Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Covid19 Part XIX-25,802 in ROI (1,753 deaths) 5,859 in NI (556 deaths) (21/07)Read OP

1192193194195197

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭YellowBucket


    US2 wrote: »
    Your also seeing thousands upon thousands of hypochondriacs looking thinking they have it and testing negative, also thousands of people thinking they were floored with it in December.

    It's mostly a harmless disease for healthy people under 65, no amount of scaremongering will change the facts.

    It would seem that basically all of the experts and all of the experience is pointing towards it being a LOT more serious than flu. It also simply is not the influenza virus so even by that logic it is not flu and will be unlikely to cause the exact same set of symptoms as flu.

    As for the people who’ve been tested. If you’re talking about antibody tests and they’re taken more than 3 months after the symptoms, the research is pointing towards no antibodies showing up as being quite normal. That doesn’t necessarily mean no immunity at all, as there may be T cell memory but it’s not looking like it provokes much of a long term immune response and definitely isn’t leaving a lot of people with long term detectable antibodies but a negative antibody test beyond a few months may be meaningless.

    No amount of dismissing facts and evidence will make it any better either.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Gruffalux


    Jesus you gotta love this thread

    “Doesn’t seem to be long term side effects”
    “Claire Byrne still has issues”
    “Yeah but that’s just one and it’s RTÉ”
    “Well 91% of nurses are still suffering fatigue”
    “Yeah but can you prove it’s covid?”

    Yet everything on the “all is rosy” side is stuff like “I don’t think we’re having a second wave and if you think you are you’re probably pulling the mickey off yourself”

    Haha :) had to laugh at this.

    The amount of times that misery **** trope has been used since day one of coronavirus has left me bemused. There is hardly a day when someone does not imagine other people doing it. One even had sand paper inserted in the visualisation yesterday. Very odd!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    It would seem that basically all of the experts and all of the experience is pointing towards it being a LOT more serious than flu. It also simply is not the influenza virus so even by that logic it is not flu and will be unlikely to cause the exact same set of symptoms as flu.

    As for the people who’ve been tested. If you’re talking about antibody tests and they’re taken more than 3 months after the symptoms, the research is pointing towards no antibodies showing up as being quite normal. That doesn’t necessarily mean no immunity at all, as there may be T cell memory but it’s not looking like it provokes much of a long term immune response and definitely isn’t leaving a lot of people with long term detectable antibodies but a negative antibody test beyond a few months may be meaningless.

    No amount of dismissing facts and evidence will make it any better either.

    There's around 10 people in hospital country wide with covid. Its mostly harmless for most people.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Jesus you gotta love this thread

    “Doesn’t seem to be long term side effects”
    “Claire Byrne still has issues”
    “Yeah but that’s just one and it’s RTɔ
    “Well 91% of nurses are still suffering fatigue”
    “Yeah but can you prove it’s covid?”

    Yet everything on the “all is rosy” side is stuff like “I don’t think we’re having a second wave and if you think you are you’re probably pulling the mickey off yourself”

    In fairness there's nothing sexier than a highly infectious virus that can leave long term damage or even kill you and those you love.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    US2 wrote: »
    Your also seeing thousands upon thousands of hypochondriacs looking thinking they have it and testing negative, also thousands of people thinking they were floored with it in December.

    It's mostly a harmless disease for healthy people under 65, no amount of scaremongering will change the facts.

    Have you got a link to some facts about those thousands of hypochondriac bastards clogging up the system, buddy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    US2 wrote: »
    Your also seeing thousands upon thousands of hypochondriacs looking thinking they have it and testing negative, also thousands of people thinking they were floored with it in December.

    It's mostly a harmless disease for healthy people under 65, no amount of scaremongering will change the facts.

    No amount of ignoring data or skewing it will change the facts either.

    It’s a fascinating disease, some people in their 90s survive with no issues or even symptoms, then a 27 year old nurse has issues for months. There’s so much we’ve learned in the last 6 months but just as much, if not more, that we don’t know.

    Personally I move from “it’ll all be fine” camp to “Jesus no we’re doomed” camp almost daily with ease after reading varying viewpoints.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    Check my next post. two thirds of nurses who contracted it are still experiencing post viral fatigue.

    That's the majority.


    HSE being challenged on workplace safety.
    A tweet where HSE executive downplays any post viral effect is par for the course.

    And most nurses who didn't catch it are also experiencing fatigue. They are mentally drained by the whole thing. Fatigue is a very difficult thing to quantify.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    polesheep wrote: »
    And most nurses who didn't catch it are also experiencing fatigue. They are mentally drained by the whole thing. Fatigue is a very difficult thing to quantify.

    source?


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,483 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    gabeeg wrote: »
    Have you got a link to some facts about those thousands of hypochondriac bastards clogging up the system, buddy?
    Continuous positive rate in testing being less than 1% is enough evidence.

    A doctor posted on Twitter last week about the number of calls he was getting looking for covid tests. All this talk of second waves and people needing tests all around the country but the proof is in the results of these tests. 99% of people daily submitting for covid tests are testing negative


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    I’m sure of any group of people, professional healthcare workers would be able to identify that they’re suffering from illness induced fatigue rather than just working hard.

    I’d tend to listen to the nurses and doctors on this one.

    You’re also seeing and hearing exactly the same story from people around the world reporting identical experiences of long recoveries and lasting symptoms.
    Hundreds of thousands of them, and this has been widely known since mid-March.

    https://www.click2houston.com/health/2020/03/11/i-had-covid-19-and-heres-my-story-woman-shares-details-of-coronavirus-experience/

    https://www.npr.org/2020/03/15/816174103/former-coronavirus-infected-patient

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8110389/Coronavirus-patients-recover-left-damaged-lungs-researchers-claim.html

    https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2020/03/15/the-other-potential-coronavirus-catastrophe-no-one-is-talking-about/

    Being in denial is not an effective strategy against a pandemic, as America are demonstrating.
    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Thankfully on a positive note i know 12 people who have had it including my cousin that has type 1 diabetes.

    All have recovered with no after effects whatsoever.
    Two (one elderly, one with a mild disability) out of three that live near me with it have died, the other (overweight but only in their thirties) is never going to have a quality of life resembling what it was before. One perfectly healthy young person I know abroad and his partner no longer have a sense of smell after contracting it. I don't know anyone with "no after effects". So I guess it's relative. I certainly wouldn't presume nobody has any long-term illness, just as I wouldn't presume that everyone will definitely feel knock-on effects after they recover.

    My views are informed by facts, instead of by wishing on a star for what I would rather be true (and vehemently opposing anyone who presents any evidence to the contrary).


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Evidence please... and the ethnic origin of the travelers is totally irrelevant.

    The virus does not swim here, blow in with the wind or fall with the misty rain.

    It arrives in people from known hotspots, just like it did from Italy in March.

    USA has just topped 4,000,000 cases and had a death toll of over 1,100 yesterday.

    Legal residents should not be allowed return? Where is the evidence that the vast majority of those entering are not isolating?


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,651 ✭✭✭US2


    Cant believe people are trying to argue that disease is mostly harmless to most people.

    How many positive tests in last 30 days , how many hospital admissions in last 30 days.

    Why do people enjoy being scared.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    marno21 wrote: »
    Continuous positive rate in testing being less than 1% is enough evidence.

    A doctor posted on Twitter last week about the number of calls he was getting looking for covid tests. All this talk of second waves and people needing tests all around the country but the proof is in the results of these tests. 99% of people daily submitting for covid tests are testing negative

    We were talking about long term effects.

    But please, carry on


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,950 ✭✭✭polesheep


    source?

    Ask any of them. I live with one and know many. They are completely fed up with it. Just having to wear a mask all day is becoming a drain, to the point that a lot of them on the general wards are now not wearing them. Look around you, there is a general weariness throughout the entire population thanks to Covid - apart from those who find it fascinating. People have had enough and just wish that the damn thing would go away.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    s1ippy wrote: »

    My views are informed by facts, instead of by wishing on a star for what I would rather be true (and vehemently opposing anyone who presents any evidence to the contrary).

    I don’t give a toss about your informed facts. I know 12 people fully recovered the oldest being 78 that caught in hospital after suffering a mild stroke.

    My cousin lost her sense of taste/smell. Guess what, it fully returned. But keep up your post covid doom and gloom hysteria, be my guest.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,980 ✭✭✭s1ippy


    Well I think you're extremely brave to still be plugging away at that narrative, even at the risk of looking very foolish while doing so.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    US2 wrote: »
    Cant believe people are trying to argue that disease is mostly harmless to most people.

    How many positive tests in last 30 days , how many hospital admissions in last 30 days.

