Gameweek 6 Matchday Thread

Jim Gazebo

Ffs Tierney clean sheet gone and I've kwp on the bench. Hope doherty doesn't play tomorrow. Have McCarthy in goal so didnt want to chance double Southampton defence again and of course it's a cleanie jaysus

wonski

Albrighton in, Maddison out.

wonski

Xhaka booked.

wonski

All over. Not a great match to watch.

wanderer100

I hate owning Auba

siblers

Arsenal are ****e as ever. They've no cutting edge at all. Auba should be further up the pitch

Open the Pubs

Of course I took Vardy out this week then he comes on to score and kills my double Arsenal CS.
Love this game!

wonski

I have no Arsenal and not even tempted to bring Auba in unless they start playing like a team.

Leicester wasn't great either, but they have Vardy.

Tiger Roll

siblers wrote:

Arsenal are ****e as ever. They've no cutting edge at all. Auba should be further up the pitch

Manager is clueless ,some good attacking players in that squad but he can't get system right .

Ace2007

siblers wrote: »

Arsenal are ****e as ever. They've no cutting edge at all. Auba should be further up the pitch

It's like Arteta saw the FF have Auba as a midfielder and so he has to play him there.

Arteta running Lampard close for some of his decisions.

And yet Ole gets hounded most weeks, whereas Arteta is a "great young manager", and can't say anything about Lamps as he's English

extra gravy

The obsession with playing Auba on the wing baffles me. It's not like they have a top no. 9 to accommodate, Laca is so inconsistent.

Happy4all

The bloke with the current weekly leading score of 95 has hits of -56

Did he forget to press wildcard 😂

siblers

Happy4all wrote: »

The bloke with the current weekly leading score of 95 has hits of -56

Did he forget to press wildcard 😂

One of those players just trying to get the weekly highest score. Game is littered with them

dahat

wanderer100 wrote: »

I hate owning Auba

That is a long list of managers headed by KM79 and myself!

Ace2007

dahat wrote: »

That is a long list of managers headed by KM79 and myself!

How nearly 17% of players still own him just :eek: - It's not as if he's 7m and there isn't many options, he's 12m - you could literally get everyone bar Salah/Mane for him.

He's up there with the biggest trolls in the game - he might get a hattrick next week, but could then easily got 4/5 games of doing nothing, and at 12m that's just not good enough imo.

gammygils

Happy4all wrote: »

The bloke with the current weekly leading score of 95 has hits of -56

Did he forget to press wildcard ��

That's true supposedly. I read it on Reddit

Mr.Nice Guy

Was hoping Barnes would reward my faith in him but not to be. 39 pts with Lamptey and Kane to come.

extra gravy

gammygils wrote: »

That's true supposedly. I read it on Reddit

Ya I saw that too, think he was 7th overall as well. Yikes.

wonski

gammygils wrote: »

That's true supposedly. I read it on Reddit

He had 10+ transfers a week every week.

There are thousands of people stacking their team with Fri/Sat fixtures like that. Not even worth looking at.

Rikand

Leicester really are a 1 man team

scotchy

scotchy wrote: »

10 from 5 so far.

Kilman, Son, JRod, DCL, Kane (C), and Maupay to go.

Castagne if JRod doesn't play.

Lot of Salah captainers ahead of me in my main league.

Nearly all the overall top 10 or so have Kane captained, interesting.

.

Up to 15 with Maupay (brought in for Vardy:rolleyes:) ,Son, and captain Kane left.


.

wonski

Rikand wrote: »

Leicester really are a 1 man team

That's good for FF, not like Liverpool

Ace2007

wonski wrote: »

He had 10+ transfers a week every week.

There are thousands of people stacking their team with Fri/Sat fixtures like that. Not even worth looking at.

They should have some sort of criteria in order to be highest ranked team. Are these players artificially inflating players price rises? For instance, only teams registered in GW1 or no more than 2 transfers, or ranked within top 5m for instance.

Ace2007

Ace2007 wrote: »

They should have some sort of criteria in order to be highest ranked team. Are these players artificially inflating players price rises? For instance, only teams registered in GW1 or no more than 2 transfers, or ranked within top 5m for instance.

Or even something like max 4 maybe 5 transfers allowed to be in for it.

Like very few genuine players of the game would be taking hits of up to that.

Jim Gazebo

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Or even something like max 4 maybe 5 transfers allowed to be in for it.

Like very few genuine players of the game would be taking hits of up to that.

I think you can't play any chips like wildcard for if so making 10 transfers should absolutely be counted out

Happy4all

Ace2007 wrote: »

They should have some sort of criteria in order to be highest ranked team. Are these players artificially inflating players price rises? For instance, only teams registered in GW1 or no more than 2 transfers, or ranked within top 5m for instance.

Why don't the hits count in the actual week?

machiavellianme

How likely is Digne's suspension to be overturned? I don't want to waste a transfer unless I have to as I'm hoping to set and forget for November as an expirement.

machiavellianme

machiavellianme wrote: »

How likely is Digne's suspension to be overturned? I don't want to waste a transfer unless I have to as I'm hoping to set and forget for November as an expirement.

These things so rarely get over turned unless it was glaringly obvious, and given it was looked at by Var I just cant see them saying everyone got it wrong personally.

wonski

It wasn't deliberate, it was a mistake, but red card mistake.

Dangerous tackle is dangerous, regardless of intentions.

Digne is decent player and apologised straight away. That's the end of the story I would say.

[Deleted User]

[Deleted User] wrote: »

Or even something like max 4 maybe 5 transfers allowed to be in for it.

Like very few genuine players of the game would be taking hits of up to that.

Allow myself to introduce........ myself.