Child Receives Electric Shock from Damaged Lamp-Post

Electronic Writer

Tork wrote: »

All of which confirms to me that this thread is a wind up.

Last comment for you Tork , seeing as how I'm here now ,



A wind up is an attempt to deceive people about the truth . This person at his age has no intention of deception .

Tork

Electronic Writer wrote: »

Last comment for you Tork , seeing as how I'm here now ,


A wind up is an attempt to deceive people about the truth . This person at his age has no intention of deception .

Oh I think there's no shortage of deception going on here.

Electronic Writer

Tork wrote: »

OK I think there's no shortage of deception going on here.

Prove it ! Give detailed argument of why ? Open that argument to detailed scrutiny by everybody . Don't conclude with no basis of argument . In the end , you could have it accepted that you can prove it , but it would be wrong , as only the truth can be proven , anything can be believed . You , Tork can only find belief with a view like this , I will always know the proof .

Notmything

Electronic Writer wrote: »

Prove it ! Give detailed argument of why ? Open that argument to detailed scrutiny by everybody . Don't conclude with no basis of argument . In the end , you could have it accepted that you can prove it , but it would be wrong , as only the truth can be proven , anything can be believed . You , Tork can only find belief with a view like this , I will always know the proof .

You're asking someone to prove this thread is a wind up yet you want us to believe that the person involved suffered life changing injuries without any proof other than their say so.

Electronic Writer

Notmything wrote: »

You're asking someone to prove this thread is a wind up yet you want us to believe that the person involved suffered life changing injuries without any proof other than their say so.

I'm asking why the person thinks it's a wind up . Elaborate why , explain why , a lot of what's been said from people has been elaborated upon and explained by me .



Do the same .



What do you call proof ? I'll give you a hypothetical .


A man goes to the doctor and says I have a pain in my knee . The doctor gives him a certificate on the basis that he believes the man to have a pain in his knee . The doctor can't see the pain , feel the pain or measure the pain . The man uses the certificate as part proof that he had a pain in his knee . Those who believe think the man has proven he has a pain in his knee because he has a certificate , not because he has proven he has pain .


Define proof ?


Let's say we all meet in the pub in Dun Laoire for dinner on Sunday . At the end of dinner we will take a secret vote from everybody present as to who is the most likely person to have received an electric shock based on personal observations . Yourself and Tork can go halves on paying the bill if I do receive 95 percent of the votes other than yourself and Tork . Would you be confident of keeping your money based on being confronted with hard proof of your own eyes ?

And that's it lads , end of , unless Tork or sidekick has something to say.

Tork

So have you met this person? Why are you able to explain in such clear detail everything that happened? What have you to gain out of this?

Electronic Writer

Tork wrote: »

So have you met this person? Why are you able to explain in such clear detail everything that happened? What have you to gain out of this?

Tork , You explain what is a wind up , what is the deception , what is the fraud , what is the potential perjurious information , think about it and give us more than a couple of one liners , you are the last to continue this discussion with me .

I am the person Tork . A man I know , me , knows a man , me ...............................................

I know myself , do you know yourself ? Do you want to bring a grand with you to Dun Laoire on Sunday to pay the bill ?

Tork

I'm not going to engage in further in this and turn the thread into a train wreck. Good luck with the legal advice.

Electronic Writer

Tork wrote: »

I'm not going to engage in further in this and turn the thread into a train wreck. Good luck with the legal advice.

Tork , your problem is you refuse to backup your assertions , so they have the status of the flip of a coin . a guess .


Luck will play no part in furthering my future .

Eggs For Dinner

Your use of punctuation is preventing me contributing to this thread anymore. Best of luck

Electronic Writer

Eggs For Dinner wrote: »

Ah lads, 32 years ago. Seriously!

Eggs For Dinner wrote: »

Your use of punctuation is preventing me contributing to this thread anymore. Best of luck

"""""""""" See you later . """"""""""

Why did it take you so long to be peeeee 'ed off with the punctuation ?

hullaballoo

Moderator: Thread closed, probably overdue.

There was not much in the way of laws to be discussed from the outset but the majority of the posts at this stage have nothing to do with the forum topic whatsoever.