    Why do people enjoy being scared.

    Ask Stephen King.

    You generally don't get admitted to hospital if you're suffering long-term covid effects. You struggle on at home.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭YellowBucket


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    I don’t give a toss about your informed facts..

    Well at least we know where you stand in any debate then.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    marno21 wrote: »
    Continuous positive rate in testing being less than 1% is enough evidence.

    A doctor posted on Twitter last week about the number of calls he was getting looking for covid tests. All this talk of second waves and people needing tests all around the country but the proof is in the results of these tests. 99% of people daily submitting for covid tests are testing negative

    That's a good thing - the higher the rate of positive tests the higher the probability of missing cases, the higher the probability of untraced community cases, the higher the probability of uncontrolled spread


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,591 ✭✭✭gabeeg


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    I don’t give a toss about your informed facts. I know 12 people fully recovered the oldest being 78 that caught in hospital after suffering a mild stroke.

    My cousin lost her sense of taste/smell. Guess what, it fully returned. But keep up your post covid doom and gloom hysteria, be my guest.

    I know multiple people suffering with long term covid effects.

    This is all anecdotal evidence. But your anecdotal evidence doesn't negate ours. Just like ours doesn't negate yours.

    You're just lucky I guess


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,139 ✭✭✭What Username Guidelines


    US2 wrote: »
    Cant believe people are trying to argue that disease is mostly harmless to most people.

    How many positive tests in last 30 days , how many hospital admissions in last 30 days.

    Why do people enjoy being scared.

    No one enjoys being scared, to think that people are enjoying this is the height of ignorance.

    How does positive tests have anything to do with it? This is not about the number of cases or worrying about a surge, it is genuine concern about the unknowns of a new illness shown in clear data.

    Links and data are being posted to show that while there may be a “mild” category it is relative and may mean that even without hospitalisation, people may suffer long term issues when data considers them “recovered”. Some issues appear minor, others life changing.

    So excuse us if discussing exercising a degree of caution is give us all raging boners.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    s1ippy wrote: »
    Well I think you're extremely brave to still be plugging away at that narrative, even at the risk of looking very foolish while doing so.

    Are you referring to me? No i just don’t let hysteria rule my life. What do you expect me to do about it? Stock up with bog roll,? I take every precaution out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,681 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    I know someone who died and also someone who recovered fully after a week, it really depends on personal circumstances


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,513 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    Lads are we really posting anecdotes to somehow try and undermine the validity of a study of hundreds, like come on

    Studies inform and direct debate , anecdotes distract and lower the quality of discussion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭YellowBucket


    The issue is it’s a new (to humans) virus. You’re going to see a wide range of reactions and immune responses to it and that seems to be what’s coming up in evidence from around the world.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Well at least we know where you stand in any debate then.


    Sure it’s hard to debate when you have a thread full of doom and gloomers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭theballz


    s1ippy wrote: »
    Hundreds of thousands of them, and this has been widely known since mid-March.

    https://www.click2houston.com/health/2020/03/11/i-had-covid-19-and-heres-my-story-woman-shares-details-of-coronavirus-experience/

    https://www.npr.org/2020/03/15/816174103/former-coronavirus-infected-patient

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-8110389/Coronavirus-patients-recover-left-damaged-lungs-researchers-claim.html

    https://www.thecanary.co/global/world-analysis/2020/03/15/the-other-potential-coronavirus-catastrophe-no-one-is-talking-about/

    Being in denial is not an effective strategy against a pandemic, as America are demonstrating.


    Two (one elderly, one with a mild disability) out of three that live near me with it have died, the other (overweight but only in their thirties) is never going to have a quality of life resembling what it was before. One perfectly healthy young person I know abroad and his partner no longer have a sense of smell after contracting it. I don't know anyone with "no after effects". So I guess it's relative. I certainly wouldn't presume nobody has any long-term illness, just as I wouldn't presume that everyone will definitely feel knock-on effects after they recover.

    My views are informed by facts, instead of by wishing on a star for what I would rather be true (and vehemently opposing anyone who presents any evidence to the contrary).

    Firstly, I completely agree with most of what you said. However, I have contradicted the virus (mid 30's, not sporty or by any means fit) and I have zero long term effects - the swab showed positive, I have also had the antibody test which has shown that I have the the antibodies.

