Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Tampax ad banned

Options
1…34689…20

Comments

  • Options
    #152
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    Yester wrote: »
    How much power do we have here? I mean if enough people complain about Mcdonalds ads could we get them banned from TV?

    Why would you want a Macdonalds as banned though. Do Macdonalds ads portray 1/2 the population as loudmouth vulgar thickos?


  • Options
    #153
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    you mean someone who talks slightly louder than normal?

    You seem to have left off the speaking in a crass and vulgar manner.


  • Options
    #154
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,466 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    katiek102010 wrote: »
    You seem to have left off the speaking in a crass and vulgar manner.

    you mean she was discussing things that you think should not be discussed in public?


  • Options
    #155
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    ollkiller wrote: »
    That ad is a huge concern. Lol. Nothing wrong with the ad at all. The absolute state of the people giving out about this ad. Grow up will ye.

    Women are portrayed in the ad as tasteless loudmouth idiots. You have no objection to that?


  • Options
    #156
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,466 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Women are portrayed in the ad as tasteless loudmouth idiots. You have no objection to that?

    they were explaining something that wasn't immediately obvious to at least one poster here. maybe they have should have demurely discussed knitting or something to suit you.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #157
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    meeeeh wrote: »
    That didn't bother me one bit.

    You and your dad aren’t uncomfortable with women being depicted as shouty thickos with no class or dignity. That’s fine. Own it girl.


  • Options
    #158
    One eyed Jack
    Registered Users Posts: 23,938 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    you mean she was discussing things that you think should not be discussed in public?


    There’s no need to be so disingenuous. They weren’t portrayed as discussing anything.


  • Options
    #159
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,466 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    splinter65 wrote: »
    You and your dad aren’t uncomfortable with women being depicted as shouty thickos with no class or dignity. That’s fine. Own it girl.

    what it is like living in 1972?


  • Options
    #160
    FishOnABike
    Registered Users Posts: 4,488 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    gmisk wrote: »
    Shower gel is a lot easier to use than a tampon well done....
    Have you ever got shower gel in your eyes? It's no trivial matter.:D


  • Options
    #161
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,466 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    One eyed Jack wrote: »
    There’s no need to be so disingenuous. They weren’t portrayed as discussing anything.

    they were discussing how to use a brand of tampon that works differently to previous versions.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #162
    sydthebeat
    Subscribers Posts: 41,654 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    katiek102010 wrote: »
    You seem to have left off the speaking in a crass and vulgar manner.

    Vagina, menstrual bleeding, tampon, put it into your Vagina, get it up there, blood, period, sanitary, discomfort, bleed.

    Do these words cause you to squirm and be uncomfortable ?

    If so YOU have a problem, not everyone else.


  • Options
    #163
    Bobblehats
    Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    The Nal wrote: »
    Get it up there girls!

    Whatever happened to discreet :o I hardly ever look at ads, just overhear them. And that shít sounded like a woman seizing the initiative in some hardcore geordie porn


  • Options
    #164
    One eyed Jack
    Registered Users Posts: 23,938 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    they were discussing how to use a brand of tampon that works differently to previous versions.


    They weren’t? It was easily demonstrated with the animation that was shown during the advert without all the rest of the nonsense portraying women as though they’re a bunch of simpletons.


  • Options
    #165
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    they were explaining something that wasn't immediately obvious to at least one poster here. maybe they have should have demurely discussed knitting or something to suit you.

    I see. I’m trying to oppress my own sex when I say, like many of the rest of us, that I don’t want women portrayed as vulgar crass shouty oafs on the tv.
    It’s people like you that caused the advertising executives (who are mostly men btw) to think that that’s how women actually want to be depicted.
    You be a loudmouth harpie if you want, that’s your right. But clearly that’s not how most women see themselves.


  • Options
    #166
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    splinter65 wrote: »
    Women are portrayed in the ad as tasteless loudmouth idiots. You have no objection to that?

    Portrayed as really obnoxious. That's my biggest concern.

    Showing that kind of behaviour on TV either in adverts or programming needs to stop as it just glorifies it.

    If my kids thought they could speak like that about any topic, they would be severely punished


  • Options
    #167
    Bobblehats
    Registered Users Posts: 4,707 ✭✭✭Bobblehats


    If it was a nasal stick and it said “get it up there lads” there’d be outrage. And rightly so


  • Options
    #168
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    you mean she was discussing things that you think should not be discussed in public?

    As I said in my first comment the content was fine.

    They could have been discussing the weather, the manner in which they were discussing it was vulgar, crass cheap and nasty.


  • Options
    #169
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    None of those words cause anyone any discomfort.
    An ad portraying women as a bunch of laughing hyenas aping a bunch of men on a building site is very uncomfortable however.
    Maybe not for you but for enough of viewers that the ad has been banned.


  • Options
    #170
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    So you opinion of modern women is that they are all trampy loudmouth vulgar idiots.

    You should be ashamed


  • Options
    #171
    feelings
    Registered Users Posts: 487 ✭✭feelings


    FFS. I really thought Ireland had moved past this type of "I'm offended" rubbish. There is a pandemic with 700k dead and people are offended by a tampax advert? Cop the f**k on and get over yourself.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #172
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    what it is like living in 1972?

    You think all women are shouty thickos with no class or dignity? You do realise that’s very misogynistic?


  • Options
    #173
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    splinter65 wrote: »
    I see. I’m trying to oppress my own sex when I say, like many of the rest of us, that I don’t want women portrayed as vulgar crass shouty oafs on the tv.
    It’s people like you that caused the advertising executives (who are mostly men btw) to think that that’s how women actually want to be depicted.
    You be a loudmouth harpie if you want, that’s your right. But clearly that’s not how most women see themselves.

    Fantastic, thank you. We are not larger loutish idiots and have braincells


  • Options
    #174
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    feelings wrote: »
    FFS. I really thought Ireland had moved past this type of "I'm offended" rubbish. There is a pandemic with 700k dead and people are offended by a tampax advert? Cop the f**k on and get over yourself.

    I can’t be concerned for the pandemic and offended by a horrible depiction of women at the same time? Why not?


  • Options
    #175
    YellowBucket
    Closed Accounts Posts: 491 ✭✭YellowBucket


    Oh FFS. Seems we’re back to the prudish old days of a bygone Ireland.

    Also it’ll be happily running on loads of U.K. channels that we all have anyway.

    Well done the rosary bead clutchers - making Ireland look like a backwater again!

    I don’t really like those complaints driven processes we have for broadcasting regulation. They’re easily driven to decisions by a few crackpots and now with social media that can easily be generated by a little bubble of outrage.

    Periods, tampons and vaginas are hardly something to be offended by in 2020. It’s just practical reality.


  • Options
    #176
    ohnonotgmail
    Registered Users Posts: 40,466 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    splinter65 wrote: »
    You think all women are shouty thickos with no class or dignity? You do realise that’s very misogynistic?

    no, i dont think that but i'm not going to get upset because an ad shows a woman that is a bit loud.


  • Options
    #177
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    katiek102010 wrote: »
    Fantastic, thank you. We are not larger loutish idiots and have braincells

    I have no idea what you are training to say here.


  • Options
    #178
    meeeeh
    Registered Users Posts: 11,624 ✭✭✭✭meeeeh


    splinter65 wrote: »
    You and your dad aren’t uncomfortable with women being depicted as shouty thickos with no class or dignity. That’s fine. Own it girl.

    I hope you missed my other replies because otherwise you have serious comprehension issues or you are intentionally selective in your quoting.


  • Options
    #179
    splinter65
    Registered Users Posts: 9,420 ✭✭✭splinter65


    ohnonotgmail wrote: »
    no, i dont think that but i'm not going to get upset because an ad shows a woman that is a bit loud.

    A bit loud? Loud stupid vulgar crass thick. I’m not having it. The advertising standards aren’t having it either. Women 1 ad execs 0. Great result.


  • Options
    #180
    [Deleted User]
    Posts: 0 ✭ [Deleted User]


    Where has the idea that the two women in the ad are “trampy” come from?


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #181
    katiek102010
    Registered Users Posts: 1,106 ✭✭✭katiek102010


    YellowBucket wrote: »
    Oh FFS. Seems we’re back to the prudish old days of a bygone Ireland.

    Also it’ll be happily running on loads of U.K. channels that we all have anyway.

    Well done the rosary bead clutchers - making Ireland look like a backwater again!

    Yes all us women who have been fighting for equality and to be treated with respect and dignity fully appreciate being portrayed as scumbags on tv


Advertisement