Oceans 11 Werewolf Game Thread

Steve WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Mary, you voted Steve (and I can see why), but it doesn't fit into your thoughts last night. Clarify please

You said you can see why Mary voted for me, care to clarify that?

Barbara WW

Oisin - felt pockety a little yesterday so will delve a little deeper
Frank - No real reason here but giving me the creeps a little
Gabriel - Guns blazing this morning which is good but seems a little forced to me

Be looking at these in a bit more detail when I get back on the laptop

Mary WW

Steve WW wrote: »

Mary, what changed from last night here, when you said we should take Henry's word for it that yourself, myself and Clodagh were all village, to this morning putting a vote on me?

Have you decided against trusting Henry?

i got excited by abigail's reasoning this morning, stuck a vote in for you. it all made sense.

forgot that you were cleared (well are we really cleared? waiting for henry to clarify that).

Barbara WW

@Clodagh- your formatting is incorrect on the voting

Frank WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Morning all. Anyone seen my shirt? I appear to have lost it down by the blackjack table

Fluff

Nigel WW wrote: »

Very quiet. Won’t be helped by the lack of a munch this morning I reckon. Unless we get talking today the first lynch could be a bigger ****show than usual

Nigel WW wrote: »

Nope I think I’ve already lost my shirt.

Trousers shoes and boxers still to go though!!

C’mon sixes, daddy needs a new job!!

More fluff. Friendly fluff though. Offends no one.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Not much tbh. Generally I find the early tree rustlers tend to end up as village even though we waste a day or two accusing them. We’ve most players posted at this stage with the exception of Wendy, Steve and Regan but most players haven’t given much to go on at this point.

Reasonable neutral comment. Nothing really here, except its appealing to the everyman. Interesting comment about tree shakers, but no tree shaking is being done by Nigel

Nigel WW wrote: »

I’m also wondering something about the quiet night0 and the no munch this morning, but not sure if it’s not a bit meta

Mechanics discussion, nothing here.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Haha that actually pretty neat

Or creepy

No, no I’ll stick with neat

More neutral stuff.

Nigel WW wrote: »

I’m wondering if the lack of activity might be down to some players knowing in advance there’d be no lynch

Vague, nothing of substance.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Ooh let me try:

Once a wolf a came a rambling
To a casino, took up gambling
But they didn’t have much luck,
Cause we caught them
Now they’re ****ed

Partaking in the poem fun.

Nigel WW wrote: »

That a bit of a reach from what I posted Steve. One thing I won’t be going for is no lynch

Nigel WW wrote: »

To be honest I’d read that but didn’t expect that there’d be no munch this morning

Nigel WW wrote: »

Ah ok my bad for a typo. I meant munch, typed lynch

He typed lynch but meant munch. Finally a little interaction with another player, but its all a misunderstanding.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Sorry folks RL has killed me today so just back now. My vote is going to be mainly gut at this stage I think.

RL got in the way. Ok.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Hey Frank, what’s with the genie vote for me in there?

I got wolf vibes from you. Now I have time so I'm doing an ISO to see what substance there is.

Nigel WW wrote: »

And Henry, what’s with the self vote?

Henry is a mystery to us all. Except Henry of course.

Nigel WW wrote: »

Wait are you saying she’s bad for posting a good list?

Nigel WW wrote: »

Really?

Clarification from Mary.

So there we have it. If Nigel was a colour he'd be grey. No tree shaking, no pointed questions, little enough interactions with anyone around him. One to watch I think. Feels like someone playing it safe, but maybe not.

Clodagh WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

@Clodagh- your formatting is incorrect on the voting

Thanks, but how, it looks fine except for capitalization,

Gabriel WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Why not find a wolf instead of picking to arbitrary people and making it a race between them?

Ok so this is your train of thought right?

Then why vote for me? Am I a wolf? if not then why vote for me under your logic.

Poker face Clo, you aint got one.

Barbara WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Thanks, but how, it looks fine except for capitalization,

Your leaving out vote

Rikand wrote: »

In this thread you will vote for who you wish to lynch. To place a vote for a player, post the player's name in the format '##Vote XXXX' where XXXX will be the players name. The ##Vote has to be all one word. ##Vote<space>XXXX

Please type the players full name in your vote

Lynches will be at 9pm and posts on or after this time will not be included for that day's lynch.