    In short, I am fitter, healthier and happier than I have ever been in my life so I have to widely disagree with you and call out that you have been very unfortunate to that "I don't know anyone with "no after effects".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,681 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Sure it’s hard to debate when you have a thread full of doom and gloomers.

    The new generation of doomers are more fact driven than the old :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,659 ✭✭✭Doctor Jimbob


    Jesus you gotta love this thread

    “Doesn’t seem to be long term side effects”
    “Claire Byrne still has issues”
    “Yeah but that’s just one and it’s RTɔ
    “Well 91% of nurses are still suffering fatigue”
    “Yeah but can you prove it’s covid?”

    Yet everything on the “all is rosy” side is stuff like “I don’t think we’re having a second wave and if you think you are you’re probably pulling the mickey off yourself”

    Yeah, that's an entirely fair and balanced portrayal of both sides of this discussion. No misrepresentation there at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,241 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Sure it’s hard to debate when you have a thread full of doom and gloomers.

    Or to debate with someone who "doesnt give a toss about facts"......


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Legal residents should not be allowed return? Where is the evidence that the vast majority of those entering are not isolating?

    Strawmen ??

    Of course they should be allowed to return... If they self isolate for 14 days.

    Half of people not answering the phone on the number they gave on the yellow form at the airport and the reports from businesses refusing those who did not isolate, is evidence enough for me.

    The government had better make up it's mind quickly if it wants to protect the bio-security of the country or the interests of the Irish Hotels Federation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    pjohnson wrote: »
    Or to debate with someone who "doesnt give a toss about facts"......


    I meant to say about facts that over exaggerated. You’ll only hear about the post covid side effects cases. I wonder how many that have recovered around the world that are now 100% in comparison.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,450 ✭✭✭✭Jim_Hodge




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Yeah right.

    Lets not go over the top here

    Take that up with the experts if you don't believe them.

    It was Dr. Colm Henry who stated that based on actual evidence. Sure there are outliers, as he addressed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,842 ✭✭✭Rob A. Bank


    Covid-19 is known to be more dangerous for people with certain underlying conditions.

    The question then is how many people have these underlying conditions ?

    A team of experts from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine analysed global data sets of illnesses including diabetes, lung disease and HIV used these to estimate how many people are at heightened risk of serious COVID-19 infection.

    Answer :- An estimated 1.7 billion people - more than 20 percent of the world's population.

    And the proportion is higher in Europe - 30% in danger of serious COVID-19 infection.

    If that 30% is applied to Ireland – population = 4,937,786 – at risk group = 1,481,336 people.

    But the Trump/Bolsonaro fans and the assorted flu-bros here still say that it's harmless !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,148 ✭✭✭Ger Roe


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Sure it’s hard to debate when you have a thread full of doom and gloomers.

    The head of the HSE has just announced that they are very concerned about the recent rise in cases and the number of close contacts being reported. Also concerned about people refusing to be tested when they are identified as being close contacts of a confirmed positive case.

    I would tend to take his concerns seriously, after all he will be tasked with picking up the pieces again, if we do go backwards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,681 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Ger Roe wrote: »
    The head of the HSE has just announced that they are very concerned about the recent rise in cases and the number of close contacts being reported. Also concerned about people refusing to be tested when they are identified as being close contacts of a confirmed positive case.

    I would tend to take his concerns seriously, after all he will be tasked with picking up the pieces again, if we do go backwards.
    To be fair they're not going to come out and say everything's rosey, ever.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Lets not go over the top here

    Take that up with the experts if you don't believe them.

    It was Dr. Colm Henry who stated that based on actual evidence. Sure there are outliers, as he addressed.

    Thanks for snipping my post.

    I said yeah right in relation to a HSE executive downplaying any post viral effects one day after nurses union told enquiry that 2/3rds of nurses are experiencing post viral symptoms.

    The INMO is demanding that legislation be changed to allow health and safety inspections be carried out on the environmental risk which nurses and doctors are exposed to.

    I find the timing more than a little suspect.

    I also pointed out and been shouted down previously for these things.

    It wasn’t airborne until it was
    Masks didn’t work until they did.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 474 ✭✭ChelseaRentBoy


    Jim_Hodge wrote: »

    R. I. P

    A true hero and should be honoured as such.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Strawmen ??

    Of course they should be allowed to return... If they self isolate for 14 days.

    Half of people not answering the phone on the number they gave on the yellow form at the airport and the reports from businesses refusing those who did not isolate, is evidence enough for me.

    The government had better make up it's mind quickly if it wants to protect the bio-security of the country or the interests of the Irish Hotels Federation.

    Here's a novel idea -expect people to have some personal responsibility


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,662 ✭✭✭Duke of Url


    Here's a novel idea -expect people to have some personal responsibility

    Expectation is the mother of all frustrations


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,329 ✭✭✭owlbethere


    R. I. P

    A true hero and should be honoured as such.

    RIP


    Something that's missed here on these forums is that we really have to suppress this virus as much as possible in our country and within our population.

    We learned that healthcare workers are a key group of people infected with the virus. We also now know that there is a long tail illness of the virus going on for several months for some people. We really can't afford a second wave of this virus and for the virus cases to climb and peak again. More healthcare workers will probably become ill and there will be less people to treat and care for sick people in hospital.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,901 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    Micky 32 wrote: »
    Thankfully on a positive note i know 12 people who have had it including my cousin that has type 1 diabetes.

    All have recovered with no after effects whatsoever.

    Good for you.

    But understandably I'm not going to take the word of some random online stranger over a bonafide study of medical health professionals when it comes to determining if Covid 19 causes a second long term wave of illness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,572 ✭✭✭Micky 32


    Boggles wrote: »
    Good for you.

    But understandably I'm not going to take the word of some random online stranger over a bonafide study of medical health professionals when it comes to determining if Covid 19 causes a second long term wave of illness.

    Good for you too. Sure we’ll see longterm. Sure when the vaccine comes out at least you’ll have something else to whinge about regarding longterm effects.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭YellowBucket


    It just shows how quickly things are changing : There’s open discussion in France about possibly closing the Spanish border again due to rising case numbers in Catalonia.

    https://www.ouest-france.fr/europe/espagne/coronavirus-l-espagne-espere-que-la-france-ne-fermera-pas-sa-frontiere-6914784


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,873 ✭✭✭podgeandrodge


    Claire Bryne had it mild and she's still suffering effects after 4 months.

    Entirely predictable given who it is.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,868 ✭✭✭✭Eod100


    owlbethere wrote: »
    RIP


    Something that's missed here on these forums is that we really have to suppress this virus as much as possible in our country and within our population.

    We learned that healthcare workers are a key group of people infected with the virus. We also now know that there is a long tail illness of the virus going on for several months for some people. We really can't afford a second wave of this virus and for the virus cases to climb and peak again. More healthcare workers will probably become ill and there will be less people to treat and care for sick people in hospital.

    Yeah I think the other consideration besides greater risk of illness is how physically and mentally exhausting the last few months have been for healthcare workers. Now with flu season approaching and non-covid procedures resuming, there will be extra pressure on health service.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭caveat emptor


    Jesus you gotta love this thread

    “Doesn’t seem to be long term side effects”
    “Claire Byrne still has issues”
    “Yeah but that’s just one and it’s RTɔ
    “Well 91% of nurses are still suffering fatigue”
    “Yeah but can you prove it’s covid?”

    Yet everything on the “all is rosy” side is stuff like “I don’t think we’re having a second wave and if you think you are you’re probably pulling the mickey off yourself”

    Pandemic is affecting everyone differently. Being able to continue working from home or not is a large factor in some of this divide.

    Pilots need to fly.
    Publicans need to sell beer.

    It might colour people's opinion slightly.

    Unfortunately doesn't change the science but Economics important too.

    https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS/USA-REMOTEWORK/xlbpgbrljvq/index.html


    520788.png


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Covid-19 is known to be more dangerous for people with certain underlying conditions.

    The question then is how many people have these underlying conditions ?

    A team of experts from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine analysed global data sets of illnesses including diabetes, lung disease and HIV used these to estimate how many people are at heightened risk of serious COVID-19 infection.

    Answer :- An estimated 1.7 billion people - more than 20 percent of the world's population.

    And the proportion is higher in Europe - 30% in danger of serious COVID-19 infection.

    If that 30% is applied to Ireland – population = 4,937,786 – at risk group = 1,481,336 people.

    But the Trump/Bolsonaro fans and the assorted flu-bros here still say that it's harmless !


    93% of deaths in Ireland had underlying conditions


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    I didn't get Covid but i have been fatigued all summer due to increased hayfever symptons and being more sedate due to being stuck at home all day.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement