2020 the battle of the septuagenarians - Trump vs Biden, Part 2

LessOutragePlz

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

Some very questionable things on that list.....


Strom Thurmond is listed as a Democrat, despite the fact that he represented Democrats for 10 years, and Republicans for the next 39.


Jared Fogle as a "politician', or in any way a prominent Democrat, is something I'd want to see some evidence for.


Bernie Ward was a radio host, not a politician.


Dean Westlake is included, but not Roy Moore for some reason.


That's just looking through very quickly.

I haven't gone through every person on that list but, I have looked up some of them.

I don't think it's unfair to say that the majority of the names on that list is accurate.

I only posted it to prove that there are genuine newsworthy stuff being posted on QAnon. As I've previously stated I browse it for news not as an avid follower of what is posted as I know most of the stuff posted isn't true as there is often no evidence to verify the claims in their posts but, on this occasion that particular post seems to be true.

silverharp

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

Go on try the same for Donald Trump there

why? I doubt there anywhere near the comparable searches

Kidchameleon

silverharp wrote: »

why? I doubt there anywhere near the comparable searches

Top searches on when I tried it were:

Does Donald Trump have kids

Does Joe Biden have beautox

dwayneshintzy

silverharp wrote: »

why? I doubt there anywhere near the comparable searches

Well if you try it in Bing, "Does Donald Trump have dementia" also auto-conpletes/gets suggested.

I think they're very comparable searches, what with them both being elderly Presidential candidates going up against each other.

Here's another one for you; try "did Donald Trump have a stroke?" in google search. Doesn't get suggested, but does on Bing. What does this prove then?

Kidchameleon

dwayneshintzy wrote: »

Well if you try it in Bing, "Does Donald Trump have dementia" also auto-conpletes/gets suggested.

I think they're very comparable searches, what with them both being elderly Presidential candidates going up against each other.

Here's another one for you; try "did Donald Trump have a stroke?" in google search. Doesn't get suggested, but does on Bing. What does this prove then?

LOL my top searches suggested for did Donald Trump / did Joe Biden:

did Joe Biden marry his sister

did Donald Trump shut down Roblox

Overheal

Trump celebrates extrajudicial killing as 'the way it has to be' :eek:

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1304979813971656704?s=20

Timberrrrrrrr

Overheal wrote: »

Trump celebrates extrajudicial killing as 'the way it has to be' :eek:

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1304979813971656704?s=20

Well his response to covid deaths was

"People are dying, it is what it is"

So honestly this doesn't surprise me at all.

Danzy

Overheal wrote: »

Trump celebrates extrajudicial killing as 'the way it has to be' :eek:

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1304979813971656704?s=20

Lol.

Extrajudicial killing.

Really embellish it.

LessOutragePlz

Overheal wrote: »

Trump celebrates extrajudicial killing as 'the way it has to be' :eek:

https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1304979813971656704?s=20

I'd rather he was tried and convicted in court but I won't be losing any sleep over a cold blooded killer getting killed himself.

He doesn't deserve any sympathy IMO and Trump knows that too.

Danzy

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I'd rather he was tried and convicted in court but I won't be losing any sleep over a cold blooded killer getting killed himself.

He doesn't deserve any sympathy IMO and Trump knows that too.

He didn't get to murder anyone else, didn't hit the police and his kids are now safe.

Good riddance to the totalitarian prick, he dug his own hole.

extra gravy

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I'd rather he was tried and convicted in court

As was his right under the Constitution but we already know that Trump only cares about "law and order" when it suits him.

Leroy42

Danzy wrote: »

Lol.

Extrajudicial killing.

Really embellish it.

What part?

Overheal

Considering some of these are stated agenda of this president, why has McConnel killed these bills that have passed the House and wait on his desk?

https://twitter.com/repadamschiff/status/1305188702717607944?s=21

Kidchameleon

Could there be foreign meddling in the democrats campaign???

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors

Data shows that half of 2019 donations to ActBlue came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors

A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement

******

Trump slams Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue after it was revealed $346M in donations came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors and asks 'money laundering anyone?'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8726765/Trump-slams-Democrat-fundraising-platform-ActBlue-untraceable-unemployed-donors.html

Overheal

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Could there be foreign meddling in the democrats campaign???

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors

Data shows that half of 2019 donations to ActBlue came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors

A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement

******

Trump slams Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue after it was revealed $346M in donations came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors and asks 'money laundering anyone?'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8726765/Trump-slams-Democrat-fundraising-platform-ActBlue-untraceable-unemployed-donors.html

So he is suspicious that people who have lost their jobs under Trumps time in office are investing in Democrats?

Almost 40M unemployed this year. If they all donated $10...

LessOutragePlz

Kidchameleon wrote: »

Could there be foreign meddling in the democrats campaign???

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/exclusive-data-shows-that-half-of-2019-donations-to-actblue-came-from-untraceable-unemployed-donors

Data shows that half of 2019 donations to ActBlue came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors

A Take Back Action Fund analysis of $400M in donations to liberal causes raises red flags of possible foreign involvement

******

Trump slams Democrat fundraising platform ActBlue after it was revealed $346M in donations came from untraceable 'unemployed' donors and asks 'money laundering anyone?'

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8726765/Trump-slams-Democrat-fundraising-platform-ActBlue-untraceable-unemployed-donors.html

It's also very interesting that when you go to the BLM page and hit donate you're taken to the actblue website, easy to see why Democrats have been very vocal in the their support for BLM.

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ms_blm_homepage_2019

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

It's also very interesting that when you go to the BLM page and hit donate you're taken to the actblue website, easy to see why Democrats have been very vocal in the their support for BLM.

https://secure.actblue.com/donate/ms_blm_homepage_2019

not that interesting. ActBlue is just a technology platform. It is basically gofundme for those lefty liberal types you despise so much.

LessOutragePlz

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

not that interesting. ActBlue is just a technology platform. It is basically gofundme for those lefty liberal types you despise so much.

Nice try, but their website clearly states that they only accept donations for Democratic candidates

"That’s why we’ve built a powerful online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot"

https://secure.actblue.com/about

Can you show me any Republican candidates that you can donate to using actblue?

ohnonotgmail

Overheal wrote: »

So he is suspicious that people who have lost their jobs under Trumps time in office are investing in Democrats?

Almost 40M unemployed this year. If they all donated $10...

it is more likely that people are not recording their employer when they donate. ActBlue gives the name of all donors to the federal government.

Is it possible to get a similar list of all donors to republican party?

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Nice try, but their website clearly states that they only accept donations for Democratic candidates

"That’s why we’ve built a powerful online fundraising platform for Democratic candidates up and down the ballot"

https://secure.actblue.com/about

Can you show me any Republican candidates that you can donate to using actblue?

the republicans have their own platform.

LessOutragePlz

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

the republicans have their own platform.

But they don't have a platform that funnels BLM donations to their presidential candidate and other Democratic candidates.

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

But they don't have a platform that funnels BLM donations to their presidential candidate and other Democratic candidates.

what makes you think that the donations on that BLM page go to anything other than BLM?

the page seems quite clear

Your contribution will benefit Black Lives Matter Support Fund at Tides Foundation.

lawred2

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

I didn't treat them as credible I merely stated that I've checked their posts for news.

Why would you check sources you don't consider credible?

LessOutragePlz

lawred2 wrote: »

Why would you check sources you don't consider credible?

Because sometimes on rare occasions they post something that is newsworthy such as the previous example that I have posted.

Their not credible 99% of the time but on rare occasions they post something that is credible and newsworthy which is why I sometimes browse their posts.

duploelabs

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because sometimes on rare occasions they post something that is newsworthy such as the previous example that I have posted.

Their not credible 99% of the time but on rare occasions they post something that is credible and newsworthy which is why I sometimes browse their posts.

But its not newsworthy as its shown to be incorrect and untrue in various places as shown by a previous poster.

We've talked about cognitive bias before

LessOutragePlz

duploelabs wrote: »

But its not newsworthy as its shown to be incorrect and untrue in various places as shown by a previous poster.

We've talked about cognitive bias before

He didn't show that any of the charges were incorrect or true merely that the person's political affiliation was incorrect he also only listed 4 people when there was well over 50 people on those lists.

One or two discrepancies doesn't make the rest of the information posted untrue or not newsworthy if they are all proven to true and accurate now does it?

Feel free to go through the list and point out the inaccuracies and false stories if there are any false stories.

Then come back to me and talk about cognitive bias.

duploelabs

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He didn't show that any of the charges were incorrect or true merely that the person's political affiliation was incorrect he also only listed 4 people when there was well over 50 people on those lists.

One or two discrepancies doesn't make the rest of the information posted untrue or not newsworthy if they are all proven to true and accurate now does it?

Feel free to go through the list and point out the inaccuracies and false stories if there are any false stories.

Then come back to me and talk about cognitive bias.

Those inaccuracies have already been shown to you, stop being obtuse

Igotadose

Overheal wrote: »

So he is suspicious that people who have lost their jobs under Trumps time in office are investing in Democrats?

Almost 40M unemployed this year. If they all donated $10...

So, this is this week's distraction thread from the fact they're lagging the fundraising race. $210mn in August (vs. $354mn for the Democratic party.) https://www.npr.org/2020/09/09/911191349/trump-republicans-raise-210-million-in-august-far-behind-democrats-haul

TBF - $210mn would've been a record. Pretty interesting to me so much money's coming in, lots of interest in the last month.

ohnonotgmail

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

He didn't show that any of the charges were incorrect or true merely that the person's political affiliation was incorrect he also only listed 4 people when there was well over 50 people on those lists.

One or two discrepancies doesn't make the rest of the information posted untrue or not newsworthy if they are all proven to true and accurate now does it?

Feel free to go through the list and point out the inaccuracies and false stories if there are any false stories.

Then come back to me and talk about cognitive bias.

have you done that? did you know that the 4 already pointed out were incorrect? Or did you just assume it was all correct?

Leroy42

LessOutragePlz wrote: »

Because sometimes on rare occasions they post something that is newsworthy such as the previous example that I have posted.

Their not credible 99% of the time but on rare occasions they post something that is credible and newsworthy which is why I sometimes browse their posts.

Just so I understand you.

You ignore MSM because you believe it not credible, but on this occasion, you are willing to run with this story despite acknowledging that they are not credible.

So is it that you judge each story on its merits or that the credibility of the organisation has a bearing on your view on it?

Becasue I don't understand why you would avoid MSM on that basis