---

List of players ::


Abigail WW
Barbara WW
Clodagh WW
Riona WW
Fiona WW
Frank WW
Gabriel WW
Henry WW
Holly WW
Mary WW
Nigel WW
Oisin WW
Orla WW
Phil WW
Katie WW
Steve WW
Vernon WW
Wendy WW


IT IS NIGHT. DO NOT VOTE

You had it right yesterday

Clodagh WW wrote: »

##vote Frank WW

But not today

Clodagh WW wrote: »

## Gabriel WW

Abigail WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I know that I am a villager! I am 100% sure of that!

Get you! Misunderstood that

Oisin WW

Hey there Gabriel.

Gabriel WW wrote: »

This post was made early in the game today,

Whats the logic begind this post Oisin?

If your against a no lynch, why suggest it indirectly.

I was saying that in the rules it says you can vote no lynch and therefore it is always an option.

I said in a post afterwards that I am dead against no lynch votes.

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Or Oisin knows theirs no tasks as hes a wolf.

A wold slip here perhaps?

I explained this already and you conveniently omitted the same information as Vernon did yesterday. I said that Rikand said there would be no tasks (this was a mistake I later corrected to said actions) on N0. Nevermentioned the game after that.

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Page 2 down, my only wilf lean thus far is Oisin, suggesting no lynch in directly.

He puts it out there but wont go as far as to endorse it.

Then why mention it at all Oisin?

I did not suggest no lynch. I was referring to the rules.. But you don't seem to want to worry about context.......

Gabriel WW wrote: »

So you dont like steve for jumping on the poetry stuff.

What wrong with him jumping on the poetry stuff ? Why is that wolfy?

Again I explained this yeterday but you don't seem to care about that. I said that he came straight out a pointed at the 3 poets calling them a team. No reasoning just he saw something odd and went after them. I said numerous times I didnt get the poetry and still dont.

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Im between Oisin and Steve right now. Only upta page 5.

Oisins got me thinking villager at times, accusing folk, not sitting on the fence, etc.

Then again some if his play can be subtle wolfy. Indirectly suggesting No lynch, IMO. Jumping on Steve for jumping on others.

Steve himself is looking suss, appearing when mentioned despite saying he wasnt going to be around.

Both could be wolves, though Id bet that one is and one isnt.

Gonna switch to Steve.

Long story short Gabby. Read all my posts before you start coming out with this rehashed, incomplete stuff. It is all there for you but as I said you dont seemed bothered with the context in which those quotes were made. Nice work

Barbara WW

Henry, not being funny pal, I like your shtick sometimes but you can happily tell us your powers now! Munch is over, if i was wolf and you werent on my team, given the powers you've insinuated, id be munching you! So if you can do what you seemed to suggest can you clarify so we can disregard some people pending your death

Clodagh WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Ok so this is your train of thought right?

Then why vote for me? Am I a wolf? if not then why vote for me under your logic.

Poker face Clo, you aint got one.

I asked you to explain why you voted for nigel, as up until then I didn't see a the thought process that should suggest you voting there in your thread presence.

Then you said it was because he is eviler than frank.

thats a non answer, then you come at me saying that i am not answering, and deflection. these all seem like wolf moves to me, so i voted for you because i believe you are a wolf.

Its all on thread and easy to follow. maybe you should read it back.

Clodagh WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Your leaving out vote



You had it right yesterday


But not today

Whoops.. thank you.

Abigail WW

Mary WW wrote: »

thats some nice work abigail.

clodagh switched to self pres.

steve was always on holly, why did he recast his vote again at 9.59? to get the last vote in for the tie break? therefore to protect whoever was for the chop before that...was it nigel?

I presume it goes on last vote cast. Maybe Rikand can clarify. If it was then Nigel was going

Gabriel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Henry, not being funny pal, I like your shtick sometimes but you can happily tell us your powers now! Munch is over, if i was wolf and you werent on my team, given the powers you've insinuated, id be munching you! So if you can do what you seemed to suggest can you clarify so we can disregard some people pending your death

This is a fair point Henry. Esp with the wolves appearing to have 2 kills.

3 reasons I can think of

1. He is a wolf (I dont think this is likely yet).

2. Hes a low powered villager who is trying to draw a munch..... and the wolves dont buy it.

3. The wolves believe by leaving him alive, it will cast doubt on his semi claims

Henry WW

Mary WW wrote: »

henry, can you clarify this please:

are the 3 who voted holly good?

One who voted Holly is good.

Abigail WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

@mary, Why vote for steve when a roled player has said they are good? Would it not be better to vote the player who gave us that info so that after they flip we can read their docket and see how they knew what they knew?

Henry has given us three different versions of his story so far. I wouldn’t be putting any stock in anything he posts until he clearly says what he wants to say

Henry WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Henry, not being funny pal, I like your shtick sometimes but you can happily tell us your powers now! Munch is over, if i was wolf and you werent on my team, given the powers you've insinuated, id be munching you! So if you can do what you seemed to suggest can you clarify so we can disregard some people pending your death

Do not threaten me.

Henry WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Henry has given us three different versions of his story so far. I wouldn’t be putting any stock in anything he posts until he clearly says what he wants to say

Vote for me.





Please.

Mary WW

Henry WW wrote: »

One who voted Holly is good.

that helps the theory that both steve and nigel are bad.

Oisin WW

Mary WW wrote: »

The following were there :: Danny, Rusty, Reuben, Frank, Linus, Livingston, Yen, Basher, Saul and the two Malloys. Robbing Terry Benedict was not going to be easy. They'd have to negotiate his casino manager as well his assorted other hired help. And there may be some surprises along the way. Danny had his friend Bruiser that may help. Denny Shields was a big money player who knew everything and Tess..... what part would she have to play in this before the end....

11 good + bruiser
terry benedict + manager
denny shields...no idea here
tess

thats 16, 18 players in total. so prob 2 more unknowns on terry's team

Gabriel WW wrote: »

Tess was as much a villager as she was a wolf. Its not good news, we lost a potential goodie too. Its middle of the road news if anything.

Why is Marys list accurate? Do tell?

Have you any reads yourself, or you just gonna follow Mary?

Above is the quote I was talking about.

I am not following Mary but as it turns out i think she could be fairly spot on with her thinking as we now know that Terry has numerous goons.

Tess could have become a powerful villager yeah but at the time of her death she was nothing. And now she definitely cannot become a wolf. She was not definitely going to become a powerful villager. I personally like that outcome.

As far as reads go I need to spend more time going over last nights stuff. Wouldve much rather have been online at the time. Dont like trying to catch up with that amount of action in such a short space of time.

I have a few free hours this afternoon though so will put up a list of my reads so far.

One thing I do know is that Henry is as mad as a bag of spiders!

Gabriel WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I asked you to explain why you voted for nigel, as up until then I didn't see a the thought process that should suggest you voting there in your thread presence.

Then you said it was because he is eviler than frank.

thats a non answer, then you come at me saying that i am not answering, and deflection. these all seem like wolf moves to me, so i voted for you because i believe you are a wolf.

Its all on thread and easy to follow. maybe you should read it back.

Nope, nope, nope.

You voted for me in a knee jerk reaction to me hounding you.

Gotten to.

What are you alluding to thats "on thread". ? Your nonsence about Frank being cleaner than Nigel (with no justification whatsoever).

Firsty Nigel has not accused anyone all game. He has big pieces of wood sticking in his bum from sitting on the fence.

Secondly 5 people had 2 or 3 votes. 4 of them are good (if Im understanding things right from last night, to be honest Im a little confused), leaving Nigel.

Abigail WW

Henry WW wrote: »

One who voted Holly is good.

Why have you said in the last that all three are good and why have you said that you know a Wolf?

Gabriel WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Above is the quote I was talking about.

I am not following Mary but as it turns out i think she could be fairly spot on with her thinking as we now know that Terry has numerous goons.

Tess could have become a powerful villager yeah but at the time of her death she was nothing. And now she definitely cannot become a wolf. She was not definitely going to become a powerful villager. I personally like that outcome.

As far as reads go I need to spend more time going over last nights stuff. Wouldve much rather have been online at the time. Dont like trying to catch up with that amount of action in such a short space of time.

I have a few free hours this afternoon though so will put up a list of my reads so far.

One thing I do know is that Henry is as mad as a bag of spiders!

Ok, thats fair, I can not ask for more than that.

Gabriel WW

Henry is looking for a lynch.

My own experience tells me that can mean 1 things perhaps.

Some good roles seek a lynch to gain a prize for the village or a power. He could be sacrificing himself for our own good.

But that doesnt add up to the rest of his play.

Clodagh WW

@henry, is self voting a task to activate your powers or are you just having a bubble bath?

Oisin WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Oisin - felt pockety a little yesterday so will delve a little deeper
Frank - No real reason here but giving me the creeps a little
Gabriel - Guns blazing this morning which is good but seems a little forced to me

Be looking at these in a bit more detail when I get back on the laptop

Haha pockety? Come off it Babs.

