Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BLM, or WLM? [MOD WARNING: FIRST POST]

Options
1…94959799100…354

Comments

  • Options
    #2882
    Quantum Erasure
    Registered Users Posts: 8,553 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    I liked this thread better when I thought it meant 'untouchable' in the mafia sense...


  • Options
    #2883
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    weldoninhio wrote: »
    The latter hasn’t been convicted of anything so far.

    The former hasn't been convicted of any of the crimes listed to defame him, either.


  • Options
    #2884
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Cupatae wrote: »
    But it makes it ok for 4 ex cons some with guns to attack a 17 year old? Would you have rathered the 17 year old didn't defend himself and left himself to the mercy of these upstanding citizens ?

    So far I've seen one person with a gun besides him. That image is from after the first killing. So that's a pretty important piece of context.


  • Options
    #2885
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    this is boards mate

    how do you prove your point ?

    You've stated unequivocably 'no it's not' about a matter of law. I assume you'd have some citation of the law to support that charge.


  • Options
    #2886
    weldoninhio
    Closed Accounts Posts: 14,311 ✭✭✭✭weldoninhio


    [Deleted User] wrote: »
    Convictions also doesn't suddenly make it okay for a vigilante to shoot and kill you with a rifle. Also it's not even legal under Wisconsin law to do that regardless of the situation. Also the prosecutors clearly view the case against him as credible.

    Self defence buddy. Righteous kills.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2887
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    weldoninhio wrote: »
    Self defence buddy. Righteous kills.

    Self defense while committing a crime is not legally privileged self defense.


  • Options
    #2888
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Thought the narrative was the knife was in his hand, now its in his car? Tomorrow it'll be that he was driving to his house, where he had a knife in the kitchen....

    the knife was found in the foot well of the car ,

    can you see in the video if he had a knife in his hand ? if now was he trying to retrieve it from the car ,

    either was what do you think his plan was ? to drive off . after fighting the cops being tazed with kids in the car .


  • Options
    #2889
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Overheal wrote: »
    Self defense while committing a crime is not legally privileged self defense.

    looting and rioting is a crime too right ?


  • Options
    #2890
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Overheal wrote: »
    You've stated unequivocably 'no it's not' about a matter of law. I assume you'd have some citation of the law to support that charge.

    have you something to prove it is , your the one who made the claim first aren't you ?


  • Options
    #2891
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    looting and rioting is a crime too right ?

    Sure. What's your point? Because, if someone is looting and rioting, it doesn't give one the legal privilege to kill them. Not that I've heard confirmation the 3 victims were rioting, or looting.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2892
    statesaver
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭statesaver


    Absolute state of this fcuking moron. These people cannot be allowed to win. They do not believe in peoples right of freedom of association, freedom of thought, freedom really.

    https://twitter.com/nieto_phillip/status/1299207662043828224

    Don't believe in democracy.


  • Options
    #2893
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    have you something to prove it is , your the one who made the claim first aren't you ?

    I already have. Read the thread.


  • Options
    #2894
    BattleCorp
    Registered Users Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Overheal wrote: »
    Sure. What's your point? Because, if someone is looting and rioting, it doesn't give one the legal privilege to kill them. Not that I've heard confirmation the 3 victims were rioting, or looting.

    You are twisting things though. Rittenhouse didn't kill anybody for looting or rioting. He killed them because they attacked him.


  • Options
    #2895
    Foxtrol
    Registered Users Posts: 11,146 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Overheal wrote: »
    Round in circles because people pretend they don't know what a dog whistle is.

    Ah a certain poster admitted to it a while ago.

    Told me I needed to 'read between the lines...'


  • Options
    #2896
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    statesaver wrote: »
    Absolute state of this fcuking moron. These people cannot be allowed to win. They do not believe in peoples right of freedom of association, freedom of thought, freedom really.

    https://twitter.com/nieto_phillip/status/1299207662043828224

    I'm confused, do you support free speech or not?


  • Options
    #2897
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Overheal wrote: »
    I already have. Read the thread.

    193 pages ?

    what page ?


  • Options
    #2898
    sabat
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    White trash rank lower than the blacks...


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkGiFpJC9LM


  • Options
    #2899
    ThunbergsAreGo
    Registered Users Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    statesaver wrote: »
    Absolute state of this fcuking moron. These people cannot be allowed to win. They do not believe in peoples right of freedom of association, freedom of thought, freedom really.

    https://twitter.com/nieto_phillip/status/1299207662043828224

    Don't believe in democracy.

    The bald lad comes across really well in that video.

    I'm sure someone will be along to tell me he worships Hitler.

    That woman is a lunatic, an annoying lunatic. I'm not sure there were enough people recording that...


  • Options
    #2900
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,647 ✭ [Deleted User]


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    looting and rioting is a crime too right ?

    As my mum used to say to me when I was a toddler. Two wrongs don't make a right. Can't imagine she ever thought I would be saying this to an adult.


  • Options
    #2901
    MisterAnarchy
    Registered Users Posts: 14,876 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Overheal wrote: »
    I'm confused, do you support free speech or not?

    Thats not free speech, thats hate speech and personal abuse.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2902
    briany
    Registered Users Posts: 13,981 ✭✭✭✭briany


    sabat wrote: »
    White trash rank lower than the blacks...


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkGiFpJC9LM

    The film industry have taught us that running into a backwoods inbred family is incredibly dangerous. In reality, it's mainly monotonous and sad.


  • Options
    #2903
    Economic Collapse
    Registered Users Posts: 27 ✭Economic Collapse


    The Irish obsession with America is reaching new levels. You know we are on a different continent and none of this has any relevance here, yes?


  • Options
    #2904
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    All them NBA millionaires and rappers sure are blocked from making money aint they


  • Options
    #2905
    statesaver
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭statesaver


    Overheal wrote: »
    I'm confused, do you support free speech or not?

    I do. I also believe in respect and not threatening behaviour witnessed here against that couple.
    Is speech not violence anymore, I thought you lads endorsed that nonsense,
    speech is violence, silence is violence.

    The metal gymnastics people like yourself have to do must be exhausting, it's surprizing you have the energy to post here 24/7. :rolleyes:


  • Options
    #2906
    markodaly
    Registered Users Posts: 14,717 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    A caste system where blacks sit at the bottom, yet not 4 years ago there was a black president and all likelihood there will be a black female VP come Novemeber

    Does.not.compute.


  • Options
    #2907
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    MisterAnarchy wrote: »
    Thats not free speech, thats hate speech and personal abuse.

    The president of America has engaged in hate speech and personal abuse throughout his presidency. You must be outraged. Also pretty sure the video would not fall under the banner of hate speech in any countries with hate speech laws.


  • Options
    #2908
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,393 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    MisterAnarchy wrote: »
    Thats not free speech, thats hate speech and personal abuse.

    How is it hate speech?


  • Options
    #2909
    mynamejeff
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭mynamejeff


    Deleted User wrote: »
    As my mum used to say to me when I was a toddler. Two wrongs don't make a right. Can't imagine she ever thought I would be saying this to an adult.

    but if them fellas hadn't been out rioting and looting they would be alive and well ?

    isn't that a right

    consequences are tough on people who make bad choices , but I guess them fellas will never learn now


  • Options
    #2910
    BattleCorp
    Registered Users Posts: 11,789 ✭✭✭✭BattleCorp


    Deleted User wrote: »
    The president of America has engaged in hate speech and personal abuse throughout his presidency. You must be outraged. Also pretty sure the video would not fall under the banner of hate speech in any countries with hate speech laws.

    Just because people have different views doesn't mean that they should be outraged.

    That's the problem with the internet nowadays. Disagree with someone and they become outraged.

    It's a difference of opinion, that's all.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #2911
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 8,647 ✭ [Deleted User]


    mynamejeff wrote: »
    but if them fellas hadn't been out rioting and looting they would be alive and well ?

    isn't that a right

    consequences are tough on people who make bad choices , but I guess them fellas will never learn now

    Where is the evidence that these particular individuals were rioting and looting?


Advertisement