Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Sinn Fein Omerta

Options
1…272829303133»

Comments

  • Options
    #962
    markodaly
    Registered Users Posts: 14,719 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Ah, what a novel debating tactic when called out on nonsense...deflect. :D

    Well, I have asked you a few times now, when you started on with this 'nuance' talk so again, tell me. Where is the nuance of that tweet?


  • Options
    #963
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 69,176 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    markodaly wrote: »
    Well, I have asked you a few times now, when you started on with this 'nuance' talk so again, tell me. Where is the nuance of that tweet?

    If you want to find out what the Victims issue is about...here's what I am doing.
    I am reading the Stormont House Agreement and about how the DUP once again rowed back on something they previously agreed on.

    Your opinion is redtop sensationalism as was Martina Anderson's tweet.


  • Options
    #964
    James Brown
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    Truthvader wrote: »
    "I know Michael Noonan acted inappropriately"........."we need to await the outcome of the outside investigation". Lets just run with the latter without the constant smearing

    Do not believe for second that Noonan did anything dishonest - but lets wait and see.

    As to Gerry Adams really don't have the energy to consider whether he was on their register of members filed in the Company's Office or not. Agree not much or any difference. If Gerry wanted you dead you were found on the side of the road the next day

    No smear FG's oen investigation said he acted inappropriately. Thats not a smear it's a finding.


  • Options
    #965
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    If you want to find out what the Victims issue is about...here's what I am doing.
    I am reading the Stormont House Agreement and about how the DUP once again rowed back on something they previously agreed on.

    Your opinion is redtop sensationalism as was Martina Anderson's tweet.

    What have the DUP got to do with Martina Anderson's tweet?


  • Options
    #966
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Bowie wrote: »
    No smear FG's oen investigation said he acted inappropriately. Thats not a smear it's a finding.

    Once again you are making things up and telling lies.

    Firstly, the PAC report said that it was "procedurally inappropriate" for him to meet someone, not that he "acted inappropriately"

    Secondly, the FG members of the PAC dissented from that Report.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #967
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 69,176 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    What have the DUP got to do with Martina Anderson's tweet?

    Mark's interpretation of the issue is similar to Anderson's tweet, is what I said - kneejerk, sensationalist and wrong in equal measure.


  • Options
    #968
    blanch152
    Registered Users Posts: 27,971 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Mark's interpretation of the issue is similar to Anderson's tweet, is what I said - kneejerk, sensationalist and wrong in equal measure.

    Has she resigned yet? I might have missed the announcement.


  • Options
    #969
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 69,176 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Has she resigned yet? I might have missed the announcement.

    Not that I heard.


  • Options
    #970
    James Brown
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    blanch152 wrote: »
    Once again you are making things up and telling lies.

    Firstly, the PAC report said that it was "procedurally inappropriate" for him to meet someone, not that he "acted inappropriately"

    Secondly, the FG members of the PAC dissented from that Report.

    Can you explain the difference?
    Isn't his being procedurally inappropriate based on something he did, isn't that an act?
    And please point out the lie or apologise.
    Report: Noonan acted inappropriately - Nama sale flawed

    Dossier prepared for TDs investigating the sale of Project Eagle

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news-focus/report-noonan-acted-inappropriately-nama-sale-flawed-61445871

    Yeah they did, thats why we need outside people to look at it. They are though so no worries.


  • Options
    #971
    Higgins5473
    Registered Users Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭Higgins5473


    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2058108250/1/#post114445239

    New thread here...

    All reasonable comments welcome :)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #972
    batman75
    Registered Users Posts: 596 ✭✭✭batman75


    FrancieBrady wrote: »
    Within days of arriving they were at the behest of the RUC raiding catholic houses and intimidating.
    Eamonn McCann and Hume fearex them leaving only because of the threat from the RUC and Stormont.
    Your grasp of the factual history is watery to say the least.

    Have to say I must have a water version of history too because it was my understanding that the Catholic population welcomed the British Army when they first came over.


  • Options
    #973
    James Brown
    Closed Accounts Posts: 16,013 ✭✭✭✭James Brown


    batman75 wrote: »
    Have to say I must have a water version of history too because it was my understanding that the Catholic population welcomed the British Army when they first came over.

    Thats true as I recall. They initially believed the BA might protect them.


  • Options
    #974
    FrancieBrady
    Registered Users Posts: 69,176 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    batman75 wrote: »
    Have to say I must have a water version of history too because it was my understanding that the Catholic population welcomed the British Army when they first came over.

    If you know anything about the predicament people were in - fear of massacre - they'd have welcomed the Soviet Army too.

    The FACT is it changed very quickly, very very quickly and all those reasons are out there in the facts too.


Advertisement