Lost Werewolf - GAME THREAD

Gertrude WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

I was thinking about what the wolves would have been thinking during Fiona's fake peek/reveal (which I personally was poor village play but anyway). If Angus is a wolf, they'd have been thinking "sh*t, that's a second one of us gone" - would they have stayed off the thread or come on it? If Angus is not a wolf, they have been thinking "WTF is going on here?" and probably stayed off the thread imo?

With that in mind, I had a look at the posts around when this happened:

Taken from 2140 onwards players posting were:

Nigel
Angus
Nigel
Orla
Fiona - claims alignment peek @ 2143
Phil
Angus
Wendy
Emily
Fiona
Derry
Angus
Fiona - says she's entered the peek request @ 2146
Derry
Emily
Fiona
Emily
Nigel
Derry
Fiona
Fiona - @ 2149 claims Angus is a wolf
Emily
Emily
Derry
Emily
Patrick
Nigel
Fiona
Patrick
Derry
Emily
Emily
Fiona
Derry
Wendy
Nigel
Fiona
Orla
Emily
Fiona
Derry
Patrick
Angus - asks Fiona to check the peek with Necro @ 2157
Derry
Fiona
Emily
Nigel
Patrick
Emily
Orla
Fiona - comes clean about it being a fake @ 2200
Frank
Emily
Wendy
Nigel
Fiona
Emily
Patrick
Phil
Nigel
Fiona

Now amongst the players that were posting around then, I don't see much cause for concern. Patrick appeared but his posts seem okay. Phil also appeared shortly after Fiona came clean, maybe suspicious? Wendy went to bed at 10pm apparently thinking that Angus was a wolf (she had said earlier that she wouldn't be around for the 10pm number input)

This somewhat depends on the assumption that Fiona is village however...

Either you know she is, with it’s own implications or it’s got a big assumption underneath it

Fiona WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

No more wise than when I started reading back Voting Emily for now since she felt dodgy at the start but it’s just a hunch tbh. Need to do some serious reading tomorrow

Gerty please elaborate on exactly how Emily was dodgy.
Give examples?

Gertrude WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Gerty please elaborate on exactly how Emily was dodgy.
Give examples?

Later, first I think I’ll look into the deaths so far and see if I understand what they died for

Jacob approves of this

Fiona WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Later, first I think I’ll look into the deaths so far and see if I understand what they died for

Jacob approves of this

Man thats wolfy.

Im thinking your vote last night was random, Emily didn't do anything suss.

Youre full of **** and cant back up your vote.

And now you cant explain either

Gertrude WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Gerty please elaborate on exactly how Emily was dodgy.
Give examples?

Of course while you’re waiting you can prep your answer on why your so happy to defend Emily who I assume you don’t know particularly well

Fiona WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Of course while you’re waiting you can prep your answer on why your so happy to defend Emily who I assume you don’t know particularly well

I feel shes good. By all means, prove me wrong

Vernon WW

Missed the vote, very sorry to Mods and Players. IRL and all that.

Will be getting more involved today once I catch up.

Fiona WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

Of course while you’re waiting you can prep your answer on why your so happy to defend Emily who I assume you don’t know particularly well

And while I feel Emily has a good lean, you are correct I dont know her.

Im grievance isn't that you voted her its that your reasons provided on thread havent been backed up with anything beyond shes wolfy.

Why is she wolfy, explain it to me

Derry WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

Gerty please elaborate on exactly how Emily was dodgy.
Give examples?

Fiona you haven't indicated yet why you voted for Angus

Phil WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Missed votes for


Barbara WW
Henry WW
Vernon WW


Barbara, Henry, Holly and Vernon all with less than the minimum post count as far as I can see

Based on the OP, I don’t think the mods would take kindly to a member of the wolf team missing a vote.

2. We have 23 players so we encourage you all to get as involved as you can and contribute to the game. Please get a vote in as a minimum each day. 2 missed votes may mean a player could be modkilled or replaced by a sub, depending on mod discretion. We will judge each missed vote on a case by case basis. Also, we require you to make a minimum of 5 posts per day, munch to munch

Fiona WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Fiona you haven't indicated yet why you voted for Angus

I have ya doorknob. Numberous times

Phil WW

^^^^ purposely missing a vote is what I mean.