I called out Steve for being a genie and the poetry stuff BEFORE you did your ISO on him and called him out for the exact same stuff

Delve all you want. Nothing to hide here

Abigail WW

Henry WW wrote: »

One who voted Holly is good.

I stand by the below comment.

Abigail WW wrote: »

Henry has given us three different versions of his story so far. I wouldn’t be putting any stock in anything he posts until he clearly says what he wants to say

The only info we do have is that Steve and Clodagh both voted late and those votes saved Nigel. One of those votes was enough to save him. However it’s very unlikely both are wolves. They’d be in a back room deciding who to throw under the bus.

I don’t have time now but I’ll check back later over Steve’s claim that he was fixing the formatting of his vote. I did comment at the time that I thought it strange you were holding out on voting but simultaneously you voted.

Clodagh wasn’t under the noose at the time but did have two votes so would understandably be nervous about getting lynched and could vote to self-pres. Again I’ll Need to look back at the sequencing.

Then there’s Nigel, no comment from him yet. So I suppose we’ll have to wait to see what he says. In the absence of any further information it kinda has to be him to go. All the rows about he said she said are conjecture. The only solid facts we have are around the voting.

Gabriel WW

Gabby extra fun FFA (actually its just normal).... in no particular order:

1. Clodagh - Suggests that Nigel and Frank could be evil based off the voting pattern. Suggest Nigel is cleaner than Frank..... gives no justifcation. Shges challenged and has no real reason why to vote Frank over Nigel. Is she trying to lynch Frank knowing he's good and Nigelk is bad..... Im guessing yes.

2. Nigel - Sat on the fence for the day 0-1, if those who voted for in 2 or 3's, then Nigel appears bad. His play doenst suggest he is village at this point.

3. Orla -

"Originally Posted by Orla WW View Post
I reckon he is yeah, from my previous post there's always a lunatic in the first couple of days and they're nearly always a villager and everyone thinks when they're dead "why on earth did he act that way?"

Where does you voting for someone who you think is town coming into it? I'm saying if you vote for your wolf buddy Frank because of reasoning that makes no sense knowing nobody else will do the same and everyone else voted for Henry and he flipped good then that would look good on you and something you could then use against the people who did vote for him"

Originally Posted by Orla WW View Post
Vote gone in for Clodagh for the reasoning in my last two posts

Originally Posted by Orla WW View Post
Clodagh I had considered voting for Frank in the beginning but he hasn't been here to defend himself and wolf lean or not I don't play shady like that but would you look here now I have my own wagon going.
Anyone care to jump on the Clodagh train? Choo choo

Thats my reasoning for throwing Orla on here. Votes Clo, for no reason (she says she explained previously but she didnt )Then suggest Frank is wolfy despite never alluding to it.

Admittedly the all probably arent wolves (Orlas vote for Clo, would be less wolfy if Clo is a wolf..... unless its a early day attempt to look good lkater in the game)

Mary WW

Rikand wrote: »

Day 1: Automated Votals from #1 to #28

Fiona WW (1): Katie WW
Nigel WW (2): Frank WW, Abigail WW
Mary WW (2): Nigel WW, Holly WW
Clodagh WW (2): Orla WW, Barbara WW
Holly WW (1): Mary WW
Steve WW (2): Oisin WW, Gabriel WW
Frank WW (2): Clodagh WW, Vernon WW
Henry WW (1): Henry WW
Barbara WW (1): Fiona WW
Not voting (4): Riona WW, Phil WW, Steve WW, Wendy WW


Phase ends in 0h4m. Hammer at 45.

Vote history:
[SPOIL]Clodagh WW (1): Frank WW
Fiona WW (2): Holly WW -> Barbara WW
Oisin WW (1): Steve WW
Holly WW (3): Mary WW -> Henry WW -> Mary WW
Henry WW (3): Henry WW -> Holly WW -> Henry WW
Abigail WW (2): Gabriel WW -> Nigel WW
Katie WW (1): Fiona WW
Frank WW (1): Nigel WW
Mary WW (2): Riona WW -> Holly WW
Vernon WW (1): Frank WW
Orla WW (1): Clodagh WW
Gabriel WW (1): Steve WW
Barbara WW (1): Clodagh WW
Nigel WW (1): Mary WW[/SPOIL]
<Beta v0.1.8>

there's the voting at 8.56. steve voted holly at 7.50.

so it appears steve realised his vote wasnt counted and then corrected it in the 4 mins after mod posted the above.