Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

Options
1190191193195196331

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 22,017 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    He is not a criminal.

    Can you tell me what crime he has been convicted of?
    Apparently to the left, "credibly accused" means convicted.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    More fake news.

    He hasn't been convicted of a crime so he is not a criminal.

    So you're okay with criminals who avoid charges by settling with district attorneys? So basically rich criminals are fine. Your moral compass is pretty warped. The man isn't legally allowed to manage a charity because of how it operated for his own benefit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    He is not a criminal.

    Can you tell me what crime he has been convicted of?

    If I am running around killing people am I considered a criminal ?

    yes or no


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Unnamed co-conspirator in the case that took down Michael Cohen

    And what crime was Trump convicted of in that case?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    So you're okay with criminals who avoid charges by settling with district attorneys? So basically rich criminals are fine. Your moral compass is pretty warped. The man isn't legally allowed to manage a charity because of how it operated for his own benefit.

    He is not a criminal as he has not been convicted of a crime.

    A settlement does not mean he is guilty of a crime, or that it is an admission of guilt.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    ELM327 wrote: »
    Apparently to the left, "credibly accused" means convicted.

    I know, what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    He is not a criminal as he has not been convicted of a crime.

    A settlement does mean he is guilty of a crime, or that it is an admission of guilt.
    He illegally operated a fraudulent “university” and a self-dealing “foundation.” He avoided charges by paying millions of dollars to settle those cases.

    ;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He is not a criminal as he has not been convicted of a crime.

    A settlement does mean he is guilty of a crime, or that it is an admission of guilt.

    So you had no problem with OJ Simpson when he got off for killing his wife? Never convicted so all good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    I know, what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?

    So I am not a criminal when running around killing people .... Only when I'm actually caught doing it ?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    So you had no problem with OJ Simpson when he got off for killing his wife? Never convicted so all good.

    Yup innocent until proven guilty.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 40,470 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    And what crime was Trump convicted of in that case?

    he wsan't indicted because Barr decided that a president cannot be indicted. very convenient for trump. But dont worry, Trump's time in prison orange will come.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    weisses wrote: »
    So I am not a criminal when running around killing people .... Only when I'm actually caught doing it ?

    You could have killed those people in self defense so, no you would not be a criminal if you were running around killing people.

    You need to be convicted of a crime in a court for you to be a criminal.


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,423 ✭✭✭✭Outlaw Pete


    Quin_Dub wrote: »
    Ah , that's ok so - He just acts "Handicapped" to mock people because he thinks a handicap is something to mock.

    So he wasn't mocking that specific disabled journalists , just all disabled people in general.

    Lovely.

    I can't believe what I am reading here...

    At no stage did the user you're quoting say that Trump acted handicapped. You're just putting words in their mouth so you can have a childish groundless rant about Trump and claim he mocked all disabled people. He did no such thing and you know very well he didn't.
    namloc1980 wrote: »
    I'll ask again as you are ignoring the question.

    I didn't ignore the question. You just failed to understand the answer. Trump said you gotta see this guy in reference to his grovelling. Watch the video I included. The motions he uses are the ones he always used when mocking people and no that does not mean he's mocking all disabled people. What the hell is wrong with you all? NO disabled people mocked for being disabled. It never happened.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    A settlement does mean he is guilty of a crime, or that it is an admission of guilt.

    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/04/10/trump-university-settlement-judge-finalized/502387002/
    A federal judge finalized the $25 million settlement between President Trump and students of his now shuttered Trump University on Monday, with New York's attorney general claiming “victims of Donald Trump’s fraudulent university will finally receive the relief they deserve.”


    So trump settled ... According to you that is an admmission of guilt

    And according to you
    I can't support a criminal.

    Ur welcome


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,460 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    And what crime was Trump convicted of in that case?

    Campaign finance violation, a federal crime


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    weisses wrote: »
    https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2018/04/10/trump-university-settlement-judge-finalized/502387002/




    So trump settled ... According to you that is an admmission of guilt

    And according to you



    Ur welcome

    You need to read my post again I said a settlement is NOT an admission of guilt never has been and it never will be, unless they admit liability with the settlement.

    Edit: I left out the word not in my original post


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,887 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Yup innocent until proven guilty.

    I punch you in the face. Am I innocent of punching you in the face until proven guilty in a court of law? Let's say there's not enough evidence and I'm given a verdict of not guilty. Were you not punched in the face?