Derry WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

I have ya doorknob. Numberous times

Less of the name calling thanks very much

Vernon WW

Is Barbara still playing or did she die and I missed it?

Fiona WW

Derry WW wrote: »

Less of the name calling thanks very much

More of the reading my numberous posts thanks very much.

Gertrude WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

I have ya doorknob. Numberous times

Hmm maybe a recon of your posts before sundown would be useful later

Patrick WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

What a waste of time.

Why do you say that?


The Angus thing does come across as a bit of a witch hunt

Oisin WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Oisin, I won’t lie, you’re coming across as a bit of a wolf here, trying to get another wagon going on me tonight.

Here’s the FACTS you wanted.
Those who agreed alphabetical rota:
Conor post#227
Fiona post#240
Wendy post#247
Conor post#261
Abigail post#262
Patrick post#327
Angus post#353
Senan post#546

Mic drop.

How in gods name am I trying to start a wagon here? I've challenged some things you've said. You still haven't even come close to saying why you are/were so sure about Orla. Or give any indication as to why you might have avoided the lynch.

Ok so fair enough. 7 people is now the entire group.

And one who was a wolf.

Possibly another one in there as I think that spelling out a list in advance would be beneficial to them

Patrick WW

I’m happy to input the code at anytime

Fiona WW

Patrick WW wrote: »

Why do you say that?


The Angus thing does come across as a bit of a witch hunt

I mean the tracking back by Angus seeing who agreed to go alphabetical.

It wasnt adhered to yesterday in any shape or form.

He says I agreed to it. I had no problem with it.

However I also said fcuk you all, i dont care anymore later as all the moaning about the rota was pointless.

Phil WW

Go for it Patrick. We spend too much time on this as it is.

Patrick WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

I mean the tracking back by Angus seeing who agreed to go alphabetical.

It wasnt adhered to yesterday in any shape or form.

He says I agreed to it. I had no problem with it.

However I also said fcuk you all, i dont care anymore later as all the moaning about the rota was pointless.

I don’t really see him back tracking though. He said people voted for it and they did. He’s dug out seven people. That’s a lot more than any other plan had in fairness.


We’re getting completely sidetracked by the Angus talk when we should be concentrating on the important things, like inputting this code!

Joke


Like finding another wolf

Angus WW

Gertrude WW wrote: »

@angus do you know how you avoided being lynched last night?

Yes. Because the island moved.

Nigel WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

We've spent/wasted a lot of time discussing who's going to input the numbers over the past 2 days, time that probably could have been better spent imo. I've a proposal that will hopefully help reduce that bickering but also make it difficult for the wolves to get control of the process.

I'm proposing that anyone who is interested in or doesn't mind entering the numbers says so (many already have) to create a pool of players from which other players can nominate. Anyone who wants then nominates one person from the pool and we come to a consensus (or something close to a consensus) based on those nominations.

The idea being that if there are 2/3 wolves left, it's going to be difficult for them to arrange for more than one wolf to input the numbers. The nominations in themselves may give us some data if someone flips red and someone else had been pushing them to input the numbers.

Any thoughts on going with something like this? I'd be more or less happy with anyone nominated by a second player in this manner rather than self-nominated

Derry WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

More of the reading my numberous posts thanks very much.

Fiona. There's a very clear rule in the OP. I'd ask you to stick to it next time is all I'm saying. Thanks.

Gertrude WW

Angus WW wrote: »

Yes. Because the island moved.

And so you know why the island might have moved?

Jacob said it moved many times Ab aeterno but for special reasons. Would you know the reason this time

Oisin WW

@emily and @Isla......

Why did you say yesterday was a waste of a day?

We got a wolf and lost two NRVs. Another couple of days like that and we are in a great spot

Patrick WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Any thoughts on going with something like this? I'd be more or less happy with anyone nominated by a second player in this manner rather than self-nominated

You happy for me to go for it this morning as per Phil’s post?

Abigail WW

Nigel WW wrote: »

Any thoughts on going with something like this? I'd be more or less happy with anyone nominated by a second player in this manner rather than self-nominated

Yeah Nigel I'm happy enough with this plan. I can't input for another 2 goes I think? (Is that how it works) but I'm happy to put my name back in the hat when that time comes around (and assuming I'm still here).

Angus WW

Fiona WW wrote: »

What a waste of time.

Agreed, but unfortunately I needed to prove Oisin was talking crap.