Oceans 11 Werewolf Game Thread

Mary WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Also on this, Mary never disputes his two wolves thing, does she know cause she hasnt told us! If he made that comment to me and I knew what he was talking about, id clarify, so far she hasnt

of course i dont dispute him, but as more info has come to light i have asked for clarity on the situation

Clodagh WW

@Vernon. I'd like to hear more from you.

Barbara WW

Mary WW wrote: »

of course i dont dispute him, but as more info has come to light i have asked for clarity on the situation

Do you feel you've along with Henry, identified one or two wolves?

Gabriel WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

At this stage, yes! I think he is full of ****e! I am in the minority but I dont see this as a village play

I will agree his play isnt village. Its hardly wolf either though.

Its unhelpful to us. Maybe the point of his role is add confusion and doubt. Again more of a jester role in my head.

That said he could be just a fool amusing himself. Id like to see myself wrong here.

Clodagh WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Do you think a wolf is likely to play like that?

Hi Phil, welcome to day 2.

You ask a question but give us nothing on how you feel about Henrys play.
Do you think a wolf plays like that?

If you had the gun, would you use it, and if so, what do you think your odds are of hitting a wolf?

Gabriel WW

Its less than 6 hours until lynch. Right now, theres nothing to sway me voting from my FFA.

I encourage others to add theirs.

Barbara WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Hi Phil, welcome to day 2.

You ask a question but give us nothing on how you feel about Henrys play.
Do you think a wolf plays like that?

If you had the gun, would you use it, and if so, what do you think your odds are of hitting a wolf?

Where's your bullet going Clodagh?

Henry WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Thought he was dead, even though he wasnt






Claims to know a wolf, great

No wolf on Holly (post thanked by Steve)

Clodagh who was on the Holly wagon asks for clarity

Henry says plural, you are all clear

Refuses mroe details

Mary notes the quiet thread

Henry agrees




[/B][/B]
Henry agreeing with Mary and saying they have solved two wolves

In response today about others being clear, only clears Mary

Does so AGAIN here despite telling Clodagh last night the Holly wagon was clean


Seriously, he is taking the piss at this stage. His own story isnt consistent

I'm going nowhere hehe.

Nigel WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

He didnt say if hed be using it though.

Gabs are you deliberately not reading the thread or the op? This ones already been pointed out

Clodagh WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Where's your bullet going Clodagh?

I'd prefer a peek than a bullet tbh. My order of preference for peeks would be gabriel then frank.

Barbara WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I'd prefer a peek than a bullet tbh. My order of preference for peeks would be gabriel then frank.

Me too but we (apparently) have a bullet, you gotta fire! Wheres it going?

Henry WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I'd prefer a peek than a bullet tbh. My order of preference for peeks would be gabriel then frank.

Not on me hehe

Barbara WW

Henry WW wrote: »

Not on me hehe

An adult using hehe, probably deserves the bullet

Clodagh WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Me too but we (apparently) have a bullet, you gotta fire! Wheres it going?

I'd still want the same people resolved.

Gabriel WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Gabs are you deliberately not reading the thread or the op? This ones already been pointed out

You gonna sit on the fence or are you gonna provide some reads, unlike yesterday.

Hashtag Spinter Bum

Give us an FFA

Gabriel WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I'd still want the same people resolved.

But which one out of those people would get it first?

Gabriel WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

I'd prefer a peek than a bullet tbh. My order of preference for peeks would be gabriel then frank.

So is that for a peek or a bullet.... or both

Oisin WW

Right so here is what I have on some of the players so far guys.

Gabriel: Im not sure if they are intentionally being obtuse or really genuinely asking the asking they are but ive had the exact same conversation with her today as I did Vernon yesterday. Answering questions by asking some of her own. Don’t like either of these types of play. Creates more traffic to get through and helps wolves to hide. Really don’t like it. Not going to say wolf but not leaning good anyway.

Henry: Really don’t know what to make of him. His story changes every hour. First he knows 3 Holly voters were goodies. Then he has 1 confirmed wolf. Then he thinks he has 2 confirmed wolves with Mary. Then just claims that Mary is good and that is all. So he could be a wolf playing a mad suicide game and just doing his best to confuse the village (which would be working to be honest). I’m not sure he is though. As someone said (I think Abi) before theres always a player like that and then when they flip good we are all asking why they bothered playing like that. I lean this way. That is not to say he is any use to the village though.

Mary: The thing that sticks out with Mary for me is how she managed to go from “how could I possibly have a good list this early” to “at least 4 out of the 5 players who had 2/3 votes last night are good”. That is quite the turnaround. Do not like it at all.

Clodagh: I like the constant accusatory tone. I’m not sure a wolf would be that brazen about getting into non stop confrontations. Also made a lot of sense when discussing Mary’s idea that players can be essentially confirmed good after the lynch. Then makes the point that Nigel is “cleaner than Frank” but not necessarily “clean”. This is important as anyone who at this stage is clearing people (with the exception of Henry the madman) is very suspect IMO.

Which leads me onto…..Frank: The idea of lynching the Holly voters in order to clear people based of the musings of Henry is pure madness and completely a odds with what the village should be doing at this stage. Very dodgy lean.

Steve: Me old pal Steve. Definitely soften on him today for the simple reason that he was earlier calling Frank out about his idea of “clearing” people based off Henry’s word. And based off his interaction with Gabs earlier on I would definitely lean good for him ahead of Gabs.

That’s all the time I’ve had. Will try and add a few to that before 6.

If I’d to do an FFA right now it would be :
Gabs
Mary
Frank

Phil WW

Clodagh WW wrote: »

Hi Phil, welcome to day 2.

You ask a question but give us nothing on how you feel about Henrys play.
Do you think a wolf plays like that?

If you had the gun, would you use it, and if so, what do you think your odds are of hitting a wolf?

I don't think I class it as wolfy based on what we know. There is something that is odd about it but that wouldn't make me think wolf necessarily. Although the idea of an alpha, who perhaps would be peeked as good, might fit their play if that role is in the game. I'd question whether it was or not. The double killing over night suggests a wolf (perhaps an alpha) who gets an additional kill.

I would use a gun, although not sure if I'd use it yet.

Frank WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Right so here is what I have on some of the players so far guys.

Gabriel: Im not sure if they are intentionally being obtuse or really genuinely asking the asking they are but ive had the exact same conversation with her today as I did Vernon yesterday. Answering questions by asking some of her own. Don’t like either of these types of play. Creates more traffic to get through and helps wolves to hide. Really don’t like it. Not going to say wolf but not leaning good anyway.

Henry: Really don’t know what to make of him. His story changes every hour. First he knows 3 Holly voters were goodies. Then he has 1 confirmed wolf. Then he thinks he has 2 confirmed wolves with Mary. Then just claims that Mary is good and that is all. So he could be a wolf playing a mad suicide game and just doing his best to confuse the village (which would be working to be honest). I’m not sure he is though. As someone said (I think Abi) before theres always a player like that and then when they flip good we are all asking why they bothered playing like that. I lean this way. That is not to say he is any use to the village though.

Mary: The thing that sticks out with Mary for me is how she managed to go from “how could I possibly have a good list this early” to “at least 4 out of the 5 players who had 2/3 votes last night are good”. That is quite the turnaround. Do not like it at all.

Clodagh: I like the constant accusatory tone. I’m not sure a wolf would be that brazen about getting into non stop confrontations. Also made a lot of sense when discussing Mary’s idea that players can be essentially confirmed good after the lynch. Then makes the point that Nigel is “cleaner than Frank” but not necessarily “clean”. This is important as anyone who at this stage is clearing people (with the exception of Henry the madman) is very suspect IMO.

Which leads me onto…..Frank: The idea of lynching the Holly voters in order to clear people based of the musings of Henry is pure madness and completely a odds with what the village should be doing at this stage. Very dodgy lean.

Steve: Me old pal Steve. Definitely soften on him today for the simple reason that he was earlier calling Frank out about his idea of “clearing” people based off Henry’s word. And based off his interaction with Gabs earlier on I would definitely lean good for him ahead of Gabs.

That’s all the time I’ve had. Will try and add a few to that before 6.

If I’d to do an FFA right now it would be :
Gabs
Mary
Frank

This is a joke of an FFA. Steve had one soft half comment about not going with my idea. Clodagh was the one going hard against it. If you're gonna put me on an FFA at least read the thread properly.

Phil WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

:pac::pac::pac: Slip here, you know Wendy has a bullet and are pretending to read back

Hmm, perhaps a fair point although in a post of yours just before this you mention Wendy having a bullet. So it is plausible they haven't read Wendy's original post yet.

Oisin WW

Frank WW wrote: »

This is a joke of an FFA. Steve had one soft half comment about not going with my idea. Clodagh was the one going hard against it. If you're gonna put me on an FFA at least read the thread properly.

But Frank I clearly explained why you are on it.....

What did I not read correctly?

Are you not suggesting that we should do through the Holly voters list?

Based solely off the word of Henry?

Gabriel WW

So Oisin has me top of his FFA despite him not thinking Im a wolf (his words)

God its a lot long FFA with no serious leans. Stop trying to have 1 foot out and one foot in. Accuse someone. Not a definitive read after all the chatter since Hollys death.

My god its poor.

Frank WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

But Frank I clearly explained why you are on it.....

What did I not read correctly?

Are you not suggesting that we should do through the Holly voters list?

Based solely off the word of Henry?

Yes, it was an idea for the group to discuss so we're not endlessly talking about who voted last or nothing at all like yesterday.

Henry has given us an option to sort good from bad players, we either go with it or move on to something else.

Put forward something constructive yourself maybe instead of this hurler on the ditch nonsense.

Oisin WW

Gabriel WW wrote: »

So Oisin has me top of his FFA despite him not thinking Im a wolf (his words)

God its a lot long FFA with no serious leans. Stop trying to have 1 foot out and one foot in. Accuse someone. Not a definitive read after all the chatter since Hollys death.

My god its poor.

Very poor Gab is it yeah? I have given my FFA with reasons for it. Now if you don't like them then thats fine. But i've explained myself.

Now if you need me to explain it again to you thats fine. You seem to like that. But i will not be dragged into your game of clogging up the thread

Gabriel WW

Oisin WW wrote: »

Very poor Gab is it yeah? I have given my FFA with reasons for it. Now if you don't like them then thats fine. But i've explained myself.

Now if you need me to explain it again to you thats fine. You seem to like that. But i will not be dragged into your game of clogging up the thread

Your reasons are W E A K.

Phil WW

Oisin I'd rank your suspicions as follows

Frank
Mary
Gabriel
Steve
Clodagh
Henry

Would that be fair to say?

Oisin WW

Frank WW wrote: »

Yes, it was an idea for the group to discuss so we're not endlessly talking about who voted last or nothing at all like yesterday.

Henry has given us an option to sort good from bad players, we either go with it or move on to something else.

Put forward something constructive yourself maybe instead of this hurler on the ditch nonsense.

If you think that the village bus should be driven by Henry then thats all I need to know.

Im not sure what "hurler in the ditch" means.

But I would like to see us working off FFAs and votes tonight. We don't have a lot of info which makes me even more suspect of players who are quick to clear others or claim to have theorys to clear them by killing others.

Here's the thing. Which version of Henry do you want to listen to?

Oisin WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Oisin I'd rank your suspicions as follows

Frank
Mary
Gabriel
Steve
Clodagh
Henry

Would that be fair to say?

Top 5 yes.

Henry is in a list of his own!!

Mary WW

Barbara WW wrote: »

Do you feel you've along with Henry, identified one or two wolves?

i've not identified any wolves unfortunately.