Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Schools closed until February? (part 3)

1168169171173174194

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,411 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    km79 wrote: »
    Teachers would have to travel to work every day as normal and teach all their classes remotely from the school building
    No other way around it

    Yup and principals will push for all staff to be in at normally working hours id bet


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    touts wrote: »
    Twitter is exploding with outraged students who suddenly realize they might have to do some work for the next 6 months. might be exposed to a rampant and far more contagious virus, bringing it home to their loved ones.

    Fixed it for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭j@utis


    Why hasn't this topic's title been changed yet to "closed till April"???


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    Yup and principals will push for all staff to be in at normally working hours id bet

    Would actually be entertaining to watch our school wifi try to cope with that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,241 ✭✭✭alroley


    Yeah I'd say we'll be in school all day teaching 6th in person and the rest on zoom from our classrooms. So schools are very much open and not closed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    If LC going ahead is this much of a priority they shud all be vaccinated in March/April rather than risk missing exam


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,243 ✭✭✭C__MC


    Norma is thinking of the money pumped in last summer
    She knows full well schools are gone until April at best, trying to salvage her financial package in some form


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭combat14


    alroley wrote: »
    Yeah I'd say we'll be in school all day teaching 6th in person and the rest on zoom from our classrooms. So schools are very much open and not closed.

    already got an email from our principal to say school wide open today for teachers to come in etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭combat14


    GCSEs and A-levels cancelled in Northern Ireland

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.rte.ie/amp/1188019/


    from the admin up north that cant decide on anything ... says it all


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 Barbeapapa


    My LC student is not afraid of doing some work for the next 6 months. She is afraid of a leaving cert like every other year despite the fact that they have not nearly finished any of the courses for their subjects and now there is even less hope of completing the course and they are still insisting it will be LC as normal. She's a consistent, hard worker but anyone would be daunted by this. The LC exam needs to be adjusted in light of how much school was missed and disrupted, that's all most seem to want.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    combat14 wrote: »
    already got an email from our principal to say school wide open today for teachers to come in etc.

    What?! Come in and do what exactly?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,325 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Its about reducing numbers, I don't see the issue with exceptions been made to 6th years and special schools. The vast majority of students still won't be on the move, while the most vulnerable and most important in our education system are still looked after.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    Barbeapapa wrote: »
    My LC student is not afraid of doing some work for the next 6 months. She is afraid of a leaving cert like every other year despite the fact that they have not nearly finished any of the courses for their subjects and now there is even less hope of completing the course and they are still insisting it will be LC as normal. She's a consistent, hard worker but anyone would be daunted by this. The LC exam needs to be adjusted in light of how much school was missed and disrupted, that's all most seem to want.

    You’re absolutely right but wouldn’t be counting on it. DES wouldn’t organise a p*ss up in a brewery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,049 ✭✭✭spaceHopper


    JimmyVik wrote: »
    She will have the highest bodycount of any minister in the history of the state.

    She won't make any decisions or accept any responsibility. Heard her on the radio before kept saying but we are following HSE/Nephit advice. She'll stick blindly to that and pass the buck, she may as well not be there. In fact lets sack the government and let Tony run the show


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭lulublue22


    Special needs kids are usually transported to school by contractors working for Dublin bus usually in mini buses. Are the drivers and SNA's on the buses going to be vaccinated before the kids return because i wouldn't want to be driving a minibus with 7-8 kids onboard with the virus so rampant at the minute.

    School transport is a huge concern - I would be worried about schools from the perspective of contacts and community transmission being high . I would worry about special schools in terms of transmission within the school and medically vulnerable children.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    What?! Come in and do what exactly?

    Possibly to pick up materials or anything they may need for online teaching?

    My principal emailed the same. I won't be going near the place until I know what is happening.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    Waterford Whispers News on fire again

    "If only we had a year to prepare for this"

    Accompanied by picture of government :pac:

    “Hospitals, oh we would have had them properly resourced. We wouldn’t have had everything open around Christmas, are you joking me? Schools? We would have had extensive home learning supports in place immediately if we needed to shut them down a second time,"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    What?! Come in and do what exactly?

    Move yourself up the ladder for a middle-management position?

    Some principals acted disgracefully during the last lockdown, they haven't had personality transplants since.


  • Registered Users Posts: 201 ✭✭scrubs33


    Yup and principals will push for all staff to be in at normally working hours id bet

    I imagine the managerial bodies will be quite happy for this to happen. I haven’t heard a peep from them about the current situation.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭combat14


    scrubs33 wrote: »
    I imagine the managerial bodies will be quite happy for this to happen. I haven’t heard a peep from them about the current situation.

    if college students can do online all year long leaving certs will be able to do it for a couple of weeks too... whats the big deal crack on with it they are not exactly babies....

    health and safety has be number 1 at present the government has lost control of this virus at present....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭uli84


    namloc1980 wrote: »
    What's not happening in your house??

    Learning/teaching won’t happen except looking for 3 hrs at rte


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,481 ✭✭✭lulublue22




    https://twitter.com/marietcasey/status/1346810464945238016?s=21



    Yet it is fine to send special schools / special classes and LC back. You really couldn’t make this ****e up.

    ETA she tweeted this in reply to a tweet re proposals to bring LC back to school.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,317 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    combat14 wrote: »
    GCSEs and A-levels cancelled in Northern Ireland
    from the admin up north that cant decide on anything ... says it all
    It's not like they had a choice to be fair. Can hardly hold their exams if the rest of the UK isn't.
    combat14 wrote: »
    if college students can do online all year long leaving certs will be able to do it for a couple of weeks too... whats the big deal crack on with it they are not exactly babies....

    health and safety has be number 1 at present the government has lost control of this virus at present....
    I'm failing to see the logic of bringing in 17-19 year olds into schools for the sake of 4-6 weeks which they can easily use for exam preparation. Infection rates are currently highest in the 19-24 cohort, bringing in LC students is asking for trouble.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,071 ✭✭✭appledrop


    Is she actually for real!!!!!!!!!!

    First of all you could have say 120 students in a year group who will be in various different mixes of classes during the day due to subject choice so not only 24 students mixing.

    Secondly not only few staff in school because if students in Principal, Deputy, Year Head maybe 15-20 teachers in see how numbers are adding up?

    Do they come in for only 1 class for 6th year then have to stay all day as might live an hours drive away and need to do classes for other year groups?

    As we know virus very widespread at moment so you could have half staff + half students absent due to Covid/close contact. So then do you need another few teachers to do S&S as students can't be left on their own.? So students in but not with their actually teacher as out so probably end up just working on what teacher sent in anyway as not there and other half at home anyway isolating.

    Then what 3 days? Is it going to change every week so all subjects are covered?

    I hope to god the someone in cabinet has the cop on to tell her how this plan is not going to work.


  • Registered Users Posts: 299 ✭✭Alqua


    She's an actual teacher. I'm honestly flabbergasted. WTF is wrong with her?

    Seems like she's throwing out this unrealistic idea so that she can say afterwards "I tried/wanted to accommodate the LCs, but the pesky NPHET/ASTI/TUI/whoever else said no."


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,719 ✭✭✭uli84


    End of Jan, haha, am I supposed to believe that?
    Also thought we’re at level 5 (?)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,341 ✭✭✭combat14


    Alqua wrote: »
    Seems like she's throwing out this unrealistic idea so that she can say afterwards "I tried/wanted to accommodate the LCs, but the pesky NPHET/ASTI/TUI/whoever else said no."

    she sounds like a clown no offence meant


  • Registered Users Posts: 840 ✭✭✭teachinggal123


    This is some new level of shhtsh0w and incompetence.

    We’ve already had conflicting emails from principal this morning. Nobody knows what the hell is going on and how we’re going to deal with the next few weeks/months.

    We (teachers) are idiots to be putting up with this. It is not serving us, students and parents in any way health-wise or education-wise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    appledrop wrote: »
    Is she actually for real!!!!!!!!!!

    First of all you could have say 120 students in a year group who will be in various different mixes of classes during the day due to subject choice so not only 24 students mixing.

    Secondly not only few staff in school because if students in Principal, Deputy, Year Head maybe 15-20 teachers in see how numbers are adding up?

    Do they come in for only 1 class for 6th year then have to stay all day as might live an hours drive away and need to do classes for other year groups?

    As we know virus very widespread at moment so you could have half staff + half students absent due to Covid/close contact. So then do you need another few teachers to do S&S as students can't be left on their own.? So students in but not with their actually teacher as out so probably end up just working on what teacher sent in anyway as not there and other half at home anyway isolating.

    Then what 3 days? Is it going to change every week so all subjects are covered?

    I hope to god the someone in cabinet has the cop on to tell her how this plan is not going to work.

    Okay, after reading that I can see that this can't work at all. Which presumably NF knows since she's a teacher and she's just kite flying.

    On another note, after checking the "essential worker" list, I am actually on it! (If I'm on it, half the country must be).

    Funnily enough all I have heard is the term "key worker" rather than "essential worker" over the past few days. I suspect - if they open the schools at all for key worker children - that "essential worker" list will be vastly culled.

    However, it looks like creches will definitely open for key worker children. I may get to keep my 3 year old in creche after all! I really hope I do, it took him four months to settle back in last year, to the point that we were about to apply for AIMS support for him. I'm not getting my hopes up though.


  • Registered Users Posts: 840 ✭✭✭teachinggal123


    appledrop wrote: »
    Is she actually for real!!!!!!!!!!

    First of all you could have say 120 students in a year group who will be in various different mixes of classes during the day due to subject choice so not only 24 students mixing.

    Secondly not only few staff in school because if students in Principal, Deputy, Year Head maybe 15-20 teachers in see how numbers are adding up?

    Do they come in for only 1 class for 6th year then have to stay all day as might live an hours drive away and need to do classes for other year groups?

    As we know virus very widespread at moment so you could have half staff + half students absent due to Covid/close contact. So then do you need another few teachers to do S&S as students can't be left on their own.? So students in but not with their actually teacher as out so probably end up just working on what teacher sent in anyway as not there and other half at home anyway isolating.

    Then what 3 days? Is it going to change every week so all subjects are covered?

    I hope to god the someone in cabinet has the cop on to tell her how this plan is not going to work.

    This.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    This is some new level of shhtsh0w and incompetence.

    We’ve already had conflicting emails from principal this morning. Nobody knows what the hell is going on and how we’re going to deal with the next few weeks/months.

    We (teachers) are idiots to be putting up with this. It is not serving us, students and parents in any way health-wise or education-wise.

    God, your principal should be waiting until we know what exactly is going on, nobody needs that on top of it all. Put him/her on mute for a couple more hours I'd say


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,940 ✭✭✭Tippex


    Jesus christ things were bad Gemma Hussey was minister for education (just when I was going into secondary) but really they (DES and NF) have absolutely no concept of the stress that all this is putting on students, parents and teachers. Someone on the thread mentioned it before but if they want to do something right and radical just can the plans for the year completely (yes everyone stays in school an extra year do it becomes a 3 year leaving cert effectively) but with them not being able to organise a pi$$ up it is the only logical thing to do.

    They cannot have one year group in and affect the education of the rest of the student population never mind the stress levels of the schools and teachers which I am sure are starting to go through the roof.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 837 ✭✭✭John O.Groats


    j@utis wrote: »
    Why hasn't this topic's title been changed yet to "closed till April"???

    Well till March anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭E36Ross


    Special needs kids are usually transported to school by contractors working for Dublin bus usually in mini buses. Are the drivers and SNA's on the buses going to be vaccinated before the kids return because i wouldn't want to be driving a minibus with 7-8 kids onboard with the virus so rampant at the minute.

    Mainly Bus Eireann contracts, But no the bus drivers and bus SNA's are mostly forgotten about in all of this.....

    Social distancing is impossible on a bus being realistic, They all come in and out the same door and into a confined space.

    Very hard to keep ventilated this time of year, Can't exactly drive around with windows fully open either and you NEED a heater on to keep the windows condensation free.

    Very few will or can wear masks.


    Don't get me wrong, I love the job (Bus Driver) and understand parents wanting to have a routine for there kids.

    But it really is a **** situation.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 138 ✭✭Endintheclowns


    E36Ross wrote: »
    Mainly Bus Eireann contracts, But no the bus drivers and bus SNA's are mostly forgotten about in all of this.....

    Social distancing is impossible on a bus being realistic, They all come in and out the same door and into a confined space.

    Very hard to keep ventilated this time of year, Can't exactly drive around with windows fully open either and you NEED a heater on to keep the windows condensation free.

    Very few will or can wear masks.


    Don't get me wrong, I love the job (Bus Driver) But it really is a **** situation.


    Absolutely ridiculous. There's a guy in our estate that does it and he's in his 60's i'd say. I wouldn't do it for diamonds at the minute as you say impossible to keep windows open this time of year and social distance. Surely the parents will have to bring the kids in themselves but not possible with a lot of kids i'd imagine.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,411 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Any update yet on what these idiots have planned?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    Do ye really think the schools will be closed til March?

    Look, I'm not saying it isn't a possibility, but we can all agree that there seemed to be a seachange in government's thinking on the topic over the summer.

    Given the rate of infections, we could have opened the schools in June last year. But when that decision was being made, in early May, it seems the government and NPHETs focus was getting infections as close to zero as possible. So rather than opening schools for a month, they decided to press ahead with eliminating the virus and pushed out the opening until September.

    Then MM came in, and pinned the entirety of his government's hopes of success on keeping the schools open. There was a much clearer understanding of how bad it is for the economy, and children's education, to keep schools closed for an extended period of time. That was why they basically said that everything would close before schools would be closed again. By that logic, as soon as we see a downward trajectory of infections for more than two weeks, I would expect schools to be the first place to open.

    It does appear to me that everyone is adhering to the lockdown this time around. Our main road - busy since June and all through Lockdown II - is absolutely deserted the past two days. I would expect to see a fairly sharp downward trajectory by next week, and for it to continue to the end of January.

    If I was a betting woman, I'd say we'll open after the mid term break.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    Any update yet on what these idiots have planned?

    Will prob be timed for the news at 6 so they can do their interview


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,426 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Will prob be timed for the news at 6 so they can do their interview

    More than like some pearls of wisdom will sparkle on the six one news.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,337 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    So school buses are goin to run for 6th years only?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,751 ✭✭✭mirrorwall14


    More than like some pearls of wisdom will sparkle on the six one news.

    Yeah, god forbid they could have actually met last night and this morning so we didn't lose another day of planning.....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    Will prob be timed for the news at 6 so they can do their interview

    Newstalk are saying there will be an announcement on school closures at 3pm, with a caveat for those sitting exams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,784 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    Yeah, god forbid they could have actually met last night and this morning so we didn't lose another day of planning.....

    They cud have met Monday. Numbers weren't going to change much in the meantime.

    They've little consideration for the work that needs to be done to transport students, feed students, get schools open and to prep for either on-site or online lessons. Not to mention childcare arrangements if we are to go to the physical school building next week


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,811 ✭✭✭joe40


    JDD wrote: »
    Do ye really think the schools will be closed til March?

    Look, I'm not saying it isn't a possibility, but we can all agree that there seemed to be a seachange in government's thinking on the topic over the summer.

    Given the rate of infections, we could have opened the schools in June last year. But when that decision was being made, in early May, it seems the government and NPHETs focus was getting infections as close to zero as possible. So rather than opening schools for a month, they decided to press ahead with eliminating the virus and pushed out the opening until September.

    Then MM came in, and pinned the entirety of his government's hopes of success on keeping the schools open. There was a much clearer understanding of how bad it is for the economy, and children's education, to keep schools closed for an extended period of time. That was why they basically said that everything would close before schools would be closed again. By that logic, as soon as we see a downward trajectory of infections for more than two weeks, I would expect schools to be the first place to open.

    It does appear to me that everyone is adhering to the lockdown this time around. Our main road - busy since June and all through Lockdown II - is absolutely deserted the past two days. I would expect to see a fairly sharp downward trajectory by next week, and for it to continue to the end of January.

    If I was a betting woman, I'd say we'll open after the mid term break.

    The spread of the infection seems to be much more rampant now than earlier. There was plenty of mixing and interaction during late summer and september with staycations, first communion parties etc but the numbers were not skyrocketing like they are now.

    Maybe it can be explained by more indoor socialising but i think the rate of infection from mid Dec has taken everyone by surprise, even the health authorities.

    I think school were right to stay open term 1, but situation is different this time around, not just in Ireland but throughout Europe.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,432 ✭✭✭SusanC10


    JDD wrote: »
    Do ye really think the schools will be closed til March?

    Look, I'm not saying it isn't a possibility, but we can all agree that there seemed to be a seachange in government's thinking on the topic over the summer.

    Given the rate of infections, we could have opened the schools in June last year. But when that decision was being made, in early May, it seems the government and NPHETs focus was getting infections as close to zero as possible. So rather than opening schools for a month, they decided to press ahead with eliminating the virus and pushed out the opening until September.

    Then MM came in, and pinned the entirety of his government's hopes of success on keeping the schools open. There was a much clearer understanding of how bad it is for the economy, and children's education, to keep schools closed for an extended period of time. That was why they basically said that everything would close before schools would be closed again. By that logic, as soon as we see a downward trajectory of infections for more than two weeks, I would expect schools to be the first place to open.

    It does appear to me that everyone is adhering to the lockdown this time around. Our main road - busy since June and all through Lockdown II - is absolutely deserted the past two days. I would expect to see a fairly sharp downward trajectory by next week, and for it to continue to the end of January.

    If I was a betting woman, I'd say we'll open after the mid term break.

    I think it really will depend on the severity of the new Restrictions, how many different Groups of people will still be able to move around and mix, enforcement of the restrictions, people's adherence to the restrictions and the ability of the Health Services to cope.

    Edit to add :- The speed of the Rollout of the Vaccines.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,687 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    I'm completely in favour of a national lockdown for 2/3 weeks and then reopen schools
    Need to get community transmission way down


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,537 ✭✭✭touts


    I've decided that in 10 years if I'm in hospital and a junior doctor starts to treat me I'm asking when he/she did the leaving Cert and if they say 2020 or 2021 I'm asking for a real doctor and I don't give a damn if that makes them cry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,399 ✭✭✭✭ThunbergsAreGo


    From RTE

    "Another proposal looks at closing ECCE/preschools, but with crèches only open for children of essential workers and vulnerable children"

    What are vulnerable children defined as?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,426 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    From RTE

    "Another proposal looks at closing ECCE/preschools, but with crèches only open for children of essential workers and vulnerable children"

    What are vulnerable children defined as?

    There was a creche owner on Liveline who said that such is the size of the essential worker list that it covered pretty much all the children that attend her place. Another closer pointed out that the only occupation he could think of not listed on it were priests.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    touts wrote: »
    I've decided that in 10 years if I'm in hospital and a junior doctor starts to treat me I'm asking when he/she did the leaving Cert and if they say 2020 or 2021 I'm asking for a real doctor and I don't give a damn if that makes them cry.

    Because the LC is the most relevant exam undertaken by a doctor. :rolleyes:


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement