Healthcare assistant jailed for 11 years for rape of woman with Alzheimer's

ExMachina1000

1800_Ladladlad wrote: »

So he came here illegally from Nigeria in 2000. Puts in an application for asylum status, but then he dropped the asylum case when his baby was born. Well well well, why am I not surprised, an Anker baby would give it automatic citizenship within the space of two years of him breaking the law and entering the country illegally.

What really boiled my p*ss was Justice McDermot taking into account that the rapist had otherwise lived a blameless and hardworking life. . . . . forgetting the fact that he was a criminal the moment he stepped foot in our country illegally. God only knows what he has done. TBH the thought of it turns my stomach. Abuse and heinous attacks on the elderly is something that affects me to me, if I was to explain what happened to my nanny and grandad, it would be too much of a coincidence for some to comprehend.

It's "unlikely" he'll be deported when he finishes his sentence, and with it being Ireland, the land of "Cead Mile Failte" His family will be looked after so will he when gets out. When his sentence is finished, his citizenship should be revoked and he should be deported to his own country. Him breaking the law and entering the country illegally in the first place, should be more than enough to deport a degenerate who broke the law twice. Both being serious crimes. Its bad enough we have our own filth that do these vile crimes but to import and entertain them??

Here illegally
Judge said he showed no remorse

This is the new Ireland.

His legal status to remain here is now null and void.
Deport this criminal after the lengthy prison sentence

tom1ie

Why was his picture not all over the news?
There was a case a day before of a road rage incident allegedly against a politician, and the perpetrators picture was all over the news....

Normal One

BuT WaT aBoUt aRr HoMeGrOwN rapists?!?!

Gatling

Simple Irish media are either afraid to identify him or they are pretending it didn't happen

ExMachina1000

tom1ie wrote: »

Why was his picture not all over the news?
There was a case a day before of a road rage incident allegedly against a politician, and the perpetrators picture was all over the news....

The media decides what's best for the people

Mad_maxx

A traveller with multiple convictions was convicted of brutally raping a ninety year old woman about ten years ago, while today fm radio highlighted this fact, RTE did not disclose it

Of course if a traveller becomes a senator or gains a PHD, its very important to point to the ethnicity

Same deal here

Gatling

Overheal wrote: »

If you're concerned about a loved one just go ahead and take precautions now, be aware of Ireland wiretapping laws but consider setting up some safeguards, some were mentioned earlier in the thread like getting your loved one a private room and install a hidden camera (pending legalities).

Safeguards bug a loved ones room and hidden CCTV .


How bout we safeguard number 1 we stop allowing these animals a real right to permanently stay here regardless of what crimes they commit ,

Put our people first .

JustAThought

What absolute dross -
this from the continuous right of this vile rapist defender. Expected no better.

Still no word from any media on what nursing home this vermin was working in. Given the way people are staying away in droves from
this defend the rapist rights thread one can expect
little.

Annasopra

JustAThought wrote: »

What absolute dross -
this from the continuous right of this vile rapist defender. Expected no better.

Still no word from any media on what nursing home this vermin was working in. Given the way people are staying away in droves from
this defend the rapist rights thread one can expect
little.

Stop posting lies. Noone here is defending the rapist.

Overheal

Is it a fact or an assumption his family came to Ireland illegally?

Not that I don’t as a American find the whole concept of “illegal entry” being an original sin to be little more than a conservative cop-out.

Gatling

Overheal wrote: »

Is it a fact or an assumption his family came to Ireland illegally?

Bogus asylum seeker who allegedly got someone pregnant

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Gatling wrote: »

Bogus asylum seeker who allegedly got someone pregnant

Doesn't answet the question! (Not that it makes much difference).

4068ac1elhodqr

His bogus (illegal/false asylum application) i.e. status, was reported by a newspaper, they've most likely done some research or asked a few quesitons before publishing:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EeZwauzXYAAdQKJ?format=jpg&name=small

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Anderson Breezy Signpost wrote: »

His bogus (illegal/false asylum application) i.e. status, was reported by a newspaper, they've most likely done some research or asked a few quesitons before publishing:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EeZwauzXYAAdQKJ?format=jpg&name=small

... in the Sunday World...? Ok then. That settles that.

4068ac1elhodqr

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

... in the Sunday World...? Ok then. That settles that.

^User will only accept stories from the (very poor selling) Guardian, anything else offends their sensitivities too much, aww bless.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Anderson Breezy Signpost wrote: »

^User will only accept stories from the (very poor selling) Guardian, anything else offends their sensitivities too much, aww bless.

Come on - I said the issue was settled! Sunday World - unquestionable integrrity and purveyor of honest truth as evidence by the sales numebrs!

4068ac1elhodqr

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Come on - I said the issue was settled! Sunday World - unquestionable integrrity and purveyor of honest truth as evidence by the sales numebrs!

Just lucky you don't write for them in which case, with such atrocious spelling, lols.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Anderson Breezy Signpost wrote: »

Just lucky you don't write for them in which case, with such atrocious spelling, lols.

Dammit! I always forget to proofread when the Grammar Nazis are in town! One day, I will remember.... one day...

Anyway, where were we? Oh yes. Sunday World. Case closed - next thread please.

4068ac1elhodqr

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

...Anyway, where were we? Oh yes. Sunday World. Case closed - next thread please.

Ah yes, here we are: 'Person unable to spell, critises and dismisses newspaper as a potential valid source'.

Surely someone will do a J'Depp and sue this particular newspaper for defamation etc, if as you allude to, there is 'zero truth' to the published story?

Of course they will, any day now...

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Anderson Breezy Signpost wrote: »

Ah yes, here we are: 'Person unable to spell, critises and dismisses newspaper as a potential valid source'.

Surely someone will do a J'Depp and sue this particular newspaper for defamation etc, if as you allude to, there is 'zero truth' to the published story?

Of course they will, any day now...

I know, I know - doesn't proofread for typos, can't possibly be a journalist. You never see typos in a newspaper.

No clue what "doing a "J'Depp" is. Assuming it's related to the actor.

Tokyo

Mod: @Princess Consuela Bananahammock, @Accumulator - quit it with the childish back and forth.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

HE STARTED IT!!!

Seriously, though sorry - should have nipped it in the bud with the grammar Nazi defense.

Not that it matters: he's scum (as in the rapist) but where he comes from and how he got here is irelevant.

Corcaigh84

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Not that it matters: he's scum (as in the rapist) but where he comes from and how he got here is irelevant.

Ah yeah, coming from one of the rape capitals of the world is totally irrelevant

https://www.fairobserver.com/culture/nigeria-sexual-violence-arewa-me-too-movement-africa-news-88876/

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Corcaigh84 wrote: »

Ah yeah, coming from one of the rape capitals of the world is totally irrelevant

https://www.fairobserver.com/culture/nigeria-sexual-violence-arewa-me-too-movement-africa-news-88876/

Ya see, this is the point: you're not judging the individual. If you're ok being banned from somewhere for based on your nationality - fair enough - at least your concisent.

Beyond that it's confirmation bias for xenophobia: I'd argue you're against immigration full stop and not just in cases like this - and you're more offedned by the contry/city than the actual act.

Mr. Karate

DelaneyIn wrote: »

The papers are reporting that he came to Ireland illegally, got leave to remain when he had a kid here and that it’s unlikely that he will be deported upon completion of his sentence.

https://twitter.com/DonCarlo66/status/1289841958723022848/photo/1

I wonder what background checks were conducted?

None. He was hired solely so the Nursing Home could virtue signal [Waterford Regional had one working in the clinics and he couldn't even read an X-Ray] about how diverse their staff is. I hope the family take them to the cleaners.

joseywhales

This guy who couldn't read an x-ray, was he a radiologist or at least an MD? I assume so, it just sounds like you are expecting a care worker to read an x-ray

Mr. Karate

No idea. My Sister twisted her ankle and when we went to Waterford Regional he told her that he didn't know how to read an X-Ray. This back in 2008 and I can guarantee he's still there.

Joeytheparrot

Joeytheparrot wrote: »

Nah - a lot of people here are twisting this into a sick racist agenda and couldnt give a **** about the woman who was raped. All they care about is "the rapist was foreign".

Unlike people like you who don't give a **** about the rape victim and only care about being able to shout racism.

Overheal

Mr. Karate wrote: »

No idea. My Sister twisted her ankle and when we went to Waterford Regional he told her that he didn't know how to read an X-Ray. This back in 2008 and I can guarantee he's still there.

If the staff member isn't trained/certified to give a diagnosis from an X-Ray they shouldn't. What's the conniption there? I don't give legal or fiduciary advice in a professional capacity either even though on a personal level I know how to navigate the law and balance my checkbook. I'm not certified to do so for others and will not open myself up to that liability.

StackSteevens

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

... in the Sunday World...? Ok then. That settles that.

That's the stupidest comment on this thread by a country mile! It appears to assume that the Defamation Act doesn't apply to the Sunday World, which is absurd.

(Plaese note that the foregoing is no reflection whatsoever on the person who posted it, as the Moderators don't approve of ad hominem comments.)

