Explosive device thrown at US courthouse

Sweetemotion

Anarchist Agard-Berry appeared in court today for federal arson.


https://twitter.com/USAO_OR/status/1289327782309384193




18 years of age, facing minimum of 5 years in a federal. This young guy ruined his for what?





Mod
Thread title edited. This thread is not Antifa 2.0 and it will be closed if it heads down that route

Sweetemotion

The burning of books has also begun again.

https://twitter.com/DGPurser/status/1289582769182408704

JasonStatham

Ah America ok. I'm in Ireland.

Birneybau

Move along people, definitely no ulterior motives here.

James Brown

Sweetemotion wrote: »

The burning of books has also begun again.

https://twitter.com/DGPurser/status/1289582769182408704

Don seems unstable.

Sweetemotion

Bowie wrote: »

Don seems unstable.

I'm not sure if we can discuss peoples mental health or just some peoples mental health or if it's only certain posters are allowed to discuss peoples mental health.

TheValeyard

Thats a bomb

Sweetemotion

TheValeyard wrote: »

Thats a bomb

Peaceful bomb.

Danzy

Anarchists today, psycho angry priests in the 50s here, fascists in the 30s, bolsheviks in the teens.

Similar type of bollox and they are always middle class activists looking for a why

James Brown

Sweetemotion wrote: »

I'm not sure if we can discuss peoples mental health or just some peoples mental health or if it's only certain posters are allowed to discuss peoples mental health.

No idea about his mental health if he has a problem I apologise.
From his tweet alone he seems to be very right wing and religious. A very dangerous cocktail. That is my point. Also hes looking to stir something up.
He seems unstable.

Were the people burning books with mental health issues? Maybe the thread should be closed?

Sweetemotion

Bowie wrote: »

No idea about his mental health if he has a problem I apologise.
From his tweet alone he seems to be very right wing and religious. A very unstable cocktail. That is my point. Also hes looking to stir something up.
He seems unstable.

Were the people burning books with mental health issues? Maybe the thread should be closed?

Touche, I tip my hat.


Same could be said for the Trump thread. Gemma thread and the Tommy Robinson thread.

James Brown

Sweetemotion wrote: »

Touche, I tip my hat.


Same could be said for the Trump thread. Gemma thread and the Tommy Robinson thread.

Exactly. Unstable is how the tweet made Don seem. You suggested it was making light of mental health. Very SJW.

ExMachina1000

https://twitter.com/antifastats/status/1289168621097418757?s=20

Could be facing life in prison.

Sweetemotion

Bowie wrote: »

Exactly. Unstable is how the tweet made Don seem. You suggested it was making light if mental health. Very SJW.

I don't care about Don forget Don, it was the video that concerned me.


https://twitter.com/Ruptly/status/1289621920292380672


Burning of books should never be acceptable.

kildare lad

Here's a clip of antifa/ BLM getting ready to attack police , all premeditated btw

https://youtu.be/UL1pdPezm54

Sweetemotion

That's a very limited thread title change.

James Brown

Sweetemotion wrote: »

I don't care about Don forget Don, it was the video that concerned me.


https://twitter.com/Ruptly/status/1289621920292380672


Burning of books should never be acceptable.

It's the taring with the same brush I don't like. Right wing militia tripping over themselves to make the states a right versus left battle ground. Dangerous people looking to use either side as an excuse to cause trouble.
The Trump administration has a lot of responsibility for feeding this.
Some twats allegedly burning the bible are just that, not a movement. I had a ****ing idiot on facebook send me a video of some immigrants in France breaking a shop window. "France has fallen!" It was titled. Lots of dangerous loons looking to stir up sonething.

James Brown

kildare lad wrote: »

Here's a clip of antifa/ BLM getting ready to attack police , all premeditated btw

https://youtu.be/UL1pdPezm54

No it's not.
BLM is a call to recognise the plight of black people.
You're posting nonsense.

Overheal

Explosive thrown; perp caught, facing justice. /thread.

Sweetemotion

Overheal wrote: »

Explosive thrown; perp caught, facing justice. /thread.

Exactly why the thread title was changed.

Gatling

I hear the weather in Cuba is lovely

Sweetemotion

Gatling wrote: »

I hear the weather in Cuba is lovely

And the octopus.

Sweetemotion

Bowie wrote: »

It's the taring with the same brush I don't like. Right wing militia tripping over themselves to make the states a right versus left battle ground. Dangerous people looking to use either side as an excuse to cause trouble.
The Trump administration has a lot of responsibility for feeding this.
Some twats allegedly burning the bible are just that, not a movement. I had a ****ing idiot on facebook send me a video of some immigrants in France breaking a shop window. "France has fallen!" It was titled. Lots of dangerous loons looking to stir up sonething.

The Trump administration is just over 3 years.

Overheal

Bowie wrote: »

It's the taring with the same brush I don't like. Right wing militia tripping over themselves to make the states a right versus left battle ground. Dangerous people looking to use either side as an excuse to cause trouble.
The Trump administration has a lot of responsibility for feeding this.
Some twats allegedly burning the bible are just that, not a movement. I had a ****ing idiot on facebook send me a video of some immigrants in France breaking a shop window. "France has fallen!" It was titled. Lots of dangerous loons looking to stir up sonething.

