Boards Werewolf: BCU

Barbara WW

Holly WW wrote: »

Oh I missed Nigel.

Meh with the low volume of posts I'm not liking the idea of going after people with 4 posts just cos they posted on a super slow Sunday

Feels like a red herring to me personally

And for hours it was just me talking to myself.

Lucy WW

Holly WW wrote: »

Oh I missed Nigel.

Meh with the low volume of posts I'm not liking the idea of going after people with 4 posts just cos they posted on a super slow Sunday

Feels like a red herring to me personally

In fairness, the mods would have set a task (be it on-thread or off) without knowing how busy/quiet it would be.

While I'm not saying it's definitely something, I think it's a bit of a stretch to say it's a red herring. More like "something to bear in mind" imo

Barbara WW

If it was an on thread task the wolves weren't in any rush.

Nigel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

If it was an on thread task the wolves weren't in any rush.

based on that comment my vote will be on you tonight unless something drastic happens

Lucy WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Had a quick check there and these were the posts before 9pm yesterday (assuming a 9pm cut off for the task):

Barbara 6
Nigel 4
Holly 3
Isla 2
Fiona 1
Senan 1

One of the top three there must have been tasking imo

Only 2 posts (one of which was Holly) for the hour before I post this. After I post, Barbara (2 min), Holly (7 min) and Nigel (8 min) are all on pretty quick to rubbish it. Did it come up in the backroom by any chance?

Nigel WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Only 2 posts (one of which was Holly) for the hour before I post this. After I post, Barbara (2 min), Holly (7 min) and Nigel (8 min) are all on pretty quick to rubbish it. Did it come up in the backroom by any chance?

you posted something worthy of comment and discussion

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

you posted something worthy of comment and discussion

Posted mere speculation at that.

Barbara WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Only 2 posts (one of which was Holly) for the hour before I post this. After I post, Barbara (2 min), Holly (7 min) and Nigel (8 min) are all on pretty quick to rubbish it. Did it come up in the backroom by any chance?

It'd be easier to find when I haven't been posting.

Lucy WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

you posted something worthy of comment and discussion

Fair enough although apart from Frank, I think the only 3 people who popped in were the three at the top of the list

Barbara WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Fair enough although apart from Frank, I think the only 3 people who popped in were the three at the top of the list

So you think the three most likely taskers would also be the three quickest to respond to your theory?

Holly WW

Lucy WW wrote:

While I'm not saying it's definitely something, I think it's a bit of a stretch to say it's a red herring. More like "something to bear in mind" imo

Fair enough... But then you follow up with this...

Lucy WW wrote:

Only 2 posts (one of which was Holly) for the hour before I post this. After I post, Barbara (2 min), Holly (7 min) and Nigel (8 min) are all on pretty quick to rubbish it. Did it come up in the backroom by any chance?

Makes me lean more red herring tbh.... Unless you know exactly what the task was you're pushing this idea really hard and now linking the three of us as a team which means we have to be exactly the Night King and co.

Lucy WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

So you think the three most likely taskers would also be the three quickest to respond to your theory?

Possibly not but the fact is that the three of you popped on immediately when I posted it. Holly had posted on the thread a few mins before but you hadn't been on for > 1h before that and Nigel was off even longer

Holly WW

Barbara WW wrote:

So you think the three most likely taskers would also be the three quickest to respond to your theory?

Maybe it's me but generally the top posters are on top because they're online more than anyone else and thus react to things first. So it makes sense that we would respond first, particularly when we're being mentioned

Look it could be that a high poster is tasking, absolutely.

It could also be an off thread task, or a no post task, or a one post task etc etc

Trouble is we don't know

Lucy WW

Holly WW wrote: »

Fair enough... But then you follow up with this...



Makes me lean more red herring tbh.... Unless you know exactly what the task was you're pushing this idea really hard and now linking the three of us as a team which means we have to be exactly the Night King and co.

I only noticed the timing of all of your replies after I made the earlier post. I'm not linking all three of you to the one team but you could be on separate teams and have been competing in some way on the task

Nigel WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

based on that comment my vote will be on you tonight unless something drastic happens

barbara, surprised you haven't addressed this comment by me?

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

barbara, surprised you haven't addressed this comment by me?

I missed it.

OK, that's fine, you have my blessing.

Lucy WW

We started with 17 players, 5 wolfs and 12 villagers, we're now down to 11 villagers, down to 9 v 5 if we mislynch tonight. It's going to get to squeaky bum time very quickly around here

Nigel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

I missed it.

OK, that's fine, you have my blessing.

you're not even gonna question why?

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

you're not even gonna question why?

You've given your reason. You thought my comment was suspicious.

Nigel WW

I did.

"If it was an on thread task the wolves weren't in any rush".

why just the wolves that weren't in a rush?

Holly WW

Lucy WW wrote:

We started with 17 players, 5 wolfs and 12 villagers, we're now down to 11 villagers, down to 9 v 5 if we mislynch tonight. It's going to get to squeaky bum time very quickly around here

Yes but split across two teams.

So 9 vs 3 vs 2 iirc.

Evils have to kill each other to win so it's all gravy

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

I did.

"If it was an on thread task the wolves weren't in any rush".

why just the wolves that weren't in a rush?

Because if it was something like "post first" or "first photo/gif", "post the most", etc

Who else would be in a rush?

Nigel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Because if it was something like "post first" or "first photo/gif", "post the most", etc

Who else would be in a rush?

the SK team

Barbara WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

the SK team

Wolves/SK team are all the one.

Frank WW

Team 1
The Night King, White Walker and Viscerion. Will compete with the sk team for N1 munch and will have one kill per night. Any member of the team may place the kill order

Team 2
Dr Frankenstein - Dr Frankenstein is vulnerable to all manner of attacks. However everyone he kills, he inherits their powers and can use them at his own will.He can not inherit a kill from the opposing evil team even if he kills one of them.

The Monster - Frankenstein's monster follows Dr Frankenstein around but can not inherit powers, if the doctor dies the monster will make the kill orders.

So kill this morning must have been Dr. Frankenstein. So the competing kill ia for tonight, so tasks still very much in play at the moment. Who's been looking tasky?

Barbara? But again, so obvious that it seems TWTBAW.

Emily WW

Jake WW wrote: »

This jumped out for me. Could be just a jokey play on a user's name.

Its nothing more than a hello.

Lucy WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Team 1
The Night King, White Walker and Viscerion. Will compete with the sk team for N1 munch and will have one kill per night. Any member of the team may place the kill order

Team 2
Dr Frankenstein - Dr Frankenstein is vulnerable to all manner of attacks. However everyone he kills, he inherits their powers and can use them at his own will.He can not inherit a kill from the opposing evil team even if he kills one of them.

The Monster - Frankenstein's monster follows Dr Frankenstein around but can not inherit powers, if the doctor dies the monster will make the kill orders.

So kill this morning must have been Dr. Frankenstein. So the competing kill ia for tonight, so tasks still very much in play at the moment. Who's been looking tasky?

Barbara? But again, so obvious that it seems TWTBAW.

Aaaah, that changes things if the task is for tomorrow's munch rather than this morning's munch.

What does SK stand for?

Eva WW

Frank WW wrote: »

I like the above reply much more than the one below. Why such a timid reply Eva WW?

I was battling with gifs again, hence the blank space under my message. Can't preview my posts on mobile. Pretend the gif below featured in that post.



Meanwhile Holly got her post in while I was faling to use gifs.

Emily WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Team 1
The Night King, White Walker and Viscerion. Will compete with the sk team for N1 munch and will have one kill per night. Any member of the team may place the kill order

Team 2
Dr Frankenstein - Dr Frankenstein is vulnerable to all manner of attacks. However everyone he kills, he inherits their powers and can use them at his own will.He can not inherit a kill from the opposing evil team even if he kills one of them.

The Monster - Frankenstein's monster follows Dr Frankenstein around but can not inherit powers, if the doctor dies the monster will make the kill orders.

So kill this morning must have been Dr. Frankenstein. So the competing kill ia for tonight, so tasks still very much in play at the moment. Who's been looking tasky?

Barbara? But again, so obvious that it seems TWTBAW.

Judging from the thread, Barbara has been rattling Frank.

Frank is now pointing at her to he tasky?.

Franks retaliation may be tit for tat. Babs may be rusttling trees and getting a response. Very little to work with thus far but if voting was now, Id vote frank.

Early days though

Eva WW

Lucy WW wrote: »

Aaaah, that changes things if the task is for tomorrow's munch rather than this morning's munch.

What does SK stand for?

Ooh that's interesting, never spotted that it was only for night 1. Does that mean potentially a lynch and two kills tonight?