Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Schools closed until February? (part 3)

Options
1280281283285286323

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 260 ✭✭E36Ross


    Again half arsed leaked reports regards leaving certs....

    I can't understand why they couldn't call a meeting last week, iron out the issues make a grown up decision and give people a week to get in order.

    I drive a bus for special needs and don't know if I have a job Monday or not. (And if I do, Is it really that safe?)


  • Registered Users Posts: 585 ✭✭✭vid36


    The proposal is for Leaving Certs to be back 3 days.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    km79 wrote: »
    It gets better
    She is proposing they only come in 3 days a week
    I wonder will she decide which 3 days are safer
    Or
    Will schools have to rearrange all timetables ......
    And I mean all. If L C timetables are rearranged then that affects all other year groups

    Oh ffs


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    RTE still pushing the angle that LC students considered to return to school on Monday.

    The Unions should squash that nonsense from a H&S standpoint.

    No testing and tracing (I think this is where we're at?) cases rampant and 25% said to be the new more contagious strain, hospitals nearing capacity, many with small and overcrowded classrooms, some under ventilated and even if so it's baltic out...

    Honestly if I were a teacher ordered to go back Monday I'd get a doctor to write me off sick with stress. F@ck that.

    The DES should move to change the game for LC once and for all. As pointed out, seems to be always under review. No time like the present.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,761 ✭✭✭Knine


    E36Ross wrote: »
    Again half arsed leaked reports regards leaving certs....

    I can't understand why they couldn't call a meeting last week, iron out the issues make a grown up decision and give people a week to get in order.

    I drive a bus for special needs and don't know if I have a job Monday or not. (And if I do, Is it really that safe?)

    I think even if open, my daughter with Special Needs will be staying at home!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    Is this being leaked to gather public opinion?

    I feel like Norma is pushing for this because if schools close fully her position is borderline untenable considering she was telling us they are entirely safe just days ago. Madigan clinging for it too I’d imagine, embarrassed herself two days ago.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,779 ✭✭✭Benimar


    vid36 wrote: »
    The proposal is for Leaving Certs to be back 3 days.

    Will someone just put a random Junior Infant in charge. They would have a more coherent plan than Norma!


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,410 ✭✭✭Icyseanfitz


    Its either safe for us to be back or not, stop the ****ing half measures at this stage, things are too dire


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 198 ✭✭The Wordress


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    RTE still pushing the angle that LC students considered to return to school on Monday.

    The Unions should squash that nonsense from a H&S standpoint.

    No testing and tracing (I think this is where we're at?) cases rampant and 25% said to be the new more contagious strain, hospitals nearing capacity, many with small and overcrowded classrooms, some under ventilated and even if so it's baltic out...

    Honestly if I were a teacher ordered to go back Monday I'd get a doctor to write me off sick with stress. F@ck that.

    The DES should move to change the game for LC once and for all. As pointed out, seems to be always under review. No time like the present.

    That is one issue that is annoying me. The leave aspect of it.

    If I were in mainstream, I could work at home and probably not have to take any leave.

    Now, I may be forced into a situation to take leave if I have no childcare and feel deeply uncomfortable to go into school everyday.

    So basically I use up a huge amount of leave because I am being forced into a very uncomfortable situation and other are not. Not fair at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    Wording of RTE article suggests SEN schools only but that they are working on something for LCs. Doesn't sound like the plan at the moment is to have the schools open to them, at least not fully

    https://www.rte.ie/news/coronavirus/2021/0106/1187920-cabinet-covid-restrictions/


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,915 ✭✭✭cursai


    Is nobody asking the virus what it plans to do? Surely he can produce an itinerary .


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    That is one issue that is annoying me. The leave aspect of it.

    If I were in mainstream, I could work at home and probably not have to take any leave.

    Now, I may be forced into a situation to take leave if I have no childcare and feel deeply uncomfortable to go into school everyday.

    So basically I use up a huge amount of leave because I am being forced into a very uncomfortable situation and other are not. Not fair at all.

    Please don't resent your colleagues over this though. It is likely that they feel the unfairness of it too.

    We have an ASD unit attached to our mainstream school. If it turns out they are in and the rest of us are not, I will (a) not be happy about it either and (b) will be doing whatever is allowed to help them out


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,423 ✭✭✭wirelessdude01


    Exams gone this year in NI.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭lulublue22


    There is really no coherence or joined up thinking among this gov - stephan Donnelly on twitter highlighting the seriousness of the new strain ( which is linked to greater transmission rates in children) and how we must all stay at home and stay safe and Norma Foley - schools are safe - closing schools to reduce movement except for special schools , special classes and LC.

    Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    Can’t even click and collect now yet Norma is thinking of sending kids back. The whole schools are safe thing seems to be the hill she is willing to die on.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,580 ✭✭✭JDD


    I can see how opening school for LCs would be a bit of a logistical nightmare. That being said, it is 55,000 pupils out of 1,000,000 school going children. It's not going to make a massive difference on the spread of the virus, but I'd imagine will be a massive headache for the schools to organise, while also trying to teach 1-5th years remotely.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭Sammy2012


    Is this being leaked to gather public opinion?

    I feel like Norma is pushing for this because if schools close fully her position is borderline untenable considering she was telling us they are entirely safe just days ago. Madigan clinging for it too I’d imagine, embarrassed herself two days ago.

    Both are useless and should be sacked or step down.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭deiseindublin


    Stateofyou wrote: »
    RTE still pushing the angle that LC students considered to return to school on Monday.

    The Unions should squash that nonsense from a H&S standpoint.
    That's probably the plan.

    NF tried to sort it out but the big bad unions said NO.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Bananaleaf


    lulublue22 wrote: »
    There is really no coherence or joined up thinking among this gov - stephan Donnelly on twitter highlighting the seriousness of the new strain ( which is linked to greater transmission rates in children) and how we must all stay at home and stay safe and Norma Foley - schools are safe - closing schools to reduce movement except for special schools , special classes and LC.

    Talk about talking out of both sides of your mouth!

    The higher transmission rates among children is way more problematic to the country as a whole than people seem to understand too

    Listening to Tomas Ryan on The Stand it could potentially be responsible for that new strain becoming the dominant variant of C19 in Ireland and if that happens, nothing less than level 5 restrictions will EVER work. It could also raise cases so high that by the time the vaccines roll around for all, for many of us it may no longer work


  • Registered Users Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    I can't see how its going to work for LC students if everyone else has to stay at home. How are teachers going to work that? Do they have to travel into the school to teach their LC classes face to face and then go back home to work with everyone else remotely? Seems completely unworkable. I do agree LC students should be prioritised as much as possible if traditional exams are to happen.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭lulublue22


    Bananaleaf wrote: »
    Please don't resent your colleagues over this though. It is likely that they feel the unfairness of it too.

    We have an ASD unit attached to our mainstream school. If it turns out they are in and the rest of us are not, I will (a) not be happy about it either and (b) will be doing whatever is allowed to help them out

    Special schools won’t have anyone to help out though - John Boyle on Ireland am indicated transmission rates ( not surprisingly ) in special schools slightly higher than in national schools. Yet all good to open with such high levels of community transmission not to mention the school transport issue.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,548 ✭✭✭Leftwaffe


    eviltwin wrote: »
    I can't see how its going to work for LC students if everyone else has to stay at home. How are teachers going to work that? Do they have to travel into the school to teach their LC classes face to face and then go back home to work with everyone else remotely? Seems completely unworkable. I do agree LC students should be prioritised as much as possible if traditional exams are to happen.

    It would be a bit of a logistical nightmare timetable wise. I’m assuming all LC timetables would have to be redone temporarily. This would lead to a knock on effect trying to teach other year groups online according to the regular timetable. Teachers would likely have to livestream classes as well as face to face as attendance will likely be very low for 6th years. I’m sure there are other aspects I’m not thinking of.

    Today is Wednesday too.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭Stateofyou


    Bananaleaf wrote: »
    Please don't resent your colleagues over this though. It is likely that they feel the unfairness of it too.

    We have an ASD unit attached to our mainstream school. If it turns out they are in and the rest of us are not, I will (a) not be happy about it either and (b) will be doing whatever is allowed to help them out

    In fairness I think that poster resents the situation it would put them in, not their colleagues. I would feel exactly the same way.
    That's probably the plan.

    NF tried to sort it out but the big bad unions said NO.

    Too right.

    I have premium Independent subscription, and just after reading an article that made my blood boil, entitled "Homeschooling 2.0: Eleven ways to make learning at home easier this time round"

    It's eleven ways parents can be better organised essentially. It acknowledges the challenges, multiple kids, unfamiliar curriculum, lack of devices, but if the parents can just be better organised, it will all work out.
    Nothing about the DES failures. Nothing about how principles should now direct teachers to take charge of the actual teaching of the curriculum. No mention of a lack of a standard remote learning plan including supports from the DES. We should just remain calm, work it out with our spouses, take breaks and teach our children how to be independent. "Every day is a school day." Not joking that's a direct quote.

    Like FFS, honestly. Media seems to cover for the DES inadequacies. I may have to have a drink with my lunch I'm so p'd off.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,751 ✭✭✭mirrorwall14


    JDD wrote: »
    I can see how opening school for LCs would be a bit of a logistical nightmare. That being said, it is 55,000 pupils out of 1,000,000 school going children. It's not going to make a massive difference on the spread of the virus, but I'd imagine will be a massive headache for the schools to organise, while also trying to teach 1-5th years remotely.

    Almost all teachers in my school have a LC group. That means that the LC students, most of the teachers and the ancillary staff all have to be on site. You are talking about 1/4 of the school being in even though its only one year group. Then they have to get to school.

    Then from the 3 day idea being floated they'd have to change their timetables which has a knock on affect for all the students at home. And we have two days notice.

    How will it work? Do I still (if I wasn't very high risk) teach my 24 music students in one room? Do we need to split the class up, which presumably we should? Then who gets to be with me the class teacher? And if the proposal is to stream to the others in another room wouldn't they be safer at home

    Then there's the students who simply won't want to come in due to safety concerns.

    Its populist kite flying and Norma Foley should be fired.

    If this was EVER a possibility then there should have been a plan in place. Which is what parents, teachers and schools have been asking for since the start. There should have been a set of levels ready to go for schools with Level 5 the nuclear fully online, level 4 special schools open etc.

    But no. The minister and the Department have done NOTHING. Argh. :mad::mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,629 ✭✭✭jrosen


    I see why there would be a desire to bring LC students back in. But I dont see how it would work for the remaining years. You cant expect a teacher to teach on site and then also teach from home. It would be really difficult to manage from a staffing point.

    Im afraid its all or nothing


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭jimmytwotimes 2013


    They've left this so late, yet again, it's criminal.

    What am I doing on Monday and how do we prepare work for totally unknown scenarios.

    It's really disappointing, the lack of contingency planning, my god.

    Edit: I wud assume if you're on site to teach LCs you'd just stay in building for the day and remote teach the rest.

    If you have no LC class, you teach from home.

    Some principals won't like the loss of control on that one


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 138 ✭✭Endintheclowns


    This idea about bringing in LC students has to be a wind up? Does the minister not have any idea about how the education system works at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,779 ✭✭✭Benimar


    jrosen wrote: »
    I see why there would be a desire to bring LC students back in. But I dont see how it would work for the remaining years. You cant expect a teacher to teach on site and then also teach from home. It would be really difficult to manage from a staffing point.

    Im afraid its all or nothing

    Before we went fully online for the year we looked at the possibility of bringing in all 1st Years. Logistically, it just wouldn't have worked. In fact, it would have been a disaster.

    It's the same here. It needs to be all in (no chance of that at present) or all online.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,751 ✭✭✭mirrorwall14


    This idea about bringing in LC students has to be a wind up? Does the minister not have any idea about how the education system works at all.

    She's an actual teacher. I'm honestly flabbergasted. WTF is wrong with her?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 48,213 ✭✭✭✭km79


    jrosen wrote: »
    I see why there would be a desire to bring LC students back in. But I dont see how it would work for the remaining years. You cant expect a teacher to teach on site and then also teach from home. It would be really difficult to manage from a staffing point.

    Im afraid its all or nothing

    Teachers would have to travel to work every day as normal and teach all their classes remotely from the school building
    No other way around it


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement