Errors in Leaving Cert predicted grades system

JasonStatham

https://www.thejournal.ie/teachers-students-calculated-grades-5218926-Sep2020/

Surprise surprise, the Devs cocked it up.

I'm reminded of the Chronicles of Riddick where the Riddick says ...."Shoulda taken the money, Toombs!"

They should have held the Leaving Cert!

Plumbthedepths

I remember the minister saying they wouldn't make the same mistakes they did in the UK. Fair play they didn't they made two stupid mistakes that has had a dreadful impact on 6,000 kids.

TheBlackPill

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

I remember the minister saying they wouldn't make the same mistakes they did in the UK. Fair play they didn't they made two stupid mistakes that has had a dreadful impact on 6,000 kids.

Half of those got too high a mark that will not be downgraded. If i have any future job applicants from the 2020 class, any that sat the november exam will have a big advantage

dundalkfc10

TheBlackPill wrote: »

Half of those got too high a mark that will not be downgraded. If i have any future job applicants from the 2020 class, any that sat the november exam will have a big advantage

Not to forget the poor kids who got the correct points for courses with correct grades but as people got Inflated grades they misses out on places.

This is a sensational scandal, The Govt think the Youth wernt listening before are in for some shock

TheBlackPill

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Not to forget the poor kids who got the correct points for courses with correct grades but as people got Inflated grades they misses out on places.

This is a sensational scandal, The Govt think the Youth wernt listening before are in for some shock

The smart kids will have kept up the study during lockdown and will sit the exam in November

Zookey123

TheBlackPill wrote: »

Half of those got too high a mark that will not be downgraded. If i have any future job applicants from the 2020 class, any that sat the november exam will have a big advantage

Leaving cert grade is only really important for getting into a college course. I haven't once been asked my leaving cert score in a job interview. Your primary degree/experience is what really counts not some silly rote learning exam.

Double O Seven

Could someone explain why holding the leaving cert exams in early August was deemed a "health hazard" by NEPHT when all school kids were going back at the end of that month?

tonycascarino

Lots of people are getting into courses this time around that they aren't capable of and shouldn't be getting. However, I suppose that is good news for colleges as it means more exam failures which equals more money for them.

suicide_circus

I for one am shocked

Tow

It is not just this year. People who sit the leaving in the next few years will be at a disadvantage. They will be competing against their inflated results both for college courses and jobs.

GetWithIt

The first error was that the standardisation was meant to take in the three core Junior Cert subjects: English, Irish and Maths, and the students’ two highest subjects – but instead the algorithm took into account their two lowest subjects.
The second error was that the algorithm was to discount the subject Civic, Social and Political Education (CSPE), and instead included it.

The first thing that came to my mind having read that was MEAT - Most Economically Advantageous Tender

Zookey123

Zookey123 wrote: »

Leaving cert grade is only really important for getting into a college course. I haven't once been asked my leaving cert score in a job interview. Your primary degree/experience is what really counts not some silly rote learning exam.

The grade is useful for non-third level courses. A rather sizable percentage of our population don't attend university/college, instead going for technical courses, private courses, or directly into work placements. Even when getting further certs past the initial one, their LC results are often used for appraisal during interviews. The LC results are often used for people applying for work who haven't attended university...

beggars_bush

Double O Seven wrote: »

Could someone explain why holding the leaving cert exams in early August was deemed a "health hazard" by NEPHT when all school kids were going back at the end of that month?

Not enough lead in time to correct

Atlantic Dawn

I'm beginning to think this government may have overtaken a funeral in their limousine convoy, it's cursed from day 1.

Godeatsboogers

My leaving cert results were used as a reason to stop me doing a science course at a further education college in limerick 14 years after the exams because I didnt do great in science but very well in business, but I hated business. Turns out the science class was free but the the science teacher who denied me the chance to join his class suggested I take the accounting class, the only class left with open spaces besides his, was one of the only fees based class, surprise surprise, with only 8 students.

Pronto63

Plumbthedepths wrote: »

I remember the minister saying they wouldn't make the same mistakes they did in the UK. Fair play they didn't they made two stupid mistakes that has had a dreadful impact on 6,000 kids.

6,000 kids that will be voting in the next election!!

JDxtra

Polymetrika International, the Canadian company contracted to do the coding is a bit suspicious looking. Looks like a one man show who knocked up an Excel macro or something.

99nsr125

Double O Seven wrote: »

Could someone explain why holding the leaving cert exams in early August was deemed a "health hazard" by NEPHT when all school kids were going back at the end of that month?

Because NEPHT have no idea what they are doing, just think ostrich with it's head in the sand

bobbyy gee

so my 7As
were a mistake

endacl

bobbyy gee wrote: »

so my 7As
were a mistake

Maybe not. I believe they don't mark for punctuation or formatting these days.

:pac:

patnor1011

Meh, what is called mistakes is a convenient lie to appease disgruntled fee-paying colleges and their students who somehow feel they deserve more points they got.