    Innocent until proven guilty is the legal position of the court, judge, prosecutors, jury etc, must start from the position that the defendant is innocent, and it's up to the prosecutors to prove to the judge/jury that the defendant is guilty.

    It does not mean a crime has not been committed until the defendant has been proven guilty, or that if they're found not guilty it doesn't always mean they're not guilty, but could mean there wasn't enough evidence (or the prosecutors weren't able) to prove the defendant was guilty.

    Trump not being convicted of a crime does not mean he hasn't committed any, and given his position and the number of investigations into him and his stonewalling of every investigation, it's more than likely he is guilty of some crimes.

    Right now it's only his position as POTUS which is helping him block criminal proceedings against him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    You need to read my post again I said a settlement is NOT an admission of guilt never has been and it never will be, unless they admit liability with the settlement.

    Edit: I left out the word not in my post

    Yeah that word is kinda important


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Campaign finance violation, a federal crime

    What court convicted him of this crime?


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭weisses


    Penn wrote: »
    Right now it's only his position as POTUS which is helping him block criminal proceedings against him.

    Plus his wealth which he can use to settle without admitting guilt

    Every normal citizen would have done serious time


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    What court convicted him of this crime?

    He's an unindicted co-conspirator in that case but he cannot be indicted while in office.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Penn wrote: »
    I punch you in the face. Am I innocent of punching you in the face until proven guilty in a court of law? Let's say there's not enough evidence and I'm given a verdict of not guilty. Were you not punched in the face?

    Innocent until proven guilty is the legal position of the court, judge, prosecutors, jury etc, must start from the position that the defendant is innocent, and it's up to the prosecutors to prove to the judge/jury that the defendant is guilty.

    It does not mean a crime has not been committed until the defendant has been proven guilty, or that if they're found not guilty it doesn't always mean they're not guilty, but could mean there wasn't enough evidence (or the prosecutors weren't able) to prove the defendant was guilty.

    Trump not being convicted of a crime does not mean he hasn't committed any, and given his position and the number of investigations into him and his stonewalling of every investigation, it's more than likely he is guilty of some crimes.

    Right now it's only his position as POTUS which is helping him block criminal proceedings against him.

    So your basically saying that a person is not innocent until proven guilty?

    And that a crime has been committed but there isn't enough evidence to prove it.

    Tell me this: Who decides that a person is guilty of a crime even when there isn't enough evidence to prove it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    He's an unindicted co-conspirator in that case but he cannot be indicted while in office.

    So he's not a criminal?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18,313 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I didn't ignore the question. You just failed to understand the answer. Trump said you gotta see this guy in reference to his grovelling. Watch the video I included. The motions he uses are the ones he always used when mocking people and no that does not mean he's mocking all disabled people. What the hell is wrong with you all? NO disabled people mocked for being disabled. It never happened.

    No he didn't - you're deliberately ignoring it at this stage. I'll quote Trump again as you've obviously missed it the first few times: "nice reporter, now the poor guy you gotta see this guy". Why say he's a "poor guy" that people "gotta see"? What's poor about him?


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,460 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs


    What court convicted him of this crime?

    Southern District of New York


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    duploelabs wrote: »
    Southern District of New York

    Can you provide me with the judgement that was made against him and the punishment that was handed down by the court?


  • Registered Users Posts: 14,375 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    He's not hiding anything he's under no obligation to release them.

    Ever hear of Schrodinger's cat?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,236 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    So he's not a criminal?

    I don't know where you're getting that.

    Regardless, it's clear that you'll just continue to redefine what you consider to be a criminal to avoid having Trump fit that definition. That's your right, childish and illogical as it may be.

    I assume you can be held to that definition in future conversations?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭LessOutragePlz


    Ever hear of Schrodinger's cat?

    I have, watched a video in relation to quantum theory that used it.

    I can see how you would apply it here but the law is black and white.

    You're either guilty or not guilty.

    There's a lot more of a grey area in science especially quantum theory.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 22,017 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    weisses wrote: »
    So I am not a criminal when running around killing people .... Only when I'm actually caught doing it ?


    You are not a criminal until you are tried and convicted by a jury of your peers. The law is pretty clear and unanimous in most western countries about this. The US (and Ireland for that matter) is no exception.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement