political points as bad as the abuser too


Which is why thankfuly,mary butler and FF supporters insulting and hurling abuse at survivors of bill kennelly during last election rarely gets mentions ....because it is a pure scummy thing to do

The little stories now for every political situation is just too much. So I ain't responding to them anymore because they are clearly made up.

Shefwedfan

Shefwedfan wrote: »

The little stories now for every political situation is just too much. So I ain't responding to them anymore because they are clearly made up.

Except its not.....i literally gave yous name of people involved

Shefwedfan

Deleted User wrote: »

Except its not.....i literally gave yous name of people involved

It's a story, if it was the first or second one maybe someone would disregards zero media coverage. But every topic on here you have a story. From medical information to back up SF, to running a self sustaining farm from the discussion on Keelings to XYZ every few days

And as you have always said, the charter doesn't require you to back up your stories with links.

So personally I will decide to ignore these stories from now on. The charter doesn't say we have to accept them either :-)

maccored

Shefwedfan wrote: »

So child abusing is whatsboutery now? Strange position to take. The rest of the Civilised world think it’s abhorrent.

People who protect child abuser are as bad as the abuser. Do you not think?

I think you 'whatabout' when you get asked anything. this is a topic about SF and RTE - not adams or his brother.

Shefwedfan

maccored wrote: »

I think you 'whatabout' when you get asked anything. this is a topic about SF and RTE - not adams or his brother.

Yes and SF protect child abusers. The entire SF party assisted with the protection.



I think you point should be asked about the poster talking about MM/FF on a SF and RTE thread do you not think?

Shefwedfan

Shefwedfan wrote: »

It's a story, if it was the first or second one maybe someone would disregards zero media coverage. But every topic on here you have a story. From medical information to back up SF, to running a self sustaining farm from the discussion on Keelings to XYZ every few days

This was covered in both the examiner,irish indopendant and on wlr as well as variety of news sites?
(Anyone with a rudimentry interest in the election/irish pol has heard of this)

A quick google shows the aforementioned TD apoligised for actions here,though she also.went on wlr and claimed russians hacked her facebook :pac:

And as you have always said, the charter doesn't require you to back up your stories with links.

So personally I will decide to ignore these stories from now on. The charter doesn't say we have to accept them either :-)

Your free to ignore it,but its the truth,very trumpian to ignore facts,which dont fit in with your world view....but ignore away all yous want mate

maccored

Shefwedfan wrote: »

Yes and SF protect child abusers. The entire SF party assisted with the protection.



I think you point should be asked about the poster talking about MM/FF on a SF and RTE thread do you not think?

more of the whataboutery

Shefwedfan

maccored wrote: »

more of the whataboutery

Let remind of of YOUR post

maccored wrote: »

this is a topic about SF and RTE - not adams or his brother.

So you didn't seem to have an issue with a FF post but took issue with my posts which was about SF and the cover up and protection of child abusers?



Please explain your standards for "whataboutery"



Based on most descriptions on any website the FF post would be a perfect description of "whataboutery" do you not think?

Chiparus

Shefwedfan wrote: »

You think it’s ok for politician to hide child abusers? I think that topic would be of more concern wouldn’t you?

In regards to the article you posted from
“Village”, I already said I’m sure I can find a copy of the beano which has more political clout and at least a good read

What’s next? Sending a link to a Gemma article on 5g and telling us it was MM ? :-)

No, my concern is what affects me. I dont care about the church collections for ff/fg- but the bagmen in the Law Library do, or the politicians in the debt of property developers or multimillionaires, or insurance companies.

Shefwedfan

Chiparus wrote: »

No, my concern is what affects me. I dont care about the church collections for ff/fg- but the bagmen in the Law Library do, or the politicians in the debt of property developers or multimillionaires, or insurance companies.

So start a thread, this is about SF and RTE.

Personally I would be more concerned about child abuser than money. Money is money. A child's life is more precious. Imagine raping a girl from the age of 4 - 10 and when she reaches out to try and get help the person that is doing it is protected. Do you not think a childs protection against a monstor like that and the people that protected him is not more important than money?

Maybe I am odd, but that is the way I am.

Chiparus

Shefwedfan wrote: »

So start a thread, this is about SF and RTE.

Personally I would be more concerned about child abuser than money. Money is money. A child's life is more precious. Imagine raping a girl from the age of 4 - 10 and when she reaches out to try and get help the person that is doing it is protected. Do you not think a childs protection against a monstor like that and the people that protected him is not more important than money?

Maybe I am odd, but that is the way I am.

Clearly