Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

IAMAMORON

I understand that the Zara Twitter account is a pisstake account. One of her quotes from last month

" Part of my peaking and retreat from wokeness has been leaving behind a whole mode of infantile behaviour and thinking. The “zero tolerance of disagreement” mentality. The “labels as identity” mentality.

The mentality that “identity is valid” but material reality is not."

Total pisstaker - here is another,

"What I do know is it is so much safer right now, in domains run by leftists, to be a powerful trans man than it is to be a powerful lesbian, and this feel like a u-turn from the direction of progress in which we had been heading.”


Just Saying. I found this cool poster on it though.

Wanderer78

punisher5112 wrote:

My penis defines I am male...

What happens if it falls off, how will you be defined?

punisher5112

Wanderer78 wrote: »

What happens if it falls off, how will you be defined?

That's interesting thought process....

Still be male just that bits be falling off worried now

uptherebels

punisher5112 wrote: »

That's interesting thought process....

Still be male just that bits be falling off worried now

How would you still be male, if it is your penis that defines you as such?

punisher5112

uptherebels wrote: »

How would you still be male, if it is your penis that defines you as such?

Well Adams apple, hairy arms, legs, beard deep voice, not a woman, balls etc etc....

uptherebels

punisher5112 wrote: »

Well Adams apple, hairy arms, legs, beard deep voice, not a woman, balls etc etc....

So its not you penis that defines you as male then...

Wanderer78

Wanderer78 wrote: »

What happens if it falls off, how will you be defined?

It gets itchy and **** first.. He'd probably get to a doctor before it fell off..

Omackeral

IAMAMORON wrote: »

I understand that the Zara Twitter account is a pisstake account.

It’s honestly not easy to tell at times what’s parody and what is not.

Sir Oxman

Titania restricted. Again. Restricted meaning he has to remove what is unpalatble to the great Big Tech God.
The massive catalog of real links from real people blaming hillwalking to toasters for being racist with the parody lampooning them has gone.

Hmm.
https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath?s=20

Correction: It appears the big thread on 'everything is racist' is still there.

IAMAMORON

Omackeral wrote: »

It’s honestly not easy to tell at times what’s parody and what is not.

It takes one to know one.:p

Gruffalux

uptherebels wrote: »

So its not you penis that defines you as male then...

It is not your penis that defines you as a male.
The penis is a male organ.
These two sentences are two separate truths.
Why do people want to randomly join them together into a "so what you're saying is.." piece of idiotic deduction?

Gruffalux

And it is not just penises and vaginas that are different organs - in this case reproductive - between the sexes.
Archaeologists milennia from now will be able to dig up your bones and tell what sex you are. People who are good at it can tell by looking. They don't need scientific instruments.
Between male and female among the following characteristics there is significant difference
Jaws
Waist hip ratio
Height and weight
Finger length ratios
Rib cage sizes
Lumbar curves
Pelvises are constructed very differently
Angle of femurs
Skull sizes
Thyroid cartilage
Teeth sizes. Women have more enamel.
Conversion of energy into muscle or fat is different.
Size of trachea and bronchi
Heart size
Higher haemoglobin
Thickness of skin differs
Amount of body hair
Higher melanin in males
Brain size
Ratio of grey to white matter
More inter hemispheric connectivity in females
Amygdala larger in males
Hippocampus larger in females
Sensory perception differences. Smell. Pain. Sight.
Body fat differences
Hormones
And so on. And on.
I think the case could be made for male and female organs more generally, therefore.

COVID

Gruffalux wrote: »

And it is not just penises and vaginas that are different organs - in this case reproductive - between the sexes.
Archaeologists milennia from now will be able to dig up your bones and tell what sex you are. People who are good at it can tell by looking. They don't need scientific instruments.
Between male and female among the following characteristics there is significant difference
Jaws
Waist hip ratio
Height and weight
Finger length ratios
Rib cage sizes
Lumbar curves
Pelvises are constructed very differently
Angle of femurs
Skull sizes
Thyroid cartilage
Teeth sizes. Women have more enamel.
Conversion of energy into muscle or fat is different.
Size of trachea and bronchi
Heart size
Higher haemoglobin
Thickness of skin differs
Amount of body hair
Higher melanin in males
Brain size
Ratio of grey to white matter
More inter hemispheric connectivity in females
Amygdala larger in males
Hippocampus larger in females
Sensory perception differences. Smell. Pain. Sight.
Body fat differences
Hormones
And so on. And on.
I think the case could be made for male and female organs more generally, therefore.

You forgot ability/inability to multitask.

punisher5112

uptherebels wrote: »

So its not you penis that defines you as male then...

Well I like girls too does that help

Wibbs

Sir Oxman wrote: »

Titania restricted. Again. Restricted meaning he has to remove what is unpalatble to the great Big Tech God.
The massive catalog of real links from real people blaming hillwalking to toasters for being racist with the parody lampooning them has gone.

Hmm.
https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath?s=20

Homosexuality is transphobic because it reinforces the myth of a gender binary.

So although we must oppose homophobia, we also need to recognise that not being homophobic is a form of transphobia.

This really isn’t difficult.

Sir Oxman

Wibbs wrote: »

Homosexuality is transphobic because it reinforces the myth of a gender binary.

So although we must oppose homophobia, we also need to recognise that not being homophobic is a form of transphobia.

This really isn’t difficult.

Classic

Correction to my post:
It appears the big thread on 'everything is racist' is still there.

silverharp

its such a well crafted tweet, the punchline is a killer

Gruffalux

https://twitter.com/TitaniaMcGrath/status/1344744649584472064?s=19

I like Titiana's New Year Resolurion to close the gender menstruation gap

storker

I'm not a big Twitter user but I do follow Titania. Good for a laugh when you're not expecting it and living proof of Poe's Law.

"It never ceased to amaze me how many Nazis I would encounter on a daily basis once I had decided that everyone but me was a Nazi.”

Elmo

COVID wrote: »

You forgot ability/inability to multitask.

This might be connected to that

*More inter hemispheric connectivity in females

CruelCoin

Anyone covered this little piece of stoopid yet?

“We ask it in the name of the monotheistic God… God known by many names and by many different faiths. Amen, and awoman,” said Mr Cleaver, a representative from Missouri and an ordained United Methodist pastor.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/congress-prayer-cleaver-amen-awoman-b1781843.html

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

punisher5112 wrote: »

Well I like girls too does that help

Technically, no

Tony EH

Omackeral wrote: »

It’s honestly not easy to tell at times what’s parody and what is not.

Doubly so for the people who are so primed to be outraged at even the slightest bit of silliness they see on the web and then go running around like Chicken Licken claiming all sorts of hysterical nonsense.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

I think this is a major part of the Titania MaGrath twitter account - I've honestly seen poeple quote her in debates in the same way people occasionally quote The Onion.

And therein lies the problem with the woke crowd: they aren't offended, they're angry and use the emotions to hide behind the fact that ultimately aren't all that intelligent. Consequently, everything gets blown out of proportion way too much attention in the same way tabloids do.

Tony EH

The "problem" doesn't just lie with the woke crowd though. The other "side" is just as bad. The ones who love searching out this tripe, getting all worked up about it and then go spreading it around further than it ever would have got in the first place.

The two camps a choc-a-bloc with cretins.

Dyr

Tony EH wrote: »

The "problem" doesn't just lie with the woke crowd though. The other "side" is just as bad. The ones who love searching out this tripe, getting all worked up about it and then go spreading it around further than it ever would have got in the first place.

The two camps a choc-a-bloc with cretins.

Ah the old they're-both-as-bad-as-each-other, last seen on this Island whenever a loyalist paramilitary walked into a catholic area and sprayed a shop full of punters with bullets

The "other" crowd arent trying to run people off social media and get them fired from their jobs until all opposing viewpoints are silenced, so the false equivalence can go away and ****e.

Tony EH

Bambi wrote: »

Ah the old they're-both-as-bad-as-each-other, last seen on this Island whenever a loyalist paramilitary walked into a catholic area and sprayed a shop full of punters with bullets

The "other" crowd arent trying to run people off social media and get them fired from their jobs until all opposing viewpoints are silenced, so the false equivalence can go away and ****e.

With the shite you've just typed, you're in no place to make accusations of "false equivalence". :rolleyes:

Trying to equate paramilitary murder with Twitter spats. FFS.

COVID

Elmo wrote: »

This might be connected to that

*More interhemispheric connectivity in females

Yes, but isn't the male brain optimised for intrahemispheric communication.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Bambi wrote: »

Ah the old they're-both-as-bad-as-each-other, last seen on this Island whenever a loyalist paramilitary walked into a catholic area and sprayed a shop full of punters with bullets

Sorry, how is this the same thing?

For a start, which side represents which in the analogy? Who's just a punter in a shop? Did the punters do something or are they innocent bystanders in the woke or anti-woke crowd just, eh "punting"? Or are the woke crowd armed now?

Vieira82

The Awakening of RTE

RTÉ's editorial board reviewing NYE segment

Dyr

Tony EH wrote: »

With the shite you've just typed, you're in no place to make accusations of "false equivalence". :rolleyes:

Trying to equate paramilitary murder with Twitter spats. FFS.

It's the same oul nonsense, both sides are as bad as each other, desperately trying to dismiss something that you don't want to acknowledge.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Bambi wrote: »

It's the same oul nonsense, both sides are as bad as each other, desperately trying to dismiss something that you don't want to acknowledge.

But in your analogy, one side were people in a shop and other side just walked in and gunned them down. How is this "as bad as eash other"?

Wihtout getting up on some moral highhorse, please.

Tony EH

Bambi wrote: »

It's the same oul nonsense, both sides are as bad as each other, desperately trying to dismiss something that you don't want to acknowledge.

Internet spats and an occupation of a country leading to a paramilitary war are not even remotely the same thing.

Stop talking crap.

Elmo

If I make the statement that one side is just as bad as the other, regardless of how bad each side in whatever context they are as bad as one another.

A general thing with the history of the North is to state "look at what the nationalist did", followed by "but look at what the unionist did", and so on and so fore.

It's very easy to turn around and say "but they are as bad as one another". It has nothing to do with the problems that exist with in the north or describing someone as a terrorist. The poster is just describing the problem with such a statement.

Kind of like saying "But you started it".

The poster is just point out that its very easy to say that the woke crowd and the un-woke are as bad as one another.

The question is where is the middle?

Tony EH

Elmo wrote: »

The question is where is the middle?

The middle, in case of the thread topic, is the vast majority of people laughing at the cretins on both sides. Those who claim all sorts of gibberish new paradigms usually on behalf of a group of people who never asked for their disingenuous heroics in the first place, and the other bunch of morons who claim that the sky is falling in because the left, queers, trannies or brown people are coming to take over.

Each fringe is just as bad as one another in their nonsense.

And it has fuck all to do with the conflict that occurred in Northern Ireland in any way. That's simply a ludicrous attempt at an analogy.

Elmo

Tony EH wrote: »

And it has fuck all to do with the conflict that occurred in Northern Ireland in any way. That's simply a ludicrous attempt at an analogy.

That's just what Hitler would say :pac:

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Elmo wrote: »

If I make the statement that one side is just as bad as the other, regardless of how bad each side in whatever context they are as bad as one another.

A general thing with the history of the North is to state "look at what the nationalist did", followed by "but look at what the unionist did", and so on and so fore.

It's very easy to turn around and say "but they are as bad as one another". It has nothing to do with the problems that exist with in the north or describing someone as a terrorist. The poster is just describing the problem with such a statement.

Kind of like saying "But you started it".

The poster is just point out that its very easy to say that the woke crowd and the un-woke are as bad as one another.

The question is where is the middle?

Except that that's not what said poster is doing - his terrorist version portrays one side as vicious murdderers and the other as innocent bystanders.

And even if he did correctly portray it, it's still inaccurate because the woke crowd don't engage the non-woke crowd - they engage what they feel (wrongly or rigthly) are social injustices. So in effect there are three parties instead of two.

Fruthermore, vengeance is a big part of the Northern Ireland conflict, whist nothing to do with the woke/anti-woke dispute.

So, if you care to enlighten me as to how "as bad as the other" relates to both conflicts - accurately and simultaneously - I'd love to hear it.

biko

I don't think depicting a Muslim as a Christian saint is kosher.

EmmetSpiceland

https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1346891509669507087?s=20

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Danish kids tv-show about a man with a giant penis he can't control and of course the #metoo crowd have gone mad. I'm guessing one of two of the anti-woke crown might be in agreement.

This might - just might - have the nutjobs on both side of the fence coming (no pun intended) together...

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv-radio-web/children-s-tv-show-about-man-with-giant-penis-airs-in-denmark-1.4451619

Gruffalux

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Danish kids tv-show about a man with a giant penis he can't control and of course the #metoo crowd have gone mad. I'm guessing one of two of the anti-woke crown might be in agreement.

This might - just might - have the nutjobs on both side of the fence coming (no pun intended) together...

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/tv-radio-web/children-s-tv-show-about-man-with-giant-penis-airs-in-denmark-1.4451619

"DR responded to the latest criticism by saying it could just as easily have made a programme “about a woman with no control over her vagina” and that the most important thing was that children enjoyed John Dillermand."

Make that show. A big gobbly sheela na gig stalking toon town.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Gruffalux wrote: »

"DR responded to the latest criticism by saying it could just as easily have made a programme “about a woman with no control over her vagina” and that the most important thing was that children enjoyed John Dillermand."

Make that show. A big gobbly sheela na gig stalking toon town.

Maybe they did - sounds like a B-movie I watched back in the 80s...

NIMAN

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1346891509669507087?s=20

Watched both clips and cant see any rioting.

Dyr

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Except that that's not what said poster is doing - his terrorist version portrays one side as vicious murdderers and the other as innocent bystanders.
.

Nope.

Try again.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock

Bambi wrote: »

Nope.

Try again.

I've pointed out several inaccuracies in three posts and requested multiple clarifications. I most certainly am NOT going to try again.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

But in your analogy, one side were people in a shop and other side just walked in and gunned them down. How is this "as bad as eash other"?

Wihtout getting up on some moral highhorse, please.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Except that that's not what said poster is doing - his terrorist version portrays one side as vicious murdderers and the other as innocent bystanders.

And even if he did correctly portray it, it's still inaccurate because the woke crowd don't engage the non-woke crowd - they engage what they feel (wrongly or rigthly) are social injustices. So in effect there are three parties instead of two.

Fruthermore, vengeance is a big part of the Northern Ireland conflict, whist nothing to do with the woke/anti-woke dispute.

So, if you care to enlighten me as to how "as bad as the other" relates to both conflicts - accurately and simultaneously - I'd love to hear it.

Princess Consuela Bananahammock wrote: »

Sorry, how is this the same thing?

For a start, which side represents which in the analogy? Who's just a punter in a shop? Did the punters do something or are they innocent bystanders in the woke or anti-woke crowd just, eh "punting"? Or are the woke crowd armed now?

AllForIt

AllForIt wrote: »

I was listening to a race debate on UK media recently. They were talking about black visibility, for e.g. in soap operas (yawn) and that sort of thing, mostly TV.
Proportional representation is not what they are after, it's equal representation, i.e. the same number of black ppl on TV whether it's news, drama, weather forcasting. 50/50 b/w and noting less.

Sorry to quote myself, but I tuned into RTE today as the lottery numbers were being pulled. Guess what, a Johnny Foreigner presenting the show. Just like I said, the diversity Nazi's want it seen everywhere, like I said even in trivial areas such as weather forecasting, etc.

Imagine you went to Pakistan and an Irishman was pulling the numbers for their version of the lotto. Or you went to China and a Spaniard was pulling the numbers.

Any problem in itself? No. But the efforts RTE go to to pander to this diversity nonsense is unreal. The whole point is they went to the effort rather than it was ever a naturally occurring thing in the first place. No way did it come about naturally. No way.

Quantum Erasure

EmmetSpiceland wrote: »

https://twitter.com/abbydphillip/status/1346891509669507087?s=20

Youve done this before Emmet, where is the 'woke' ...




You should be more clear in what youre getting at, for example this tweet...

https://twitter.com/nward905/status/1346904566449795077

#StayWoke

biko

Australian national anthem to change

https://twitter.com/jekearsley/status/1344607808554078210?s=20

https://www.news.com.au/national/australian-national-anthems-lyrics-changed-new-version-of-advance-australia-fair-adopted/news-story/f12ec4d3070c949f71806dae4cac73d2

Quantum Erasure

biko wrote: »

Australian national anthem to change

https://twitter.com/jekearsley/status/1344607808554078210?s=20

https://www.news.com.au/national/australian-national-anthems-lyrics-changed-new-version-of-advance-australia-fair-adopted/news-story/f12ec4d3070c949f71806dae4cac73d2

Well now... that's about the weakest reason to change any thing that ive ever seen...

punisher5112

Was it an ageist thing???