It is another PR stunt just to settle threats of court action so they came up with some "software glitch" to allow them to shut up a couple of thousands unhappy future dentists and lawyers by tossing them extra points.

SnowyMay

JDxtra wrote: »

Polymetrika International, the Canadian company contracted to do the coding is a bit suspicious looking. Looks like a one man show who knocked up an Excel macro or something.

Whoops. So, apparently the code looked at the Junior Cert results for English, Irish and Maths, together with the two weakest subjects, instead of English, Irish and Maths, and the two strongest subjects.

Also took into account CSPE, which wasn't meant to be part of the equation.

Sure, many of the students could have written that code properly!

Tow

JDxtra wrote: »

Polymetrika International, the Canadian company contracted to do the coding is a bit suspicious looking. Looks like a one man show who knocked up an Excel macro or something.

Very much so, Linkedin In gives the CEOs details. They also have a expired certificate (for almost a year) on their Canadian 'ca' website.

Looks like the dept. did not bother to properly check the results. Classic case of outsourcing the job so we will not be responsible.

Floppybits

SnowyMay wrote: »

Whoops. So, apparently the code looked at the Junior Cert results for English, Irish and Maths, together with the two weakest subjects, instead of English, Irish and Maths, and the two strongest subjects.

Also took into account CSPE, which wasn't meant to be part of the equation.

Sure, many of the students could have written that code properly!

Maybe the code was coded correctly but the requirements supplied to the developers was incorrect.

JDxtra

Polymetrika is a one man show. The CEO/data analyst/developer/QA tester clearly he has some connection back to the dept. of education. One look at their web site or LinkedIn page says you need to run in the opposite direction, yet somehow he was awarded €160k!

All along there were assurances about the integrity of the algorithm, but clearly nobody did any proper testing of what was delivered.

Plus, there is no way this had "50,000" lines of code.

Total sham.

Edgware

Pronto63 wrote: »

6,000 kids that will be voting in the next election!!

They'll get over it. Some will stay with the course they were offered. Some will take up courses they should have received either this year or next year. Many will like the idea of a deferment because the first year college experience certainly wont be what it normally is.
I would be more concerned with the young people who are not interested in third level but are out looking for employment. This media obsessed whinging about L.C students who are suffering from stress because they didnt have their two weeks in Benidorm and annual Freshers week pissed is a joke.

dundalkfc10

Edgware wrote: »

They'll get over it. Some will stay with the course they were offered. Some will take up courses they should have received either this year or next year. Many will like the idea of a deferment because the first year college experience certainly wont be what it normally is.
I would be more concerned with the young people who are not interested in third level but are out looking for employment. This media obsessed whinging about L.C students who are suffering from stress because they didnt have their two weeks in Benidorm and annual Freshers week pissed is a joke.

What about money that's been wasted by kids parents going to places taking up 2nd offers who are now going to be offered their 1st place.
What about people who got coorect points who would have got spots in courses only for students with Inflated grades to get their spot.

Their was a delay in these results coming out, as they were making sure they were correct.

They knew they were wrong but still went ahead with CAO offers the next day, 8 days later it came out and they had no answers to any solutions.

Today they stiill don't have any answers

But sure it's grand

Edgware

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

What about money that's been wasted by kids parents going to places taking up 2nd offers who are now going to be offered their 1st place.
What about people who got coorect points who would have got spots in courses only for students with Inflated grades to get their spot.

Their was a delay in these results coming out, as they were making sure they were correct.

They knew they were wrong but still went ahead with CAO offers the next day, 8 days later it came out and they had no answers to any solutions.

Today they stiill don't have any answers

But sure it's grand

What about? What about?

dundalkfc10

Edgware wrote: »

What about? What about?

Yes what about them students and their family's? Why should their year be further upended because of the incompetence of the Dept of Education.

They will have to set more money in budget aside now for legal fees for court cases, alot them kids not at college will now be entitled to social welfare.

But sure Its grand

Edgware

dundalkfc10 wrote: »

Yes what about them students and their family's? Why should their year be further upended because of the incompetence of the Dept of Education.

They will have to set more money in budget aside now for legal fees for court cases, alot them kids not at college will now be entitled to social welfare.

But sure Its grand

I'm sure that everyone involved in this process did their best at short notice and in very difficult times. There will always be mishaps when humans are involved but errors made were not down to wilful intent. The hurlers on the ditch will always have the answer. Errors were made and every effort is being made to rectify them. The Department and the various third level institutions have indicated that they are amenable to assist with change of courses, refunds, deferring of entries etc. The whingers can continue whinging in their perfect little world while others will being doing their best in difficult circumstances

JDxtra

The problem here is that the department engaged Fernando Cartwright under the guise of his “company”. I don’t care if this guy is an expert in his field, that’s irrelevant. He’s a single person, and that’s a huge risk.

Many eyes should have been all over this - the algorithm, the coding and the most importantly the testing. It was too important to farm the whole process out to one guy.

Of course mistakes happen, but if this was done properly those mistakes would have been detected way sooner.