The wondrous adventures of Sinn Fein (part 2)

FrancieBrady

McMurphy wrote: »

RTE radio I assume lads?

Have a bit of a drive later I could do with a laugh in the background.

Very end of news at one McMurph...doesn't take Matt long to make the FG look precious, pretentious and only interested in point scoring.

Dempo1

McMurphy wrote: »

RTE radio I assume lads?

Have a bit of a drive later I could do with a laugh in the background.

Yep, Saturday with Katie Hannon, the FG rep, just went off on a SF rant, had nothing to do with what was being discussed, but SF"S Matt Mc Carthy responded by handing the Minister, his A*** on a plate.

theballz

a very cool kid wrote: »

Is this the official Sinn Féin position now? Do you think the Americans did 9/11 themselves?

Bet he also thinks the world is flat and the moon landing never happened.

James Brown

Dempo1 wrote: »

Yep, Saturday with Katie Hannon, the FG rep, just went off on a SF rant, had nothing to do with what was being discussed, but SF"S Matt Mc Carthy responded by handing the Minister, his A*** on a plate.

Its obvious.
Was similar on RTE 1 radio last Thursday night. Everyone cross party saying it was distraction and the FG'er talking about anonymous accounts critical of government likely being SF.
If FG addressed the issues they'd maybe fare better.

Brendan Bendar

Dempo1 wrote: »

Yep, Saturday with Katie Hannon, the FG rep, just went off on a SF rant, had nothing to do with what was being discussed, but SF"S Matt Mc Carthy responded by handing the Minister, his A*** on a plate.

You don’t even know the guys name dude !!! Carthy handed nobody their arse on a plate.

I listened to the programme and Hannon was her usual inept self, totally useless.

Complete waste of space.

FrancieBrady

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

You don’t even know the guys name dude !!! Carthy handed nobody their arse on a plate.

I listened to the programme and Hannon was her usual inept self, totally useless.

Complete waste of space.

SF Shills In Da Studio!

The FG guy was left shouting on the sidelines...nobody took his bait. I.E. nobody is interested, there are more important things to worry about.

smurgen

Christ they're still lying.FG are Trumpian. https://twitter.com/christineomg5/status/1337786362582462470?s=19

Brendan Bendar

FrancieBrady wrote: »

SF Shills In Da Studio!

The FG guy was left shouting on the sidelines...nobody took his bait. I.E. nobody is interested, there are more important things to worry about.

Incorrect Francie, the auld VB tactics, Sf keep talking through all the flak, and Hannon jumps in the back them up .

Francie, listen, there are people out here who see those tactics being operated.

Like a good lad, stop trying to say black is white.... we see the tactics.

‘Nuff said, stop trying to defend the indefensible.

FrancieBrady

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Incorrect Francie, the auld VB tactics, Sf keep talking through all the flak, and Hannon jumps in the back them up .

Francie, listen, there are people out here who see those tactics being operated.

Like a good lad, stop trying to say black is white.... we see the tactics.

‘Nuff said, stop trying to defend the indefensible.

You clearly were not listening to the show.

aido79

a very cool kid wrote: »

That's your one who went on her holiers during the campaign? (The campaign SF expected to win so much they didn't run enough candidate or come up with a program for Government on).

How many current TDs that have "issues" are we on now?

Patricia Ryan - 9/11 conspiracy theorist

Brian Stanley - Anti Fluoride, pro Provo, glorifies death

Reada Cronin - hates Jews

Violet Wynne - steals from charities

Martin Browne - Another with his Twitter gone

David Cullianane - Up the RA

Dessie Ellis - an actual murderer

Aenghus O Snodaigh - wife threatens cops/his election helpers found with weapons/printer cartridges

Who have I missed? At what point do these stop being one-offs?

Don't forget Francie's number 2, Pauline Tully. You'd have to wonder about the type of person who would marry a former provisional IRA member while they were in prison for the manslaughter of a detective.

FrancieBrady

aido79 wrote: »

Don't forget Francie's number 2, Pauline Tully. You'd have to wonder about the type of person who would marry a former provisional IRA member while they were in prison for the manslaughter of a detective.

Just how much control of people do you guys want? Scary when a person's choice of partner is used against them.

aido79

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Just how much control of people do you guys want? Scary when a person's choice of partner is used against them.

What has it got to do with control? I just think a person's choice of partner gives an idea of what type of person they are especially if that person is a deranged psychopath.

FrancieBrady

aido79 wrote: »

What has it got to do with control? I just think a person's choice of partner gives an idea of what type of person they are especially if that person is a deranged psychopath.

I wouldn't consider it any of my business, and would not try to control or pass comment on who somebody decides to have as a partner.

Nor would I pass comment to score a cheap political point.But we have yet to find out how low the FG crew will go.
Do you pass judgement on choice of partner when other relationships go bad? Do the old 'I told you so'? Lovely.

Brendan Bendar

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I wouldn't consider it any of my business, and would not try to control or pass comment on who somebody decides to have as a partner.

Nor would I pass comment to score a cheap political point.But we have yet to find out how low the FG crew will go.
Do you pass judgement on choice of partner when other relationships go bad? Do the old 'I told you so'? Lovely.

Francie you have been on here piling on FG on three or four threads 12 hours a day for the past few months.

Don’t you thing it’s a bit rich to start squealing when someone gives you a taste of your own medicine.

Nothing personal, but if you can’t take it, don’t give it.

FrancieBrady

Brendan Bendar wrote: »

Francie you have been on here piling on FG on three or four threads 12 hours a day for the past few months.

Don’t you thing it’s a bit rich to start squealing when someone gives you a taste of your own medicine.

Nothing personal, but if you can’t take it, don’t give it.

Never commented on anyones choice of partner ever, to score a point Brendi.

Not my medicine.

You FG lads have no boundaries or ethics when a political party frighten you. Are youse planning to go much lower?

aido79

FrancieBrady wrote: »

I wouldn't consider it any of my business, and would not try to control or pass comment on who somebody decides to have as a partner.

Nor would I pass comment to score a cheap political point.But we have yet to find out how low the FG crew will go.
Do you pass judgement on choice of partner when other relationships go bad? Do the old 'I told you so'? Lovely.

Maybe you don't have a problem with her choice of partner but do you have any issues with her as a SF councillor campaigning for his early release?
Can you imagine a member of any other party in Ireland actually campaigning with the full support of the party for the release of a convicted killer of a detective?

FrancieBrady

aido79 wrote: »

Maybe you don't have a problem with her choice of partner but do you have any issues with her as a SF councillor campaigning for his early release?
Can you imagine a member of any other party in Ireland actually campaigning with the full support of the party for the release of a convicted killer of a detective?

Yes, if the party was the political wing of an army involved in a conflict/war.(She would have seen it as an army, before you get indignant)

I could check what happened after the conflict/wars FG and FF were born out of if I was stuck for a cheap political point. But I won't. I'll leave you to make the most of all you guys seem to have left, digging the dirt.

aido79

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Yes, if the party was the political wing of an army involved in a conflict/war.(She would have seen it as an army, before you get indignant)

I could check what happened after the conflict/wars FG and FF were born out of if I was stuck for a cheap political point. But I won't. I'll leave you to make the most of all you guys seem to have left, digging the dirt.

What conflict/war was happening in 2005 when she was campaigning for his release?

FrancieBrady

aido79 wrote: »

What conflict/war was happening in 2005 when she was campaigning for his release?

There isn't one now, but plenty still taking out their recriminations.

The GFA was a process. She and he had every right to look for release. If you didn't understand that then you shouldn't have voted for it and maybe write to whoever you do vote for and complain, because all the political parties here fervently supported it. Some of them just want to cherrypick the bits that suit them though, funnily enough.

Danzy

aido79 wrote: »

Maybe you don't have a problem with her choice of partner but do you have any issues with her as a SF councillor campaigning for his early release?
Can you imagine a member of any other party in Ireland actually campaigning with the full support of the party for the release of a convicted killer of a detective?

No problem .

RandomViewer

aido79 wrote: »

Don't forget Francie's number 2, Pauline Tully. You'd have to wonder about the type of person who would marry a former provisional IRA member while they were in prison for the manslaughter of a detective.

Think you need to brush up on your former FF TDs
Google Gillespie sisters

expectationlost

smurgen wrote: »

Christ they're still lying.FG are Trumpian. https://twitter.com/christineomg5/status/1337786362582462470?s=19

https://twitter.com/IrishMailSunday/status/1337902552600363010

aido79

FrancieBrady wrote: »

There isn't one now, but plenty still taking out their recriminations.

The GFA was a process. She and he had every right to look for release. If you didn't understand that then you shouldn't have voted for it and maybe write to whoever you do vote for and complain, because all the political parties here fervently supported it. Some of them just want to cherrypick the bits that suit them though, funnily enough.

Maybe so but still not a good look for politicians to campaign for the release of something who killed a detective in my opinion.
I won't be writing to anyone but Pauline is way down the list of people I will ever vote for.

aido79

RandomViewer wrote: »

Think you need to brush up on your former FF TDs
Google Gillespie sisters

You realise they were Sinn Fein members don't you?

McMurphy

aido79 wrote: »

You realise they were Sinn Fein members don't you?

Google harder aido.

FrancieBrady

aido79 wrote: »

Maybe so but still not a good look for politicians to campaign for the release of something who killed a detective in my opinion.
I won't be writing to anyone but Pauline is way down the list of people I will ever vote for.

Was voting for her compulsory?

aido79

McMurphy wrote: »

Google harder aido.

What am I going to find out? That one of the sisters who served time in prison married a FF Td? Anything else?

aido79

FrancieBrady wrote: »

Was voting for her compulsory?

Voting for anyone is not compulsory.

Loafing Oaf

a very cool kid wrote: »

Brian Stanley pro Provo

David Cullianane - Up the RA

And you reckon these particular 'issues' will put off a lot of potential SF voters?

RandomViewer

aido79 wrote: »

What am I going to find out? That one of the sisters who served time in prison married a FF Td? Anything else?

It wasn't an issue then and that was the time that Johnny Bruton was waving his carrot at Charlie Windsor, think if you start looking into politicians partners you'll find a lot of stuff you don't like, might even lead to a exhumation or two