Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXII-30,360 in ROI(1,781 deaths) 8,035 in NI (568 deaths)(10/09)Read OP

Options
11415171920322

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,376 ✭✭✭Funsterdelux


    NIMAN wrote: »
    Not sure if this is a serious reply or being sarcastic?

    There could be more than 6 people in ICU today due to car crashes or something else.

    I think 6 is an amazing figure...out of 5.5 million.

    It was both. Sarcastic and serious, we did a **** job at the start and its continuing.

    We're talking about 6 icu covid patients though right?

    In this day and age most car crashes could be prevented too. It all leads back to the same thing, economy/consumerism.

    Im just cranky


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭SeaBreezes


    wadacrack wrote: »
    It means it could be an endemic disease. That's a very naive outlook to have on it.

    It was always going to be endemic.

    But having had it once 2nd strain was asymptomatic. That means he had a form of defense to it.

    Therefore one strain can give some protection against another.

    Means herd immunity is possible?


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,259 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    wadacrack wrote: »
    Devastating news . Hopefully not a common occurrence

    https://twitter.com/BNODesk/status/1297881830025297920

    Wouldn't exactly call it devastating.
    1 case out of how many ??

    If it was common you'd see much much more of this already.

    Doesn't really change much in terms of vaccine development either which I suspect will eventually become much like the yearly flu vaccine.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 8,484 CMod ✭✭✭✭Sierra Oscar


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    It was always going to be endemic.

    But having had it once 2nd strain was asymptomatic. That means he had a form of defense to it.

    Therefore one strain can give some protection against another.

    Means herd immunity is possible?

    Herd immunity works by not being able to catch the virus after already having contracted it. The hint is in the word immunity - if you can still get it then you're not immune to it.

    If you have it you can spread it. That's not herd immunity. He might be asymptomatic, but doesn't mean a person he comes into contact with won't end up in ICU.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,205 ✭✭✭✭hmmm


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    Means herd immunity is possible?
    Of course it is, ignore the "herd immunity is now impossible" talk.

    This report tells us nothing about the effectiveness of a vaccine which is designed to generate a robust immune response.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Dublin’s incidence is higher than ~16/17 other counties. It’s a worry. Dominating the figures again.

    Not everyone thinks a 0.5% increase in cases means it's time to lockdown.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,128 ✭✭✭✭Oranage2


    Getting crazy now, numbers at a massive level, hospitalizations up, thousands marching against the government. Schools opening will cause even more discontent. FF had their chance and they blew it, every decision they made was wrong and their wait and see approach has made the people to lose confidence in them. It's game over and we need a restart


  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭darjeeling


    Eod100 wrote: »
    Not sure if this has to be peer reviewed yet and hopefully very small number of cases. https://twitter.com/KarenGrepin/status/1297841334900756480?s=19

    This is the proof we've been waiting for - a clear case where the virus genome sequenced the second time round was unambiguously different from the first time.

    Scientists have been speculating since the start of this pandemic about the long-term future of this virus, wondering if it eventually become another seasonally circulating common cold coronavirus.
    Immunity is not binary, and the thinking is that immunity resulting from initial infection may wane over time but not wholly disappear.
    Re-infection could result in a minor infection of the upper airway that does not progress to the more severe forms of disease that we're seeing now in some patients on initial infection.
    People re-infected would gain a boost to their immunity, again preventing infection for months to years until the next time.

    Although this is only a sample size of one and we don't yet have the paper, news reports are saying that the person re-infected did not have symptoms and was - presumably - picked up on routine border testing.
    The 33-year-old IT worker was cleared of Covid-19 and discharged from a hospital in April. He tested positive for the virus again after returning from Spain earlier this month.
    https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1545589-20200824.htm
    The 33-year-old man had only mild symptoms the first time, and no symptoms this time around. The reinfection was discovered when he returned from a trip to Spain, the researchers said, and the virus they sequenced closely matched the strain circulating in Europe in July and August.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/24/world/covid-19-coronavirus.html#link-6d6b8cdd


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,501 ✭✭✭bb1234567


    It is very discouraging news that reinfection is possible, it does put future prospects in question, I mean like a year down the line, or longer, that seems very uncertain now. But for the foreseeable, herd immunity looks possible, several Indian cities certainly appear to have achieved herd immunity.


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    SeaBreezes wrote: »
    It was always going to be endemic.

    But having had it once 2nd strain was asymptomatic. That means he had a form of defense to it.

    Therefore one strain can give some protection against another.

    Means herd immunity is possible?

    It is good that he was asymptomatic the second time .

    I am not sure that that means it is because he has some defenses against it , as if that was so he wouldn't be reinfected by the same virus . Unless it's a mutation?

    Too many questions...

    Having just read darjeeling post there , that answers some of them , thanks d :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,845 ✭✭✭Polar101


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    It is very discouraging news that reinfection is possible, it does put future prospects in question, I mean like a year down the line, or longer, that seems very uncertain now. But for the foreseeable, herd immunity looks possible, several Indian cities certainly appear to have achieved herd immunity.

    I saw that study where they said 50% had been infected in Pune. Are they still reporting a lot of new cases? Would be interesting to see those numbers in such a big city (pop. 7.4 million).


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Getting crazy now, numbers at a massive level, hospitalizations up, thousands marching against the government. Schools opening will cause even more discontent. FF had their chance and they blew it, every decision they made was wrong and their wait and see approach has made the people to lose confidence in them. It's game over and we need a restart

    Thousands are not marching .
    It is worrying the up tick in cases and admissions , but not crazy yet .
    Yes about FF though ;)


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Game changer. Herd immunity not an option now.

    Miss the part "he was asymptomatic during the 2nd infection". Immunity is not a binary thing. With most infections some will get full immunity, some partial immunity or resistance as we have seen with this individual and some no immunity whatsoever. All indications is that a good immune response will be triggered in the vast majority of those infected to either prevent reinfection of reduce the impact of reinfection.

    But by all means - the sky is falling


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    hmmm wrote: »
    Not sure I'd describe it as "devastating". If this was common we'd be seeing a lot more of it. The first infection he was hospitalised, the second he was asymptomatic.

    Agreed. The panic in some posters is worrying. What have we become as a people.

    Reinfection will always be a rare as anything. 1 in a million chance. Also it won't be anything as severe I would contend.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,147 ✭✭✭TonyMaloney


    Miss the part "he was asymptomatic during the 2nd infection". Immunity is not a binary thing. With most infections some will get full immunity, some partial immunity or resistance as we have seen with this individual and some no immunity whatsoever. All indications is that a good immune response will be triggered in the vast majority of those infected to either prevent reinfection of reduce the impact of reinfection.

    But by all means - the sky is falling

    Well in terms of protecting the most vulnerable it means that the like if Sweden is in the same boat as the rest of us - waiting on a vaccine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 15,259 ✭✭✭✭stephenjmcd


    Oranage2 wrote: »
    Getting crazy now, numbers at a massive level, hospitalizations up, thousands marching against the government. Schools opening will cause even more discontent. FF had their chance and they blew it, every decision they made was wrong and their wait and see approach has made the people to lose confidence in them. It's game over and we need a restart

    Crazy is a bit of an overstatement.

    Based on case numbers, hospitalisations are relatively low. Nothing crazy or out of hand.

    Thousands marching ? Come on now that's not thousands in Dublin, the same few that have been out every Saturday for the last few weeks.

    Agree on the FF part, not exactly been inspiring confidence


  • Registered Users Posts: 9,929 ✭✭✭spookwoman


    Hub Numbers
    27 (+6) Cases In Hospital (8am)
    1 Admission to hospital in the last 24 hrs
    0 Discharges from hospital in the last 24 hrs

    6 Cases in ICU (11am and 7.30pm)
    1 Admission to ICU in the last 24 hrs
    1 Discharge from ICU in the last 24 hrs


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Miss the part "he was asymptomatic during the 2nd infection". Immunity is not a binary thing. With most infections some will get full immunity, some partial immunity or resistance as we have seen with this individual and some no immunity whatsoever. All indications is that a good immune response will be triggered in the vast majority of those infected to either prevent reinfection of reduce the impact of reinfection.

    But by all means - the sky is falling

    Interesting thing is up to now the research has been showing us that those who had a more severe infection would probably have a stronger immune response .
    In this person it doesn't appear to be the case .
    However it is , just one case .


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Crazy is a bit of an overstatement.

    Based on case numbers, hospitalisations are relatively low. Nothing crazy or out of hand.

    Thousands marching ? Come on now that's not thousands in Dublin, the same few that have been out every Saturday for the last few weeks.

    Agree on the FF part, not exactly been inspiring confidence

    You are a rock of sense ! ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 475 ✭✭Onesea


    147 cases today folks
    73 in Dublin
    17 kildare
    12 offaly
    11 Wicklow
    4 Laois

    Practically irrelevant information.
    147 test positive out of x tests during x date and x date.

    Everyday there will be various numbers released, but how much longer are people willing to ignore empty hospitals.

    Nearly September now folks.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well in terms of protecting the most vulnerable it means that the like if Sweden is in the same boat as the rest of us - waiting on a vaccine.

    All a vaccine is is a short cut to herd immunity. In the same way, people who are vaccinated may get mild or asymptomatic infections. A lot of the talk I am hearing about the covid vaccines in particular is that they will produce a n immune response, and will protect most who get it from a serious infection, but will not guarantee that everyone will be 100% immune.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Herd immunity works by not being able to catch the virus after already having contracted it. The hint is in the word immunity - if you can still get it then you're not immune to it.

    If you have it you can spread it. That's not herd immunity. He might be asymptomatic, but doesn't mean a person he comes into contact with won't end up in ICU.

    Herd immunity just needs between 40% and 60% of people to be immune


  • Registered Users Posts: 13,111 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Herd immunity just needs between 25% and 60% of people to be immune

    No .
    It is at least 40 to 60 per cent .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,469 ✭✭✭ShyMets


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    You are a rock of sense ! ;)

    We don't want sense. We want hysteria and lots fu*king of it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 475 ✭✭Onesea


    Game changer. Herd immunity not an option now.

    Game changer?

    Not at all. He was sick without any symptoms.
    Half of Africa should be wiped out already.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭timmy_mallet


    Herd immunity works by not being able to catch the virus after already having contracted it. The hint is in the word immunity - if you can still get it then you're not immune to it.

    If you have it you can spread it. That's not herd immunity. He might be asymptomatic, but doesn't mean a person he comes into contact with won't end up in ICU.

    Er, you could be immune/vaccinated, but a virus could be living on your hands and you might not become ill, yet pass it to someone. Immunity doesn't mean you destroy a virus the moment it touches yer person.

    Hong Kong example above, was he ill from the re-infection? This might be my ignorance on display here, but if the test proved the existence of COVID-19 that's all it did, not that he became ill from it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,089 ✭✭✭Non solum non ambulabit


    Goldengirl wrote: »
    No .
    It is at least 40 to 60 per cent .

    Thanks edit. Point therefore stands that even if half of people never developed immunity we would still achieve herd immunity.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,215 ✭✭✭khalessi


    Er, you could be immune/vaccinated, but a virus could be living on your hands and you might not become ill, yet pass it to someone. Immunity doesn't mean you destroy a virus the moment it touches yer person.

    Hong Kong example above, was he ill from the re-infection? This might be my ignorance on display here, but if the test proved the existence of COVID-19 that's all it did, not that he became ill from it.

    If this is the same HK example two different strains of the virus apparently

    https://news.rthk.hk/rthk/en/component/k2/1545589-20200824.htm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭timmy_mallet


    Well in terms of protecting the most vulnerable it means that the like if Sweden is in the same boat as the rest of us - waiting on a vaccine.

    I think they said that from day one, but.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 552 ✭✭✭Gerry Hatrick


    bb1234567 wrote: »
    It is very discouraging news that reinfection is possible, it does put future prospects in question, I mean like a year down the line, or longer, that seems very uncertain now. But for the foreseeable, herd immunity looks possible, several Indian cities certainly appear to have achieved herd immunity.

    Which one's?


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement