Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Options
1…1415171920…331

Comments

  • Options
    #482
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,585 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Overheal wrote: »
    Another great example of bold faced lying. Aside from numerous interviews, primary debates, his own website detailing what his plans are, etc, I assume? Through what special goalpost do you think in any sincere manner that he hasn’t disclosed ambitions or plans for his presidency?

    If you’re too lazy to be bothered to look I have a suggestion for you: rather than insult your own intelligence, or ours, why don’t you instead just ask the question: “could someone please summarize what Bidens ambitions or plans are for the presidency? Thanks” instead of pretending they don’t exist or haven’t been disclosed and trolling people to provide links to you.

    As we all know, that poster will not read any links provided and admitted to wanting to "waste your time" in a previous post.


  • Options
    #483
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Mark Meadows upended by instant fact checking:

    ‘The President is *literally* checking in every hour’

    Press: ‘hasn’t he been on the golf course all day’

    ‘Well I er uhm what I meant to say was’

    https://twitter.com/dncwarroom/status/1289710313630179328?s=21

    Republicans have become alarmingly comfortable with lies of convenience.

    Also this ad is going live in swing states like Pennsylvania Ohio and Florida.

    [url]

    The general election ad campaigns are shaping up to look exactly like what I had imagined.


  • Options
    #484
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Who are Act Blue and what are they about?

    ActBlue is a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables left-leaning nonprofits, Democrats, and progressive groups to raise money on the Internet by providing them with online fundraising software. Its stated mission is to "empower small-dollar donors".

    In a nutshell they are grifters


  • Options
    #485
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,585 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Who are Act Blue and what are they about?

    ActBlue is a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables left-leaning nonprofits, Democrats, and progressive groups to raise money on the Internet by providing them with online fundraising software. Its stated mission is to "empower small-dollar donors".

    In a nutshell they are grifters

    Atacking the source instead if the content again.


  • Options
    #486
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Who are Act Blue and what are they about?

    ActBlue is a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables left-leaning nonprofits, Democrats, and progressive groups to raise money on the Internet by providing them with online fundraising software. Its stated mission is to "empower small-dollar donors".

    In a nutshell they are grifters

    In a nutshell it’s how elections are run in the US, by crowdfunding and all else. You have your PACs too. It’s all fairly well managed by the FEC which is a bipartisan body, that polices when people spend such earned funds on anything untoward, whether that’s using funds you raised to buy a car (ie. Grifting etc) or paying hush money to porn stars. Federal election fundraising is miles more regulated than say the kickstarters you see where people can just start one to raise funds for one thing and then feck off with the money and live off it. No more grifting than any campaign or political action committee receiving or soliciting funds.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #487
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    Atacking the source instead if the content again.

    Of course I'm attacking the source. The source is a biased one.

    Do any of you want me to start posting Breitbart articles? Would you call them out ? I would


  • Options
    #488
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Who are Act Blue and what are they about?

    ActBlue is a nonprofit technology organization established in June 2004 that enables left-leaning nonprofits, Democrats, and progressive groups to raise money on the Internet by providing them with online fundraising software. Its stated mission is to "empower small-dollar donors".

    In a nutshell they are grifters

    It's a software solution to allow for small donor fundraising. They report all donations to FEC. Sounds to me like a pretty transparent platform. The Republicans have an equivalent called WinRed. So have you any actual proof of grifting?


  • Options
    #489
    Timberrrrrrrr
    Registered Users Posts: 25,585 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Of course I'm attacking the source. The source is a biased one.

    Do any of you want me to start posting Breitbart articles? Would you call them out ? I would

    No, its not, Instead if doing a small bit of research you have (yet again) shown that you have no idea what you are talking about.


  • Options
    #490
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »
    No, its not, I stead if doing a small bit of research you have (yet again) shown that you have no idea what you are talking about.

    Iv given you the details of the company who funded "Really American " to produce their propaganda hit piece.

    Funded by collecting dollar donations from the public and then feed them back loaded rubbish in the hope of attracting further funding.

    Its ridiculous carry on


  • Options
    #491
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Iv given you the details of the company who funded "Really American " to produce their propaganda hit piece.

    Funded by collecting dollar donations from the public and then feed them back loaded rubbish in the hope of attracting further funding.

    Its ridiculous carry on

    This is, again, a clear misunderstanding of the role ActBlue plays. It’s as if you’re saying GoFundMe coordinates all the funds people post on their in some conspiratorial manner.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #492
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Overheal wrote: »
    This is, again, a clear misunderstanding of the role ActBlue plays.

    I have a different opinion on act blue than you do.


  • Options
    #493
    Leroy42
    Registered Users Posts: 15,663 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    Of course I'm attacking the source. The source is a biased one.

    Do any of you want me to start posting Breitbart articles? Would you call them out ? I would

    Almost every source is biased. If you ignore anything from a source that you seem is biased, how do you ever learn anything?


  • Options
    #494
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Leroy42 wrote: »
    Almost every source is biased. If you ignore anything from a source that you seem is biased, how do you ever learn anything?

    I read Reuters, the financial times and sometimes the Associated press.

    The first two are probably the most least biased media sources out there.

    Some of you are happy to only hear opinions that back up your argument. Confirmation bias is the term I believe.

    Now here is some news from Breitbart about Clinton advising Biden not to debate Trump

    https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/08/02/clinton-aide-advises-joe-biden-whatever-you-do-dont-debate-trump/

    Personally I'd like to see it. In one corner you would have the defending champion telling lies, throwing personal insults and talking in circles.
    In the other corner comes the challenger. A man who struggles to make any point, cant string a coherent sentence together and doesn't seem like he actually wants to be president.

    It would be entertaining and worrying


  • Options
    #495
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    I have a different opinion on act blue than you do.

    An opinion is a bit different than asserting they are grifters, you are trying to argue a fact that isn’t.


  • Options
    #496
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    More of the same: ads which do little else but use the horses mouth against itself

    https://twitter.com/realdonaldrumpf/status/1290016307317035008?s=21

    Must be driving him mental.

    Correction: it DOES drive him mental

    [url]

    Hashtags are illegal now.


  • Options
    #497
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Overheal wrote: »
    More of the same: ads which do little else but use the horses mouth against itself

    https://twitter.com/realdonaldrumpf/status/1290016307317035008?s=21

    Must be driving him mental.

    Correction: it DOES drive him mental

    [url]

    Hashtags are illegal now.

    MeidasTouch is an American political action committee formed in March 2020. The purpose of the committee is to stop the reelection of Donald Trump

    Do you use any neutral sources for your posts?


  • Options
    #498
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    MeidasTouch is an American political action committee formed in March 2020. The purpose of the committee is to stop the reelection of Donald Trump

    Do you use any neutral sources for your posts?

    are they meant to be neutral ?


  • Options
    #499
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1289976287004631040?s=20


    Joe Biden is under watch. His decline is really progressing


  • Options
    #500
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    MeidasTouch is an American political action committee formed in March 2020. The purpose of the committee is to stop the reelection of Donald Trump

    Do you use any neutral sources for your posts?

    You’re starting to learn the function of PACs.

    Bongino can say whatever he likes but he’s held in no esteem by moderates or indeed the left, and he has no eminence to stand on with regard to suggesting a cognitive decline of Biden. A failed congressional candidate in his own party, on repeat attempts.


  • Options
    #501
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1289976287004631040?s=20


    Joe Biden is under watch. His decline is really progressing

    Poor Joe


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #502
    Cody montana
    Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/BreitbartNews/status/1289976287004631040?s=20


    Joe Biden is under watch. His decline is really progressing

    Breitbart?
    You are hilarious.


  • Options
    #503
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Breitbart?
    You are hilarious.

    Part of this hill he wants to die on about the audacity of political sources being political.

    The reach of them and Bongino is about the same as Alex Jones.


  • Options
    #504
    Cody montana
    Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    Overheal wrote: »
    Part of this hill he wants to die on about the audacity of political sources being political.

    The reach of them and Bongino is about the same as Alex Jones.

    The inevitable ban is fast approaching.


  • Options
    #505
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Cody montana wrote: »
    Breitbart?
    You are hilarious.

    I was told multiple times not to attack the source.


  • Options
    #506
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    I was told multiple times not to attack the source.

    Though having spent a good amount of time admitting yourself in previous posts you don’t read or regard Brietbart as a quality source of information, it comes off completely transparent when you begin to use them.

    It’s about as worthwhile as reporting “rush Limbaugh doesn’t think Biden will win” - might as well run naked into the street and yell that water is wet.


  • Options
    #507
    Cody montana
    Registered Users Posts: 5,328 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    I was told multiple times not to attack the source.

    Breitbart is utter garbage.


  • Options
    #508
    weisses
    Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    I was told multiple times not to attack the source.

    tenor.gif?itemid=5414869


  • Options
    #509
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    His own words and actions keep coming to haunt him. No photoshop required unlike many of the posts about Biden being touchy with women.

    https://twitter.com/thedailyedge/status/1290026589472690176?s=21


  • Options
    #510
    ExMachina1000
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,748 ✭✭✭ExMachina1000


    Overheal wrote: »
    His own words and actions keep coming to haunt him. No photoshop required unlike many of the posts about Biden being touchy with women.

    https://twitter.com/thedailyedge/status/1290026589472690176?s=21

    https://twitter.com/khozeloeez/status/1289537243770531842?s=20

    No photoshop in videos of creepy Joe. Cant be denied

    "Daily Edge priorities:Save America, defeat Trump"


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #511
    Overheal
    Registered Users Posts: 83,483 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    ExMachina1000 wrote: »
    https://twitter.com/khozeloeez/status/1289537243770531842?s=20

    No photoshop in videos of creepy Joe. Cant be denied

    Not nearly as revolting as trump looking at a child and saying “I’ll be dating her in 10 years” or telling a live studio audience that the first thing that came to his mind when asked ‘what’s there favorite thing he and his daughter have in common,’ - and his answer was “sex.”

    https://twitter.com/biden_brigade/status/1287120788462739463?s=21


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement