Lost Werewolf - GAME THREAD

Emily WW

Derry WW wrote: »

4 8 15 16 23 42

Derry WW wrote: »

Maybe it's in my interest to be locked out

Derry WW wrote: »

4 8 15 16 23 42

Derry WW wrote: »

I won't be entering the numbers so leave me off any roster

Derry WW wrote: »

I have very valid reasons

Derry why don't you put the code in! Look above, enters code twice on thread, then is pointed out there will be a numbers thread. Then says he won't be entering codes and when quizzed why, says he's valid reasons!

Strange posting! Kinda walked away from it unscathed

Fiona WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Why wouldn’t you use it on Angus? We could utilise wagonomics then.

Good point, hadn't thought of the wagononics effect

Derry WW

I'd like a flip on Angus or Orla please.

Angus WW

Phil WW wrote: »

Why wouldn’t you use it on Angus? We could utilise wagonomics then.

+1. Lets get this sorted once and for all.

Fiona WW

Angus WW wrote: »

+1. Lets get this sorted once and for all.

Cant argue with the logic.

Submission entered.

Derry WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Derry why don't you put the code in! Look above, enters code twice on thread, then is pointed out there will be a numbers thread. Then says he won't be entering codes and when quizzed why, says he's valid reasons!

Strange posting! Kinda walked away from it unscathed

I won't be entering the codes.

Emily WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Ok , I won an allignment peek prize.

Who should I use it on. Im going to bed in 20 mins so Im using it then.

Ive Nigel myself. Wanna see how he flips..... any objection?

Angus is good for Wagonomics or if you want to go off the cuff, id go Derry! I think Angus is bad and lock bad so I've no issue with a peek there. Nigel would he up there too

Fiona WW

Derry WW wrote: »

I won't be entering the codes.

Now this has me suspicious

Emily WW

Derry WW wrote: »

I won't be entering the codes.

Yeah why the hell were you throwing them on thread twice? Thats odd behaviour

Nigel WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Ok , I won an allignment peek prize.

Who should I use it on. Im going to bed in 20 mins so Im using it then.

Ive Nigel myself. Wanna see how he flips..... any objection?

I've no objection to being peeked. Angus would definitely make sense too.

Will you get the results before the second person inputs the numbers? If so, that's a good way to settle that debate and ensure that it goes to a villager (unless you're a wolf actually and you peek a wolf and say they're village )

Derry WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Yeah why the hell were you throwing them on thread twice? Thats odd behaviour

Flavour babes

Fiona WW

Man Necro is fast with those PMs

Angus is ........

Fiona WW

..... an evil.

Emily WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Flavour babes

Sorry that's not an answer

Emily WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

..... an evil.

I ****ing knew it

Derry WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Sorry that's not an answer

4 8 15 16 23 42

Emily WW

Derry WW wrote: »

4 8 15 16 23 42

Wolf number 3

Patrick WW

I’d peek Angus, Orla or Derry. There’s the most noise there


Not happy with Orla doing the code. No issue with Phil or Wendy

Nigel WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

..... an evil.

Nice one

Fiona WW

How did Angus avoid the lynch?

Patrick WW

Abigail WW wrote: »

Is no one claiming the kill shot then? That's really odd. Are there hidden roles so?

Patrick WW wrote: »

I’d peek Angus, Orla or Derry. There’s the most noise there


Not happy with Orla doing the code. No issue with Phil or Wendy

Just see Angus is evil, well that’s great news

Derry WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Sorry that's not an answer

Numbers are part of lost.
The numbers on the thread are meaningless. It's flavour. No sense posting.

Here. I always wanted to see if I'd get locked out by posting them on this thread.... understand mechanic. A twoforo

Emily WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

How did Angus avoid the lynch?

Wolves must have significant powers! Given the numbers involved

Emily WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Numbers are part of lost.
The numbers on the thread are meaningless. It's flavour. No sense posting.

Here. I always wanted to see if I'd get locked out by posting them on this thread.... understand mechanic. A twoforo

Not buying it

Fiona WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Wolves must have significant powers! Given the numbers involved

It makes tomorrow meaningless though. The lynch is a lock on.


Angus, any words?

Derry WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Not buying it

Shrugs. Why do you think I entered them

Wendy WW

Emily WW wrote: »

Wolves must have significant powers! Given the numbers involved

Would be a hidden one, none of the roles in the OP fit

Nigel WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Here are some of Senan's last posts:



This seems like a pretty good look for Frank, maybe for Orla too. Angus only getting partial shade



Trying to pocket Emily? Or backing up his team mate?



Now separates Orla & Angus after earlier suggesting they were a team



Mentions Derry's earlier "admission" (which has been largely ignored) to bring it back into the conversation but distances himself from questioning it at the same time, looks good for Derry imo. Angus, Orla and Frank still his main picks but votes with Phil on Henry.

Overall not much to go on, the mention of Emily is probably the stand out thing for me but maybe just pocketing a villager. Frank, Orla and to a lesser extent Angus coming out of it pretty well I think.

I'll go back on his full posts when I get a chance although I don't think there are too many more of substance.

Orla and Frank looking very good now, seems unlikely Senan was mentioning more than one team mate here. Emily looking better also

Fiona WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Shrugs. Why do you think I entered them

To sabotage the village perhaps.

Thats a stretch but its possible right

Orla WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

It makes tomorrow meaningless though. The lynch is a lock on.


Angus, any words?

I somehow think tomorrow will be topsy-turvy.