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

StackSteevens wrote: »

That's the stupidest comment on this thread by a country mile! It appears to assume that the Defamation Act doesn't apply to the Sunday World, which is absurd.

(Plaese note that the foregoing is no reflection whatsoever on the person who posted it, as the Moderators don't approve of ad hominem comments.)

I've made my point with that respect. And the stupidist comment in this thread is one the implies moderators should approve of ad homeinem comments.

1800_Ladladlad

<Snip>

Don't discuss moderation on thread. Take it to pm if you wish

pinkyeye

Mr. Karate wrote: »

None. He was hired solely so the Nursing Home could virtue signal [Waterford Regional had one working in the clinics and he couldn't even read an X-Ray] about how diverse their staff is. I hope the family take them to the cleaners.

It's outrageous that you're claiming here that no checks were done. If Garda checks are not on file for any nursing home employee that nursing home can be shut down straight away by HIQA so you can be bloody sure that Garda checks are done.

Problem is, no-one knows what crime someone has done and got away with it but unless you expect nursing homes to be physic I don't know how that can be prevented.

tayto lover

I don’t know if this is racist or not but anyone coming to work in this country regardless of colour etc should have the deepest of checks done on them and any offenders who have convictions for serious crimes should be denied entry.

skooterblue2

Mr. Karate wrote: »

No idea. My Sister twisted her ankle and when we went to Waterford Regional he told her that he didn't know how to read an X-Ray. This back in 2008 and I can guarantee he's still there.

I remember that case. There was a Zambian radiographer there. She had a catalogue of complaints. A young boy was xrayed three times in succession. She was not available to come to the fitness to practice hearing because she was at home and had problems with her Visa. She claim it was racist staff that were defaming her.

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/radiographer-found-guilty-of-professional-misconduct-and-poor-performance-1.3700497
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/radiographer-treated-as-if-she-had-just-come-out-of-the-bush-1.3697739
https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-30913218.html
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/irish-radiographer-kashimbo-musonda-inquiry
https://www.lawsociety.ie/gazette/Top-Stories/sub-standard-health-worker-struck-off-as-a-danger-to-the-public/

Its all there folks

Mr. Karate

pinkyeye wrote: »

It's outrageous that you're claiming here that no checks were done. If Garda checks are not on file for any nursing home employee that nursing home can be shut down straight away by HIQA so you can be bloody sure that Garda checks are done.

Problem is, no-one knows what crime someone has done and got away with it but unless you expect nursing homes to be physic I don't know how that can be prevented.

Clearly they didn't check deep enough or they would have been discovered that he was here illegally.

Kidchameleon

We need strong leadership who forego worrying about feelings and do what is needed to keep people safe. This animal should not have been here in the first place.

skooterblue2

pinkyeye wrote: »

It's outrageous that you're claiming here that no checks were done. If Garda checks are not on file for any nursing home employee that nursing home can be shut down straight away by HIQA so you can be bloody sure that Garda checks are done.

Problem is, no-one knows what crime someone has done and got away with it but unless you expect nursing homes to be physic I don't know how that can be prevented.

I have a better question, who hired her and on what grounds?
I mean anyone in any profession will recognise another professional in a 15 minute conversation.
I am not a radiographer but at interview stage, I would be able to draw out a technical answer from an interviewee.
eg.
Q. What is the worst break you ever saw in Zambia?
A. I would expect the interviewee to use the proper bones names and parts.
I would expect technical descriptions like lateral medial distal proximal.
I would also expect a mathematical questions on radiation half lives.
Then I would make mistake and expect the interviewee to correct me on a technical point.

I mean s*it lads, I mean how hard can it be to work out how much someone knows about a subject until a spoofer becomes apparent?

pinkyeye

Mr. Karate wrote: »

Clearly they didn't check deep enough or they would have been discovered that he was here illegally.

He wasn't here illegally at the time of employment. He wouldn't be able to work at all if he was.

Stop with your nonsense.

pinkyeye

skooterblue2 wrote: »

I have a better question, who hired her and on what grounds?
I mean anyone in any profession will recognise another professional in a 15 minute conversation.
I am not a radiographer but at interview stage, I would be able to draw out a technical answer from an interviewee.
eg.
Q. What is the worst break you ever saw in Zambia?
A. I would expect the interviewee to use the proper bones names and parts.
I would expect technical descriptions like lateral medial distal proximal.
I would also expect a mathematical questions on radiation half lives.
Then I would make mistake and expect the interviewee to correct me on a technical point.

I mean s*it lads, I mean how hard can it be to work out how much someone knows about a subject until a spoofer becomes apparent?

I think you're confusing your stories, I'm talking about the subject of the thread who was a healthcare assistant not a radiographer. :rolleyes: