Who thinks Trump will win?

EasycomeEasygo

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

I can drop in more excerpts from the article if it would lead to a bit more clarity around this.

https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1319098188561788933

Scot_in_Dublin

EasycomeEasygo wrote: »

https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1319098188561788933

So you're saying no, you don't want to read any more of it? Or is it more a tit for tat thing now?

Scot_in_Dublin

EasycomeEasygo wrote: »

https://twitter.com/AKA_RealDirty/status/1319098188561788933

Also, for the record. Fair play to the gent who has that Twitter account. Can't imagine what he has gone through and wish him well.

EasycomeEasygo

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

Also, for the record. Fair play to the gent who has that Twitter account. Can't imagine what he has gone through and wish him well.

I didn't look at the twitter account and by the sounds of what you say I won't be, I simply searched for Hannity and Sen Johnson

patnor1011

Oh but we all know that Russians are behind Hunter Biden's emails. How can we say that for sure?

We don't know, but we know!

Scot_in_Dublin

EasycomeEasygo wrote: »

I didn't look at the twitter account and by the sounds of what you say I won't be, I simply searched for Hannity and Sen Johnson

Seems the guy had a pretty bad accident at some point. He's keeping active and going with what he feels. If you're going to quote from someone's private account, maybe have a look at who they are. Regardless of left or right.

EasycomeEasygo

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

So you're saying no, you don't want to read any more of it? Or is it more a tit for tat thing now?

I'm simply posting what shows very suspect behaviour of the former Vice President of the US. A tit for tat thing would be childish name calling.

From the bit you posted "But it wasn't because Shokin was investigating Burisma"

Bit of a coincidence that Joe met with Devon Archer in Joe's ceremonial office

Scot_in_Dublin

EasycomeEasygo wrote: »

I'm simply posting what shows very suspect behaviour of the former Vice President of the US. A tit for tat thing would be childish name calling.

From the bit you posted "But it wasn't because Shokin was investigating Burisma"

Bit of a coincidence that Joe met with Devon Archer in Joe's ceremonial office

If you would like the rest of the article I am happy to PM it to you.

EasycomeEasygo

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

If you would like the rest of the article I am happy to PM it to you.

Go on so

Scot_in_Dublin

EasycomeEasygo wrote: »

Go on so

Have sent it on now.

Cody montana

Are we still on Hunters emails?

I suppose normal people would be concerned about a plan for dealing with the pandemic or healthcare.

Scot_in_Dublin

Cody montana wrote: »

Are we still on Hunters emails?

I suppose normal people would be concerned about a plan for dealing with the pandemic or healthcare.

In good faith I'll still chat with folks around the Ukraine and Joe's involvement in that. On Hunters stuff, it really is nothing as far as anyone can see. And for sure should not be a factor in the election.

Cody montana

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

In good faith I'll still chat with folks around the Ukraine and Joe's involvement in that. On Hunters stuff, it really is nothing as far as anyone can see. And for sure should not be a factor in the election.

How many times has Biden been investigated in Ukraine?

Why is there no investigation now?

Scot_in_Dublin

Cody montana wrote: »

How many times has Biden been investigated in Ukraine?

I think you may have misread my post, or the spirit it was in. If you go back over my previous posts in this thread I reckon you'll see where I stand.

Outlaw Pete

Cody montana wrote: »

Are we still on Hunters emails?

No, we're on the fact that Hunter's ex business partner maintains that Joe Biden met with him in connection with Hunter's overseas business dealings, thereby suggesting that Joe lied to the American people when he claimed he never spoke with Hunter about such matters.

Now why would Joe lie about that I wonder? Wouldn't be so that it would dilute the possibility in the public's eye that he may have discussions with Hunter about having Shokin fired now would it? I mean, not only would that be bad for the Bidens, but such a revelation might also mean Trump might not get convicted in the Senate. So many motives to lie, which one to pick.

patnor1011

Cody montana wrote: »

Are we still on Hunters emails?

I suppose normal people would be concerned about a plan for dealing with the pandemic or healthcare.

Since Russian collusion is forever why would hunter's emails be any different?

Scot_in_Dublin

Outlaw Pete wrote: »

No, we're on the fact that Hunter's ex business partner maintains that Joe Biden met with him in connection with Hunter's overseas business dealings, thereby suggesting that Joe lied to the American people when he claimed he never spoke with Hunter about such matters.

Now why would Joe lie about that I wonder? Wouldn't be so that it would dilute the possibility in the public's eye that he may have discussions with Hunter about having Shokin fired now would it? I mean, not only would that be bad for the Bidens, but such a revelation might also mean Trump might not get convicted in the Senate. So many motives to lie, which one to pick.

There's still those documents on that tweet about that ex partner Pete. Do you reckon there couldn't be any correlation between them?

Cody montana

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

I think you may have misread my post, or the spirit it was in. If you go back over my previous posts in this thread I reckon you'll see where I stand.

I wasn’t having a go.
I was just asking the question.

Cody montana

patnor1011 wrote: »

Since Russian collusion is forever why would hunter's emails be any different?

Because......hunter is not running for president?

ThunbergsAreGo

This might be the wrong place to ask but can anyone define what "Russian interference in the election" actually means

Scot_in_Dublin

Cody montana wrote: »

I wasn’t having a go.
I was just asking the question.

Would be hard to put a number on to be honest. You have the Senate investigation front and foremost. Then back when Biden was VP you would have had at least an ethics committee. CIA and FBI would have had a look I would imagine. And now with this all being stirred up again, would reckon at least 3 of those happening again, and not only in the US. So, I guess the answer is many. And you can be sure that if any of them turned up any impropriety it would be reported and fully supported by the evidence.

Scot_in_Dublin

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

This might be the wrong place to ask but can anyone define what "Russian interference in the election" actually means

Targeted FB ads with disinformation around things like Covid, 'Sleepy Joe', Taking away your guns etc

EasycomeEasygo

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

This might be the wrong place to ask but can anyone define what "Russian interference in the election" actually means

An attempt by Russia to pervert the natural outcome of the election

ThunbergsAreGo

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

Targeted FB ads with disinformation around things like Covid, 'Sleepy Joe', Taking away your guns etc

So advertising? And the use of misleading information is all it is? Thought I was missing something

Bit like the new Borat movie ;-)

It really sounds alot more sinister then it is.

Outlaw Pete

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

There's still those documents on that tweet about that ex partner Pete. Do you reckon there couldn't be any correlation between them?

On the face of it I don't see one.

patnor1011

Cody montana wrote: »

Because......hunter is not running for president?

His daddy is.

Scot_in_Dublin

ThunbergsAreGo wrote: »

So advertising? And the use of misleading information is all it is? Thought I was missing something

Bit like the new Borat movie ;-)

It really sounds alot more sinister then it is.

Yeah, the one since it came out Rudy has disappeared.

I'm sure you are aware of election laws and rules when it comes to adverts and spending? I'm also sure you saw what CA did to places like Trinidad & Tobago with their 'targeted' ads. If not, you should check out The Great Hack on Netflix. It's an eye opener. Kinda goes into how they didn't (did) for Brexit and were also not involved (lol) in Trumps original campaign.

There is money being funnelled into online marketing that in turn is being used to target demographics in the US, again, in this election cycle.

Cody montana

patnor1011 wrote: »

His daddy is.

And?

Cody montana

Scot_in_Dublin wrote: »

Would be hard to put a number on to be honest. You have the Senate investigation front and foremost. Then back when Biden was VP you would have had at least an ethics committee. CIA and FBI would have had a look I would imagine. And now with this all being stirred up again, would reckon at least 3 of those happening again, and not only in the US. So, I guess the answer is many. And you can be sure that if any of them turned up any impropriety it would be reported and fully supported by the evidence.

I wouldn’t be surprised if they announced another investigation in the next few days.

Scot_in_Dublin

Cody montana wrote: »

I wouldn’t be surprised if they announced another investigation in the next few days.

Oh for sure. But it will be a super secret investigation that they can't give details on until after the election.