Bingo.

It’s a free country if you want to burn a flag or a book you own, that’s your first amendment right.

Acting as though this is akin to the totalitarian practice of book burning is silly; it’s not like the Bible is being banned or going out of print or being pulled from library shelves. Burning your own bible is like burning your own Nike shoes or throwing away your own Keurig. People also buy and burn copies of the Quran.

Sweetemotion

Overheal wrote: »

Bingo.

It’s a free country if you want to burn a flag or a book you own, that’s your first amendment right.

Acting as though this is akin to the totalitarian practice of book burning is silly; it’s not like the Bible is being banned or going out of print or being pulled from library shelves. Burning your own bible is like burning your own Nike shoes or throwing away your own Keurig. People also buy and burn copies of the Quran.

How about burning a cross you own?

Burning an efigy you made?

Overheal

Sweetemotion wrote: »

How about burning a cross you own?

Depends on the particulars. Same with burning of books etc. - Dove World Outreach planned a Quran burning in front of a mosque, it was original breach of peace charges but then expunged

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dove_World_Outreach_Center_Quran-burning_controversy

2003 Virginia v Black visited the law in Virginia which had said cross burning was prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate. The SCOTUS struck down the provision of the law, prosectors must prove on a per case basis there is an intent to intimidate. Historically in the US cross burnings we’re done on mountainsides etc. with high visibility for tens of miles, chiefly with the intent to intimidate the minority populace; in some recent cases crosses have been left burning on people’s yards and those have been, as you would expect, regarded as hate crimes and the perpetrator (in that case their neighbor across the street) is being prosecuted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._Black

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-teen-led-a-black-lives-matter-protest-in-his-small-town-a-cross-was-burned-in-his-yard/2020/07/15/6ea6e3d2-c1ef-11ea-b178-bb7b05b94af1_story.html

Effigies of Presidents have been burned as well and those are not unlawful displays. Though you might get a dossier compiled on you by the secret service for obvious national security reasons. Very much again depends on the particulars: leave one hanging on a college campus and that will be viewed as intent to intimidate, hang one in your own yard I believe that’s a matter of speech. I haven’t poured through all the effigy cases but there’s no blanket ban on the practice.

[url] https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/the-administration/335915-conservatives-forget-history-with-trump-effigy-outrage[/url]

Sweetemotion

Overheal wrote: »

Depends on the particulars. Same with burning of books etc. - Dove World Outreach planned a Quran burning in front of a mosque, it was original breach of peace charges but then expunged

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dove_World_Outreach_Center_Quran-burning_controversy

2003 Virginia v Black visited the law in Virginia which had said cross burning was prima facie evidence of intent to intimidate. The SCOTUS struck down the provision of the law, prosectors must prove on a per case basis there is an intent to intimidate. Historically in the US cross burnings we’re done on mountainsides etc. with high visibility for tens of miles, chiefly with the intent to intimidate the minority populace; in some recent cases crosses have been left burning on people’s yards and those have been, as you would expect, regarded as hate crimes and the perpetrator (in that case their neighbor across the street) is being prosecuted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_v._Black

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/a-teen-led-a-black-lives-matter-protest-in-his-small-town-a-cross-was-burned-in-his-yard/2020/07/15/6ea6e3d2-c1ef-11ea-b178-bb7b05b94af1_story.html

Effigies of Presidents have been burned as well and those are not unlawful displays. Though you might get a dossier compiled on you by the secret service for obvious national security reasons.

First amendment rights for me not for thee?

Overheal

Sweetemotion wrote: »

First amendment rights for me not for thee?

I’m not sure I understand who the me and the thee are which you are referring to here.

Junkyard Tom

kildare lad wrote: »

Here's a clip of antifa/ BLM getting ready to attack police , all premeditated btw

https://youtu.be/UL1pdPezm54

I feel bad for those cops being made risk their health to protect a stupid statue. I don't know what the statue is of, they could be KKK protesters trying to destroy a statue of MLK Jnr, for all I care, the cops shouldn't have been tasked to the job. Whoever gave that order should be fired and blacklisted.

Overheal

Junkyard Tom wrote: »

I feel bad for those cops being made risk their health to protect a stupid statue. I don't know what the statue is of, they could be KKK protesters trying to destroy a statue of MLK Jnr, for all I care, the cops shouldn't have been tasked to the job. Whoever gave that order should be fired and blacklisted.

CREW has an FOIA lawsuit ongoing to find out why Trump sent feds to secure his hotel but not other federal property - including statues.

Sweetemotion

Junkyard Tom wrote: »

I feel bad for those cops being made risk their health to protect a stupid statue. I don't know what the statue is of, they could be KKK protesters trying to destroy a statue of MLK Jnr, for all I care, the cops shouldn't have been tasked to the job. Whoever gave that order should be fired and blacklisted.

You know it's not a statue MLK and the protestors are not KKK.

Who ever the orders to protect BLM graffiti should also be blacklisted.