Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Boards Werewolf: BCU

Options
12467…57

Comments

  • Options
    #92
    Derry WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 4,722 ✭✭✭Derry WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    they need to be pulled down!


    You're doing it wrong

    Spartacus was the slave in this story


  • Options
    #93
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    they need to be pulled down!

    Never!

    I've got crates of Stella and a lot of time.


  • Options
    #94
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    You're doing it wrong

    Spartacus was the slave in this story

    This is also true.


  • Options
    #95
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Morning all

    Not much happening on day 0 but still seems a strange kill choice - no posts so I'm assuming they hadn't seen anyone in the posters who stood out. It might also indicate that most of the team that did the killing are in there. Or it might be that they want us to think that

    On who got the kill, what do folks think of the flavour- any thoughts or is it just flavour?

    I suppose by killing someone who hasn't posted, there's no suspicion cast on anyone. Admittedly most of the posts pre-much are about Salem, so I don't know how much any of that would point to anyone.

    I would think the flavour points to it being the Night King / White Walker / Viscerion team - Viscerion is the teeth marks and White Walker is stab wounds. But I also agree the flavour might have nothing to do it (but I hope not).

    Seems really unlikely that both teams would have gone for the same person who didn't post. Also, the OP states they are competing for kills, so surely even if they did pick the same person, they would only be killed by the team who won the competition and therefore the flavour wouldn't reference both teams.


  • Options
    #96
    Eva WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,736 ✭✭✭Eva WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I am nobody.

    tenor.gif


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #97
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Eva WW wrote: »
    tenor.gif

    87e96bd5dd1cd75ca47721c990c4e84b.jpg


  • Options
    #98
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    I am nobody.

    A nobody who let slip about a back room and yet still survived a munch.

    Is Francis me by the way?


  • Options
    #99
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    A nobody who let slip about a back room and yet still survived a munch.

    Is Francis me by the way?

    I am nobody, but yes, you're Francis.


  • Options
    #100
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    A nobody who let slip about a back room and yet still survived a munch.

    Is Francis me by the way?

    If I'm a wolf I'm obviously going to survive the munch.


  • Options
    #101
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    If I'm a wolf I'm obviously going to survive the munch.

    That was kinda my point old bean. I don't think a wolf comes straight out of the blocks and throws a vote on me though.

    Undecided for now.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #102
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    That was kinda my point old bean. I don't think a wolf comes straight out of the blocks and throws a vote on me though.

    Undecided for now.

    You're reading the game well, Francis.

    I may have to keep you around a bit longer.

    Might vote for Jake instead.


  • Options
    #103
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Pfft. You're stuck in the old ways with your refill pads.

    Google Docs/Word is the way to go for notes.

    Cliffs on Frank so far.

    *Singles out me for answering a question, ignores the rest. Why is this?*
    ;)

    I like the above reply much more than the one below. Why such a timid reply Eva WW?

    Eva WW wrote: »
    Interesting that you didn't have an issue with Jake answering the same question in his post...

    kRRmXfCZEoiggAnf6


  • Options
    #104
    Isla WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,479 ✭✭✭Isla WW


    Derry WW wrote: »
    Not much happening on day 0 but still seems a strange kill choice - no posts so I'm assuming they hadn't seen anyone in the posters who stood out. It might also indicate that most of the team that did the killing are in there. Or it might be that they want us to think that

    Hi Derry,

    Where is the 'in there' group than you mention?


  • Options
    #105
    Abigail WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,789 ✭✭✭Abigail WW


    Patrick doesn't necessarily strike me as a strange kill choice. Surely it was a case of role hunting and hoping he was trying to keep attention off himself by not posting.


  • Options
    #106
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Derry WW wrote:
    me too!

    Interesting. I am also Spartacus.
    Derry WW wrote:
    But I think he's wrong, because then we'd have three Sparatcus' (Sparatcai?)

    Make that 4 Spartacuseseseses
    Frank WW wrote:
    I like the above reply much more than the one below. Why such a timid reply Eva WW?

    If there's one thing I'm not that would be timid to be sure to be sure


  • Options
    #107
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Hi All

    Had some problems with my account earlier so wasn't online but have been skimming the thread this morning

    The OP stated that there was a comp for the first kill so presumably there was tasking going on before this morning's munch. I need to go back and check but Barbara was the one standing out to me as being tasky on first read


  • Options
    #108
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Had a quick check there and these were the posts before 9pm yesterday (assuming a 9pm cut off for the task):

    Barbara 6
    Nigel 4
    Holly 3
    Isla 2
    Fiona 1
    Senan 1

    One of the top three there must have been tasking imo


  • Options
    #109
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    I think Barbara is most likely.


  • Options
    #110
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    how likely the task was not comment on thread at all?

    i think more likely the task was a back room game.

    Unlikely imo, a task like that would probably not have a clear winner since it's easy not to post


  • Options
    #111
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Lucy WW wrote: »
    Had a quick check there and these were the posts before 9pm yesterday (assuming a 9pm cut off for the task):

    Barbara 6
    Nigel 4
    Holly 3
    Isla 2
    Fiona 1
    Senan 1

    One of the top three there must have been tasking imo

    This is good logical reasoning


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #112
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    main-qimg-1cb19ea3e5ae1dcc3c69071bfd8767ae.webp


  • Options
    #113
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Lucy WW wrote:
    One of the top three there must have been tasking imo

    Unless the task was not to post

    Or post once

    Etc etc..


  • Options
    #114
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Holly WW wrote: »
    Unless the task was not to post

    Or post once

    Etc etc..

    Exactly. It's too obvious to be set a task of post the most, or whatever.


  • Options
    #115
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Frank WW wrote: »
    This is good logical reasoning

    Sarcasm?


  • Options
    #116
    Nigel WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,600 ✭✭✭Nigel WW


    Lucy WW wrote: »
    Had a quick check there and these were the posts before 9pm yesterday (assuming a 9pm cut off for the task):

    Barbara 6
    Nigel 4
    Holly 3
    Isla 2
    Fiona 1
    Senan 1

    One of the top three there must have been tasking imo

    thats if task was on thread. could be a backroom quiz or something.

    with so few posts yesterday, a task would stick out like a sore thumb.

    aside from barbara posting pics of statues, there's nothing i can see there that resembles a task. having said that, it could me such a subtle task as well.


  • Options
    #117
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Frank WW wrote:
    This is good logical reasoning

    I dunno. Maybe it's cos I'm up there with a big fat total of 3 posts (top poster lol :D )

    Anyhap I see the reasoning but without knowing what the task is it's a dangerous assumption.

    I'm good and I've a good feeling about Babs due to the early aggressiveness. Then we drop into people who posted once or twice...

    It's like finding a needle in a haystack imo


  • Options
    #118
    Holly WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,061 ✭✭✭Holly WW


    Oh I missed Nigel.

    Meh with the low volume of posts I'm not liking the idea of going after people with 4 posts just cos they posted on a super slow Sunday

    Feels like a red herring to me personally


  • Options
    #119
    Lucy WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 1,394 ✭✭✭Lucy WW


    Nigel WW wrote: »
    thats if task was on thread. could be a backroom quiz or something.

    with so few posts yesterday, a task would stick out like a sore thumb.

    aside from barbara posting pics of statues, there's nothing i can see there that resembles a task. having said that, it could me such a subtle task as well.

    Could be something completely off thread like that. It was the first three pics/vids from Barbara that made me think task but TBF, it's not a lot to go on


  • Options
    #120
    Barbara WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 3,146 ✭✭✭Barbara WW


    Lucy WW wrote: »
    It was the first three pics/vids from Barbara that made me think task but TBF, it's not a lot to go on

    I think we should give the mods a bit more credit to come up with something more creative than that.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #121
    Frank WW
    Forum Games Player Posts: 2,749 ✭✭✭Frank WW


    Barbara WW wrote: »
    Exactly. It's too obvious to be set a task of post the most, or whatever.

    Maybe not volume, but the point would be to post. Thats the point after all, risk vs reward. Would make sense to eliminate a no poster as well to give us nothing to go on.


Advertisement